Seema Mody

10.8K posts

Seema Mody banner
Seema Mody

Seema Mody

@seemacnbc

Tech Reporter @CNBC. Beats: AI, software & industrials. Tracks global affairs. Life Member @CFR_org. Pratham board member. Posts are my own. Born USA.

NYC Katılım Temmuz 2009
2.3K Takip Edilen55.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
Here we come 🇮🇳 🇺🇸
English
39
23
465
0
Seema Mody retweetledi
Jack Prescott
Jack Prescott@JackPrescottX·
Chamath on Dario’s inability to refute Alex Karp’s claims: “When Alex came on… at no point did Anthropic say, ‘He’s got it totally wrong, here’s the exact technical details, there’s nothing to see here.’” “I thought to myself, why wouldn’t you, the minute after that clip started to go viral, be completely specific and repudiate the claim.” “The reason, we all know, is because it’s the true version.” …. woah
Jawwwn@jawwwn_

.@chamath says Palantir CEO Alex Karp “deserves a medal” for being “on the right side of history” and one of the only AI leaders speaking the truth: “You can look at a graph of the financing needs of these companies and pinpoint when they oscillate between 2 messages.” “1. We’ve created a super god and the VCs are like lemmings and need to be on the right side of the super god.” “2. This is a complete weapon, let’s shut the world down and regulate everything.” “The problem is, at a trillion dollar market cap, that game has ripple effects that touch everybody in the industry.” “What Alex Karp did—he deserves a medal.” “This is an incredible human being that had the courage to come here, everybody watched that clip, all these S&P500 CEOs called me after that clip asking, ‘Help me interpret this.’” “I’ll tell you—he was on the right side of history.” “What he’s showing you is—you need to have a much more predictable way of running your business. Because if you’re bending to the vicissitudes of private company funding cycles, or their desire to need to live up to trillion-dollar valuations, you’re taking a level of risk you didn’t know you were taking.” “The LLMs do a very good job at a superficial form of privacy called ‘Zero Data Retention or ZDR.’” “They say, ‘Enable this and everything is hunky dory.’” “When you look at the fine print, if he uploads the secret formula for KFC into the model, that part is ZDR’d. But if he just clicks the like button, is there any guarantee that info is not stored? The honest answer technically, is no, because we don’t know how to do that.” “When Alex came on… at no point did Anthropic say, ‘He’s got it totally wrong, here’s the exact technical details, there’s nothing to see here.’” “I thought to myself, why wouldn’t you, the minute after that clip started to go viral, be completely specific and repudiate the claim.” “The reason, we all know, is because it’s the true version.” Via @CNBC

English
9
51
355
52.7K
Seema Mody retweetledi
anand mahindra
anand mahindra@anandmahindra·
Alex Karp’s CNBC interview is going to be widely discussed and debated. My initial take on it: Some will call Alex’s comments self-serving but there is an underlying argument he makes which I think is worth taking seriously: AI has three layers. Compute. Model. Application. He argues that critical infrastructure doesn’t run on a model alone, that it needs an application layer sitting on top. I think he’s right about the stack. I made a version of this argument in my recent letter to TechM’s shareholders this year: AI is like today’s smartphone: remarkable technology, but indispensable only because of the apps and experiences built on top of it. The ecosystem determines who creates lasting value, not the chip or the model underneath. To be clear, I still believe India should pursue sovereign frontier model development. But if Karp’s hypothesis is right, and the model layer is commoditising, then the verticalization of the compute, models and applications needs to happen at the same time. For AI services, from his arguments, it appears the more durable commercial and strategic edge is the application layer: model-agnostic, built on whichever open model fits best, carrying decades of enterprise workflow knowledge that no model provider owns. As Karp says, the application layer “takes a large language model & makes it safe and precise…Everyone gets to ask the basic questions: who owns the data, where is it cashed, are the prompts secure, is this being transferred to you?” And “critical infrastructure does not run these models without an application layer.” And this criticality is where the stakes are highest: defence, classified programs, regulated industries, where control over data, auditability and governance is non-negotiable, whichever model happens to sit underneath.
 The application also has to enable business enterprises to preserve their ‘alpha.’ That’s where I truly believe AI service companies have the edge. Not necessarily in owning the model, but in owning what sits above it. I’m keen to hear other reactions to his interview…
English
146
145
1.1K
231.8K
Seema Mody retweetledi
Michael Mignano
Michael Mignano@mignano·
Karp’s comments highlight even more reasons why enterprises will increasingly feel pressure to move away from the big labs. He’s saying the labs will eat your IP and charge you to do it. And use it to train their next models. And you’ll get nothing defensible in return. All of this adds even more fuel to the transition to the Rebel Alliance stack, enabling enterprises to both save money and control their own destiny.
English
10
4
75
18.5K
Seema Mody retweetledi
Patrick Moorhead
Patrick Moorhead@PatrickMoorhead·
Every CEO should watch this video on risks of losing their inventions and business processes to frontier models. Alex Karp is saying out loud what few will say. Yes, Palantir benefits from this, but seeing @AnthropicAI behavior, seems legit to me.
English
41
73
726
185.8K
Seema Mody retweetledi
Daniel Newman
Daniel Newman@danielnewmanUV·
$PLTR CEO Alex Karp was outstanding on Squawk Box this morning. A vision of what AI looks like in the real world. Forward deployed on an application layer that addresses security and governance. 💪🏻
English
24
14
155
15.9K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
Karp tells us CEOs are frustrated by the cost of AI tokens and the inability to keep their data in-house, creating the risk that frontier AI labs could ultimately replicate their businesses. His solution: an American-built, secure, open-source model $pltr cnbc.com/2026/07/01/pal…
English
9
6
66
6.3K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
A pleasure to have Palantir CEO Alex Karp join us on @SquawkCNBC this morning. He did not hold back. "“Are we really going to outsource the battlefield of this country to the consensus view in Silicon Valley? That is effing insane.” $PLTR
@jason@Jason

I've been shouting about this for over a year…. The Frontier models need to win the application layer and they're going to do that by giving free tokens to startups and discounted ones to large companies in order to steal their IP, innovations, and businesses The only way to fight this is to use open source software

English
23
25
334
27K
Seema Mody retweetledi
Matthew Tuttle
Matthew Tuttle@TuttleCapital·
Gas turbines are the real AI infrastructure bottleneck - not nuclear, not renewables. GE Vernova's order book is full through 2029, now booking into 2031. One turbine costs >$250M. Prices up 300% in 3 years. Microsoft bought 7 for 2.7GW in Texas. xAI Colossus and OpenAI Stargate are already running GEV turbines. 20% of GEV's gas power order book is now AI/data centers. The nuclear headlines are noise. Gas is what actually powers the build right now. @SeemaCNBC cnbc.com/2026/06/27/ge-…
English
5
2
20
2.2K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
We're hearing from two sources that Spacex's inclusion into the Nasdaq 100 could be announced as early as tonight $SPCX $QQQ $NDAQ Full story here on what could mean for the stock: cnbc.com/video/2026/06/…
English
4
9
77
8.6K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
Here’s what we know about SpaceX’s debt deal -went to market to raise $20b -saw incredibly strong demand from bond investors with nearly $90b in orders -at the end of the day SpaceX decided to upsize the amount it raised to $25b (with short and long term maturities) $spcx
English
1
1
22
4.9K
Grant Melson, CFA
Grant Melson, CFA@grant_melson·
@Vol888 @Vol888SpaceX Legit hope it doesn't happen any time soon. If only there were any pure-play TSLA shareholders or TSLA employees that could be interviewed to share their thoughts... I've only seen large SpaceX shareholders and SpaceX presidents interviewed for this publicly @CNBC @seemacnbc
English
2
0
3
91
Vol888
Vol888@Vol888·
@grant_melson @Vol888SpaceX Yep, the merger question always comes down to price. SpaceX holders want a premium and Tesla holders don't want dilution. That's the real negotiation.
English
1
0
4
162
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
Historic day to be at the Nasdaq following the opening trade for $SPCX @SpaceX @nasdaq president Nelson Griggs tells me SpaceX is on track to join the Nasdaq 100
Seema Mody tweet media
English
2
3
51
3.1K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
@Dagk Not a restriction, just a penalty if you do trade in first 15 days
English
1
0
0
663
Dag Kittlaus
Dag Kittlaus@Dagk·
@seemacnbc It’s silly for anyone to restrict trades except insiders. Like saying it should be illegal to flip homes.
English
3
0
32
3.5K
Seema Mody
Seema Mody@seemacnbc·
Retail brokerages are reinforcing their anti-flipping policy ahead of #SpaceX's IPO Fidelity: if you try to sell within the first 15 days, you'll likely be banned from participating in IPO deals for 6 months. Second attempt: banned for 1 year. Third: indefinite ban $SPCX
English
78
17
301
135.4K