Simodine_19
11.8K posts


@OmgItsShadow91 @MAGAVoice by money while another factor was that kamala wasnt a strong opponent!
English

@SenRandPaul First time I’ve agreed with you in a while. It has become too big and unreliable
English

President Trump is right to strongly consider leaving NATO.
I support the President’s constitutional authority under Article II to withdraw from any treaty — including NATO — without needing Senate approval. Congress tried to block that with the 2023 Kaine-Rubio provision in the NDAA, but the Constitution grants the executive power to the president.
thehill.com/homenews/admin…
English

@GissiSim Everyone needs to relax, trump needs 2/3 of the senate to vote to leave NATO which will never in a million years happen
English

@sudelpool @GissiSim Exactly and that’s why they don’t attack anyone. They would lose all those trade deals. Be sanctioned to death and then be broke.
English

@delteded @SFakamoto @GissiSim @Max_Sarcasium1 China doesn’t attack anyone because it would lose its trade deals. They know they can’t attack anyone.
English

@SFakamoto @GissiSim @Max_Sarcasium1 You’re talking about two cases from roughly 40 and 70 years ago...
China has been rearming for about 30 years without attacking anyone with that increased capability.
Honestly, that doesn’t look bad for countries that believe in diplomatic and trade ties.
English

@simodine_19 @italypete10 @aleksthgrt Sure your farmers who need bailing out, your military complex who are having orders cancelled, and China/Japan will dominate in AI not the USA. Canada exports to China/Europe now, China now uses Brazil for beans. Your cars are too big for most nations. substandard meat is barred
English

@simodine_19 @AqDennis35221 @pl_european Declaration of war makes war a federal law, and it creates a legally binding obligation for the president to follow the law. If the Congress declares the war, and the President refuses to instruct the Army, the Congress can impeach the POTUS on political matters.
English

Well, you have to go through Congress.
Clash Report@clashreport
BREAKING: Trump says he is “strongly considering” pulling the U.S. out of NATO. Source: The Telegraph
English

@MurieAnita1 @aleksthgrt @newhopenow3 Statistics, do some research on products sold in China. Main imports are oil and agriculture
English

@simodine_19 @aleksthgrt @newhopenow3 Where did u get that idea? Your ass? It’s ridiculous in 2026 to think that 🤡
English

@MurieAnita1 @aleksthgrt @newhopenow3 They aren’t buying imported products. China makes everything and they are buying Chinese products. It’s nearly an impossible mission to penetrate the Chinese market. That a fact.
English

@simodine_19 @aleksthgrt @newhopenow3 Their middle class is growing. That is why their buying power is growing

English

@Mupsypupsy @italypete10 @aleksthgrt Nah, they will not be economically isolated. Losing some arms sales is inevitable at this time. In nato or not. Plus ai is gonna control the future and Europe is light years behind.
English

@simodine_19 @italypete10 @aleksthgrt Splendid Isolationism again and complete stockmarket collapse, really worked well. Arms sales may continue but not in the volumes as lack of trust in America, your overrated global reach fuels your ability to show off and sell armaments.
English

@Mupsypupsy @italypete10 @aleksthgrt Reach of global dominance is overrated. Before ww2 the US was just fine. The billions is possible loss of military sales is a small fraction of the US economy. Especially since they will continue to sale arms.
English

@simodine_19 @italypete10 @aleksthgrt Plus the wholesale loss of markets for your defense industries who sell billions of $$ worth of armaments to Europe, huge job losses. Europe concentrate on rebuilding a more capable defense industry. Loss of global reach and dominance for USA.
English

@KatsActs @ethanmwolf Rare earth is really that rare the issue is refining
English

@simodine_19 @ethanmwolf US does not have or have enough of the "rare earth" required to be independent. US is not really about independence. It's about corporations & the cheapest cost to themselves & highest cost to consumers.
English

@CT9397 @realhansard No it’s not. You highly underestimate the US economy
English

@simodine_19 @realhansard They see how reliable we are and will draw their own conclusions. This is a disaster of epic proportions for the US
English

@JulienHoez All that is useless if they can’t use those bases. If the only reason is to protect Europe then close them. The US has over 700 bases work wide and will never be attacked so they can choose if and when to go to war.
English

The USA is essentially dependent on military bases like Ramstein, Signoella, Aérea de Morón and Rota to ensure that it can effectively pivot it's ground forces, supplies, and launch air operations across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and in some cases, having more options for deployments in Asia when necessary
They use these bases to more effectively react to crises, gather intelligence, host logistical hubs that can reach globally across theatres, project power in the face of countries like Russia, China and India, and also to be better prepared to react to crises.
This is very, very, very basic.
𝔽𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕜 𝔻𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕖𝕝𝕤@ThatFormerBrit
@JulienHoez Oh please enlighten me mate. This humble chap couldn't possibly understand the military.
English

@Coffey4Canada2 Nah, the US has over 700 bases world wide. Even if they left nato they will have hundreds. Plus the US only enters wars of choice. They just won’t protect Europe.
English

Yes please.
Said the rest of the NATO.
Better get to work building 5 more aircraft carriers.
They’ll be ready in 2040.
PS, don’t call us next 9/11.
Mike Newman@MikeNew19512115
Close down all US bases in Europe. Leave NATO. France, Spain and UK are no longer our allies.
English

@JohnBouras3230 @USAmbCanada Not really because the after effects kill all economies.
English

Foreign countries like China, Japan, the UK, and Canada hold massive amounts of U.S. debt.
Total U.S. interest payments are approaching $1T
Still, the U.S. depends heavily on global creditors including allies to finance its deficits. That’s real leverage.
@USAmbCanada @MarkDWiseman @AnitaAnandMP

English

@CT9397 @realhansard Japan and South Korea will never waiver from the US. They both 100% rely on the US protection. Don’t fool yourself when push comes to shove.
English

@realhansard Eurppeans, Canadians and Australians, Japanese and South Koreans need to form a new alliance and ensure British and French nuclear deterrence covers all of them with nukes stationed on each continent.
English







