Dave

1.6K posts

Dave banner
Dave

Dave

@space__city

“The quieter you become, the more you can hear.”

Las Vegas, NV Katılım Ağustos 2013
26 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@ATevlovits59328 @JackPosobiec Sucking tit and licking clit, am I right my man?! Miller gonna fill ‘er , make dat baby batter go splatter.
English
0
0
0
20
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@OliviaMesser @Ally_Sammarco This case sounds super similar to the Danny Masterson trial. He got 30 years to life…with what’s already in the public there is a high probability he will be charged. I’m sure there is a ton that’s not out in the open yet. Dudes fucked.
English
0
0
0
63
Olivia Messer
Olivia Messer@OliviaMesser·
I have spent my entire career reporting on sexual misconduct by politicians. The barrier to publication anywhere with good lawyers is very, very high. Getting women to speak and share personal records and acquire corroboration from friends and colleagues is extremely difficult.
English
73
823
5.8K
442.4K
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@rohanpaul_ai Why would an Anthropocic Engineer have a roommate?!?! Thought they were making billlzzz
English
0
0
10
1.5K
Shrija
Shrija@plot_twistttt·
Hey @grok swap their fat & outfit
Shrija tweet media
English
921
314
31.7K
21.4M
علیرضا جاویدعربشاهی
⚡ Response to Trump’s threat with a quote from Martyr Ali Larijani Trump has threatened that if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened, he will strike Iran’s power grid. Martyr Ali Larijani [@alilarijani_ir] had previously responded to Trump in these words: x.com/alilarijani_ir… “If they hit Iran’s electricity, within half an hour the entire region will go dark, and darkness will be the best opportunity to hunt American troops.”
English
1
0
1
10.8K
Insurrection Barbie
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree·
Matt Walsh is doing what he does best constructing a clever-sounding logical argument on a foundation he didn’t bother to research. Here’s why it falls apart completely: The argument he’s making: If the program was obliterated in summer 2025, it cannot also be close to immune from attack in February 2026. Logical impossibility. Square circle. After the June 2025 Israeli strikes the IAEA confirmed Iran’s enrichment program was significantly set back. That’s obliterated in the sense that it was severely degraded not erased from existence permanently. Iran then spent eight months rebuilding. This is documented. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said in December 2025 that Iran appeared to be attempting to rebuild Fordow and said it suggested they “didn’t get the full message” from the June strikes. Iran moved approximately 408 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium to secret locations in deeply buried facilities at Isfahan before the February 2026 strikes. Iran announced it would build new advanced centrifuges after the IAEA censure. Iran reduced IAEA cooperation to hide its rebuilding progress. So the actual sequence is: June 2025 — program obliterated by Israeli strikes. June 2025 through February 2026 — Iran rebuilds in hardened underground facilities specifically designed to survive future strikes. February 2026 — program approaching immune status in those hardened facilities, requiring American B-2 bombers with bunker-buster MOPs that only the United States possesses to reach. Hope that clears things up.
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

We were told the program was “obliterated” in the summer. That’s what they told us. Direct quote. It cannot be the case that the program was both obliterated and also close to being “immune” to attack. That is a logical impossibility. A contradiction in terms. Like a square circle. It makes no sense.

English
140
381
2.4K
99.2K
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@omarrahman He knew the NYTimes piece was dropping, trying to get in front of it, still looks like a complete idiot
English
0
0
7
2.7K
Omar H. Rahman
Omar H. Rahman@omarrahman·
After Sec Hegseth's blundering presser today, Sec. Marco Rubio is now weighing in on American rationale/war objectives. They are two-fold: 1. America had to attack Iran NOW because Israel was preparing to attack, and Iran would have retaliated against American military assets. -This is not very credible because Iran didn't retaliate against American assets last June until the US itself attacked. Iran is not interested in unnecessarily bringing the US into a war. They would have much preferred a bilateral engagement with Israel. 2. Not only can Iran not have nuclear enrichment capabilities, but it cannot have conventional military capabilities either, because the latter supports the former. Iran was becoming too strong as a conventional power, which would insulate its nuclear program from attack. Therefore America must dismantle Iran's conventional weapons capabilities, including missiles and navy. -This is circular logic and a demand that no sovereign state would comply with, especially one in the Middle East. Three days into this war and we've had rolling justifications from American leaders, including Trump, Hegseth and Rubio. #Rubio #marcorubio
English
5
28
269
214K
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
If you’re a proponent of this war, so be it. Make your case. But lecturing skeptics for not “trusting Trump” is the dumbest argument you could possibly make. It is perfectly reasonable for American to be skeptical of regime change wars in the Middle East. Trump himself was skeptical of them. The idea that we are obligated to just assume it’s a good move because Trump decided to do it is asinine, not to mention un-American.
English
3K
2.1K
22.5K
1.2M
Pro-America | Politics & Markets
@MattWalshBlog I'm totally fine with wars that remove evil dictators that have killed thousands of Americans that last 48 hours. Sign me up for those kinds of wars. Are we now at the point where we can't distinguish between that and spending 20 years in Afghanistan?
English
68
7
183
10.3K
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
🚨BREAKING: TMZ says there has just been activity spotted in the Bitcoin wallet from the alleged Guthrie ransom note. This is the address tied to the first note that demanded millions in BTC. The deadline passed over 24 hrs ago, but now funds appear to be moving in.
English
49
88
749
1.8M
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@jaketapper Hope they find Nancy tonight ❤️
English
0
1
8
2.1K
Jake Tapper 🦅
Jake Tapper 🦅@jaketapper·
Pima County sheriffs dept deputies and the FBI have detained a person for questioning in the Nancy Guthrie case based on investigative leads, a law enforcement official familiar with the investigation tells CNN. The person, who has not been charged, was located south of Tucson.
English
37
75
626
119.9K
Jon
Jon@Jonatha85127147·
@seanhannity A medical emergency? She ripped her doorbell cam of during the medical emergency? She bled on only a few tiles and then wandered off into desert with no further blood trail? Cancel that 3rd option right away.
English
2
0
6
1.7K
Sean Hannity 🇺🇸
Sean Hannity 🇺🇸@seanhannity·
Dan Bongino lays out three troubling possibilities in the Nancy Guthrie case, saying the lack of early answers suggests either a calculated crime or that the initial story may not be the full truth “I see three possibilities. The first is that this was obviously a kidnapping—an intended kidnapping for a ransom payment. The second possibility is that this was just a crime that went awry. Someone was at the house, maybe it was a burglary, something went bad, and you have some bad actors committing another crime by requesting a ransom for something they didn’t do, just to take advantage of a situation like this. The third possibility is that there may have been some kind of medical emergency or something, and maybe this was not a kidnapping. When you can’t find someone in a crime scene like this right away, within the first couple of days, you either have really good, surgical-type operators, or the story you’ve been told—or believed—might not be the story.”
English
715
452
4.4K
794.8K
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@Timcast So was TRUMP. I guess they both must be guilty.
English
0
0
0
7
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@Recon1_ZA It’s a fucking whistle. Calm down there.
English
1
0
20
435
𝖱𝖤𝖢𝖮𝖭𝟣 ®✞
Chaps, there's a reason these demonstrators are using whistles, horns, and making so much noise in all the video clips you are watching. They don't do these when protesting climate change or LGBTQ rights. Those sudden, impulsive noises trigger the acoustic startle response. It's a rapid, involuntary reaction mediated by the brainstem, involving muscle tension, elevated heart rate, and adrenaline release. That repetitive exposure from them fatigues neural pathways but sustains heightened arousal, diverting cognitive resources from higher-order tasks to basic threat monitoring. It is an acute stressor, activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic nervous system, which releases cortisol and adrenaline. Long exposure to this stuff impairs prefrontal cortex function critical for decision making. Pair this with the sheer annoyance, these tactics are a low-tech escalation of protest disruption, rooted in documented physiological responses to noise. In layman's terms, they're putting these officers on edge and triggering them to act. Pretti and Good was exactly what they wanted. It's usually someone else who ends up dying and not the instigator. This is a great example. Watch the guy at the rear strike an officer against the head with an object. These officers, already on edge, are very likely to react to something like that. When someone ends up getting hurt, they're all innocent. These events aren't random. These are organised tactics. 80% of the people protesting aren't aware that they're being used by their own team as cannon fodder to generate outrage.
English
2.3K
9.3K
35.4K
2.8M
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@willchamberlain I’d still blame the pilot, a lil whistle gonna make you crash? Pussy shit
English
0
0
0
12
Will Chamberlain
Will Chamberlain@willchamberlain·
To extend your analogy, if a plane hit turbulence and then passengers started barging into the cockpit and blowing rape whistles in the pilot's ear, and then the pilot crashed the plane, you might not blame the pilot
Josh Raby@JoshRaby

I’ve said this before but: If a plane hit turbulence and the pilot panicked, aimed the nose to the ground and crashed, no one would say “Well, you try flying a plane in turbulence.” They would say “That is a bad pilot. That’s not how pilots should handle things.”

English
60
317
4.1K
137.6K
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@willchamberlain This is a pretty retarded take. Trump Is gonna change his mind tomorrow and blame the agent, you’ll look like the tool bag you are.
English
0
0
1
21
Will Chamberlain
Will Chamberlain@willchamberlain·
"A protester, armed with a camera phone in his hand," False. He had a SIG Sauer P320 pistol on his person. "defends a woman being harassed by ICE agents" False. She wasn't being harassed. She was being lawfully pushed back from an active law enforcement operation. "and puts his body between them and her." That's a federal crime. "He does not fight them. He does not strike them." Irrelevant. He physically obstructs them. That's a crime. 18 USC 111. "They then take him to the ground, overwhelm him with at least 7 agents, hit him in the head repeatedly with the pepper spray canister they sprayed him with." That's because he was violently resisting arrest. Another federal crime. "Then, after one agent finds his lawfully carried gun," False, he's required to have ID on him while he carries. "they disarm him, and then shoot him in the back when he is clearly not a threat." One officer disarmed him. Another officer shot him, almost certainly unaware that he had been disarmed. Clearly it wasn't "clear" to that officer that he wasn't a threat. Perhaps you morons should stop using eardrum-damaging rape whistles when ICE is trying to arrest people. "Then, as the man is shot on the ground, a different agent claps and celebrates, while another decides to shoot him a few more times in the back for good measure." False and defamatory. You have some real soul searching to do, Tom.
Tom Santos@tommysantos14

A moment of clarity for the MAGA folks willing to think things through objectively: A protester, armed with a camera phone in his hand, defends a woman being harassed by ICE agents and puts his body between them and her. He does not fight them. He does not strike them. He does not brandish his concealed gun and shoot at them. THIS IS WHAT THE VIDEOS SHOW, so save your fucked-up made-up gaslighting. They then take him to the ground, overwhelm him with at least 7 agents, hit him in the head repeatedly with the pepper spray canister they sprayed him with. Then, after one agent finds his lawfully carried gun, they disarm him, and then shoot him in the back when he is clearly not a threat. Then, as the man is shot on the ground, a different agent claps and celebrates, while another decides to shoot him a few more times in the back for good measure. That is what happened. That is what the videos show. They show the execution of an American citizen that should have never happened. Now... If you are posting on this platform about this incident and your narrative is anything resembling "well, I mean... 🤷‍♂️ He should have never been there in the first place," you have some real soul searching to do.

English
442
468
2.6K
107.2K
@JustSayPatriot
@JustSayPatriot@LadyPat16997097·
@Timcast Trump is the GOAT of deal making. I'm certain he has a plan beyond what we are being told. And Watz is caving because he and his cronies are in the hot seat with the Signal leak and fraud exposure.
English
4
0
21
1.2K
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@LauraAboli_X You’re a fucking idiot. This is literally psychotic.
English
0
0
0
2
Laura Aboli Official
Laura Aboli Official@LauraAboli_X·
🔥 Scott Ritter makes a claim that, if true, reframes everything… According to Ritter, Trump’s last-minute decision not to trigger an attack on Iran was not hesitation, but a deliberate move to dismantle a long-prepared regime-change operation involving Mossad, the CIA, and the usual neocon war hawks. The way Ritter describes it, Trump allowed these actors to believe he was fully aligned with their objective. At Mar-a-Lago he came to an agreement with Netanyahu. He let them plan, activate networks and position assets. In other words, he let the operation reach the point of maximum exposure, and then, at the very last moment, he didn’t pull the trigger. Iran, allegedly alerted by Russia (with Trump’s knowledge? 🤔) moved in time to dismantle the entire covert network. Assets were rolled up, communications were compromised, the entire infrastructure was destroyed. Finito. Bear in mind, these kinds of intelligence networks take years, sometimes decades, to build, so once exposed, they don’t simply get rebuilt, the capability itself disappears. So if this account holds, Trump didn’t just stop a regime-change operation in that moment. He removed the ability to carry one out in the foreseeable future, (at least under Israel’s terms). But the genius of it doesn’t stop there… By allowing the situation to escalate right up to the edge, Trump also forced Iran into believing an attack was imminent. And when a regime truly believes the moment has arrived, it reveals itself; emergency protocols get activated, military movements occur, communication pathways change and leadership protection mechanisms are triggered. In other words, Iran showed its hand. That response; how they move, what they protect, what they prioritise, what they trigger, is priceless intelligence, which you only get it when the other side believes it’s real. Israel and the intelligence hawks were allowed to overextend and expose their covert machinery. Iran was pressured into revealing its defensive response. No war was launched, no missiles fired, but the strategic balance changed completely. If this was a carefully premeditated plan by Trump, as Ritter suggests, then it was nothing short of genius; warmongers were neutralised, the adversary was exposed, war was avoided and Trump walks away with all the leverage. That’s strategic mastery, and it’s exactly why Trump continues to confound both his enemies and his supposed allies. @NakedHedgie @eko @realMrTruthBomb @KAGdrogo @jamiemcintyre21
English
1.1K
2.1K
7.9K
1.2M
Dave
Dave@space__city·
@RealCandaceO Narcissism doesn’t have to be overt. This type of behavior, subjecting kids to it for decades, does real harm. Death by a 1000 cuts. Its function is to look harmless, but its real world affect is absolutely abuse.
English
0
0
0
13
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz have never worked a day in their entire lives. They really do believe they are suffering over a wedding dress and a typical in-law disagreement. Zero adversity in life is what creates this phenomena. People worldwide are starving, dying, and being slaughtered in their hometowns— but poor Brooklyn and Nicola had a dust-up at their billionaire wedding. They are so wealthy, they were then able to organize another wedding to make up for the first— but they want the public to realize how stressful it is that they had to have TWO multi-million dollar weddings because his brother said something mean to him and his mother danced with him at the wrong time. Truly traumatizing. Pray for them. 🫠🫠🫠
English
1.3K
3.1K
36.5K
2.9M