Josh

@D5423587549223 Christ Jesus does

@spiffster28 Who does?

Our Lady of Lourdes,intercede for us.

@nelmjn @Cboze1217 @CatholicQuote12 Your using something scripture does call us to do, pray for one another, to argue that Mary who is in paradise somehow intercedes for us, even though there is no Scripture to support such theology.

@spiffster28 @Cboze1217 @CatholicQuote12 Ah…you don’t read well, I guess (see previous comment).

@nelmjn @Cboze1217 @CatholicQuote12 The dead don’t intercede

@Cboze1217 @CatholicQuote12 Don’t ever have any of your family or friends pray for you…can’t have any of that evil interceding going on.

@Joel7Richardson @Protestia I wouldn’t classify what brown did as a disease. Just straight up sin. Disease implies he can’t help it

'I was abusive...I was a wolf. I was a wolf....I was a revenous wolf whose conscience was seared..that's where my heart was.' Jonathan Welton, whose ministry imploded 7 years ago after he was caught engaging in sexual misconduct, released a video candidly acknowledging this.

@TheMuppetPastor Oh I agree, just giving context to the reaction they have

@spiffster28 Yes it is understandable. I get that. But it’s still wrong even if it’s understandable if it denies what the Bible says.

The sad God of cessationism lacks power, and binds Himself only to a Bible , which itself testifies of God frequently speaking to others audibly and without record in scripture. We don’t know exactly what God said to Deborah, Nathan, Hilda’s, Anna, Huldah, yet we know He did even if the exact words aren’t in the bible. I understand many people lie, but this is tossing out the baby with the bath water. 1 John tells us to test every spirit against scripture, not outright deny it. Who are we to disregard this?

@patristicpill That’s a straw-man argument, as if there r only these two options that only go to support your argument. History in general and church history is much more complicated than that

If the visible Church fell into corruption immediately after the apostles, then Christ failed to preserve His Church If He preserved it, Protestantism is unnecessary …that is the dilemma

@RodAVanier Yeah, how dare homeowners be allowed to defend themselves

Not a chance. The use of reasonable force is already permitted. PP wants permission for home owners to use unreasonable force in defense of their home. How American is that!

@MikeWingerii A crazy dude

"There's a realm in the Spirit where you lead him [Jesus]" Brian Simmons teaching Song of Solomon, from his own translation of the Bible.

@markalancraig @HabitualLinest @CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff That’s the entire point of us Protestants, we care what the Bible says not this denomination or that. Any denomination is only as good as they are faithful to the Scriptures

@HabitualLinest @spiffster28 @CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff Basically, each is going to think that they are correct, because that's why they believe what they believe. Rome believes what it believes because it believes it is correct. Others believe what they believe because they think that they are correct. What does the Bible say?

The Roman Catholic backlash to @gavinortlund and @WesleyLHuff has been instructive. Both men are irenic, careful, and respectful in how they address what they believe are errors in Roman Catholic doctrine. Yet both have drawn deeply personal attacks for their apologetic work. This raises an important question many Protestants are asking: why do thoughtful, respectful critiques of Roman Catholicism often provoke such a visceral response? The visceral reaction many Catholics have when Rome is challenged makes sense once we understand the Roman Catholic system. Rome is not merely one church among others in their theology. It is the visible institution possessing the fullness of the means of salvation, the sacramental economy, the authentic interpretation of Scripture and Tradition, and the Petrine office of universal authority. Therefore, to challenge Rome is not received as a mere doctrinal disagreement. Rather, it is received as an attack on the what they believe is the very structure by which Christ supposedly teaches, governs, absolves, and saves. In contrast, Protestants are less threatened by challenges to a particular church tradition because Protestantism, at its best, does not locate salvation in institutional submission. The Baptist does not need the Baptist church to be indefectible. The Presbyterian does not need every presbytery to be incapable of grave error. The Lutheran does not need Wittenberg to be the necessary center of visible unity. Protestants argue fiercely, but their assurance rests finally in Christ’s finished work received by faith, not in the claim that one visible hierarchy or institution uniquely dispenses the fullness of saving grace. That is the real issue: Rome’s authority claims make historical criticism an existential threat. Protestantism can admit that church history is messy because the visible Church is always in need of reform. Protestants can also recognize ambiguity in the historical record and draw reasoned conclusions that differ from others without collapsing the faith. Rome cannot do this so easily. If too much historical complexity is admitted, Rome’s claim to be the indefectible guardian and interpreter of the apostolic deposit begins to weaken. History must produce clear answers because Rome must show that she has always taught what she now requires believers to confess—whether baptismal regeneration, Eucharistic transubstantiation, or papal supremacy. If the historical record shows change, ambiguity, contradiction, or later accretion rather than apostolic continuity, the entire sacerdotal system is threatened. So when a Roman Catholic lashes out at a protestant theologian or historian who is making an argument that runs counter to the approved narrative, the issue is often deeper than the topic being debated. The Protestant is arguing about history or doctrine. The Catholic may feel that their whole edifice of certainty, grace, authority, and salvation is being pulled down. And in a sense, the Catholic is right to feel critical importance of the stakes. If Rome is wrong about herself, then she is not merely wrong about secondary matters. She is wrong about the very place she has assigned herself between Christ and the believer.

@sunnyright Crazy

I have an extended family member deep down the Owens/Tucker/Fuentes rabbit hole, and you can’t imagine how basically woke these people are now on Islam and a slew of people who are commies but also hate Jews.

@SarahisCensored To be fair he did knock her up without marrying her, like with every other of his children. Children need more than just money to grow well. Overall they’re both in the wrong putting their selfish desires first

In January 2026, Elon Musk publicly announced on X that he would file for full custody of his son. Ashley pushed back on that. Elon also provided Ashley with a $2.5 million lump sum and is sending $500,000 per year ($41,667 per month) in ongoing payments. Ashley pushed BACK on Elon’s involvement, and she is praising some other guy for “stepping up” as if to assume Elon didn’t? Okay.

@bryanrbeal @TrentTelenko Cool, but it would help if we took in real concerns like the hiking of power rates. So we should build more nuclear power plants

The fact China is working overtime to spread propaganda opposing American data centers is all you need to know about why we need to build more of them

@HabitualLinest @CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff He answered your question, but you are t willing to listen so there’s nothing anyone could say to help you understand.

@spiffster28 @CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff Ironic, since you haven't answered my question

@HabitualLinest @CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff Your inability to admit you’re wrong is impressive

@CBT_91 @rickbrennanjr @gavinortlund @WesleyLHuff It's pretty crazy that you admit you don't know who has the complete Christian faith

@jyapsalot Yes cause ai never lies

Andrew Kolvet denying that the Charlie Kirk show is distributed by a registered foreign Agent of Israel & Grok saying…Yes it is 😂

@RepThomasMassie @5149jamesli @jchodagam @grok Wow what a scumbag you’ve become

@5149jamesli @jchodagam .@grok, is it true that the Charlie Kirk Show is now distributed by a registered foreign agent of Israel?

FYI, this show is now being run by a registered foreign agent of Israel. Seriously look it up, I'm not joking.

The 250th Anniversary of the USA is on July 4th, and we are releasing this limited-edition commemorative watch for just $317.76. Assembled in the USA, it features a quartz movement, sapphire crystal, and 100M W/R. Wasson: For the man who knows what time it is.

I need everyone to share this. This is a 14-year-old Palestinian boy who tried to stab IDF soldiers to death. The anti-Israel crowd edited the video to make it look like they killed him for no reason. This is the full unedited version. Please make this go viral.