robotys

マレーシアとシンガポールに触れてみて、物価が３倍違うということは、こういうことなのかって、本当によくわかった。 物価が３倍でも暮らせるということは、それだけ、給料も高いということ。 そして、給料が高いということは、それだけ効率よく稼げるスキルがないと対応できないので、高い教養も求められる。 マレーシアは、TRXとかどうかだけど、コストセンターなんだなって、本当に感じた。 高くても良いから効率化が出来る人材ではなく、安い人材をいかに従順にマニュアル通りに働くように躾けるかがコストセンターでは大事。 一方、産業のリードをしていく高付加価値経済では、プロセスより、効率が良く最も高い結果を出したほうが優秀で、その競争に負けると生き延びられない。 この２つの国は、それだけ文化が違う。

Boomers calling remote work lazy is hilarious coming from people who took 2 hour lunches and pretended to be busy for 30 years.

I don't write code anymore I haven't written code in I think 6 months? I think everyone is like this no?

if you run an ai lab, pls ensure your team has read this before putting any charts out into the world

Every year I read this book. Every year I make more money.

Work compounds , intelligence doesn’t. I've met plenty of gifted folks in my career who got lazy along the way. They assumed they'd keep their lead. It's infuriating. A few years in, folks who put in the work surpassed them. AI makes this worse. You can pay $20 to get superhuman (autistic) intelligence in your pocket. But if you don't seek hard problems, challenge yourself, and put in consistent effort, you will get crushed.

I am getting tired of reading 'experts' like LeCun repeatedly claiming that our AIs are nowhere near human-level intelligence. Let us look at the evidence. US universities rank students based on standardized tests like the SAT. Current AIs achieve near-perfect SAT scores. They also beat tests like the GRE. A few years ago, it was notable when early ChatGPT scored ~120 on an IQ test, a common measure of human intelligence. An IQ of 120 is well above average. Current AIs reportedly have IQ scores similar to those of leading scientists. It is not just in tests. I can ask an AI to produce a science paper that looks undistinguishable from what a PhD level student could do. I just have to give it the data. Better yet, from a prompt, agents can run the experiments and collect the data, and then write the papers. Those of us who try to get work done with AI know what is possible. You can't possibly just say 'this is nowhere near human-level intelligence'. In software, good AIs show a greater mastery of, say, C++, than your average software engineering professor. You could just build a formal test to prove it. The difficulty is that the professors would refuse to take your tests. At this point point, someone will object 'yeah, but your AI can't do this simple thing that we can all do'. Fine. These AIs do not have *human* intelligence. They are very much not human beings. They are something like alien intelligence. They can code straight in assembly language, but have trouble counting characters in words. But that's the result of trade-offs. A dog or a monkey can solve some problems faster than you can. But let us be fair. As a species, these AIs have definitively 'human-level intelligence'. You can't spend decades setting up cognitive tests for human beings, have these AIs beat us in these tests and then say 'well, that's not real intelligence'. Come on !

マレーシアの良かったところ🇲🇾 ・物価が安い ・給与水準は日本と同じくらい ・教育水準もトップクラス ・英語や中国語を学べる ・ご飯が美味しい ・優しい人がたくさんいる だから留学や移住に人気なんだなぁ☺️✨ 実際行ってみてマレーシア好きになった！ 逆にマレーシアのネガティブポイントは↓