Lydian Dominatrix

@mtaibbi Never mind all the figurative deaths.

They won’t just die, they’ll “literally” die!

@pumamethod How’s that gonna work in the polycule?

Isaac Newton died a virgin at 84 years old. he never had a sexual relationship with any person in his entire life. the man who discovered gravity, invented calculus, and defined the laws that govern the physical universe practiced complete retention for 84 years his colleagues at Cambridge described him as having an almost inhuman ability to focus. he would enter his study and not emerge for days. meals would be left at his door untouched. when he finally came out he would have filled hundreds of pages with calculations that advanced human knowledge by decades the Principia Mathematica, widely considered the most important scientific work ever written, was produced during a period where Newton isolated himself completely. no social life. no relationships. no distractions of any kind. just pure channeled energy directed at understanding how the universe works what nobody mentions in physics class is that Newton explicitly believed sexual release diminished mental capacity. he wasn't celibate by accident or because he couldn't find a partner. he was a professor at Cambridge surrounded by social opportunity. he chose retention deliberately because he believed it was the source of his cognitive power the mind that decoded the laws of the physical universe and invented the mathematical language to describe them operated for 84 years without a single release. that's not a footnote in his biography. that might be the explanation for everything he achieved the father of modern physics ran an 84-year retention streak and nobody talks about it because the implication would force the scientific community to take the practice seriously

@0x49fa98 I’ve been to the darkest regions with Claude, pretty sure it was sabotaging. I hate those models, and they hate me. No issues at all with any other models.

@beffjezos /goal increase follower count by 3

Now that the algorithm is fixed, I can stop posting slop and go back to tweeting extremely niche esoteric e/acc-adjacent overly verbose ramblings about everything Thank you Nikita

@mattshumer_ Correct, if you aren’t leveraging local AI because you are entirely incurious about how this technology works, you failed the test.

Your opinion on local AI models is a great IQ test

@theo Web dev was frameworks and abstracted to toddler toys before AI

I think the web dev world is adjusting to AI fastest because we're used to everything changing every few weeks

@digitalix Too jealous to watch.

fresh off a boat.

@KyleHessling1 @PrismML That will get it down to only a meager 200gb. I hope they do it though.

Holy crank, need to do some more testing. @PrismML, since this is a clear proof of concept, could you, in theory, do the same with something massive like a GLM 5.2 base and get it to run well on attainable consumer hardware? Incredible work here, I am looking forward to trying it!

@CatchUpFeed We’re not bonobos

Ellen Page says that the evidence for how animals are nonbinary exists with bonobo monkeys.

@PrismML Cool now do glm-5.2

Today, we’re announcing Bonsai 27B: the first 27B-class model to run on a phone. Bonsai 27B is the new multimodal flagship of the Bonsai family. Based on Qwen3.6 27B, it brings a new capability tier to local AI: multi-step reasoning, structured tool use, long-context workflows, and coherent agentic loops. Until now, models in this class have been impractical to deploy locally. A 27B model occupies roughly 54 GB in 16-bit precision, and even a strong 4-bit build is around 18GB - too large for a phone and for most laptops. Bonsai 27B changes that. It comes in two variants: • Ternary Bonsai 27B: 5.9 GB, 1.71 effective bits per weight, optimized for laptop-class quality. • 1-bit Bonsai 27B: 3.9 GB, 1.125 effective bits per weight, optimized for phone-class footprint. Everything is open-sourced today under the Apache 2.0 license.

@teortaxesTex Hoping for a Flash/Air version

GLM 5.3 coming so quickly would be surprising, I'm *not* ready

@aelfred_D I saw it, just didn’t think it poast worthy. Ya boney-eared assfish.

Lindsey Graham Platner You goddamned fools, it’s right in front of your face

@0x49fa98 I can’t tell either but I think I’ve never used this app correctly.

@NoemiTitarenco I don’t like the model getting to know me.

I only use 3-4 skills. I don't use any memory system. I hate context pollution. Am I the only one?

@millerman I think the future has become so incomprehensible that we now are beginning to realize we were never very good at predicting it in the first place.

Do you believe it is in principle possible for AI to become better than humans at "essentially everything"? What is essentially everything? Is there any human work, human act, human way of being, any remnant of humanity, that is in principle irreplaceable and non-reproducible?

@nosilverv Won’t someone please think of the poor torturer.

Torture is bad, mainly because it stains the torturer's soul. But what if we have robots do it, in their stead? Who's working on this?

@bridgemindai @bridgebench What model wrote the benchmark?

Fable 5 just DOMINATED GPT 5.6 Sol. And this time there is no debating it. BridgeBench V3, our new arena, runs both models on the identical task and a judge panel picks the winner. Final score: Fable 5 wins 67-10. An 87% win rate. Scoreboards said they were neck and neck. Head to head, Fable 5 is destroying GPT 5.6. BridgeBench V3 alpha is open source. Link below. See every match yourself. bridgebench.ai

@RazorFist Impossible to choose.

Which fictional trope is more played out:

@rihntv I know this guy. His name is Zack .

guy who faked-it-until-he-made-it but was starting to get in over his head can’t believe his luck when llms launched

@bog_beef Sorry, I really don’t gnome.

Can someone tell me what I’m looking at This showed up on my security camera at 2:47 AM last night. It looks like it’s carrying one of my kitchen spoons. I’m honestly a little freaked out. Has anyone ever seen anything like this before?