Eric_Sugi🇺🇲

@Mangalawyer Every wedding ive ever been too the Groom says they were saved by the Bride. Usually saving the men from themselves. And 007 is known for being reckless

Apparently in the New Diverse 007 First Light videogame. James bond is saved by a woman 3 times including the end

Trump appears to have forgotten today that he posted the same rambling message, word for word, about his war in Iran 1 week ago.

@kenndroooo @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 One look at ur timeline and I can see I hit the nail right on the head. Hit dogs holler as they say

@sugi_eric @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 no but youre saying undesirable like i said that. dont put words in others mouth ya little bitch

Presidential tier list (in my lifetime)

Trump is set to visit Walter Reed on Tuesday for his 3rd checkup in 13 months. The White House touts reports he's in "exceptional" health. Outside physicians said there are legitimate health questions about the nearly 80-year-old president. wapo.st/4f5wJ4j

@_kityru @kenndroooo @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 Do those secret police refuse to identify themselves, wear masks, r flown out of state after murdering citizens, and have complete immunity as described by our current VP. Wait they don't? So ur entire argument is so bad faith that even u know its bullshit? How embarrassing

@sugi_eric @kenndroooo @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 Bro there's also a non secret police (the audacity doing it in the open!) rounding up other undesirables (also known by the stigmatizing name of "criminals")

@Heavenly_Race_ This guy is so stupid he is incapable of communicating with people of lower intelligence. Trying to teach his dog how to sit or fetch is proving too difficult for him

Once you hit about a 20-point IQ gap, communication starts to completely break down. It's not that the lower IQ person is "stupid" (although that can often be the case) or the higher one is arrogant, it's that you're literally operating on different systems. A 20 point difference (roughly 1.3 standard deviations) means: Vocabulary and abstraction levels diverge sharply. What feels like crystal clear logic to one side sounds like vague, pretentious word salad to the other. Jokes land flat. Metaphors get taken literally. Complex cause and effect chains get simplified into "this good, that bad." Different time horizons and pattern recognition. One person thinks in months or years and sees systems, the other is locked into days or immediate rewards. Trying to explain second order effects feels like speaking another language. Also, processing speed and working memory gaps. The higher IQ person is already three steps ahead, getting impatient. The lower IQ person feels talked down to or overwhelmed. Both walk away frustrated. Both have wasted each others time.

@TheModerateCase Yes exactly. This is why Trump's decision to attack Iran may have been the single dumbest fucking move any President has ever made. Look at how quickly and thoroughly he has compromised the entire region along with our ability to project military force abroad. Trump fucked us

Most Americans seriously have no clue how important the Gulf states are to American power in the Middle East. The Gulf is basically the front porch of the Iranian regime. That region is where America can project power, monitor Iran, defend shipping lanes, coordinate air defense, track Iranian terror networks, protect world energy flows, and essentially keep Tehran from feeling like it can just dominate the whole region through Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and militias in Iraq and Syria. People seem to not understand that Iran built a regional network. Specifically, one to solely target and destabilize the west, while benefiting itself. So America needs a regional network too. You do not and cannot weaken Iran by standing alone and pretending the geography here doesn’t matter. You weaken Iran by making sure it is boxed in by countries that can share intelligence, host U.S. forces, buy American defense systems, normalize with each other, and make the regime understand that every move it makes has a cost. Not every Gulf government is perfect. But foreign policy is not kindergarten. It’s not about only working with countries that pass a purity test invented by people who have never had to secure a shipping lane (or even understand how this works), deter missile attacks, or deal with a regime that uses terror groups as foreign policy. Without the Gulf states, the Strait of Hormuz becomes harder to protect. Israel and Arab partners become harder to defend, sanctions become harder to enforce, our regional deterrence gets weaker, and Iran gets a lot more room to breathe. The Gulf alliance is simply about leverage. The Gulf States do not like Iran. They fear a powerful Iran, especially one that acts as the hegemonic power over the oil flows. When you are dealing with the Iranian regime, leverage is everything. More Americans should take it upon themselves to be educated on this region and the geopolitical implications it has in relation to America, rather than whining on the internet about things they have no idea about. Unfortunately, America is very illiterate and dumb, especially when it comes to media and media literacy.

@kenndroooo @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 Before I respond earnestly r u an actual nazi and/or white supremacist? Cause its kinda pointless to explain how "undesirables" was Jews yesterday, but immigrants today. But if ur a racist who thinks non-whites r subhuman than whats the point.

@sugi_eric @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 who are the undesirables exactly

@kenndroooo @Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 There is literally, currently, a secret police force rounding up undesirables and putting them in camps with no oversight or care.

@Ravens_Realest @Abraham48977550 thinking anything is like nazi germany in this day and age is a sign youre stupid

ولعن الله امة سمعت بذلك فرضيت به

How the case of the "Broadview Six" ends: With jaw-dropping revelations — days before trial — that could haunt the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s office for years. My UPDATED @Suntimes story on the permanent dismissal of their criminal charges: chicago.suntimes.com/immigration/20…

Trump and Gabbard claim she's leaving due to her husband's health, but Reuters reports "the ​White House ‌forced her to ⁠resign" reuters.com/world/white-ho…

Guess I wasn't clear enough... If you went to the Capitol on January 6, and when the violence began, you DID NOT TURN AROUND, WALK AWAY AND GO HOME, but rather joined in, then you participated in an attack on America, you are a traitor, and you should be stripped of your citizenship and deported. Clear enough?

Officer Eugene Goodman deserves compensation not the insurrectionists.

Spoke with @washingtonpost about the #SanDiego mosque shooting. My take: - This was a planned, deliberate, and ideologically driven neo-Nazi accelerationist attack, rooted in white supremacist ideology and modeled on the Christchurch massacre. The perpetrators used livestreaming, symbols, and a manifesto as core propaganda tools. - Livestreaming: The goal was to spread hatred, inspire copycats, achieve viral fame (or a twisted sense of “immortality”), and transform the attack into effective propaganda. The helmet-cam first-person perspective deliberately mimics video games to appeal to young, online audiences. - Symbols & Ideology: Nazi, white supremacist, and accelerationist insignias (linked to Atomwaffen Division and The Base) demonstrate a deep ideological alignment with the transnational neo-Nazi echosystem. - The manifesto: The attackers expressed hatred toward multiple groups, including Muslims, Jews, Black people, and Hispanics. They sought to trigger a race war to create a pro-White ethnostate. The symbols served as in-group signals on fringe platforms, marking the attack as part of an ongoing “crusade.” - Tarrant Link: Brenton Tarrant occupies an almost mythical status in far-right accelerationist circles and is widely regarded as the pioneer of modern livestreamed, manifesto-driven terrorist attacks. The shooters calling themselves “Sons of Tarrant” is significant — it signals not just inspiration, but a conscious claim of continuity and succession in this violent legacy. - Bottom line: This was a propaganda-of-the-deed operation rooted in violent far-right online subculture, designed for recognition, celebration, and emulation within it. It carries a clear risk of inspiring further attacks. Suppressing the spread of their material is essential, though only one of several URGENTLY NEEDED MEASURES to protect communities, support the victims and their families, and prevent the radicalization of young people online into hateful forms of violent extremism. Thanks to @drewharwell for the great questions. washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/05…

The $1.8 billion slush fund isn't simply old-school corruption, done on a bigger scale. My latest for @nytopinion ...

The upshot: "It is a roach motel. Money goes in, nothing comes out. We, the taxpaying members of the public, will pay $1.776 billion dollars to Donald Trump's five handpicked people who will do with it whatever they want." More on the "Star Chamber" allrisenews.com/p/tonight-in-y…

It's hilarious to watch Trump's DOJ stumble over itself to claim something isn't rightwing extremism. The San Diego killers cited neo-Nazi books, worshipped neo-Nazi leaders, ripped off a neo-Nazi documentary about "White Terror." But it's just "nihilism"? cbsnews.com/news/san-diego…

New newsletter: THE END OF MORALITY AND THE RISE OF THE 'MORAL BLANK CHECK' Within a 48 hour period this week, Trump: - got out of a $100m IRS fine - secured IRS "immunity" for his family - created a $1.8b slush fund for his supporters - was reported for likely insider trading worth nearly $1 billion Trump's corruption is obvious. What I find less obvious and more interesting is that practically nobody tries to defend him. The closest thing to a defense you get is the common argument that "Biden/woke was also bad," which isn't even an attempt at a defense. It's rather a moral blank check made out to the administration that promises to cover the cost of any transgression. When you zoom out, it is extraordinary how rare it is in modern politics to hear universal arguments for virtue or morality. Just listen to the way we talk about right and wrong, these days. We hear that 'the rich don't play by the rules, so why should I?' We hear that Democrats are bad, so why should Republicans be good? It is broken social contracts and special excuses all the way down. We are in a world after virtue. It's the age of vicemaxxing. And that's bad. derekthompson.org/p/can-america-…

The DNC 2024 autopsy cnn.com/2026/05/21/pol…