
bluffbluffinton17681
157.9K posts




Spitting at me is disgusting, and I will make you famous. I had been on the street for 1 minute and was still quietly setting up my tripod — which would be broken two minutes later in a separate assault — and this man felt compelled to spit at me for wearing a sign that says “children cannot consent to puberty blockers.” Guess what? You don’t get to spit at me and walk on like nothing happened. In a proper world you’d be arrested.

Hamas Commanders: “Our fight is not only about Palestine. Our mission is to kill every non-Muslim on earth. We will hunt down Jews and Christians wherever they are in the world. They will either convert to Islam - or WE WILL KILL THEM.” In NYC, fellow Islamofacists chant, “We are Hamas,” while their sympathizers justify this as “resistance.”



Pushers, the Channel 4 sitcom written by and starring Rosie Jones, has been cancelled after one series. comedy.co.uk/tv/fyi/1093/pu…

🚨 Today's court update. A tough read - proceed with caution ⚠️ A teacher accused of murdering his adopted baby angrily denied harming and sexually abusing the boy when confronted by police, a trial has heard. Jamie Varley, 37, told officers "I have not done it. I will fight you til the day I die" as he was questioned over the death of 13-month-old Preston Davey, Preston Crown Court heard. "I know you are wrong. I have not done it," he said in the video interview with detectives shown to the jury. Varley, at the time a high school teacher, is accused of the murder of the child, while his partner John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, is accused of allowing his death, with both accused of sexual abuse. Both men deny all the charges against them. During the four months Preston was under their adoption at their home in Blackpool, it is alleged he was routinely ill-treated, had indecent images and videos taken of him, was sexually abused and physically assaulted. The defendants had rushed the unconscious baby from their home, after an alleged final sexual assault by Varley, to Blackpool Victoria Hospital at about 18:20 on 27 July 2023. Medics worked for nearly an hour to resuscitate the child but could not save him. Varley said he had left the child alone in the bath for three or four minutes before he returned and the baby had drowned. But in the police interview officers put to him the post-mortem examination findings of pathologist Dr Alison Armour. Dr Armour concluded Preston had not drowned but was the victim of "abusive trauma, non-accidental injuries and sexual abuse". A detective puts it to Varley that the pathologist also found the injuries to the baby suggesting he was sexually assaulted shortly before his death. "You are absolutely wrong," Varley replied. "Preston was in your care, what did you do to him?," the officer continued. "Nothing," the defendant replied. The post-mortem examination also found bruises to Preston's forehead, back of throat, mouth and bottom and bleeding in the lungs. His cause of death was given as an upper airway obstruction, leading to his collapse by a deliberate act of smothering, or an object or objects inserted into his mouth. The officer asked Varley: "How do you explain that level of bruising? How does he have so many bruises?" "No comment," Varley said. "By prodding him? By poking him?" the officer continued. "No," the defendant said. The officer added: "Preston lived for one year, one month and 11 days. "He was only in your care just less than four months before he was killed. "There is no evidence of natural disease. "I'm going to suggest you have killed Preston." The defendant, raising his voice and clearly angry, replied: "I have not done it. I will fight you til the day I die. I know you are wrong. I have not done it." Earlier, the officer put to Varley the series of images and videos taken of Preston which were evidence of alleged cruelty or indecency. They include one video lasting 14 minutes and 31 seconds where Preston is left alone in a bath. Varley said he set his phone up to record and was on the landing out of sight "to see how he reacts to his own company". The officer asked Varley: "How do you explain that, Jamie? He's slipped, whimpering, I would describe him as distressed. Why not go to comfort him? "Have you left him in the bath because you are fed up with him?" Varley replied: "I was keeping an eye on him. He's not distressed. There was no intent to hurt him." Varley was also asked about intimate videos and photos of the child found on his phone, prosecutors allege are indecent images. He told the officers they were attempts at "capturing" his child's life. Angrily, the defendant told officers: "Unlike you, I don't think about his genitals 24/7. 1/2......




🇬🇧 WHY IS THE UK BANNING CONSERVATIVES?! 7 international voices. Valid travel authorisations. All revoked. The Home Office says their presence is “not conducive to the public good.” That phrase used to be reserved for terror preachers. Now it apparently covers @D_Tarczynski (a sitting Polish MEP), @FDW_VB (a Belgian politician), and @AdaLluch (a Spanish woman with a podcast). Quite the glow-down for the threat assessment team. Let us be honest. Keir Starmer’s government looked at a guest list, did not like the politics, and decided the British public could not be trusted to listen to grown adults speak into a microphone for fifteen minutes. The world’s oldest parliamentary democracy, scared of @EvaVlaar with an X account. A government that decides which foreign voices its citizens are allowed to hear is a government that has stopped trusting its own people to think. Today it is @JoeyMannarino, @ValentinaForUSA, and @RealDonKeith. Tomorrow it is whoever the next Home Secretary finds annoying. The precedent does not check your voter registration. And then there is the Streisand effect. Whoever signed off on this has clearly never been on the internet. The UK just handed 7 people the biggest platforms of their lives, for free, with a side of martyrdom. Go follow all of them and see for yourself what Whitehall is so afraid of. Congratulations, Home Office. You’re their new publicist. If the speech was dangerous, sunlight beats silence. If it was weak, exposure would have done the work. Banning does neither. It just tells the world His Majesty’s Government would rather close the border than win a debate. The rest of us will sit back and watch @TRobinsonNewEra rally trend worldwide on Saturday. SO AGAIN, WHY IS THE UK BANNING CONSERVATIVES?

Compilation of Palestinian terrorists confessing to their rape and sexual violence against Israelis on October 7th Monsters









