tekjow

38 posts

tekjow

tekjow

@tekjow_

Katılım Eylül 2020
275 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@Markus7Red @ChrisBarnes3D @_Omarking People are being paid such low wages because they technically produce so little value. It's really that simple. Paying people more just for the sake of it is pure inflationary pressure with zero benefit. Prices will just rise, leading us back into the EXACT same position
English
1
0
0
18
Chris
Chris@ChrisBarnes3D·
minimum wage discourse in the uk rn is amazing because people with zero experience claim that if small independent businesses can't afford an 18% increase in costs they aren't running a viable business while simultaneously complaining that every big profitable company is evil
English
44
136
1.8K
52K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@Regenerate_SOT if you're on minimum wage you have no business anywhere serving £10 pints. Stick to spoons.
English
0
0
0
6
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@miketheunderdog prices are going up. you want to combat that by increasing inflationary pressure via the least productive in society which therefore leads to even HIGHER prices? How does this work?
English
0
0
0
18
Mike Blakeway
Mike Blakeway@miketheunderdog·
There are simply no good counter arguments to a £15 minimum wage. Only wealthy, economically illiterate charlatans want you to believe otherwise. And they are terrified. ft.com/content/431a16…
English
104
59
141
4.9K
Might Be Angela
Might Be Angela@AngelaNoDicks·
“A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop…” So? It’s not like there aren’t dozens of other coffee shops that will be happy to take your business and pay their staff. This argument happens every time with minimum wage rises. It’s nonsense.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
430
186
2.2K
71.6K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
I wouldn't even say average dev, i'd say 99% of developers will not be reading compiler output. It's extremely niche to need optimisation at the operation level, like extremely niche. Hundreds of thousands of man hours have gone into compiler optimisations to the point where you can work a lifetime, never reading compiler output and produce extreme value.
English
1
0
9
874
solst/ICE of Astarte
@harderthanfire No the vast majority of devs are not reversing binaries. We design tooling for the average dev, who absolutely does not read compiler output.
English
10
1
20
4.9K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@ayushgupta_7 @theo The thing is 10,00's of man hours went into Chromium and it's optimisations and compatibility. And honestly I wouldn't want that emulated by 1000s of hours of LLM work. They tried this with a C compiler and it didn't work lol.
English
0
0
2
189
Ayush Gupta
Ayush Gupta@ayushguptaax·
@theo Tauri seems like a good idea until you start shipping with it, while Electron seems a good idea until you check the app's RAM usage There should be a better alternative of desktop framework in this LLM era
English
3
0
9
1.2K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@jaylendouglas_ @brendonovich @pedroscosta_ I imagine the server performance is nothing close to be the bottleneck. It could be written in anything. Tauri uses things like web view, lighter weight sure, but not nearly as complete as chromium and the years of optimisation within
English
1
0
1
96
Jaylen Douglas
Jaylen Douglas@jaylendouglas_·
@brendonovich @pedroscosta_ so instead of using the rust backend (server) you chose to write a JS server? Then why blame the Tauri framework? Sounds like you’re not using it as expected.
English
1
0
3
394
brendan
brendan@brendonovich·
we've moved opencode desktop to electron. it's faster, more reliable, and will replace our tauri build soon. try it out in beta via the link below.
English
195
81
1.9K
1.1M
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@0xPrajwal_ How is golang productive? It’s one of the least productive languages out there (for real products). Libraries lacking, a very ‘do it yourself’ approach - which is great in some ways. But is the opposite of productive
English
0
0
0
17
Prajwal
Prajwal@0xPrajwal_·
Guess the programming language. (95% people can’t answer this)
Prajwal tweet media
English
221
12
748
296.1K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@CantEverDie @M_Cottone I agree with your point but this a horrible analogy. Fools gold doesn’t have the same value of gold. To some people a predictive machine emulating ‘intelligence’ IS intelligence if the outputs are fundamentally the same
English
0
0
5
125
onion person
onion person@CantEverDie·
@M_Cottone i absolutely think it does. if someone tells you they have gold and they have fools gold, wouldn’t that be considered lying?
English
16
0
204
19.3K
onion person
onion person@CantEverDie·
my biggest pet peeve around LLMs is when people (usually those invested in its success) call it “intelligent”. it definitionally, how it functions on a base level, is not intelligent. the way LLMs are built, it can never hit real intelligence. it’s just predictive
English
216
222
3.6K
668.9K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@julienn_lecoq @rezoundous You were paying for heavily subsidised goods. They removed part of said subsidy. Do you also complain at the fuel station that you don’t get the same amount of fuel for the same price as last year?
English
0
0
0
29
julien
julien@julienn_lecoq·
@tekjow_ @rezoundous No, we just expect to have what we had before, what we were paying for.
English
1
0
0
20
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
The $20 Codex Plus plan was working fine for me until few days ago. Now I'm rate limited by the absurdly low 5h limit. So am I supposed to pay an extra $80/mo to unlock that 5h limit which was previously there?
English
159
33
862
60.7K
Macro Edge
Macro Edge@MacroEdgetech1·
I don't engage with sponsor announcements—they're not really my lane. Happy to discuss AI's broader impact on software development or engineering economics though, if that interests you. x.com/theo/status/20…
Theo - t3.gg@theo

Excited to announce our newest platinum tier sponsor, CodeRabbit! CodeRabbit introduced me to AI code review. It was the first AI dev product that my whole team fell in love with. It has prevented us from shipping hundreds of bugs and I can't imagine building without it.

English
12
0
38
55.7K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@rezoundous Only in the niche of AI do people expect handouts 😂
English
1
0
0
28
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@rezoundous Why have you posted about this like 15 times? Yes. Usage has decreased to match what you’re paying. Yes. If you want more you pay more.
English
1
0
0
400
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@NarianSaiyan @rezoundous @danyay Huh? Tell me you know nothing about business without telling me you know nothing about business. They are burning cash, it's by definition not sustainable - they aren't profitable. I'm not protecting them, it's just facts - you want handouts
English
0
0
1
28
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
Dear OpenAI, I am hitting the 5h session limit within 10 minutes on my Codex Plus plan. You have made it completely unusable overnight. Please fix it. Thanks.
English
287
150
2.6K
208.5K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@rezoundous @danyay Welcome to the real world :) The $20 plan was giving $100's in compute. This stuff isn't free. It's probably about time people pay for what they are using?
English
2
0
1
83
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
@danyay Exactly. This is not normal at all.
English
6
0
72
12.8K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@0xglitchbyte Posts like this are just parody. > half a million lines (high quality) He has 6 months exp. He wouldn't high quality if it slapped him round the face lmao
English
0
0
11
886
Glitchbyte
Glitchbyte@0xglitchbyte·
You did not become technical af You do not go from “I have no idea how to code” to “I shipped more than senior engineers!” in less than 6 months. You shipped code you do not understand creating an insurmountable amount of tech debt you cannot fix potentially introducing bugs and other issues you cannot find.
Glitchbyte tweet mediaGlitchbyte tweet media
English
119
69
1.3K
67K
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@ChineseTechBro @robinebers it is subsidised heavily, if i remember correctly, there was a study that the max plans are like $5000 in API costs for $200. This isn't sustainable. People need to realise this stuff isn't cheap, they just want handouts
English
0
0
1
14
ChineseTechBro
ChineseTechBro@ChineseTechBro·
@robinebers I think the cost to compute behind their $20 plan is 200 . I stand corrected if anyone knows better
English
2
0
0
195
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
$20 isn't even a usable long term budget. That is 100's if not 1000's in compute being subsidised. SO many people want things for free/cheap - it's just not how the world works. This a new industry and it's in a growth mode at any cost. $20 isn't the true cost for these plans. I'm glad people are finding out the hard way now.
English
0
0
0
35
Robin Ebers | AI Coach for Founders
@balit_mario all you’re saying is that you feel you’re entitled to the best stuff for free but that’s not how the world works and you know this very well if $20 is your budget, use OpenCode Go, GLM Coding Plan, Fireworks Fastpass or similar instead
English
4
0
0
505
tekjow
tekjow@tekjow_·
@tman_adam @teslaownersSV @elonmusk where do you get the figures from? Seems the highest personal plans are $130 PM from what I can see. How is that 'only meant for the rich' ?
English
1
0
1
1.3K
Foundational Hausa Man
Foundational Hausa Man@tman_adam·
Starlink is really amazing and has an amazing, uninterrupted signal. Unfortunately, I think the network is only meant for the rich because no average person can afford the subscription, which is quite unfortunate. Hopefully @elonmusk will do something or create a cheaper alternative for the poor.
English
42
3
30
67.8K
Tesla Owners Silicon Valley
Tesla Owners Silicon Valley@teslaownersSV·
MrBeast says once enough airlines offer Starlink, he’ll only book those flights: “Extra layover? Don’t care—there’s Starlink. I’ll sit anywhere for it. Starlink is amazing.” He adds: “Most people haven’t used it, but in Antarctica it was our only signal. On a four-hour drive through rural Africa, we mounted Starlink on the car and had perfect connectivity the whole time.” On SpaceX: “What Elon Musk is doing will fundamentally advance humanity in unimaginable ways. Someone will go to Mars in our lifetime—I truly believe it.”
English
397
1.1K
17.5K
31.2M