Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!

18.8K posts

Don't blame me, you invested in garbage! banner
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!

Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!

@subach

Haha Money Vacuum go Burrr!

Katılım Eylül 2008
576 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
Fed: It's important to manage inflation expectations least it become phycologically entrenched. Everyone: "Fed will pivot the moment something breaks or a recession starts, #inflation will come roaring back" Banks fail Fed: 25bp Everyone: repeat "" surely the #Pivot is soon
English
0
0
3
2.7K
Nostra, House of Gold
Nostra, House of Gold@Nostre_damus·
Iran has a population (92MM) larger than the last 4 countries the US went to war with and lost Afghanistan 2001 - 20MM Iraq 2003 - 35MM North Vietnam 1965 - 18MM North Korea 1950 - 10MM
English
28
92
876
29.8K
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage! retweetledi
Jim Breuer
Jim Breuer@JimBreuer·
Different face, same script. The channel changes but the show never does.
English
47
134
748
14.9K
Tom Moyer 🇺🇸
Tom Moyer 🇺🇸@TomMoyerUT·
I think most people know this, but it’s worth saying anyway. Gas is the current long-duration energy storage. The system works because gas is available to fill the gaps - and that’s fine. Renewables compete with gas *operating* cost. They cut fuel use and help meet summer peaks.
Craig Lawrence@clawrence

Renewables advocates in Texas, natural gas is your friend not your enemy. Solar ramped up from 0GW at 7am to 20GW at 9am. The only way that works is because natural gas fired power plants could ramp down that quickly. Batteries certainly helped, and will continue to take more of that burden. But natural gas is your friend.

English
10
6
38
4.9K
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@gnoble79 I get some of this sentiment, but EM* is going to massively underperform in any environment /w high energy and commodity prices. The US will outperform though some sectors will suffer, and EU will be a dumpster fire. *Ex a few commodity producers.
English
0
0
0
16
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ JUST HANDED YOU THE TRADE OF THE DECADE And most investors are looking in completely the wrong direction. Brent crude closed above $103 on Friday. Up nearly 40% since the strikes began on February 28. The Strait of Hormuz is effectively shut down. Insurance companies have canceled war risk coverage. Over 150 ships are stranded. Tanker traffic has collapsed to near zero. The IEA just called it the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market. Nearly 20 million barrels per day of crude and product flows have been choked off. The US is scrambling. The IEA coordinated the release of 400 million barrels from strategic reserves, the largest such action ever. Trump ordered emergency insurance for tankers. The Navy was told to begin escort operations. But behind closed doors, Navy officials told tanker executives there's currently NO availability for escorts. And no guarantees there will be. Iran holds the upper hand. And the market knows it. But here's why this matters far beyond the oil price: What we're witnessing is the EMification of America in real time. The US launched strikes in the middle of nuclear negotiations. The executive branch has been attacking central bank independence. Budget deficits are running at levels historically associated with emerging market economies. Erratic policymaking. Massive fiscal deficits. Judicial interference with monetary policy. These are EMERGING MARKET characteristics, and yet the US equity market still carries a premium developed market valuation. That premium is evaporating. Emerging markets returned 33% in 2025. The S&P 500 returned 17%. Almost DOUBLE the outperformance. And 2026 is accelerating the trend. Here's what the consensus is missing: EM macro is BETTER than developed market macro right now. Budget deficits as a percent of GDP? Lower in EM. Debt levels? Lower. Inflation? Lower. Forecasted earnings growth? HIGHER. EM earnings are expected to grow 21% to 29% this year versus 13% to 14% for the U.S. Brazilian equities are trading at roughly 9 times CAPE earnings. About HALF where they traded during the last EM rally in 2018. And the positioning is absurd: US institutional investors have essentially not owned China since Trump 1.0. Most portfolio managers working today weren't even in the business the last time EM led, which was 2001 to 2008. Everyone is out of position. Now layer in commodities: The digital eats the physical. Without copper, silicon, aluminum, and power, there IS no AI. Full stop. And fossil fuels and renewables are rallying AT THE SAME TIME. That tells you the world has a massive power demand problem that isn't going away. Oil above $100. Gold above $4,600. Silver above $85. Copper near all-time highs. The commodity super-cycle is confirming itself in real time. The Iran conflict just poured gasoline on it. Now here's the setup: Emerging market equities, China and Latin America in particular. Commodities across the board. Energy, industrial metals, precious metals. And what to avoid? Long-duration developed market sovereign debt. Overweight positions in the Mag 7, priced for a world where everything goes right and nothing disrupts the AI spending fantasy. Leadership batons in global markets shift in multi-year cycles. The US led from 2009 through 2024. 15 years. Now we're in the early innings of a multi-year rotation into emerging markets and commodities. The flows follow the performance. The performance follows the earnings. And the earnings are now better in EM than in the US. At a fraction of the valuation. With better macro fundamentals. And almost nobody owns it. This is the trade.
English
133
279
1.7K
433.4K
Oh Come On!
Oh Come On!@BluthCapital·
@KlendathuCap This is your worst take (among generally good ones). Although you may fall backward into a goldmine because of this release decision. Everybody knows extended angry family infighting across generations and quarrels over spice stuffing allocation is...a Thanksgiving thing.
Oh Come On! tweet media
English
2
0
0
190
TalesFromTheFuture - now also on BSKY 🦋
Here are my very rough Tesla Terafab estimates: CAPEX (1 fab): $35+ BILLION CAPEX (Terafab scale): $80+ BILLION First silicon: ~2030+ Mass production: 2032+ I’m probably even optimistic with the timeline given that Tesla has no expertise in this sector. #timestamp $TSLA $TSLAQ
TalesFromTheFuture - now also on BSKY 🦋@talesftf

I’m pretty sure that Musk will backtrack like a scared weasel once he realizes the cap-ex numbers for his Tesla “Terafab” BS dreams…. $TSLA $TSLAQ reuters.com/business/autos…

English
8
4
31
7.2K
Craig Lawrence
Craig Lawrence@clawrence·
@theripsnorter Try to get a 20-year contract for natural gas and tell me what price the ratepayers of MA will pay. This sounds like a smart hedge against future gas price increases, which are completely unpredictable, regardless of how many pipelines we build.
English
1
0
2
188
RIP MASSACHUSETTS
RIP MASSACHUSETTS@theripsnorter·
Remember when officials said Offshore Wind (OSW) would be cheaper? Even recently Ed Markey said Vineyard Wind (VW) when completed would deliver electricity to the grid at "a fraction of the cost of current wholesale prices." In 2024, with low gas prices, the wholesale price of electricity was $39.50/MWh. In 2025, with higher gas prices, it was $68.50/MWh. Now with VW fully operational, MA ratepayers will be forced to pay ~$80/MWh for everything the turbines generate because we locked ourselves into a fixed price (with escalation) over 20 years. Unless gas prices rise substantially, OSW was a bad deal for MA ratepayers. And of course, they don't want the lower and stable gas prices that would come with more pipelines — otherwise they would look even more foolish. The only saving grace — VW output will represent only 6-6.5% of MA load and hopefully only add ~$2 to your monthly bill.
RIP MASSACHUSETTS tweet media
Cape Cod Times@capecodtimes

Vineyard Wind 1 completes turbine installation after court ruling capecodtimes.com/story/news/env…

English
13
30
94
6.8K
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@Biohazard3737 Iran imports 1/3rd of their calories, and pretty much all their electronics, machinery, and other essential items to not go back to the stone age. Most of these come from China and India. They have to get the straights open to Chinese and Indian vessels soon...
English
0
0
0
92
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@relacxvii @JoshYoung Only Japan, SK, and PH. I suspect they'll get whatever they need from re-exports similar to how EU gets Russian oil via India. ~6-7 million b/day shut-in we get 90 $WTI and high LNG prices. Really dream scenario for the US economy!
English
1
0
0
69
rel
rel@relacxvii·
@subach @JoshYoung India, SEA, rest of Asia (Japan/SK) are all allies of the US/Israel.
English
1
0
0
50
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@JoshYoung That means it's mostly open. >50% of the oil coming through the straight goes to China, India, and the rest of Asia and SEA. Europe will get theirs via the Saudi pipeline. However, LNG flows are different story. It's a golden scenario of the US!
English
1
0
1
112
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@adam_tooze This is the system that identified a girls school in Iran as a target. Some analyst probably looked at it on the screen for 5 seconds before clicking "approve" to "close a kill chain....
English
0
1
44
2.5K
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage!
@shehzadhqazi It doesn't matter if they'd be breaking their own blockade. They must open the straight to Chinese and Indian cargoes! 1/3rd of their calories are imported, and almost all of their tech and machinery.
Don't blame me, you invested in garbage! tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
Shehzad Qazi
Shehzad Qazi@shehzadhqazi·
From yesterday and worth reading
Michael McNair@michaeljmcnair

If Iran allows Chinese cargoes through the Strait of Hormuz, it will break its own blockade. Iran can’t create a blockade that inflicts pain on everyone except China. That’s not how commodity markets work. Commodities like oil are fungible. The benefit China gets from a carve out doesnt stay contained in China, even if Beijing wants it to. It spreads through the entire global market. Every extra Gulf barrel China buys is one less barrel it has to buy from the rest of the world. In theory, nearly all Gulf supply could reroute through China. But the point isnt whether China literally takes every barrel. It’s that the more Gulf oil China buys, the less oil it has to buy from everyone else. And it is the act of China buying less from the rest of the world that transmits the relief globally. Trade routes change, and prices re-equilibrate. That doesnt mean prices fall all the way back to the exact pre-war price. There would still be frictions. But it would dramatically loosen the market, especially relative to the alarmist view. So Iran can’t have it both ways. It can’t maintain a blockade that economically punishes everyone else while sparing China. If China gets through at scale, China becomes the relief valve for the world. So they either keep the strait closed to everyone or the blockade breaks. China and Iran must understand this. Which means the real game for China probably isn’t securing a full scale carve out immediately. China’s leverage is highest while the threat of the blockade remains real, and prices remain elevated, and Beijing can broker from a position of maximum leverage. The moment Chinese passage opens at scale, that leverage starts to evaporate along with the scarcity premium. The US needs to understand this. If Iran wants to give China a shipping carve out, let them. It will gut the blockade and the benefits will be shared globally. If Iran lets China through, it breaks the blockade. If it keeps China out, it isolates itself from its only lifeline. Either way, the Strait is unlikely to stay closed for long…Which is why 6 month oil futures are still trading with a 7 handle.

English
1
0
3
877
The_Real_Fly
The_Real_Fly@The_Real_Fly·
BAHRAIN
Français
7
18
149
12.8K
Josh Young
Josh Young@JoshYoung·
The key oil supply chokepoint for oil is blocked, and oil prices can't sustain a bid. Odd.
Josh Young tweet media
English
8
1
45
5.1K