Chill

986 posts

Chill

Chill

@tactical012

liberals are mentally ill. conservatives are retarded.

United States Katılım Kasım 2024
594 Takip Edilen54 Takipçiler
Eric J
Eric J@TheRealEJones·
@skirano Don’t understand this take. Non-designers aren’t good with front end work. Designers will continue to push new concepts. New tools will be iterated. Can you expound on “setting space back years” ?
English
2
0
4
3.9K
Jessica Pin
Jessica Pin@jess_ann_pin·
@RealWokeRight @kai_xbt If the woman fucks up and the man fucks down, the woman won — she got more out of the encounter. But logic is hard for you idiots.
English
5
0
3
1.4K
Kai
Kai@kai_xbt·
Clavicular reveals the most blackpill thing he's seen since going mainstream "Just the amount of girls from your regular small town or in-state community college who are in my DM requests trying to get flown out to Miami. These girls are DMing pro athletes, influencers, being the most hypergamous they've ever been in the history of the world." "Girls with boyfriends DM me probably every day. If the username is in their bio I'll screenshot it and send it to him."
English
184
676
21.3K
2.2M
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
I am incredibly bullish on @meetgranola for a few reasons: 1. Meeting notes are by far the most useful context in a company 2. They know how to build for agents first with great APIs and MCPs 3. @cjpedregal is a stand-up human Love how they started with a wedge in meeting notes and are expanding into much more.
Chris Pedregal@cjpedregal

Today we're announcing our Series C alongside some big updates that make @meetgranola better for your team and your tools. Excited to partner with Danny at Index and Mamoon at KP. Big things to come. Back to work!

English
17
5
168
33K
Chill retweetledi
Chintan Zalani
Chintan Zalani@chintanzalani·
The only 4 jobs that will remain at tech companies. Credits: @yrechtman
Chintan Zalani tweet media
English
245
607
8.3K
1.1M
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@BPBlobfish @BrianAtlas lol are you obtuse? if women didn't want certain men to speak to them, they simply don't swipe right. that already happens across every other dating app token gestures and whitney's fantasy has eroded billions in enterprise value
English
1
0
1
87
Blackpilled Blobfish
Blackpilled Blobfish@BPBlobfish·
@BrianAtlas Bumble wasn't created so women ask men out first or not. That wasn't the idea idiot. It was so only men they wanted to speak to could speak to them and the men knew the women wanted to.
English
9
0
3
1.7K
Brian Atlas
Brian Atlas@BrianAtlas·
Women have dating on easy mode lol. Look, props to her for making the first move, but this is what I call token initiative. Note that despite HER approaching him, HE still asked for the number and setup the date. This was a huge problem on Bumble. The dating app that forced women to send the first message. Women will send a “hey” and then shrug the entire conversational burden and initiative burden back on the man. Hence token initiative.
English
48
43
707
49.6K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@GergelyOrosz @martinwoodward i can confirm as an enterprise user, i was default opted in to "training models on my code". we don't use copilot
English
0
0
0
85
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
@martinwoodward Why are you opting me as a paid Pro user into this as default, when you do not do this with other paid (Business and Enterprise) customers? Clearly it's somehting not Business or Enterprise wants. So why did you think your paying customers would? Why did you not make it opt-in?
English
6
0
51
3.4K
Martin Woodward
Martin Woodward@martinwoodward·
Happy to chat, but to clarify it’s Copilot usage data for Free, Pro and Pro+ users that is impacted. Not private data at rest and not users of Copilot Business or Enterprise. We emailed everyone impacted earlier in the week and have an in-product banner to let people know how to opt-out ahead of data collection starting. Full details here if you would like to learn more. github.blog/news-insights/…
English
6
0
20
4.1K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@martinwoodward @GergelyOrosz this is also not true for cursor. why even use github anymore? imagine paying a boatload AND being the product
English
0
0
3
339
Martin Woodward
Martin Woodward@martinwoodward·
@GergelyOrosz Which other tools do you use for AI coding BTW? You sure they don’t do opt-in by default. My understanding is that we are the last to adopt this but I might have been misinformed
English
4
0
6
13.2K
Kasra Khadem
Kasra Khadem@Kaz_Khadem·
Young gen z founders in SF today are blatantly embellishing their accomplishments / straight up lying about themselves to VCs to an extent I’ve never seen before… “I spearheaded the AI roll-out of—“ bro you were a freshman summer intern at Meta what are you talking about
English
69
68
2.4K
161.4K
the Rich
the Rich@Duderichy·
> puts a billion dollars of plaid shares up for $70m in cash what
Ravi Riley@ravi_riley

Holy shit this is insane > be @williamhockey > co-founds plaid  > becomes billionaire on paper  > has new contrarian idea > software-first bank > plaid $5 billion acquisition by Visa falls through  > uh oh, no cash everything still in plaid stock > fuck it, all in > banks offering low LTV on plaid stock > puts a billion dollars of plaid shares up for $70m in cash > buys a small bank in california for $70m > build through being in extreme debt > almost go bankrupt multiple times > three years later > column launches > 17m revenue in 2022 > 31m revenue in 2023 > 100m+ revenue in 2024 > 200m+ revenue in 2025, valued at 6 billion  > used by every fintech unicorn for banking services > still owns 100% of company with employees > riskmaxxing gigachad You are not taking enough risk anon

English
7
0
70
12.6K
Marko Ilic
Marko Ilic@markoilico·
If you're now designing or redesigning a website, this will help you a lot. I recently curated the best hero sections, footers, social proof and other website parts because I got tired of having 15+ tabs open (even with Mobbin). Giving it away 100% free. Comment on this post, and I'll send a Figma link to your inbox!
GIF
English
4.8K
224
5.2K
395.9K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@abcampbell even if congress fixed qualified investors, retail wouldn't be able to get an allocation or they'd get burned with the 100% fee SPVs
English
1
0
4
488
Bristol | SkyWarn Wx + Isles + Mets | 🌏
It's actually good to have more inherited properties as it retains the fabric of the community, she could have friends/other family stay over for a low price and introduce them to the neighborhood and all it's goods, in addition, the less native New Yorkers leave, the better because Businesses can stay, and that 50+ year old business, or 100+ year old business that got passed from multiple generations can sustain for eternity more easily. Rent and property tax stabilization is necessary.
English
8
0
6
4.4K
Jay Martin 🏠 🏢🏚️🌇
This family is crammed into a $3900 1 bedroom apartment. A few blocks away A single person who inherited her apartment pays 1300 for a large 2 bedroom. This is one of the key failures of the rent stabilization system. It turns an apartment into an inherited asset that prevents anyone else who might need a two bedroom apartment like a family for example from accessing it ever again. And it happens all over the city. There are massive 5,6,7 bedroom apartments (for real I never believed it myself until I saw it) in pre war buildings in northern Manhattan and the Bronx where large families could be living. The owner also can’t turn them into multiple apartments so more people who need housing can live in new 1 or 2 bedrooms made from old 5,6,7 bedrooms due to a law passed two years ago to stop “Frankensteining”. TL:DR when you hate landlords so much you prevent the availability of more housing and turn apartments into inherited wealth.
Jay Martin 🏠 🏢🏚️🌇 tweet media
Emma G. Fitzsimmons@emmagf

How a Family of 3 Lives on $500,000 on the Upper West Side: nytimes.com/interactive/20…

English
57
130
1.8K
289.5K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@trq212 so silly. why would i not just generate the code lol
English
0
0
0
37
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
This works in a clever way—by doing code generation against Figma’s Plugin API, so Claude is translating your app code into Figma functions. From my experience it makes it much more reliable!
English
11
3
174
35.2K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@KimChiSpicey retarded take. why wouldn't you divide it over the total number of funded companies
English
0
0
0
7
Kim Chi
Kim Chi@KimChiSpicey·
Ranking VCs by how many portfolio companies committed fraud or seriously appear to have. YC is #1 with 7. Interesting that Garry Tan (YC CEO) is on a mission to “make SF politics more accountable”.
Kim Chi tweet media
English
74
84
1.1K
80.5K
Shrav Mehta
Shrav Mehta@shravvmehtaa·
@NWischoff @andriy_mulyar @secureframe @getdelve The irony here is that from what I saw Delve has practically no AI compared to Secureframe. We’ve been building with AI before LLMs were a thing. We’re just more careful about how we market it and use it.
English
2
0
8
1.4K
Andriy Mulyar
Andriy Mulyar@andriy_mulyar·
My take on Delve and experience after 3 audit cycles as a founder -> We've been a decently happy customer of @secureframe the last few years but were considering migrating to @getdelve this January (took some sales calls, got some data in to feel the experience). Here's my take on the situation: I've done 3 audit cycles now where my team (and originally just me) spent weeks every quarter pulling data, filling out spreadsheets, etc to adhere to SOC 2 controls. This was followed by a painful 2-3 month audit period where I felt auditors and the underlying platform were heavily out of sync - auditors would request things that we had already synced/uploaded into the compliance tool, escalatory meetings would happen just to resolve to 'that is ok, sorry we missed it'. The promise of Delve, for me, was AI-native compliance. A platform that didn't just do 80% of the work (controls auto-synced to cloud infra, evidence pulled via vendor APIs) but got us to 95%: where agents did the annoying stuff that the other platforms couldn't handle (auto checking access roles in every vendor, filling out excel sheets first to then to hand over for human verification). Where auditors actually understood the platform holding the evidence they were auditing. I was really onboard with the vision of Delve their team and sales folks pitched me. My gripe with all the existing vendors (@TrustVanta , @DrataHQ, @secureframe ) was this: They built their tech stack and process up up pre-AI. I felt their product roadmap moved very slow, lots of small bugs everywhere and so much silly stuff has to be done manually. One hour my team is orchestrating coding agents and the next hour huddled in a call filling out an Excel sheet - it felt like these existing platforms were 'on the wrong exponential'. We're obviously sticking with Secureframe for now but the above facts still haven't changed. Im certain someone will disrupt the space by achieving the above vision - it's unfortunate that it probably won't be Delve.
English
11
2
104
23.6K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@jameszhou02 what's the over/under on them doing damage control and explaining this is a siloed off bucket with some test data 🧐
English
0
0
0
291
James Zhou
James Zhou@jameszhou02·
btw their supabase storage bucket is publicly accessible via any signed url token 😭 exposes: > employee background checks > equity vesting schedules and grant amounts > performance reviews > session tokens for stripe, notion, etc > screenshots below 🧵 i also got access to their notion 😛
James Zhou tweet media
erin griffith@eringriffith

A detailed and brutal look at the tactics of buzzy AI compliance startup Delve "Delve built a machine designed to make clients complicit without their knowledge, to manufacture plausible deniability while producing exactly the opposite." substack.com/home/post/p-19…

English
105
106
2.1K
957.4K
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@BryanOnel86 don't throw rocks when you live in a glass house! there are stories about "oneleet" too 🫣
English
0
0
0
222
Chill
Chill@tactical012·
@BriannaWu @wolfejosh it's weird that @nytimes thinks ginny thomas is fair game (ie. doesnt meet the private citizen threshold) but rama duwaji is not fair game
English
0
0
0
33