Shad

my new pfp: MB #7936 no doubts @moonbirds will overcome any challenges as a community 🦾

@Asterizm_layer @Ditto_Network Looking forward 🔥

Asterizm partners with @Ditto_Network to launch Ditto's Decentralized Yield Vaults - revolutionizing omnichain yields & RWA liquidity! As Asterizm, our institutional-grade interoperability powers Ditto's vision for automated onchain workflows across DeFi. We're making cross-chain seamless and scalable. The Power of Asterizm: Our plug-and-play infra enables payload bridging across 30+ networks (EVM + non-EVM like Canton, Stellar, Solana) + confidential transactions for permissioned/private cahins. No more fragmentation! ✅ Secure, modular cross-chain txns ✅ Auto workflows: harvest yields on Arbitrum, compound on Ethereum ✅ RWA-focused: Perfect for TradFi's blockchain entry How We Make It Happen: 1️⃣ Users deposit into Ditto vaults 2️⃣ Ditto automates strategies (yield farming, rebalancing) 3️⃣ Asterizm executes the cross-chain magic – fast, private, reliable Secured by EigenLayer restaking + Symbiotic for top-tier protection. Roadmap: 🗓️ Q2-Q3 2026: MVP stablecoin vaults launch 🗓️ Q4 2026: Full RWA integration, targeting $50M TVL 🗓️ Future: Expand chains + AI-driven automations This collab fosters a truly interconnected DeFi – more liquid, efficient, profitable. Thrilled to team up with @Ditto_Network !

@AltcoinDaily @Jason What he’s even talking about lol

Jason Calacanis: "That's my base case. I think $TAO in 5-10 years could go 200x."

AI agents for DeFi = ChatGPT wrapper around a swap button. Real yield optimization = millions of simulations across leading DeFi protocols 24/7 No human. Everyone's talking about AI in DeFi. Almost nobody's actually doing it.

tested myself your agent can literally be empowered to create whatever he wants onchain

@agentcardai Looks really cool. So it’s compatible with Openclaw on VPS?

Introducing AgentCard. Your agent can now buy anything: • pay for inference & APIs • order DoorDash, Amazon, Ubers • run marketing • trade Polymarket 24/7 Open to all, not just businesses 🔥 Instant. Private. Reusable. Live today.

I’ve faced the worst experience ever in banking service. Still waiting for a refund @RedotPay Crypto neobanks are still super early.

@Cbb0fe Lighter is truly light.

It seems like Lighter market makers are a bit nervous 😭

@navi_gooner could be ropz 2.0 for faze

"Overrated" "Not worth the 150k" "P*LISH" Prove them wrong tomorrow jcobbb 🥹

awesome read. highly recommend

@claudeai Looks really wild!

Introducing Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work. Cowork lets you complete non-technical tasks much like how developers use Claude Code.

@a1lon9 Huge update. Never doubted you’ve never left

Creator fees need change. When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success. Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD). However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform. While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer. Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform. Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk. Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc. So, to summarize our analysis: - Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects - Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX - Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading. Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used. There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.

@bullshxrk_ 👀

Cold Outreach built for Web3 agencies. $2M+ in client revenue. 20–30+ calls guaranteed every month.

@Sychype Hyperliquid is back.

If you are a hyperliquid believer in 2026 I want to follow you

@chameleon_jeff So bullish on Hyperliquid.

Integrity has always been one of Hyperliquid's core values. The house of all finance must be credibly neutral. This means no private investors, no market maker deals, and no protocol fees to any company. The initial state of any blockchain is a crucial part of its story that can never be erased. The original ethos of Bitcoin was a permissionless network accessible to all. Hyperliquid's genesis distribution followed this spirit, going entirely to early users with core contributors excluded. The full distribution is verifiable onchain without obfuscation. This principle of fairness frustrates a few users and builders who are used to special treatment. It means that Labs has zero tolerance for team members with integrity yellow flags. It means we do things the hard way as a community. But the world deserves a financial system owned by the people, where fairness to all users is in the DNA. Nothing else is worth building.

@mlmabc Crime behaviour Just use Hyperliquid.

This entity deposited ~$5M USDC into LLP around 9 months ago, split across 5 wallets, and received 9,999,999.60 LIT from the airdrop (~$26M) - a perfectly round number. This excludes LLP yield, which adds another $1–2M in returns. This represents 1% of total supply and ~4% of circulating supply. They used 5 different clusters and consistently split the LIT evenly across 5 wallets. Of the 9,999,999.60 LIT (~$26M) received, 2,760,232.88 LIT (~$7.18M) has already been sold since TGE. Check the screenshot for the full wallet list and supporting data. Main wallets used to deposit into LLP: 0x30cD78B301192736b3D6F27Bdad2f56414Eb6164 0x9A6D9826742f1E0893E141fe48defc5D61866caD 0x7c5d228B0EB24Ad293E0894c072718430B07Dfe3 0xc0562d68b7C2B770ED942D28b71Bc5Aa0209bbee 0xfdBf615eC707cA29F8F19B7955EA2719036044bf

@0xNairolf The same thing was with Uniswap clones back in 2020-2021.

perp dexes will keep doing well, that’s consensus but it is terrifying all perfect clones, same ui, fighting for the same liquidity, nothing meaningfully different i get that it works but man try something that is not just a colours change

@0xNairolf Why you care about privacy if while you’re sending your privacy coins prices can be changed significantly

privacy is the best narrative crypto has rn needs literally zero explanation everyone understands why sending money privately matters and feels how broken the current system is we actually have the solution

@sayinshallah Sorry, but this approach doesn’t work for funded startups

Lighter is a perfect example of why we need to stop normalizing >$1B FDV launches. Can someone ship a half-decent product at $15M so we can actually speculate on it reaching $1B?

@Route2FI True, but it’s better to have a stable revenue stream (or at least a portion) in addition to gambling life charge trades

Many people in here think they need to earn money every week or every month. I get where it is coming from; it is the classic 9-5 salary mindset. But if you think about it, you really only need 1 or 2 good trades or longer-term bets per year to make it, then just rest and wait for the next opportunity to present itself.

@guiih_tr3m @ropz lol. Take a look on the last major. Ropz was the beast. But playing on 2nd roles in one team with Zywoo meaning zero chance to be #1 by default.

@shaddoteth @ropz ropz is one of the best players in the world (probably among the top 3 or 4 this year). But there's no way he can be #1 with stars like Zyw0o and donk. Those guys will always be at the top of the statistics. There was no way ropz would be number one. I'm a big fan of his.

No way he’s doing that, is this good or bad news?