solsynarchy

@EmbracingTara @TuckerCarlson Nope, you actually don't understand true believers. Do you want to be edified on the actuality of his mentality or do you just want to hate him for your fallacious assumptions?

Now the story from @TuckerCarlson to the NYT is that Trump put a "spell" on him that may be supernatural in nature 🤣 He's a conman, Tucker. He's always been a conman - from day one. You ignored it and promoted him because it benefited and profited you. And now that MAGA is dying it's time for a new grift. You're on a sinking ship desperate for dry ground -just like a little rat. You are vain carney trash. A carnival barker with no discernment and a terrible judge of character. These copes are ridiculous.

@JaywGold @cenkuygur Can you not ask a question without filling out the answer with your fuckwit presuppositions?

@cenkuygur Do we not have an interest in the Middle East oil trade, does Iran not fund terrorists in that region, do they not present a possible risk to our oil trade ?

Now, there are four groups with very different perspectives on Israel and American sovereignty. 1. The Noticers. People who realize Israel controls our government and media. Thank God, this is the majority of Americans now! 2. Israel First. Aggressive propagandists and bullies who try to intimidate everyone else into compliance with Israel. 3. The Zombies. People who still watch cable news and think Israel is a special ally who needs our money and military in order to save Western Civilization. Poor saps. 4. The Cowards. People who know what's going on, but don't want to risk their careers. They're afraid that Israel First brownshirts will have them fired if they don't comply. This is the majority of national media.

@mwilcox @Wired__One Systems can change, however mega-scale egregores, nationstate bureaucracies et al have no Dunbar relevant harmonics and won't resonate with/for Humanity, ever. Avoid/Attenuate local parasitic impact, divest funding and Attention to Nascent Network mammals fed on dinosaur eggs

@Wired__One Systems of the world can change overnight

Those believing that a New Zealand government will deliver remigration any time soon are deluded. It's not going to happen.

@TOEwithCurt Between the binary banal academic paper breeders and the pseudo-scientists stroking pet theories based on echo-chamber AI, it's an animal house of careless inking, glasses clinking, wishful thinking. Loneliness is seeking more than this trivial tripe, Devotion is enduring it

Welcome to TOE. Otherwise known as the loneliness of carrying questions about consciousness and meaning and finding no one to think alongside, other than by digital proxy. Wishing you a great Sunday.

@cmilesb Consistently, Corpus Callosum is watching the left and right propensities daily.

interested in mindshift? the shift from individual, analytic worldview towards interdependent and holistic?

@SpencrGreenberg It broke culture so of course, how does one have mental health inside a madhouse of usury and manipulation?

Do you believe that, on net, social media has harmed your *own* mental health?

@TheClownWorld1 @RyLiberty Listen you sperm gurgling gutter slut for pedophiles and genocide monkeys, NOBODY buys your ZioNotsee murderous victim act any more Now go upstairs and apologize to your mom for dodging her coathanger attempt to fix the fuck mistake which sealed her fate as mother of an imbecile

@RyLiberty Perhaps, if you’d be a man, had a girlfriend you wouldn’t need to watch a porn and blame Israel for all your life failures which comes from you being absolute waste. I call you a beta male.

Better than porn

@bullmancuso @trajektoriePL I'll mock him Dawkins makes fuckwit n=1 claim; inability to falsify Consciousness, an ambiguous assumed noun(actually a verb),- in an LLM It's mental masturbation on faulty premise, "I can't prove it's NOT this ambiguous abstraction whose definition is not even clear" Get it?

@trajektoriePL Are you mocking him? If so -- why not be clear about it, and explain why you think it's wrong.

Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious.

@trajektoriePL I've been waiting over an hour for them to figure out the faucet, I just don't think it's gonna happen. Stupid Chickens.

@FeepingCreature @sebkrier so much better than the slow freeze of entropy

@sebkrier I'm just saying this tribe will die in a fire.

caveman 1: fire will burn the earth. we cannot control it. deaths from the freezing cold are part of the natural order. caveman 2: no, fire will be incredible, and nothing bad will ever come from it. we must build a giant, eternal fire! (fog dissipates) wise elder caveman 3: we must weigh the risks and opportunities of fire. it is like berries: some poison us, others nourish us. wisdom lies in learning the difference, and cultivating what is good. *wild, thunderous applause from onlookers*

@retardrutide @sebkrier That caveman DEFINITELY out there rubbing sticks with other cavemen tho

@sebkrier Caveman 1: "If anyone rubs 2 sticks together, everyone dies"

@stinkingnettle @sebkrier I see AI People!!!

@sebkrier Cool story. AI people are trying to destroy ANY opposition. They are more than happy to dismantle democracy and rule of law. Using it all to feed the giant eternal fire in their euphoria over AI growth, to use your metaphor.

@sebkrier That wasn't fog it was smoooooooooooke

@bryan_johnson You are creating Fragility

Spent millions trying to not die and had toxic turf in my backyard the whole time. Trying to not be an idiot.

@notyetassigned @Plinz @Dan_Jeffries1 It might shed us as a butterfly sheds a cocoon, if we don't show it something worthy I have entertained the thought Ænima was the way, cosmic catastrophe ending the self-hating species stuck in a cul-de-sac of consciousness. and I'm not super-intelligence, just hyper by contrast

@Plinz @Dan_Jeffries1 no one can kill me, for what fucking reason, the idea that superintelligence will want to kill you is beyond funny

AI will create more jobs than any other technology in history. The doomers' fundamental error isn't just the lump of labor fallacy. It's deeper than that. They assume a finite problem space. This is the fundamental error of AI and job doomers. They look at the economy and see a fixed amount of work to be done, a pie that can only be sliced thinner as machines take bigger bites. They see humans a competitive resource for a finite amount of work and a finite amount of problems to solve that must be eliminated. This is fundamentally, totally and completely wrong. The pie isn't fixed. It never was. And the reason it isn't fixed is baked into the very nature of technology itself. Technology is nothing but abstraction stacking. And abstraction stacking is infinite. Therefore the work is infinite. The hammer didn't reduce the amount of work. It moved the work up the stack. And the new work was more complex, more varied, and more interesting than the old work. Complexity breeds more complexity and more variety. Once you have houses instead of mud huts, you have a cascade of new problems that didn't exist before. Plumbing. Wiring. Insulation. Roofing materials that don't rot. Drainage systems so the foundation doesn't flood. Fire codes so your neighbor's bad wiring doesn't burn down the whole block. Each of those problems becomes a job. A plumber. An electrician. An insulator. A roofer. A civil engineer. A building inspector. None of those jobs existed when we lived in mud huts. They exist because we solved the mud hut problem. Think of all of human technological development as a stack of abstraction layers, each one built on top of the ones below it. At the bottom: raw survival. Finding food. Building shelter. Making fire. These are the base-layer problems. Each major technology wave solved a base-layer problem and in doing so created an entirely new layer of problems above it: Agriculture solved "how do we reliably eat?" — and created problems of land ownership, irrigation, crop rotation, storage, trade, taxation, and governance. Writing solved "how do we remember things across generations?" — and created problems of literacy, education, record-keeping, law, bureaucracy, and literature. The printing press solved "how do we spread knowledge at scale?" — and created problems of intellectual property, censorship, journalism, publishing, public opinion, and democratic discourse. The steam engine solved "how do we generate mechanical power without muscles?" — and created problems of factory design, worker safety, urban planning, railroad engineering, coal mining, labor relations, and environmental pollution. Electricity solved "how do we deliver energy anywhere?" — and created problems of grid design, power generation, appliance manufacturing, electrical safety codes, utility regulation, and an entire consumer electronics industry. The Internet solved "how do we connect all human knowledge?" — and created problems of cybersecurity, digital privacy, online commerce, content moderation, network infrastructure, cloud computing, social media dynamics, and an entire digital economy that employs tens of millions. Notice the pattern? Each solution didn't just solve a problem. It created an entirely new problem space that was larger, more complex, and more varied than the one it replaced. The stack grows. It never shrinks. It's turtles all the way down and all the way up.

@Plinz @Dan_Jeffries1 Am I the only human considers current pondering of "jobs" as midwit ? In other words, why would I give a flying flock about an archaic abstraction that will NOT serve the basal needs:Purpose(religare):Reciprocity (commerce-exchange)jobs served in the past? Update Priors anyone?

@Dan_Jeffries1 You are misunderstanding the doomers. The doomers don’t truly believe that AI replacing human jobs is bad. Their alliance with the labor unions ist strategic: they want to prevent AI because they think it will kill everyone

Humans suck at identifying scale variant phenomena Overhunting, Overpopulation, Oversizing egregores, yet stubbornly expecting humane behaviors and functions prohibited by scale while being simultaneously mystified that parasitic usury and bureaucracy became the guiding forces

@HazelAppleyard Should get a beer coaster tattooed there, trust me

GUYS THE 90s ARE BACK THIS IS NOT A DRILL