Sabitlenmiş Tweet
We need to meme these people into irrelevance.
@cguida6 @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @Beautyon_ @mattkratter @parman_the @dotkrueger @start9labs @oomahq @BTC_for_Freedom
English
Albert Einstein
242 posts
Albert Einstein
@runbip110
MSc Info Systems | node runner | systems thinking | separating money from state | Run #BIP110. See who funds bitcoin spam: https://t.co/afHFFc8tVp
North Sea Katılım Temmuz 2026
10 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
@callebtc "Don't bother locking your door at night, because burglars will just come through the window". Said no one ever.
How many times is this argument going to be rehashed?
English
👏 FILTERS 👏 DON'T 👏 WORK 👏
Someone found yet another a way to store JPGs for half the cost of OP_RETURN.
You've been lied to. At this point only the insane and utterly incompetent still believe in BIP 110.
Don't be a lemming. It's not too late to wake the f up to reality.
Steve@steverabinow
BIP110 taketh away OP_IF, but giveth OP_PLENTY. Introducing a novel way to encode arbitrary data in *contiguous* bytes. Up to 2MB fully BIP110 compliant. OP_PLENTY encodes each 4 bit nibble of the raw data into a tapscript opcode. Decoding is trivial: take the opcode mod 22.
English
@w_s_bitcoin @secsovereign @worshipbitcoin Even "open permissionless" systems function within a defined use-case. They are not for anyone to do anything.
This is just a rehashed "what even is spam" argument.
It ain't rocket science!
English
@secsovereign @worshipbitcoin It’s stored that shit since the very beginning. You just weren’t aware of it until recently because ordinals kicked it into high gear. Welcome to an open permissionless system. Nobody’s forcing you to stick around if it really upsets you.
English
It was really clever to make this a situation where the burden of proof is on BIP110.
When in reality the burden of proof should have been on Core as to why they changed Bitcoin with Core v30, and why they are not changing it back?
The was done by suppressing the discussion around Core v30 when it was happening, and then after the fact point to BIP110 as the changing agent.
(also this was possible because of the asymmetry in power with the default implementation, really an accident [or abuse] waiting to happen)
English
Albert Einstein retweetledi
Statist suitcoiner (who thinks that Bitcoin needs his pref stock in order to become money) telling sovereign node runners what to do, while showing staggering ignorance of previous UASF dynamics like BIP-148 and the role they played in activating Segwit. Incredibly embarrassing for the Bitcoin movement that this bad actor still has a platform
English
@crypt0e Please enlighten us as to your superior technical understanding?
No seriously, I'm up for a technical debate?
I mean, it ain't rocket science
English
I love that these guys keep filming and posting video evidence of just how little they understand Bitcoin on a technical level; evidence that could easily resurface and come back to haunt them in the future.
Also, notice how they're all doing it; it's very obvious they are in a group chat, desperately trying to think of things to do.
Neal Flesher #BIP 110@NealFlesher
Why I’m Running BIP 110.
English
@BitPaine Dude, everyone knows this! His old videos are still on YT FFS. Do you really think he's ever tried to hide it?
Guy is not a nym, he's open about his trading background, worked at Peter Thiel's Clarion hedge fund.
Do better, trolls.
English
u thought bro was a bitcoiner, but deep down he was always the grifter who started trader university
who could have predicted his downfall before it happened?
English
@rodpalmerhodl Can you point out an ACTUAL bug that wasn't just some low quality FUD already known about?
Bet ya can't! 😉
English
sure sex is great but have you ever scrolled through twitter after another bug was discovered in bip 110?
English
@JaneBTC2069 Calling it 'retarded' does nothing to make you sound smart or diminish the importance of BIP110.
Wanna lay out your technical objections for us to discuss?
It's really not rocket science, people.
English
Retarded #BIP110 tactic:
Write a BIP so retarded that almost everyone thinks it's retarded.
Pick some retarded people from the immense pool of people who think it's retarded
Say that opposition is retarded because the retarded people you picked are retarded
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut
Craig Wright joins the suits in their support of non-monetary use of Bitcoin and ridicule of BIP-110 🤷♂️
English
I have a theory about BIP110. This poll will either prove it or destroy it.
Be honest 👇
English
✅Bitcoin is Money 3.0
❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Property"
❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Capital"
❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Gold"
❌ Bitcoin is not just a "Store of Value"
❌ Bitcoin is not "JPEG storage"
❌ Bitcoin is not a "StableCoin settlement layer"
English
Albert Einstein retweetledi
There seems to be complete suitsensus that BIP-110 is bad
English
Yes, exactly! It's really not rocket science.
Fred Krueger #BIP-110@dotkrueger
✅Bitcoin is Money 3.0 ❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Property" ❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Capital" ❌ Bitcoin is not "Digital Gold" ❌ Bitcoin is not just a "Store of Value" ❌ Bitcoin is not "JPEG storage" ❌ Bitcoin is not a "StableCoin settlement layer"
English
Albert Einstein retweetledi
"It's 37 lines of code, it expires in 12 months, and if some unknown unknown occurs, all of it becomes available again in September 2027."
@GrassFedBitcoin argues BIP-110 isn't the existential threat critics make it out to be.
English
@NEEDcreations Not begging. Giving them a chance to get on the right side of history. Kind of Kratter tbh
English
I thought BIP110 supporters were against Big Bitcoin. Why did Matthew Spatter tag all of them, begging them to join his parade?
English
Agree with @saylor on BIP-110 and as I said in my post below:
"What we don’t need is moving those decisions into new consensus rules that invalidate previously valid, fee paying transactions and force every node to enforce someone else’s definition of acceptable use..."
This is about a fringe group attempting to force their ideology through code in the most adversarial way possible. Pushing a rule change with the stance of "If you disagree, I don't care" is not in keeping with a free-market network.
Adrian Morris@_Adrian
Appreciate you following the interviews. My position (and I guess also @Saylor) isn’t that we “need” bigger data limits or that lower ones don’t work. $BTC has always worked fine with whatever capacity the market and voluntary node policies allow, fees price out abuse, and node operators choose their own relay rules. What we don’t need is moving those decisions into new consensus rules that invalidate previously valid, fee paying transactions and force every node to enforce someone else’s definition of acceptable use. Right now I run my nodes as I wish, BIP-110 will change that. I am focused on the censorship & sovereignty problem as much as the technical implications. Furthermore, BIP-110 doesn’t solve spam better than the existing system. IMO this just creates a precedent that’s riskier than the data itself, posted about this at length as well. The network will sort itself through consensus & with economic incentives, not attempts to force “soft forks”. As I have been saying, “Bitcoin is a technology, not an ideology”.
English
@Mandrik Let's have one! I won't bring up CP. What are your technical objections?
English
