Вячеслав
104 posts
Вячеслав
@slava200711
Единственная истинная мудрость — в осознании, что мы по сути ничего не знаем.“
Лапландия Katılım Ocak 2015
326 Takip Edilen41 Takipçiler
"Do you like my new shoes?"👠
---
Steal my prompt⤵️ + RT if you're using it! Follow @iamdomprompt for daily obsession-level prompts & improvements.
---
Nano Banana Pro via Flow | Prompt:
{
"core_meta": {
"image_type": "Cinematic Fashion Editorial Photography",
"art_medium": "Digital Photography",
"style_modifiers": "Vogue aesthetic, avant-garde minimalism, provocative high-fashion, raw editorial edge",
"overall_mood": "Arrogant, dominant, and intensely glamorous",
"vibe": "Statuesque power meets vibrant contemporary luxury",
"quality_boosters": "8k UHD, photorealistic, Octane Render, ray-traced realism, masterpiece"
},
"subject": {
"identity": {
"subject_type": "Professional Fashion Model",
"gender": "Female",
"age": "20s",
"ethnicity": "Caucasian",
"description": "A statuesque fashion model radiating high-status luxury and unapologetic physical dominance."
},
"anatomy_and_body": {
"build_and_proportions": "Statuesque build with extremely elongated, toned legs and a graceful, powerful silhouette",
"skin_texture": "Hyper-realistic skin texture, microscopic pores, fine hair follicles, radiant glamour glow",
"biological_features": "Subtle subsurface scattering, natural light penetration on the skin edges",
"unique_markings_and_tattoos": "Flawless, pristine skin to emphasize the high-end editorial nature"
},
"face_and_hair": {
"face_structure": "Sharp cheekbones, defined jawline, elegant and aloof profile",
"eyes": "Gazing into the distance, detached and powerfully seductive",
"lips": "Softly parted, natural gloss",
"makeup": "Flawless editorial glam, glowing high points, subtle contour",
"expression": "Distant, arrogant, and powerfully alluring",
"hair": "Voluminous honey blonde waves exhibiting cinematic motion blur, catching the air dynamically"
},
"pose_and_action": {
"description": "An aggressive, perspective-heavy stance dominating the camera lens from above.",
"body_position": "Back intensely arched in a provocative stretch, with one elongated leg thrust directly toward the wide-angle lens for massive perspective distortion",
"hand_gestures": "Gracefully extended, allowing the flared chiffon fabric to catch the air",
"gaze_direction": "Looking away into the distance, ignoring the viewer to establish ultimate dominance"
}
},
"wardrobe_and_inventory": {
"clothing": "Sheer ruffled luxury silk chiffon mini-dress in deep burgundy with scarlet and gold floral patterns, flared fabric lifting in the air",
"accessories": "Designer platform stilettos in tan leather with high-contrast neon lime green platforms and gold-buckled ankle straps, minimalist gold anklet"
},
"environment_and_scene": {
"location": "Minimalist architectural pure white gallery-style interior",
"atmosphere": "Pristine, cold, and intensely bright fashion studio atmosphere",
"texture_details": "Satin finish walls, clean architectural lines contrasting with the soft, sheer ruffled silk chiffon"
},
"camera_and_composition": {
"frame": "Aspect ratio 3:4, vertical orientation",
"composition": "Dynamic low-angle worm's-eye view with a 15-degree Dutch tilt, creating a dizzying, perspective-heavy shot",
"hardware_simulation": "Sony A7R V, 24mm wide-angle prime lens",
"camera_settings": "f/2.8 aperture, extremely shallow depth of field, razor-sharp focus locked exclusively on the neon lime green platform heel"
},
"lighting_and_color": {
"lighting": "High-end fashion studio lighting, large overhead softbox for smooth wrap-around light, reflector fill creating a flawless glamour glow on the skin",
"color_grading": "Vibrant, clean, high-contrast palette of pure white, deep crimson, warm tan, and striking neon lime green"
},
"post_processing_and_fx": {
"rendering": "Ray-traced realism, Octane Render style",
"optical_artifacts": "Creamy circular bokeh falling off rapidly behind the sharply focused foreground shoe, cinematic motion blur on the flowing hair and dress",
"sensor_atmosphere": "Pristine, dust-free studio clarity",
"imperfections_and_realism": "Microscopic skin details, hyper-realistic leather grain on the stilettos, visible silk chiffon weave"
},
"negatives": "Flat lighting, plastic skin, CGI look, bad anatomy, messy background, soft focus on the shoe, dull colors",
"final_director_notes": "The absolute focal point is the neon lime green platform heel thrust into the 24mm lens. The extreme low-angle perspective and 15-degree tilt must create a sense of towering, statuesque dominance. The contrast between the sharp shoe and the creamy bokeh of the arching model in the sheer burgundy dress generates raw editorial tension."
}
English
🔥用ChatGPT-Image2做《AI内衣套装提案》，太优雅了！
知性克制的品牌感，把内衣穿出安静高级气质✨
藏蓝优雅感、烟灰紫知性感、雾霾蓝清冷感、银灰现代感…
每张都是高信息量提案板，模特上身效果+手写种草笔记+3套外搭建议~
提示词在引用推评论区👇
Larus Canus@MrLarus
🤯用ChatGPT-Image2生成《AI内衣套装提案》，轻奢奶白！ 全新温柔轻奢日常路线，把内衣穿出精致气质感！ 雾粉温柔感、豆沙玫瑰气质感、奶杏裸色日常感、香槟米白轻奢感… 包含模特上身效果+手写种草笔记+3套外搭建议 真正能日常穿出仪式感的完整提案！ 完整提示词在引用推👇
中文
Okay today's courtroom sketches are really getting out of control
English
@BasedMikeLee Voter ID is critical for democracy to be real
English
With the DHS shutdown over, Senate Republicans learned a hard lesson on Democrat obstruction of border security and election integrity.
Now the real choice:
(A) Nuke the filibuster for core reforms — voter ID, proof of citizenship, and immigration enforcement — so the American people decide by majority vote.
(B) Keep the status quo and hope Democrats don’t nuke it next time they’re in power and ram through their agenda permanently.
Which option would you choose?
English
Aliens performing advanced X-ray scan on Elon Musk inside a high-tech laboratory.
English
BREAKING: Elon Musk concludes testimony in the OpenAI trial.
Key claim from the stand: OpenAI tried to 'steal' a charity, converting a non-profit Musk seed-funded in 2015 into a capped-profit entity now valued in the hundreds of billions.
The verdict here will set precedent for every AI lab structured as a non-profit going forward.
English
Elon Musk on AI during the OpenAI trial:
"It (AI) could make us more prosperous, but it could also kill us all. We want to be in a Gene Roddenberry movie, like Star Trek, not so much a James Cameron movie, like Terminator.
He then elaborated by comparing AI training to almost like raising a child:
"It’s like if you had a very smart child — at the end of the day when the child grows up, you can’t really control that child, but you can try to instill the right values. Honesty, integrity, caring about humanity —being good, essentially."
English
Here's a rough summary of Elon Musk’s 1 hour and 40 minute long testimony today during the OpenAI trial. He will resume his testimony tomorrow.
• Argues the case has huge implications: "It is not ok to steal a charity. If the defendants are found not guilty, this case will become caselaw. It’ll give license to looting every charity in America. The consequences of this case go far beyond me or everyone here. The entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed."
• Says OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit, open-source counterweight to Google, focused on AI safety.
• Claims the shift to a for-profit structure violated that mission.
• Says his AI concerns date back to conversations with Larry Page, who he felt wasn’t taking AI risk seriously.
• Elon says he tried to warn Obama about AI, but that Obama felt AI was not good enough (back then) to seem scary smart. "Here we are in 2026, AI is very smart."
• Believes AI could surpass human intelligence as soon as next year and poses existential risk in the hands of the wrong people: “If you have someone who’s not very trustworthy in charge of AI, that’s very dangerous for the whole world.”
• Elon framed his companies (SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI) as part of a broader mission to protect humanity’s future.
• Emphasized OpenAI’s original goal: AI for the good of humanity, not profit-driven control.
• Elon's main argument is that OpenAI abandoned its founding principles, and that precedent could reshape both AI governance and charitable trust.
• Larry Page refused to speak to Elon Musk again after Elon recruited Ilya Sutskever to join OpenAI. Elon viewed Ilya as the “number one” most valuable member at Google.
• Elon thought in the early days, OpenAI's corporate structure would be a nonprofit funded initially with donations, but there could potentially be a parallel for-profit that is owned by the nonprofit and funds the nonprofit: “We (Sam Altman and Elon) were in agreement that OpenAI would be a 501c3 charity.
• Elon was not opposed to there being a small for-profit that provided funding to the nonprofit, as long as "the tail didn’t wag the dog."
• Elon: “there are very few people who understand venture capital in Silicon Valley like I do."
English
If OpenAI and Sam Altman lose this lawsuit to Elon, I’m pretty sure it’s going to hit them WAY harder than most people expect.
I could honestly see their whole company losing more than half its value overnight bc trust would evaporate. The trial just kicked off this week in Oakland and it all comes down to the original deal. Elon helped found OpenAI as a nonprofit to build AI safely for the good of humanity and NOT profits. If the court rules they broke that promise by going for-profit with all the Microsoft $, a lot of people are going to feel like the whole story and management team at OpenAI was shady from the start and Sam would probably get kicked out. FYI, that’s actually one of the things Elon is asking for in the suit, along with major damages in the $ billions.
Once the leadership isn’t trustworthy and the mission gets called out in court and media, investors will get nervous fast. Fresh funding would probably dry up real quick bc no one will want to pour $ into that kind of mess. And right now, their IPO is valued at around $852 billion... that would turn into a total nightmare, probably delayed or at a much lower price with all the extra questions hanging over them.
And then I believe that lost value and momentum will likely flow straight over to Grok and xAI, especially now that xAI has merged into SpaceX earlier this year. The combined entity is already sitting at a massive scale, and it positions Elon’s whole ecosystem as the clearer leader - more focused on truth-seeking AI without the same corporate drama and lost trust in management. On top of this, talent, users, and investor interest will probably also shift over pretty naturally.
I personally think Sam and OpenAI know deep down they are in trouble…
English
🚨⚔️ELON MUSK DECLARE LA GUERRE À OPENAI AU TRIBUNAL
Ce matin, Musk est venu témoigner et il balance sans filtre :
« Si on n’arrête pas ça, l’humanité va droit dans le mur. L’IA pourrait dépasser l’intelligence humaine dès l’année prochaine… et entre de mauvaises mains, c’est la fin. »
Il accuse OpenAI d’avoir trahi sa mission initiale :
- Créé comme organisation NON PROFIT et OPEN SOURCE pour protéger l’humanité.
- Sam Altman l’a transformé en machine à fric.
Musk : « Si un type peu fiable contrôle l’IA la plus puissante, c’est un danger existentiel pour toute l’espèce humaine. »
Il défend xAI, SpaceX et Starlink comme les vrais remparts pour l’avenir.
Musk vs Altman, round 1 terminé… et ça continue demain.
Français
“Eternidad”
🔥 Elon Musk acaba de soltar la bomba más grande de la historia: la extinción de la muerte.
No en un paper académico. No en una conferencia formal. Lo tiró al pasar, como si nada, en medio de una cumbre.
Musk: “Vas a tener una interfaz cerebral completa que básicamente es una forma de inmortalidad. Tu estado mental se guarda. Estás respaldado en un disco duro.” 💾🧠
El mundo todavía cree que Neuralink es un aparatito médico para que un paralítico mueva un cursor con la mente.
Están mirando la herramienta que va a romper la civilización… y solo ven el primer uso.
Y sigue: “Siempre podés restaurar ese cerebro en un cuerpo biológico nuevo… o en un robot, lo que sea.”
Tus recuerdos. Tu personalidad. Tu “yo” consciente. Todo guardado, respaldado y transferible cuando el hardware original falle.
Eso ya no es medicina.
Eso es cancelar el contrato más antiguo de la humanidad.
Toda civilización se construyó sobre una sola certeza inquebrantable:
Naces → vives unas décadas → te vas.
La religión, las leyes de herencia, la economía, el derecho, la filosofía… todo fluye de esa verdad.
La gente se termina.
Sacá esa verdad del medio y no estás reformando la sociedad… estás sacando el pasador de todas las estructuras que la sostienen. 💥
Después Musk lo conectó con la carrera de la IA:
“Vamos tan rápido hacia la superinteligencia digital que quizás ella resuelva el problema por nosotros. Mientras tanto, seguimos avanzando con nuestras computadoras de carne.”
Computadoras de carne.
No es chiste negro. Es la especificación técnica exacta.
La verdadera razón por la que miles de millones se están tirando a la superinteligencia no es productividad ni chatbots.
Es el problema más viejo y desesperante de la especie: cómo no morir.
Cada fundador que inyecta capital en esta carrera no está solo creando una empresa. Está construyendo un reloj que pueda ganarle a su propia biología. ⏳
El viejo mundo aceptaba el final y planificaba alrededor de él.
Los nuevos constructores no. Ellos están ingenierizando directamente contra el final.
Y acá viene la pregunta que nadie quiere hacerse:
Todo lo urgente que hiciste, cada riesgo que tomaste, cada momento que realmente importó…
fue impulsado por la conciencia silenciosa de que tu tiempo se acababa.
La mortalidad no era solo lo que te mataba.
Era lo que te hacía moverte. ⚡
Los constructores quieren eliminarla.
Y nadie todavía preguntó:
¿qué carajo ponemos en el lugar de la única fecha límite que la especie humana alguna vez respetó?
Español
Elon Musk turned down all shares when he left OpenAI because he believed nonprofits are not meant for self-enrichment.
"The reason I founded OpenAI was because I was concerned, based on my conversations with Larry Page, that he was not sufficiently concerned about the dangers of AI. At my birthday party, he, in front of a large group of people, called me a speciesist, for favoring humanity over computers. So after that, I was like, We got to have some counterbalance to Google, because Larry doesn't seem to care if humans make it or not.
So I thought, what's the opposite of Google? It would be an open source nonprofit, and that's where the word open, in OpenAI comes from. It means open source.
I provided all the money, recruited the key people, and taught them everything I know. I actually even got them to deal with Microsoft.
And for all that, I did not seek any financial reward whatsoever. The reason I actually took down the offer for shares is because, I mean, I felt like what are the shares, and why like nonprofits supposed to have shares? Nonprofits are not supposed to be self enrichment, so that's why I turned on the offer of shares."
— Elon Musk
English
Grok is the only moderate AI.
The others are Far Left and Woke.
This is why 𝕏 and Grok must win.
English