silky

@DucatiSF26 @TheMaineWonk -willing to hand over the uranium (reuters.com/world/asia-pac…). Plus, nothing has been formally agreed on yet, they are still in talks currently. Maybe enriched uranium would have remained out of their hands if trump never decided to tear up the JCPOA agreement.

@superdedo10 @TheMaineWonk Still seems to be in power? Who told you that - the dead ones? The infrastructure will take decades to recover. And we get the uranium - in case you don't enriched uranium in terrorists hands is bad.

MAGA: Treasonous Obama gave Iran $400 Million in Cash MAGA: When Trump gives Iran $20 BILLION

@DucatiSF26 @TheMaineWonk Yes the IRGC is still in power. America is literally negotiating with the former supreme leader’s son. As for the military infrastructure, it still seems functional because neither the U.S or Israel are able to completely destroy the regime. Also it doesn’t seem like Iran is-

@NoisyInfamous @5149jamesli He sent a tomahawk into a girls school then didn’t even have the character to apologize for it. Then as for saving the Iranian people from the regime, to my knowledge the regime is still in power and the plan to replace them with the Shah fell through.

@5149jamesli You clearly never lived under tyranny like the Iranian people. Something you could never do. Iranians begged Trump for help & he delivered. The world is infinitely safer now.

AMAZING!! $51 BILLION DOLLARS later, we are back to where we were on February 28. WINNING!!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@DucatiSF26 @TheMaineWonk The regime still seems to be in power. As for their military infrastructure it has certainly taken damage but it ostensibly seems to be functional (strait ongoing closure). And as for what Obama got that’d be the JCPOA. The current operation has been a complete failure.

@TheMaineWonk Except we destroyed tbeir military infrastructure and killed most of their terrorist regime AND got the enriched uranium. What did Obama get again?

@fruitydiorr @_itenoir "Capitalism" is inherently abstract lmao.

@_itenoir girl how is capitalism an abstract word??? it’s a system

tbh, i kinda get why people from STEM have intense skepticism towards social science considering that people who defend social science keep repeating abstract words like capitalism, colonialism, decolonisation without any consideration with the empirical

@ContraPoints The revolution is upon us!

See this I can respect. No LARPing here, an honest to god arsonist.

@noname97631923 @Out5p0ken @mjfree What I’m trying to say is that within a country comprised of smarter people billionaires would likely be more restrained than today where the effort required to manipulate the general population (into supporting their unaligned interests) is somewhat trivial.

@superdedo10 @Out5p0ken @mjfree Sorry, not into Oligarchs.

Trump supporter finds out tariffs were never paid by China. We paid. #TrumpsTariffsCostUS

@noname97631923 @Out5p0ken @mjfree Billionaires are fine and a signal of a strong economy. It’s the uneducated that are the problem, without them moronic populists like Trump wouldn’t even think about running for president.

@Out5p0ken @mjfree Another DUMB FUCK who voted for him. Imagine what a good country we’d have without the billionaires and uneducated!

@RealLeafPJ @Mobilized3213 @Harry__Faulkner Our lack of a nuclear weapons was due to the nuclear umbrella afforded by the U.S.A, that is gone now, therefore we are vulnerable and should seek a nuclear weapon to at least have protection on our own terms.

@Mobilized3213 @Harry__Faulkner Non-nuclear proliferation is a good thing, good on Poilievre for being a moral voice here #CPC

Pierre Poilievre says Canada should not develop nuclear weapons. Q: Do you think Canada should have nuclear weapons? Poilievre: I don't see a need for that. I don't know what we would get from it. We don't have any desire to threaten anyone with nuclear weapons, so I don't see a purpose for that right now.

@NoInjustice613 @sarobertsonca I mean if you truly believe that Mark Carney (former Governor of the Bank of England) would stammer like this buffoon over such an elementary question then I’d have to conclude that you’re an idiot.

@sarobertsonca Carney attempting to define it would involve plagarizing (as evident from his PhD) Pierre's answer

Pierre Poilievre attempts to define 'gdp per capita': "It's your income, really."

@BasedTact @ThePapaGut I’m pretty sure the implication is that your earning potential has likely capped due to you coming out of the closet as a neo-nazi.

@ThePapaGut Yea, im homeless now because I bought a $30 hat.

Nick Fuentes knows his cause is hopeless