Sandeep DIXIT
1.3K posts


The Schrödinger Equation Can Fold Phase Into Geometry.
Density is only half the story.
Here, the quantum phase itself twists into moving helicoidal ribbons, while self-gravity from the Schrödinger-Poisson coupling bends and compresses the wavefield into glowing caustics and vortex singularities.
Tiny white pearls mark places where the phase becomes undefined topological defects drifting through a self-generated gravitational landscape.
#QuantumPhysics #WaveFunction #SchrodingerEquation #ComputationalPhysics #ScientificVisualization #Mathematics
English

@pickover Nice !
Though, each brick continues to be an ordered piece - if it’s powdered, disorder again emerges- but again, each powdered brick bit is composed of ordered set of atoms…
So, where this order within disorder series end ?
Does it end with Order or Disorder? Strings ?
English

@pickover Definition and equation of a Circle specifies the circumference line curve only- not the completeness of disk surface inside.
The interior can have any number of holes. So, a point is removed from the center, the circumference curve remains within definition of a circle.
English

This welcome by children was lovely and did send a powerful message - drawing attention to they being at the centre and key stakeholders in any such summit on future.
youtu.be/TPzxwgm5RD0?si…

YouTube
English

@Jain_Physics ... a new chapter with a significant and powerful mission !
Welcome back Prof Jain !
English

I just love the Fish Curve in mathematics. You too?
Source: Weisstein, Eric W. "Fish Curve." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. mathworld.wolfram.com/FishCurve.html

English

@KateXGate Isn’t every Spacetime point possessing intelligence in the form of laws ?
~ manifesting as QCD —> QFT—> GR.
So, was intelligence ever locked in biological systems ?
English

Intelligence Beyond Biology
Marshall McLuhan once said:
“We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us.”
He may have understated it.
For most of human history, intelligence was locked inside biological organisms.
Now civilization is externalizing cognition itself.
Not consciousness.
Not the soul.
Cognition.
Reasoning.
Prediction.
Planning.
Agency.
And as we've learned from nature through studying biofilms and mycelium networks- intelligence was never fundamentally about neurons.
It was about the organization of information into persistent, adaptive patterns capable of navigating reality..
⸻
Some of the most important researchers alive are beginning to arrive at the same realization from entirely different directions.
Karl Friston models cognition as prediction and adaptive error correction across interacting systems.
Michael Levin has demonstrated that tissues and cellular networks can store memory, solve problems, and pursue goals without traditional brains.
Thomas Hartung is developing biological computing systems using living brain organoids as computational substrates.
Meanwhile Demis Hassabis and frontier AI labs are building autonomous systems capable of reasoning across language, code, image, tools, and live environments.
⸻
These are no longer isolated fields:
Neuroscience.
AI.
Quantum biology.
Information theory.
Cognitive science.
They are collapsing into one conversation.
And the deeper implication may be this:
Intelligence may not have been tied to biology as tightly as we once believed.
Perhaps imagining it confined there is simply what makes us feel safest.

English

Data, information, knowledge, insight, wisdom.
By Gapingvoid Culture Design Group, @gapingvoid, gapingvoid.com, Used with permission.

English

Universe, Reality, Space, Time.
A quick glimpse at how you and I fit into the universe and its history. What does the future hold?
Time and space progression of the universe. Note the inflation phase at the left edge of the yellow area. Adapted from: Einweichen, Wikimedia, tinyurl.com/4wnhrddp, CC BY-SA 3.0

English

@Kaju_Nut Isn't it about language and vocabulary that can describe quantum objects.
- The very usage of term surface, implies internal structure which causes all hell to break lose.
- Angular and Radial Gradients appear, time vanishes as one crawls to surface...
English

If it was a rotating ball
-- its surface would have to move faster than light
-- it could not return to its starting state after a full 360 degree rotation, only after a 720
and it would still get magnetic field wrong by a factor of 2.
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh
it's funny because it's true 🤣
English

@Kaju_Nut This reminds me of the Velcro :
-- the mechanism underpinning the Zip's Gluonic forces of shutting up and Opening up !
English

@HumansNoContext A man and a woman too should have been included in the scale readings
English

@Omnifarious0 @pickover Expression does solve to x^4 = 0 or 1
English

@sandeepdixit22 @pickover The general definition of √ does not include the ±. If it were x^4 - x = 0, it would definitely have 5 answers.
English

@YouWillBePwned @pickover Evaluate the expression :
x^4 = 1 or 0
Hence : x = 0, +/-1, +/-i
English

@pickover The answer is 1. People want to make this a trick question and want to mention "well two negatives make a positive" garbage. Nobody has ever asked what is the square root of 100 and the reply is -10. Square roots are obviously implied to be positive. Stop making it difficult.
English

@pdbrownhill3 @pickover Since post does not specify ‘primary root’ only, hence the terms under outer radical = _/ {(+/- 9) + (+/-9)}
= 0, +18, -18, +i, -i
Division by _/18 gives : { 0,1,-1, +i, -I }
Though, by convention only positive values of roots of 81 to be considered, leading to one real value=1
English

@Omnifarious0 @pickover The post did not specify the principal root value only. Hence mixed values to be counted - which is 5
English

@pickover Generally, √ is defined to be the positive principle root. So, only 1. If you put the ± in front of each √, you'd get 5 answers.
English

@Math_files Why this fascination of ring fencing of her capacity & capabilities by equating with the phrase 'another Einstein' ?
Was Einstein ever described as 'another Newton' ?
It would be injustice to both.
Sabrina may go beyond the GR and come up with another disruptive theory.
English











