Setul Mishra

@vgnandu7 @karthik_raj2000 @indtraderleague @shivakumark2324 @Options_IndiaAB @VK680582 @ihimanshuojha1 @BHTradeNInvest @ArynWithVol8lty @_Curious_Trader @Trader1205 @Saprem1111 I'll soon overtake him 💪

Multi-agent systems already acting like senior devs !!!

@jonasfroeller Mine went for 14 hours even after my subscription ended, that too on xhigh 🤣

btw, if you start a Codex session at a low 5-hour quota and it doesn't finish in time, it just keeps going and doesn't charge you at all

@Angaisb_ @reach_vb Use @useLunel

@reach_vb How do I connect it? It tells me to follow the instructions in my pc but nothing shows up

btw codex works on your phone now!

@zeddotdev @OpenAIDevs Superb. Can't wait to reach home and try it, lfggg.

You can now use your ChatGPT subscription in the Zed agent, with the same usage and rate limits you benefit from in Codex directly. We're grateful that @openaidevs continues to support subscription-based access for third-party tools, even as others move toward usage-based billing.

@chetaslua Prompt?

🚨 ChatGPT Image New A/B testing This looks more authentic lol , like at this point you can generate fake checks like the movie "Catch Me If You Can" Codex is becoming a SuperApp , will share more updates on it soon

@nahcrof honestly, i am enjoying your paid tier. Will re-subscribe. Keep up the good work :)

first update, I'm going to try removing the current free tier models, there will be at least one more free (but rate limited) model coming soon but for now I think this could be contributing

This is who you're trading against.

Overheard behind me while watching #H5N1 NAS workshop today: "You want to really make a pandemic, make hantavirus human transmissible"

Monitor the Situation hantavirustracker.pplx.app

@chetaslua this is crazy. but i think it got patched.

2023: Corona ended 2026: Hantavirus

i finally understand why it’s called linux porn 😭

software enginners before vs after agents

A letter to my friends at Anthropic I hate that I feel obligated to do this. I hate that I've had to be so harsh towards Anthropic for the past few months. I really, really don't want to. I know it might feel like I'm doing this for clicks or something, but I promise I'm not. My pro-Anthropic content ALWAYS outperforms my anti-Anthropic content. I have cost myself a lot of money, opportunities, sponsors, and more. I'm doing this because you work for an evil cult. I'm begging you to wake up. Your CEO, Dario, does not respect engineers. This is obvious. He couldn't make it more obvious if he tried (and I think he's trying pretty hard) You know this, but you don't want to acknowledge it. It has kept you up many nights. You know that bad code is shipping to users. You know that one bad tweet might get you fired. You fear for your vesting schedules. You're afraid. Nobody deserves what you're going through right now. You go to work afraid, you leave work afraid, and you go to YouTube to keep up on the dev world, just to hear me yelling all about how evil your company is. You deserve better. You might not feel like you do, but you know deep down that this isn't right. I hope you know how deeply I feel for you. I'm sorry. I know I haven't helped you much individually, and I want to be better about this. If you're ready to leave, please hit me up. I swear I'll never tell a soul. I have friends at every lab and most startups in the AI world. Most of them would be down to match your current vesting schedules, possibly even go beyond. If you're staying for the money, I beg you to hit me up. We can make the money happen somewhere that hates you less. I know I'm asking for a lot of trust here, and that you're scared after seeing how hard I've been on Anthropic. I can't blame you at all for that. I should have posted something like this months ago. That's my failure to own and I will own it to my best ability. If you're willing to trust me in this moment, I can make it right. Let me help you escape. You deserve to work somewhere that you can have impact. Somewhere that listens when you feel something is wrong. Somewhere that won't fire you when you point out the things that hurt your users. My DMs are always open to you. When you're ready, let me know. I promise to make it right.

Had a Jane Street interview in 2013 that still bothers me. It was my 6th round. Final interview. The guy walks in carrying no laptop, no notebook, just a cold brew and what I later realized was a single IKEA tea candle. He writes on the whiteboard: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $150 candles: $3,600 family: dying Then he turns around and says, “Optimize.” I laughed because I thought it was a culture-fit bit. He did not laugh. So I said, “Well, obviously you spend less on candles.” He says, “Assume candles are non-discretionary.” Okay. I start building a model. Basic constraint satisfaction. Family survival as a soft penalty. Candles as a state variable. Maybe there’s an arbitrage where you buy wholesale paraffin and convert the $3,600 line item into inventory. He stops me. “You’re thinking like a consultant.” That’s when I knew I was in trouble. He says, “Give me a bid-ask on family dying.” I say, “What?” He says, “You’re long candles, short family. Where do you make markets?” I try to recover. I say the real issue is liquidity: rent and utilities are fixed, food is elastic, candles are emotionally inelastic. Therefore the optimal strategy is to securitize future candle enjoyment and borrow against it. He nods for the first time. Then he asks, “What time do you sell the candles?” I say, “Whenever the market is liquid?” He says, “Be more specific.” I say, “Uh… 10 a.m. Eastern?” For the first time, he smiles. He goes, “Every day?” I say, “Every day.” He says, “In size?” I say, “In size.” He says, “And what do we call that?” I say, “Market manipulation?” The room gets very quiet. He looks disappointed and writes something down. “No. We call it providing liquidity to candle ETFs during the U.S. cash open.” I try to save it. “Right. Of course. The family isn’t dying because we underfunded them. They’re just experiencing temporary price discovery.” He nods again. Then he points back at the board. I had missed it. The utility bill was $150, but candles provide light. You can zero out utilities. I update the budget: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $0 candles: $3,750 family: still dying, but now in a more capital-efficient way He says, “How confident are you?” I say, “0.95.” He smiles and circles candles. “0.95 huh?” Then he asks me to estimate how many leveraged longs get liquidated if we dump $3,750 of candles at 10:00:01 every morning for 90 consecutive trading days. Needless to say I did not get the offer.

@intheworldofai Well then copy my prompt and paste it in your deepseek chat, find for yourself whether it's v4 or not.

@setul_mishra Please read this tweet to me

DeepSeek v4 Pro just generated this SaaS landing page and im an idiot for stating its mid lol... Factual counter to the flop-based dismissal. Real output > training compute claims

Well @deepseek_ai i guess the model hasn't been updated on chat.deepseek.com , here's the proof: chat.deepseek.com/share/qeuihtn5…

A Chinese company facing chip restrictions can train this But xAI can’t even get SOTA With a million H100 equivalents

@Hangsiin You're incorrect about the pricing though: api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pr…

Codeforces 3052 SWE-bench Pro 52.6 HLE 45.1 long-context > Gemini 3.1 Pro The API pricing for this model is: input: (Cache hit) $0.028 / (Cache miss) $0.14 output: $0.28. It supports up to 1M tokens, with no additional charges based on context length. Unless they have told some horrific benchmarking lies, this is insane.