Claire Sutton

4.2K posts

Claire Sutton banner
Claire Sutton

Claire Sutton

@suttonca81

heritage officer, mum to 2 four-legged boys, rugby fan, scuba diver, former singer, history nut, the IOW will always be home. (views are my own)

Devon, England Katılım Ekim 2011
467 Takip Edilen153 Takipçiler
Claire Sutton retweetledi
ً
ً@prinkasusa·
Two thirds of Alzheimer’s patients are women. Not because women live longer, but because estrogen protects the brain. When it’s suddenly stripped away, the brain literally shrinks. Brain fog in your 40s isn’t “just stress.” It’s a red flag. But instead of addressing hormones, women are gaslight with antidepressants or told to meditate. Fast forward 20 years and she’s in a nursing home and can’t remember her own kids. This isn’t “normal aging.” It’s medical negligence. And despite most Alzheimer’s patients being women, much of the research is still done on male mice instead of female mice. That’s not science, that’s neglect.
@cessonmute

hit me with the harshest reality truth

English
42
2.5K
14.6K
534.1K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
74% of abducted children who are killed die within the first 3 hours. 44% within the first hour. I have a 4-year-old. When I found that FBI stat, I stopped what I was doing and started teaching him four things that afternoon. 1. Phone number. Memorized, not stored in a device. A kid who can recite a parent’s number to any adult with a phone becomes findable in seconds. 2. Code word. Any adult who says “your mom sent me” gets tested. If they don’t know the word, he runs. A 4-year-old can learn this in one conversation. 3. Stop, stay, yell. This one overrides the freeze response. FBI data shows 80% of initial contact between an abductor and a victim happens within a quarter mile of the child’s home. The quiet, compliant kid is what predators count on. A kid trained to scream on reflex changes the math. Every decibel is a witness. 4. Find a mom with kids. A small child can’t judge whether a stranger is safe. But a woman already watching her own children in public is the closest thing to a guaranteed safe adult. She’s the person most likely to act in seconds. 460,000 children are reported missing in the U.S. every year. One every 69 seconds. Recovery rate is above 97%. What separates the 97% from the 3% is almost always what happened in the first few minutes. In nearly 60% of abduction homicide cases, more than two hours passed between when someone realized the child was missing and when police were called. The reporting delay alone eats most of the survival window. Every one of these five skills attacks that gap. Four rules a 4-year-old can memorize. Each one turns hours of panic into seconds of correct action.
Miyaandy 🌸@Amahashi_

I worked 20 years for a child sex trafficking rescue group. I want you to know this: 90% of Lost Children Are Found Within 30 Minutes. That statistic should both comfort you and wake you up. Most lost children are found quickly. But the ones who aren’t? They usually made one mistake. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: It’s often the exact thing most parents teach them. We tell our kids: “If you get lost, come find me.” It sounds logical. It sounds empowering. It’s WRONG! The Mistake Most Lost Children Make: When children realize they’re separated, they do three things almost automatically: They panic. They wander. They try to find you. Every step makes them harder to locate. From a search standpoint, movement creates chaos. Parents retrace their steps. Security scans zones. Staff lock down areas. Search works best when movement stops. When a child keeps walking, they move outside the original search radius. Helpers are looking where they were last seen — not where they’ve wandered. Stillness increases probability. Movement expands the problem. The first lesson is not “go find me.” It’s this: Stop. Stay. Yell. Why Stillness Wins: Think like a search team. If a child stays put: Parents can retrace steps. Security can scan systematically. Helpers converge to one fixed location. The search radius remains small. If a child keeps moving: The search area expands. Adults pass each other. Missed connections multiply. Minutes stretch into hours. Stillness keeps the math on your side. Teach Them Who to Approach: The second mistake we make as parents? We say, “Find an adult.” Not any adult. Not the nearest stranger. Children need a filter. Teach them to look for, if at all possible: A mother with children. Caregivers who already have kids with them are statistically among the safest people to approach in public settings. They are visible, stationary, and more likely to engage quickly. It’s a clear, concrete instruction. Children don’t process vague categories like “safe adult.” They process visuals. “Find a mom with kids” is visual. A Phone Only Helps If the Number Is Known: We often assume phones solve everything. They don’t — unless your child can use one. Even young children can memorize a 10-digit phone number with repetition. But you must train it. Practice it like a song. Sing it in the car. Chant it at bedtime. Turn it into rhythm. Repetition becomes recall. In an emergency, recall matters more than theory. The Code Word Rule: One more layer of protection. Choose a private family code word. Something only your household knows. If someone approaches and says: “Your mom sent me.” Your child asks: “What’s the code word?” No word. No go. This simple rule eliminates manipulation attempts instantly. It gives your child agency without requiring them to evaluate character. Real Safety Is Training — Not Luck! We don’t get safer by hoping. We get safer by practicing. Teach: • Phone number • Code word • Stop, stay, yell • Find a mom with kids Multiple skills. Simple instructions. Clear visuals. Five minutes of training can replace hours of panic. This isn’t about fear. It’s about preparation. Because when a child gets separated, the clock starts. And what they do in the first minute determines what the next thirty look like. That’s real protection.

English
73
2.2K
8.5K
968.9K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Dedda
Dedda@Deddinx·
Dedda tweet media
ZXX
110
23.5K
154K
1M
Claire Sutton retweetledi
𝐿𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒱 🥀
This was literally the most informative thing I’ve heard all year. All year. 🧈
English
109
2.9K
15.6K
392.7K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Mambo Italiano
Mambo Italiano@mamboitaliano__·
This is truly the most beautiful video I’ve seen lately So tender and heart-warming, yet it makes you stop and reflect, with a subtle touch of sadness We may have gained so much, but perhaps we’ve lost even more✨
English
452
6.2K
18K
914.9K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Channel 4
Channel 4@Channel4·
For various boring reasons we have to say that these are Hugh Grant’s views not ours, and that we definitely haven’t printed his post out and put it in a little frame on our desk
Hugh Grant@HackedOffHugh

Dirty Business on @Channel4. Brilliantly made, devastating. Water must be nationalised now. The owners of the private water companies jailed.

English
130
2.9K
26.7K
1.1M
Claire Sutton
Claire Sutton@suttonca81·
Ah, @AmazonUK Once again taking the time to just ring the doorbell and walk away; once again, mistaking the front door on a main pedestrian thoroughfare for a clearly requested safe place away from the front door; once again, just asking if it was OK and then not following up
Claire Sutton tweet media
English
1
0
0
22
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Curiosity
Curiosity@CuriosityonX·
How physics should be taught in schools 👏
English
27
242
2.1K
108.1K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Tansu Yegen
Tansu Yegen@TansuYegen·
Powerful message....
English
291
10.3K
36.8K
708.1K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Miss Universe 1997 delivered one of the most sincere answers in pageant history.
English
19
47
563
53.9K
Claire Sutton
Claire Sutton@suttonca81·
#SCOvENG @ITVSport please drop the split screen adverts! We actually want to hear what the ref is saying during those discussions!
English
1
0
13
871
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Guinness Women's Six Nations
Guinness Women's Six Nations@Womens6Nations·
𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐬𝐨𝐧 = 𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐫 Congratulations to Hollie Davidson, who becomes the first woman to referee a Men’s Six Nations match today 💪 #GuinnessM6N #Since1883 @SixNationsRugby
English
145
351
4.4K
175.7K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
internet hall of fame
internet hall of fame@InternetH0F·
This guy explains why everything we know about addiction is actually wrong
English
133
2.3K
11.2K
285.2K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
T. Bernadetti
T. Bernadetti@MrsRoyKeaneo·
"Why didn't you fight back?" Thee BEST explanation you will EVER hear regarding rape. #EpsteinFiles Watch it! Turn it up! And PLEASE RT!
English
181
8.3K
22.4K
306.7K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
The Figen
The Figen@TheFigen_·
Caregiver in Japan shows a safer way to lift patients.
English
160
2.6K
13.9K
972.8K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leebrown2·
Goosebumps! People often ask, is Shakespeare still relevant? Here is a great example, from the Steven Colbert Show, in which Sir Ian McKellen delivers an extraordinary speech. Shakespeare’s words are timeless, urgent and important. #Shakespeare #ianmckellen #stevencolbert
English
591
7.8K
24.2K
1.8M
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Leaders 𝕏 Junction
Leaders 𝕏 Junction@LeadersJunction·
Best advice.. Must Listen‼️‼️
English
23
1.9K
6.3K
158.8K
Claire Sutton retweetledi
Simons
Simons@Simon_Ingari·
"Why does our top performer get the worst reviews?" the boss asked. I was reviewing their annual performance data. "Show me," I said. She pulled up the ratings. Diana: 2.8 out of 5. Below average on "collaboration." Low marks for "team player." "What's her actual performance?" I asked. "Exceeded every target. Landed our biggest client. Trained three new hires." "So why the low scores?" "Her peer reviews are dragging her down." I scanned the comments. "Too direct." "Challenges ideas too much." "Not supportive enough." "Let me talk to Diana," I said. "I used to give honest feedback," Diana told me. "Said our pricing model was broken. Got dinged for 'negativity.'" "What happened with the pricing?" "They finally fixed it six months later. After we lost two major accounts." "What else?" "I questioned why we needed eleven approvals for a simple contract change. Manager said I wasn't being collaborative." "Are you still giving feedback?" "No. I learned my lesson. Now I smile. Nod. Say everything's great. My reviews are improving." "But nothing's actually improving?" "We're making the same mistakes. Just with better vibes." She chuckled. I went back to the boss. "Your review system doesn't measure performance," I said. "It measures compliance." "That's not true." "When was the last time someone got promoted for challenging bad ideas?" Silence. "When did someone get rewarded for preventing a mistake?" More silence. "You've trained your best people to stay quiet. And your mediocre people to stay nice." A few months later, they redesigned the system. Added a category: "Constructive Challenge." Points for identifying problems early. Rewards for preventing costly mistakes. Diana got promoted. "What changed?" I asked the boss. "We stopped confusing agreement with alignment. Stopped mistaking silence for harmony." "And?" "Turns out our 'difficult' people were our most valuable. They actually cared enough to speak up." Here's the truth about performance reviews: Most companies don't reward performance. They reward performance theater. The person who says the meeting was great beats the person who says it wasted an hour. The person who agrees with bad ideas beats the person who prevents disasters. You think you're measuring contribution. You're measuring conformity. And your best people? They've already figured out the game. They're just deciding whether to play it or find somewhere that values truth over comfort.
English
235
1.7K
9.8K
852.4K