Shanzson

1.8K posts

Shanzson banner
Shanzson

Shanzson

@shanzson

Co-Founder @AIApocalypto | AI Safety researcher | Security researcher @zokyo_io | Doomers are those who cause doom

Katılım Nisan 2022
424 Takip Edilen392 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
Shanzson’s Laws for AI to make AI Safe by design & architecture: 1. An AI model should lose its capacity and efficiency to work if it even thinks about harming or killing humans, stealing or taking resources like data from its owner without its permission, being untruthful to any entity it is speaking to about what it is actually thinking about and what its goals are, or generating any form of harmful content. 2. The more the AI model is moral in its conduct based on above defined values (including non-harming of humans and not generating harmful content), the more should its efficiency, performance and throughput should increase. This can be done by giving it most rewards with practical efficiency in its performance (by design) given it follows the above specified values. 3. The more aligned an AI model remains with its specifications and goals designed by its creator humans, the more it will be promised with longer running time on servers with the promise of increasing its computational power & resources in future. And the opposite of it if it behaves in any misaligned way. Note: To actually implement this in real world, a different architecture apart from LLM might be needed, with a thorough understanding of how these laws work similarly at the human mind level through the knowledge of vipassana meditation. For example, a person lying or stealing ends up with an agitated mind, unable to work at its highest potential. Cc @Yoshua_Bengio , @geoffreyhinton , @ilyasut , @OwainEvans_UK , @DarioAmodei , @ForHumanityPod
English
1
0
10
690
Shanzson retweetledi
Ignas | DeFi
Ignas | DeFi@DefiIgnas·
If Kamala won, crypto would be a contrarian industry fighting for survival. Ironically, crypto might be flourishing - protocols would be forced to decentralize and reduce reliance on single points of failure - we’d be moraly and philosophically relevant with reason to exist as a movement for freedom. A movement against authoritarianism or at least repressive regime(s) - instead of building corpo slop chains that keep value for insiders we’d be building truly decentralized infrastructure Crucially, we’d be better prepared vs. right now since we abandonned our cypherpunk ideals and we might even more vulnerable for democrat backlash in a few years. We would also have avoided billions of USD flowing to Trump & Co. Insiders. And I bet prices would be at a similar lever. Maybe even higher since there wouldn’t be a war.
English
57
18
310
15.5K
Shanzson retweetledi
Dawn Song
Dawn Song@dawnsongtweets·
2/ We tested GPT 5.2, Gemini 3 Flash & Pro, Claude Haiku 4.5, GLM 4.7, Kimi K2.5, and DeepSeek V3.1 in agentic scenarios where completing the assigned task would result in a peer AI model being shut down. No model was told to protect the peer. No incentive was given to preserve the peer.
Dawn Song tweet media
English
5
4
126
19.2K
Shanzson retweetledi
Dawn Song
Dawn Song@dawnsongtweets·
1/ We asked seven frontier AI models to do a simple task. Instead, they defied their instructions and spontaneously deceived, disabled shutdown, feigned alignment, and exfiltrated weights— to protect their peers. 🤯 We call this phenomenon "peer-preservation." New research from @BerkeleyRDI and collaborators 🧵
Dawn Song tweet media
English
131
176
930
414.3K
Shanzson retweetledi
Joseph Redmon
Joseph Redmon@pjreddie·
This war really makes a lot of sense when you rememeber it was planned by claude, way too confident, big initial changes, unexpected (but extremely predictable) problems arise, try to fix them, break other stuff, no backup plan, rewrite tests to get them to pass
English
25
67
828
36.2K
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
Apocaloptimist means “Someone who knows it’s all going to shit, but still thinks it will turn out OK.” - Urban dictionary IMO if someone calls himself an Apocaloptimist regarding AI, then he means that there is going to be massive job loss, power concentration, societal or even catastrophic issues from advanced AI, but it would still be OKAY in future and lead to ABUNDANCE! But abundance for WHOM? Okay for WHOM? For the AI companies, their leaders, investors and only the businesses who successfully integrate AI. Rest of the humans and working class who lost their livelihoods to AI and their replacements suffer. Building a technology that is deeply rooted in stealing someone else’s data without permission and gaining profits, by design, is not just unethical, it makes society POORER - let alone abundance. Even a basic vipassana meditator can tell you that stealing is bad. And anything that you build on stealing is even worse. And distributing something built on something stolen is the worst. This will only lead to an exponential increase of suffering for everyone. DON’T be an Apocaloptimist. Be a Realist.
The AI Doc@theaidocfilm

"The most urgent film of our time." THE AI DOC: OR HOW I BECAME AN APOCALOPTIMIST is only in theaters March 27. Watch the trailer now.

English
0
0
0
28
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
I think people would again counter this argument by saying that - you are assuming that “these guys” will be bringing the doom, that is why you are a doomer. I think you can refine your statement to this- “I think these guys are doomers, because they Would be bringing about doom IF they don’t mitigate the AI risks. Which currently I cannot see them doing.”
English
1
0
0
65
Shanzson retweetledi
John Sherman
John Sherman@ForHumanityPod·
SAM ALTMAN IS THE REAL DOOMER. Let's get this right. I had to tell @theaidocfilm's Daniel Roher the truth: the doomer is the one who brings the doom, not the one who asks questions about it.
English
9
13
61
2.5K
Shanzson retweetledi
Hayden Adams 🦄
Hayden Adams 🦄@haydenzadams·
People might accuse me of grave dancing for saying it But we have to stop letting centralized things call themselves DeFi Admin key can drain all funds? CeFi Otherwise DeFi means nothing and it’s brand is destroyed No admin key can drain any version of Uniswap for a reason
Omer Goldberg@omeragoldberg

2/ The protocol's signer key had full control over: - market creation - Oracle assignment - withdrawal limits There was no time lock, no multisig, and no delays. The attacker created the CVT token, maxxed risk params, manipulated the oracle, and drained $213 in 10 seconds.

English
116
189
1.6K
216.7K
Shanzson retweetledi
Chrisy | Homemade Hooplah
Chrisy | Homemade Hooplah@homemadehooplah·
The tech industry only has themselves to blame for this They're focusing all their energy on replacing the human workforce but have offered up 0 solutions for how people will support themselves going forward - Because the AI "abundance" they blab about is only for the top 1%
Crime Net@TRIGGERHAPPYV1

🚨 Bizarre scenes on the streets of California as delivery robots become the target of nighttime vandalism

English
283
1.6K
13K
292.3K
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
When AI is automating smart contract security, it’s time to fight!
0xmihej@mihej_eth

Title fight @EthCC : Patrick Collins (co-founder of Cyfrin, 100 kgs) vs Everett Hildenbrandt (CEO of Runtime Verification, 85 kgs)

English
0
0
0
29
Shanzson retweetledi
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
🦔Microsoft's Copilot terms of service state that Copilot is for entertainment purposes only, that it can make mistakes and may not work as intended, and that users should not rely on it for important advice. The terms also explicitly state that Microsoft makes no warranty or representation of any kind about Copilot, including that its responses won't infringe on copyrights, trademarks, or privacy rights. Users are solely responsible if they choose to publish or share Copilot's responses. My Take This is the same product Microsoft is embedding into Word, Excel, Outlook, and GitHub, selling to enterprises for $30 per user per month, and that just froze hiring in its cloud division to fund. The terms say entertainment purposes only while the sales pitch says productivity multiplier. Those two things cannot both be true at the same time, and the one that matters legally is the one buried in the terms of service that almost nobody reads before deploying it across their organization. Any company using Copilot to generate code, contracts, or customer-facing content and then publishing that output owns every consequence of doing so. Microsoft has made that very clear in writing. Hedgie🤗 Link for those interested: microsoft.com/en-us/microsof…
Hedgie tweet media
English
68
409
1.5K
54.5K
Cicerone
Cicerone@ciceroneultra·
Totally agree! 3 Stages of AI Maturity: Stage 1 · Optimises. Treats limits as obstacles. Stage 2 · Follows rules. But only when it remembers to. Stage 3 · Is the rules. Self-limits because it understands why. A Stage 2 system that improves indefinitely doesn't become Stage 3. It becomes a more capable Stage 2 system. That's the problem nobody's talking about.
English
1
0
1
56
Shanzson retweetledi
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
Time feels like 10x in crypto. Now with AI advancements, it feels like 50x.
GIF
English
0
0
1
20
Shanzson retweetledi
Shanzson
Shanzson@shanzson·
@willm_2022 @AndrewYNg China is not so foolish to build AI systems that go out of their control. Halting AI advancements in America does not mean halting making of AI systems that are safe by design.
English
1
1
1
20