SujoyRc

3K posts

SujoyRc banner
SujoyRc

SujoyRc

@sujoyrc

Check linkedin for professional profile. Views are strictly personal

Katılım Temmuz 2009
230 Takip Edilen166 Takipçiler
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@GulfAir When will @GulfAir return my ticket costs ? My flight was due on 13th and cancellation happened on 11th. Such a delay is unacceptable.
English
5
2
8
290
Gulf Air
Gulf Air@GulfAir·
Update: As the closure of Bahrain airspace continues, Gulf Air is temporarily operating a number of commercial flights via Dammam. Next update: 11:00 BHT (08:00 UTC) Mar 22. More info: gulfair.com or the Gulf Air app.
English
5
1
10
5.2K
William Dalrymple
William Dalrymple@DalrympleWill·
Where better to wake up on your birthday 🎂 than in India's greatest and most historic hotel @TajMahalMumbai ? Thank you Ritesh Sharma for your hospitality & brilliant stewardship of this fabulous institution.
William Dalrymple tweet media
English
80
59
1K
23.5K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@QuanquanGu I don't know how someone can pose the right questions without the training. For example, how does someone even know of let alone understand a frontier topic in maths or physics without training. The AI even without hallucination can answer questions you can ask.
English
0
0
8
418
Quanquan Gu
Quanquan Gu@QuanquanGu·
Actually not just math, this is happening across almost every field. AI is collapsing the barrier to entry for research. What once required a PhD and years of training can now start much easier. We are moving toward a world where there is no “hard research”, but just unsolved problems. Big things are coming!
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_

Terence Tao responding to a question on what advice he would give someone considering a career in math in 2026: 'Yeah, so we live in a time of change. It is, as I said, we live in a particularly unpredictable era. And I think things that we've taken for granted for centuries may not hold anymore. So, yeah, the way we... do everything, not just mathematics, will change. In many ways, I would prefer the much more boring, quiet era where things are much the same as they were 10 years ago, 20 years ago. But I think one just has to embrace that there's going to be a lot of change and that, you know, the things that you study, some of them may become obsolete or revolutionized, but some things will be retained. There'll be a lot of opportunities for things that you wouldn't be able to do before. So, I mean, in math, you previously had to basically go through years and years of education to be a math PhD before you could contribute to the frontier of math research. But now it's quite possible at the high school level or whatever, that you could get involved in a math project and actually make a real contribution because of all these AI tools and lean and everything else. So there'll be a lot of non-traditional opportunities to learn. So you need a very adaptable mindset. There'll be one for pursuing things just for curiosity, for playing around. And I mean, you still need to get your credentials. I mean, I think for a while it would still be important to sort of still go through traditional education and learn math and science and so forth the old-fashioned way for a while. Yeah, but you should also be open to very, very different ways of doing science, some of which don't exist yet. Yeah, so it's a scary time, but also very exciting.'

English
35
86
730
103.5K
SujoyRc retweetledi
•
@AliyuOnX·
Iran had the ability to cause such significant disruption to the global economy at 0% but chose not to at 100% when Gen. Soleimani was assassinated in 2020, their embassy in Damascus bombed in 2024, and their nuclear facilities “obliterated” last year. Iran has shown remarkable restraint over the years despite all the sanctions.
Alan Eyre@AlanEyre1

“Although President Donald Trump says he has ‘destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military Capability’, the 0% that remains is playing havoc with the global economy.” -The Economist

English
21
1K
4.5K
173.9K
SujoyRc retweetledi
Good Shepherd
Good Shepherd@HoyasFan07·
@NC_Renic Reminds of what my dad says about the difference between the American and European partners at his firm. When the Americans are on vacation, they're reachable and can work a lot. When the Europeans are on vacation it means they will *not* reply, period.
English
1
1
23
2.4K
SujoyRc retweetledi
Jostein Hauge
Jostein Hauge@haugejostein·
The US should be banned from participating in the 2026 World Cup. The US has violated the UN Charter numerous times over the past year. This was the basis for FIFA's ban on Russia. It would reflect a blatant double standard if FIFA does not ban the US from the World Cup.
English
148
874
3.6K
39.9K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@DrEmmaZang @SandroAmbuehl It helps me understand the maths or plots. But the questions and thinking and indeed the final review is mine. In fact I explicitly prohibit it from giving me text on what to write.
English
0
0
2
12
Emma Zang
Emma Zang@DrEmmaZang·
@SandroAmbuehl Absolutely agree! I had many productive conversations with AI. It’s definitely help me think through things better instead of replacing my thinking
English
1
0
1
388
Emma Zang
Emma Zang@DrEmmaZang·
Hot take for the future of peer review: Journals should start asking for a lightweight AI-based replication check (e.g., via Claude) at submission. Not to replace reviewers, but to catch coding errors, logic inconsistencies, and reproducibility issues before a paper reaches them. At this point, many of these checks are fast, cheap, and automatable. There’s little reason to rely solely on human detection. Even with restricted data, this is feasible. Authors can generate simulated datasets that preserve structure and run identical pipelines. The goal is just basic verification. More broadly, we need to rethink how we use reviewer time. Not every submission needs 3 full human reviews. A more efficient pipeline might look like: editorial triage, AI-assisted checks/review, targeted human evaluation where it matters most. If done well, this could raise standards while reducing burden on the system.
English
13
12
134
29.5K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@DrEmmaZang But many ( most latest?) training pipelines are prohibitively expensive and results would not be replicable on smaller volumes?
English
0
0
0
116
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@yuxiangw_cs So this works only if they put the entire pdf and not paragraphs , equations, tables separately to understand. I hope the latter is acceptable
English
0
0
0
1K
Yu-Xiang Wang
Yu-Xiang Wang@yuxiangw_cs·
AI watermarking in action at #ICML's avant garde peer-review experiments this year! Quite a few casualties in my SAC batch (an example below --- appropriately redacted hopefully)
Yu-Xiang Wang tweet media
English
13
34
330
76.1K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@ChrisMasterjohn Think of how bad automatic transcription for notes will be. I am sure students being allowed to use computers will soon use tools like whisper to directly transcribe especially in topics which are not mathematically dense
English
0
0
0
51
Chris Masterjohn
Chris Masterjohn@ChrisMasterjohn·
This has been well known for decades but it isn’t because writing makes you use your brain. It’s because writing is SLOWER than typing and efficiency and speed are the enemy of understanding. Slowness forces the student to reword what they are writing because they have no time to write down everything and rewording requires thinking about meaning. Typing is fast enough to write down direct quotes so it doesn’t require thinking about meaning. Use efficiency and speed for rote things that free up time to slow down for what you want to derive meaning from.
Brandon Luu, MD@BrandonLuuMD

Students who took notes by hand scored ~28% higher on conceptual questions than laptop note-takers. Writing forces your brain to process and compress ideas instead of copying them.

English
33
114
933
48.6K
Lucas Beyer (bl16)
Lucas Beyer (bl16)@giffmana·
I have a question about last year's image-generation progress, wonder what y'all think. How did we go from all models consistently getting fingers wrong, to all models consistently getting them right? This "flip" seems to have happened basically across all companies/models at the ~same time. Even "random" non-frontier papers seem to get it right? Or they just cherry-pick the figures?
Lucas Beyer (bl16) tweet mediaLucas Beyer (bl16) tweet media
English
86
15
484
109.9K
SujoyRc retweetledi
Mrs Gee 💚🇵🇸
Mrs Gee 💚🇵🇸@earthygirl011·
In a bizarre twist, Trump and Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran has succeeded in humanising Iranians to the world, undoing decades of western propaganda Iran's leaders have more wit & charm than the ghoulish Epstein Coalition in the west. Iran is no worse than the west tbh
English
99
1.3K
6.9K
60.8K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@LifeAfterFI Only 7 countries in the world have 200M or more population. So even if the number is true ( and I don't think it is) even that does not explain lack of innovation. I don't think it is true due to internal purchasing power parity and undeclared incomes
English
0
0
0
13
SujoyRc retweetledi
William Dalrymple
William Dalrymple@DalrympleWill·
Super important story: "UK security adviser attended US-Iran talks & judged deal was within reach. Jonathan Powell thought Tehran’s ‘surprising’ nuclear offer could prevent rush to war" The implication being that Kushner & Witkoff scutttled a peace deal theguardian.com/world/2026/mar…
English
88
1.8K
3.2K
207.5K
SujoyRc retweetledi
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@AnishA_Moonka·
Every time you get a cancer biopsy, the lab makes a tissue slide that costs about $5. It shows the shape of your cells under a microscope, and every cancer patient already has one on file. There’s a much fancier version of that test called multiplex immunofluorescence (basically a protein-level map showing which immune cells are near your tumor and what they’re doing). It costs thousands of dollars per sample, takes specialized equipment most hospitals don’t have, and barely scales. But it’s the kind of data oncologists need to figure out whether immunotherapy will actually work for you. Right now, only about 20 to 40% of cancer patients respond to immunotherapy, and one of the biggest reasons is that doctors can’t easily tell whether a tumor is “hot” (immune cells actively fighting it) or “cold” (immune system ignoring it). Microsoft, Providence Health, and the University of Washington trained an AI to analyze the $5 slide and predict what the expensive test would show across 21 different protein markers. They called it GigaTIME, trained it on 40 million cells in which both the cheap slide and the expensive test coexisted, and then turned it loose on 14,256 real cancer patients across 51 hospitals in 7 US states. The results landed in Cell, one of the most selective journals in biology. The model generated about 300,000 virtual protein maps covering 24 cancer types and 306 subtypes. It found 1,234 real, verified connections between immune cell behavior, genetic mutations, tumor staging, and patient survival that were previously invisible at this scale. When they tested it against a completely separate database of 10,200 cancer patients, the results matched up almost perfectly (0.88 out of 1.0 agreement). Nature Methods named spatial proteomics (mapping where specific proteins sit inside your tissue) its Method of the Year in 2024, and specifically cited GigaTIME in a March 2026 update as a model that “democratizes” this kind of analysis. The full model is open-source on Hugging Face. Any cancer research lab with archived biopsy slides, and most of them have thousands, can now run virtual immune profiling without buying a single piece of new equipment.
Satya Nadella@satyanadella

We’ve trained a multimodal AI model to turn routine pathology slides into spatial proteomics, with the potential to reduce time and cost while expanding access to cancer care.

English
103
1.8K
11.2K
933.7K
SujoyRc
SujoyRc@sujoyrc·
@allenholub @amazon It is also huge cost cuts to offset AI investments which have little ROI except via headcount reduction. This makes life more stressful and work hurried leading to more errors. And this is across the industry - I am yet to see one person who has said his/her work has reduced
English
0
0
0
68
Allen Holub. https://linkedIn.com/in/allenholub
It hasn't gone unnoticed that, since @Amazon's pushing of AI onto its engineers, the enshittification of their software has accelerated. I see this particularly in the video player. Hover-based dropdowns don't drop, or if they do, collapse immediately without a selection. Highlighted things switch focus to something else entirely after a second or so, and without prompting. Subtitle controls disappear entirely, and the original language isn't an option. Just now, it gave me a preview of a movie made in English, dubbed into Spanish without subtitles. Often, a full reboot of the player (which, on a TV, involves a power cycle) is the only way to fix things. Often, even that doesn't work. People love to blame AI for all this, but I'd like to posit that the problem isn't AI at all; it's a crappy development culture based on sweat-shop thinking and the glorification of overwork and unnecessary pressure—forcing process onto engineers based on little more than wishful thinking and hype-induced panic. Testing also seems to have gone by the wayside (maybe the engineers are forced to use the AI for testing without human intervention). None of this is a failure of AI; it's just plain old bad (and incompetent) management, going all the way up the hierarchy to Bezos himself. As with many of the critiques I see of AI, the problem isn't AI at all. Let's put the blame where it's due, not on the tech, but on incompetent or malevolent management that's forcing the misuse of what could, otherwise, be a useful tool.
English
11
8
95
12K