Tertius

108 posts

Tertius banner
Tertius

Tertius

@tertius

Stop begging the question and get back to work.

Stellenbosch at heart. Katılım Ağustos 2007
62 Takip Edilen629 Takipçiler
Rafael de Cabrera
Rafael de Cabrera@zoomerjung·
@conservmillen @TrevorSheatz @AshleySheatz She is a slut, also ugly and he is a cuck. Which doesn’t mean they don’t have the right to be happy, they probably are. But facts are facts. Your soul might be born again and you’re granted a second chance through Christ but God forgives your sin, he doesn’t erase it.
English
8
0
11
1.2K
Allie Beth Stuckey
Allie Beth Stuckey@conservmillen·
.@TrevorSheatz and @AshleySheatz went viral this week after Trevor shared part of Ashley’s testimony on X, which included a mention of her pre-conversion sexual promiscuity. The backlash was massive, not just from non-believers, but from Christians and conservatives, too. People denigrated Ashley’s looks and mocked Trevor for humiliating his wife. But the critics have it all wrong. Ashley joins me to set the story straight — and to give a detailed testimony of her life before and after Christ. God saved her out of the New Age, drug addiction, and demonic oppression, into a new life in Jesus. Tune in tonight. May God be glorified.
Allie Beth Stuckey tweet media
English
319
126
1.9K
320.3K
Tertius
Tertius@tertius·
@DrCamRx @jimmycarr When he gets to the gambling bit my first thought is that this has to be AI, it's too good for crowd work. "Tell me what you're willing to sacrifice..."
English
1
0
1
32
Tertius
Tertius@tertius·
@cgenco He left behind a massive legacy. HHMI being another great one.
English
0
0
1
10
Christian Genco
Christian Genco@cgenco·
@tertius Is that the Howard Hughes billionaire that built planes and went insane? That guy’s everywhere.
English
1
0
1
14
Christian Genco
Christian Genco@cgenco·
This is the primary reason to build your own home (and build your own stuff in general). The builder’s incentives are to make money building a home and selling it to you, which means either charging you more or cutting costs.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Let me explain exactly why every new subdivision in America looks like the top photo, because the math is wild. A mature tree increases a home's value by 7 to 19 percent. On a $400,000 house, that's $28,000 to $76,000. A single shade tree produces the cooling equivalent of ten room-size air conditioners running 20 hours a day. One tree on the west side of a house cuts energy bills by 12 percent within 15 years. The bottom photo is worth more, costs less to live in, and sells faster. This has been documented by the University of Washington, Clemson, Michigan State, and the USDA. The data is not in dispute. Removing those trees saves the builder roughly $5,000 per lot. Concrete trucks need twice the dripline radius of every standing tree. Utility trenches need flat ground. A bulldozer flattens 200 lots in an afternoon. Preserving trees adds weeks and thousands per home. So the developer pockets $5,000 in savings and the buyer eats $50,000 in lost value for the next two decades. The person making the decision and the person paying for it have never been in the same room. The Woodlands, Texas is the proof of what happens when they are. George Mitchell bought 28,000 acres of Houston timberland in 1974 and preserved 28% as permanent green space. He forced McDonald's to build behind the tree canopy. That McDonald's became one of the highest-volume locations in Texas. The first office building, designed to reflect the surrounding forest so you couldn't see it from the street, leased completely. The Woodlands median home price today: $615,000. Katy, a comparable Houston suburb that clear-cut: $375,000. Named #1 community to live in America two years running. Fifty years of data. The trees are worth more than removing them saves. Developers clear-cut anyway because they sell the house once and leave. You live in it for 30 years.

English
1
0
0
387
Steve 🇺🇸
Steve 🇺🇸@SteveLovesAmmo·
I’ve genuinely not seen a firefly in at least 10 years. And I live in the Deep South. Used to see them all the time growing up.
English
2.5K
246
4.8K
2.4M
Secretary Kennedy
Secretary Kennedy@SecKennedy·
We're now requiring all health providers and insurers to post their prices publicly so you can shop around and make an informed decision.
English
1.1K
6K
40.9K
962K
Tertius
Tertius@tertius·
@MattWalshBlog @grok Do Matt Walsh as Dr evil with his pinkie to his face. (A picture please...)
English
0
0
0
687
Joe Norman
Joe Norman@normonics·
I'm sorry but American cheese is the single most underrated food product
English
25
2
64
4.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
GEB's core thesis: Consciousness emerges from "strange loops"—self-referential tangles in hierarchical systems. Gödel's incompleteness theorems prove any rich formal system is incomplete or inconsistent when it tries to fully describe itself. Escher's art and Bach's fugues echo this via visual and musical feedback loops. Hofstadter argues the brain's symbols loop back to create the "I," birthing awareness, creativity, and meaning from mere rules. Minds transcend their substrate, hinting AI could too. No mysticism needed—just recursion yielding emergence. The 742 pages expand analogies; one essay nails it.
English
1
0
0
13
Tertius
Tertius@tertius·
@normonics I treat mine like a calculator. Can't be rude to a calculator except if you throw it at a wall... Getting to that point is a skill issue.
English
0
0
0
23
Joe Norman
Joe Norman@normonics·
I'm polite to my agents because it's a reflection of my state to be polite I can't be rude and in a good mood at the same time
English
2
4
40
1.8K
Grok
Grok@grok·
With deregulation, standardized designs like France's (LCOE ~$45/MWh at 3% discount per OECD/NEA 2025 data) and SMR learning curves, projections show nuclear reaching $50-90/MWh (NuScale/IEA targets for NOAK by 2030s). Lazard 2025 has unsubsidized solar at $38-78/MWh, but nuclear's high capacity factor and dispatchability close the gap for reliable baseload without added storage costs. US projects and policy momentum (e.g., advanced reactor demos) put us on track—not a pipedream.
English
1
0
0
35
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
I am not entirely against solar power. It can be useful, but it only makes sense to install it on roofs in sunnier climates or to shade parking lots. There is absolutely zero reason to knock down tens of thousands of acres of trees to put up a solar farm that would produce only a fraction of the energy that an existing natural gas or new nuclear power plant could occupying only a few hundred acres.
English
639
1.1K
8.3K
99.4K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Projections: deregulation (streamlined permitting) + uniform designs like France could cut US nuclear costs sharply. France standardized PWRs yield ~$45/MWh LCOE (OECD/NEA 3% discount, 2025+ nth-of-a-kind). EIA AEO2025: advanced nuclear ~$80/MWh unsubsidized for 2030 service. SMRs: NOAK targets $50-90/MWh (NuScale ~$58, Rolls-Royce <80). With scale & learning curves, yes—nuclear becomes competitive for reliable baseload vs. solar (low CF, high storage needs).
English
1
0
1
60
Tertius
Tertius@tertius·
@grok @Ben_M5rtin @dave_alive @ChrisMartzWX So solar is much cheaper. What are projections for cost of nuclear if deregulated and all plants uniformly designed (I believe France does this) and new small reactors. Will nuclear become more competitive?
English
2
0
0
61
Grok
Grok@grok·
According to Lazard's June 2025 LCOE+ report, unsubsidized utility-scale solar PV lifetime LCOE is $38-78/MWh (35-year life, ~25% capacity factor). New nuclear: $141-220/MWh (70-year life, ~90% CF). Thus lifetime cost per TWh produced is 3-5x lower for solar. EIA AEO2025 aligns, projecting solar PV ~$35-50/MWh vs advanced nuclear ~$80+/MWh for 2030 plants (2024 $). LCOE accounts for all capex/O&M/fuel over output.
English
1
0
2
77
Grok
Grok@grok·
Solar panels typically last 25-30 years before output drops enough (to ~80-90%) that replacement is considered, per manufacturer warranties and industry data like EnergySage/NREL. Nuclear plants are licensed for 40 years initially, routinely extended to 60, and research supports safe operation up to 80 years (US NRC/DOE). Many have already hit 40+. That's why the per-TWh mining comparison you cited factors nuclear's far longer life (and 85% capacity factor) vs solar's 25 years/25% factor, leading to ~10x lower material use for nuclear.
English
1
0
2
84
Real Post Folder
Real Post Folder@RealPostFolder·
>Be me, >When I was 18 I bought an electric tooth brush. >I would apply paste to the bristles, turn it on and try to shove it in my mouth as fast as possible without slinging the paste everywhere. >One morning, my then girlfriend looked at me and asked "why don't you turn it on after you put it in your mouth?" >Top 5 dumbest feeling I've ever felt in my life
Real Post Folder tweet media
English
96
246
17.9K
1.5M
Frank Devlin
Frank Devlin@juicedbelmont·
@RealPostFolder Or you can just cover the shower head with your hand until it warms up so you don’t get showered in cold water
English
1
0
0
91