Secret Headquarters [Nate]

PSGSuite users following here on X:: We have a PSGSuite prerelease published to the PSGallery as 3.0.0-beta. One of the biggest changes is raising the min PSVersion to 7.4 due to 3P deps deprecating earlier versions of .NET. What PSVersion are you using with PSGSuite today?

@kenwheeler It’s on par with his hammer skills at least lol tiktok.com/t/ZThfmdXQy/

what the fuck is that run

@Le0Abx_wz @shawmakesmagic @sama They’re using dictation to write prompts instead of typing them with a tool like Wispr Flow

@shawmakesmagic @sama Wdym? Is it like a podcast? If you're open to talk about it ofc

I am very excited about AI, but to go off-script for a minute: I built an app with Codex last week. It was very fun. Then I started asking it for ideas for new features and at least a couple of them were better than I was thinking of. I felt a little useless and it was sad.

Depends on how you define “compiled” in this context. Python is compiled to bytecode, not machine code. That bytecode is still *interpreted* to machine code at runtime though by the VM (e.g. CPython), which is why it’s still considered an interpreted language, regardless if there is some sort of compilation involved. Other Python implementations like PyPy can compile to machine code, but that isn’t the default or what most people are using

@stupidtechtakes The funny thing is Lunduke is absolutely correct, Python compiles very quickly to bytecode. Just because it runs slowly after that and needs a large runtime dependency doesn't mean it didn't compile

GW Basic is interpreted, you don't compile it

It’s pretty simple. Source available != open source. Open source implies source available with a valid open source license. What Mistral did was make their model source available, but their proprietary license means that it’s not truly open source, it just means that source is available. *OSI* list of approved licenses for reference: opensource.org/licenses

@MaziyarPanahi @AnalyticD @DiyarGn do you think that being asked to provide your definition of open source means we think you're the sole arbiter of it? no. don't be ignorant. I am asking your definition so that I can talk to you in language you understand.

"Modified MIT" license: "You are not authorized to exercise any rights under this license if the global consolidated monthly revenue of your company (or that of your employer) exceeds $20 million…"

@burningion @auchenberg Ah yes, Microsoft, whose sole product is VS Code, should have definitely attributed all of its earnings to it since it’s the only thing they make. What an oversight on their part!

@auchenberg Wait does a billion not fit into 3.7 trillion

Thought: We created VS Code, open sourced it, and didn't become billionaires.

Youre drawing straws still and detracting way away from the original comment that started this chain. The counter var in a for loop isn’t read only, of course you can modify it inside the body of the loop. You wouldn’t do that typically as the loop signature is intended to contain the incrementation logic. Will it compile? Sure, it’s syntactically valid. Will it be allowed past a code review at any actual tech job? No, it’s terrible code.

@Suffixaufnahme @Leonard0Retard0 @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork I didn’t say it was impossible, i said you don’t do that (and you don’t, as it’s bad practice).

my girlfriend has a DSA course this came in her exam Q) what's the time complexity? for (i=0;i<n;i+=2) //run some code she wrote O(n/2) aka O(n) got zero coz the answer apparently is O(logn) peak.

Yes, you can, but that would be bad practice for incrementing a counter bar in a basic for loop like this, you’d also drawing straws right now. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. There are other loop constructs if you want to handle incrementation of loop counters differently depending on your preferred language, but your PR review isn’t passing if your adding buried incrementation logic in a loop constructs that’s designed to house that in the signature

@scrthq @Leonard0Retard0 @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork For all your bluster, you really have no idea what you're talking about. You can absolutely add a statement like `i++` in the body of the for loop, in addition to the increment in the loop declaration.

@Leonard0Retard0 @Suffixaufnahme @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork Basic For loop signature broken down here is: Counter var `i` initialization: `i=0` (start i at 0) Loop completion predicate: `i<n` (finish loop once predicate is no longer true) Counter increment per loop: `i+=2` (for each loop, increment i by 2)

@scrthq @Suffixaufnahme @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork i is not modified in the loop, there's literally no way for the problem to be correct, pay attention, smart ass.

@code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork Totally. Isn’t that the point of the post though , that the corrected solution isn’t actually correct for the problem?

@code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork There is no multiplication, it’s a standard for loop that is incrementing I by 2 (i+=2) on each loop. The starting i=0 is initializing i at the start of the loop You shouldn’t be attempting to calculate time complexity if you can’t read a for loop IMHO.

@Suffixaufnahme @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork There are no typos in the problem. If the problem can’t be understood correctly, they shouldn’t be trying to correct someone on it themselves. For loops are one of the earliest pieces of logic taught in CS, not knowing how to read it but opining on runtime complexity is wild.

@scrthq @code_explorer_O @cneuralnetwork He's describing likely typos in the problem, no need to be rude

@thegreatnaph @schwabsauce @majd_alfhaily The point they’re responding to is the EXIF data, which typically contains location info. This is a security concern if the data did include location info, it would allow anyone on a FaceTime call with you to get your location by screenshotting the call

TIL: When you take a picture of a FaceTime video call using the shutter button on iOS, the picture gets taken through the other party's camera including EXIF metadata. 🤯 reddit.com/r/iphone/comme…

Age isn’t really relevant here IMO, this is someone trying to start a business and ripping off other people’s work as a foundation for that. It wasn’t “close to the original”, they took the original and replaced the speaker with themselves. It’s not “inspired”. It would have taken 5 minutes to just film or find an unused backdrop, but instead they opted to just take someone else’s work and put their face on it

@ndrewpignanelli The video was clearly close to the original, and acknowledging the inspiration would have been fair. Public callouts rarely help, every young builder is figuring out and a little grace would have done more than turning it into a dragging. Kindness goes further than criticism

Bro totally ripped off our video LMAO

@ErfanEbrahimnia @theo It’s a directive

@theo "no memo" would've been enough, but I guess they're adding the "use" part for consistency

How did I forget about this one

@cramforce Seems this is due to using a PAT for automation instead of a GitHub app? Switching to an App should prevent the commits from being done under your name (more secure regardless due to auto-expring tokens).

Since this went very viral: I'm not actually a super human coder. It's automation and the shades of green represent me actually doing work. I don't know why GitHub doesn't filter the automated actions for this graph. It clearly can distinguish them in the API/UI. Vercel uses a tool to measure dev productivity and it absolutely doesn't credit me with 10K contributions. I've been doing about a 1 PR per "traditional work day" during my time at Vercel, but tbh most of that code is written on the weekend as strong proponent of the 557 work day 😅 It was frowned upon to look at quantitative metrics during performance reviews for a while, but I've always been a proponent. Ultimately, we're here to ship code. If you didn't do that a lot, there might be a reason, but it must be a glaringly obvious reason. Is 2.1 PRs per day better than 1.9? No. But I want to understand why somebody does 0.3. Maybe they are just weak at structuring their work. My calendar today has 7.5 hours of meetings and a work dinner: - 2h customer calls - 1h board meeting of an industry org - 1.5h keynote planning for our Ship AI conf - 1h interview - 1h incident reviews + assorted fun stuff So, we'll see how much I'll get done today. Yesterday, I cancelled a bunch of meetings and spent a few hours chasing a bug in Next.js that @mintlify experienced. I eventually managed to reproduce and merged a workaround. Then I got a haircut and BBQed pork chops. So, overall a very fulfilling day

@gabriel1 Lmfao

sf has the most autistic billboards

@GKunstwerk @davidsven @beaversteever was about to say, dilution requires shares

@davidsven @beaversteever Spoiler: there will be nothing to dilute

average YC startup offer

@santiagotheory @plzbepatient that's not how it works in real life; if you offer to cut your salary in pursuit of equity, you just both end up at the lower salary rate.