Steven Webb

I have met people all across the movement, and no one, not even the most diehard pagans like this guy Everyone who is seriously involved in retaking our country and no just LARPing online understands this guy is at best trolling for engagement and at worst an op to divide

Ngl. Every single time I talk to the internet* I find less reason to do so. I never get useful feedback or answers. It’s almost always denial, cope, relational attacks or undercutting. It’s so predictable. I don’t know what you people get out of this. *the exception is my long form videos which are really more so extensions of my internal monologue that I’m showing the public

We thought Trump was our last chance. Turns out there never was a last chance. It’s already over. Trump was the psyop all along. Accept it. Prepare accordingly.

Shein's clothes are so toxic the state of Texas is suing them. Lab testing found: - PFAS at 3,300x the EU limit in 7 jackets (no federal US limit) - Phthalates at up to 428x the legal limit (children's shoes/accessories) - Formaldehyde (toxic VOC) Until lawsuits and legislation force Big Clothing to change, find natural fiber clothes free of toxic dyes, coatings, and treatments on the Oasis app.

Men of action will always be hated by men of “intelligence.” That hatred deepens when a man has both. He leaves them no refuge in theory, no comfort in critique, and no illusion of superiority. Those who won’t act learn to tear down those who do. And the world ONLY moves with those who move it.

All of out positive adaptation stimulus system ought to be aimed at one thing: Optimizing capacity acquisition within biological limits. Maximizing genetic potential. Whether the capacity in question is: - fitness - education - emotional regulation - psychological resilience - or any other vector of adaptation All of this potential is individual and personal notated by the individual’s level of development. Standardization of development is counter to the goal of optimization. Creating thresholds for participation and n some domains is valid, but standardization across entire bodies has no place in systems of adaptation. It is absolutely insane to me that as technology advances, the West tries to leverage that technology to chase some near complete sameness across the population (a ridiculous impossibility) - when those same advances could be instead be leveraged to produce near complete individualization. I will never trust any system, voluntary or compelled, engaged in that level of abject stupidity.

Right, if homeschooling is actually super high quality, then homeschooling families should not object to being evaluated, tested, and checked-in-on to make sure their kids are actually learning.

in what sense are these things gone? i'm aware of all these things still up and operating in several places in america.

The past year or so I have been fascinated with IQ and the data / discussion surrounding it. Sufficiently obsessed so that I bring it up in conversation opportunistically. Believe it or not, I’m convinced a deep unfiltered discussion of IQ and what we can learn from it is at the heart of what is needed to continue healing from the woke mind virus. Entirely too many broken mindsets and policies orbit the idea that all people are essentially interchangeable and that culture, education, and nutrition are more influential than genetics. This is obviously untrue to anyone who bothers to think for a few seconds. As an extreme example, the most well fed human on earth will never ever grow to the size of a blue whale. Similarly, the most well fed and educated blue whale will never win the Boston marathon. Our human genes have an upper bound to the size we can grow, and blue whales have their own limitations. These are silly and obvious and indisputable because they are easily measured and without exception. They are also entirely uncontroversial because they are cross species. To discuss and understand IQ in depth requires you to accept that human sexes and races also have measurable differences. This is a far more dangerous discussion, figuratively but perhaps also literally. There are many exceptions, but they don’t change the rule. I was talking to a psychologist about the topic. They considered themselves an IQ expert, and so I knew the conversation was going to get interesting quick one way or another. Unfortunately I wasn’t surprised to hear them immediately make a point that the test is biased against certain cultures. It’s always that, or the uninformed argument that IQ only measures one type of intelligence… She pointed out California case Larry P. v. Riles (1979) which prohibits testing African American students in CA for the purposes of special education placement. I started to push back, asking to clarify how that was proof the test was bias. Their response was to insult my own intelligence. To assume I have no idea what test norms are or how they are created and applied. I tried to respond to that, but they were already upset and made it clear they were finished with our talk. Look, I get it. It’s not fun or convenient to admit that much of our success or failure is fate sealed in our genetics. But it’s critical in the face of a delusional population to start facing difficult truths instead of denying them. Else we end up with men playing women’s sports and entering their locker rooms.

i’m sorry but europeans unironically using “yankee” thinking we find it like a slur is so funny