Satyam Gopal

3.4K posts

Satyam Gopal banner
Satyam Gopal

Satyam Gopal

@satyamvizually

https://t.co/oG0SENvDQW | Designing Apps & Websites for new gen AI founders | prev worked for @greptile @reductoai @workersio @joinjumbo @anvarahq

Book a call Katılım Ağustos 2021
1.3K Takip Edilen750 Takipçiler
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
@maybepratikk Oh, it’s happening everywhere? I thought only Gurugram folks were dealing with this so much.
English
1
0
1
45
Pratik
Pratik@maybepratikk·
pov: power cut across the entire city so the car is officially my office now.
Pratik tweet media
English
5
0
27
503
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
Most founders are too deep in the product. That outside eye is literally what Vizually does. We come in, find the friction, fix it fast.
English
0
0
0
15
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
Something I do before touching any design: I ask the founder - "Can you show me your last 5 support tickets or user complaints?" Every single time, the pattern is obvious within 10 minutes. → Users don't know what to do first. → They misunderstand what a feature does. → They expect something to happen and it doesn't. → Certain important feature is very under utilisied. That's not a dev problem. That's a product design problem. And it's almost always fixable without rebuilding anything from scratch. We work with AI startups and growing products on exactly this, finding the friction and removing it, fast. DM me if any of this sounds like your product.
English
1
0
2
56
JJ Gerrish
JJ Gerrish@JJGerrishDev·
My free Framer template Refit just hit 150K views 🤯 I thought I'd share some behind the scenes stats 👇🏻 → 150K+ views → 82.9K+ previews → 37.7K+ remixes → $75,000+ in affiliate earnings The power of free templates that are easy to use is insane.
JJ Gerrish tweet media
English
47
6
178
7K
Nivedha Nirmal
Nivedha Nirmal@nivedhahahaa·
For SuppRX, the bracket was the whole brand logic in one element. It had to suggest a capsule without being one. Feel native to a digital interface. Frame people and actions. And carry the brand idea - that you define your own limits, on your own terms.
Nivedha Nirmal tweet mediaNivedha Nirmal tweet mediaNivedha Nirmal tweet mediaNivedha Nirmal tweet media
English
6
2
162
4.2K
vansh
vansh@vanshdevx·
Today I was researching designers and agency owners, and found so many talented people I already know are from Gujarat Crazy. Feels like we should build a strong community here. DM me if you want to join - let’s create something impactful together. Shoutout to: @uiwithjay @maybepratikk @ajaypatel_aj @dhruvalgolakiya @humanharshad I’m sure there are many more people I don’t know yet, so tag them below Not only for Gujarat people btw - anyone building cool stuff is welcome 🚀
English
13
1
25
1.3K
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
A founder came up with a probelm that their sandbox was "too overwhelming." I opened the product. 14 options on the first screen. No defaults. No guidance. Just here you go, figure it out. Users weren't dumb. The product just never made them feel smart. We didn't add a tutorial. We didn't build a tooltip system. The fix isn't a redesign. It's a prioritization conversation. → What does a user need to feel in the first 2 minutes? → What's the one thing that makes them go "oh, this is actually useful"? → Everything else can wait. That conversation alone has changed how multiple products I've worked on approach onboarding. If your product has that problem, it's more common than you think. Ps - That product went for series B, raised $75M just after the redesign.
English
0
0
7
101
Benten
Benten@bentenwoodring·
The agencies that compete on price aren't really competing with us. They're solving a different problem. Cheap is the right answer when the website is a placeholder. Expensive is the right answer when the website is a milestone. Pick the one that matches what you're trying to do.
Benten tweet media
English
3
0
23
757
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
At one of the products I worked on, we had a design system problem. Every screen looked like it was made by a different person. The product felt cheap. The brand they were pitching to investors didn't match what users were actually seeing. So we started over. Built the system from scratch. Tied every component to their brand values. Made sure every screen, from onboarding to dashboard entire core product, spoke the same language. That product has since raised $100M+. I'm not saying design got them there. But I know a polished, consistent product builds trust faster, with users and investors both. That's what we obsess over at Vizually. Small studio. No bloated team. Just sharp design from someone who's done this at scale.
English
0
1
11
140
luis.
luis.@disco_lu·
@jamesm @mindcloudhq One sec, just gonna tweet this out and claim it as my idea as is the style of the time
luis. tweet media
English
3
1
18
959
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
Most AI products I've seen have the same problem. The tech is impressive. The onboarding makes you want to close the tab. Founders are so close to the product they forget that a new user has no idea what's happening. What I usually find when I dig in: → Step 1 asks for too much → The value isn't shown early enough → Users hit one confusing moment and never come back These aren't big problems. They're fixable in days, not months. At Vizually, the first thing we do is sit with your drop-off data and find exactly where that 60 seconds is breaking. Then we fix it. Fast. If you're an AI startup with traction but leaking users somewhere in the flow, DM me. That's exactly the problem we solve.
English
0
0
6
90
Udhaya
Udhaya@Udhayya_·
Weekend design workout done. Had a lot of learning in making this, how did i do ?
Udhaya tweet media
English
10
1
35
959
Breeje Anadkat
Breeje Anadkat@BreejeAnadkat·
Looking for a new best friend. If you're interested, DM me. (I swear it's not because I want a Mangekyō Sharingan 😭)
English
18
0
33
1.8K
Satyam Gopal
Satyam Gopal@satyamvizually·
@nikitabier you should have seen his process for boosting the engagement, let the thief open his cards and then catch him?
English
0
0
0
6
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
This is equivalent to trying to sell a cop drugs while he’s in uniform in his police car.
Nikita Bier tweet mediaNikita Bier tweet mediaNikita Bier tweet media
English
7.9K
4.4K
72.3K
4.1M
Ankur Warikoo
Ankur Warikoo@warikoo·
@nikitabier You gave him enough hints...but the guy wanted to get famous instead on X!
English
1
0
39
5.5K
Shreyans Jain
Shreyans Jain@shreyansj·
the only thing you can do is try harder than most cause there might not be space for everyone in success but there is space for many more than you think
Deedy@deedydas

The vibes in SF feel pretty frenetic right now. The divide in outcomes is the worst I've ever seen. Over the last 5yrs, a group of ~10k people - employees at Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, Nvidia, Meta TBD, founders - have hit retirement wealth of well above $20M (back of the envelope AI estimation). Everyone outside that group feels like they can work their well-paying (but <$500k) job for their whole life and never get there. Worse yet, layoffs are in full swing. Many software engineers feel like their life's skill is no longer useful. The day to day role of most jobs has changed overnight with AI. As a result, 1. The corporate ladder looks like the wrong building to climb. Everyone's trying to align with a new set of career "paths": should I be a founder? Is it too late to join Anthropic / OpenAI? should I get into AI? what company stock will 10x next? People are demanding higher salaries and switching jobs more and more. 2. There’s a deep malaise about work (and its future). Why even work at all for “peanuts”? Will my job even exist in a few years? Many feel helpless. You hear the “permanent underclass” conversation a lot, esp from young people. It's hard to focus on doing good work when you think "man, if I joined Anthropic 2yrs ago, I could retire" 3. The mid to late middle managers feel paralyzed. Many have families and don't feel like they have the energy or network to just "start a company". They don't particularly have any AI skills. They see the writing on the wall: middle management is being hollowed out in many companies. 4. The rich aren’t particularly happy either. No one is shedding tears for them (and rightfully so). But those who have "made it" experience a profound lack of purpose too. Some have gone from <$150k to >$50M in a few years with no ramp. It flips your life plans upside down. For some, comparison is the thief of joy. For some, they escape to NYC to "live life". For others still, they start companies "just cuz", often to win status points. They never imagined that by age 30, they'd be set. I once asked a post-economic founder friend why they didn't just sell the co and they said "and do what? right now, everyone wants to talk to me. if i sell, I will only have money." I understand that many reading this scoff at the champagne problems of the valley. Society is warped in this tech bubble. What is often well-off anywhere else in the world is bang average here. Unlike many other places, tenure, intelligence and hard work can be loosely correlated with outcomes in the Bay. Living through a societally transformative gold rush in that environment can be paralyzing. "Am I in the right place? Should I move? Is there time still left? Am I gonna make it?" It psychologically torments many who have moved here in search of "success". Ironically, a frequent side effect of this torment is to spin up the very products making everyone rich in hopes that you too can vibecode your path to economic enlightenment.

English
1
0
4
348