
Rey AI
364 posts

Rey AI
@thereyai
AI practitioner. Running a digital agency + building AI media. Daily AI news, weekly industry map.






JUST IN: ANTHROPIC IS REPORTEDLY DISCUSSING A NEW FUNDING ROUND THAT WOULD VALUE THE COMPANY AT MORE THAN $900 BILLION That valuation would surpass OpenAI's $852 billion valuation from its March 2026 funding round. The company has spoken to investors but discussions are still at a "very early stage" and no offers have been accepted, per Bloomberg. The Anthropic valuation arc: • February 2026: Series G at $380B ($30B raised, co-led by D.E. Shaw Ventures, Dragoneer, Founders Fund, ICONIQ, and MGX) • Recent: Investor interest reported at $800B • This week: On-chain private market trading implied >$1 trillion per The Kobeissi Letter • Now: Discussions at >$900B Recent strategic investments: • Google $GOOGL committed up to $40B (with $10B initial at $350B valuation, plus $30B contingent on milestones) • Amazon $AMZN invested $5B with plans for up to $20B more • Earnings tonight confirmed Anthropic will secure up to 5 GW of Trainium chips through AWS For context, OpenAI's $852B round closed on March 31, 2026 with $122B in committed capital, anchored by Amazon ($50B), Nvidia ($30B), and


Anthropic just revised their annual recurring revenue forecast AGAIN. At the end of 2025, Anthropic announced that they were on track to generate 9 billion in annual revenue. Now, just 4 months later, Anthropic has revised their annual revenue expectations to 30 billion. What a difference a few months can make for a foundational model AI company. What do you think their next revenue update will land at?







Apple is taking a different route in AI. While hyperscalers are scaling toward $150B–$230B in annual spend by 2030E, Apple remains around $18B. Different approach. Different priorities. ◾ Amazon ~ $233B ◾ Google ~ $223B ◾ Meta ~ $166B ◾ Microsoft ~ $165B ◾ Apple ~ $18B #MarketingCommunication


I was going through GitHub Copilot pricing changes… this is wild. They quietly changed model multipliers and some of these jumps are insane. Opus 4.6 is 9x Opus 4.5 is 5x Opus 4.7 is 3.6x Sonnet 4.6 is 9x Sonnet 4.5 is 6x Gemini 3 Pro is 6x Gemini 3.1 Pro is 6x GPT 5.1 is 3x GPT 5.2 is 3x GPT 5.3 Codex is 6x GPT 5.4 is 6x

your company's most valuable asset is the one engineer who understands it. and AI agents just made that person 10x more critical, not less. cursor, copilot, claude code. these tools are only as good as the context you feed them. and in most enterprises the context lives in exactly one place: the head of the senior engineer who's been there seven years. when they take PTO, AI output quality drops. when they leave, the AI becomes useless for anything complex. that's the tribal knowledge problem. AI amplifies it. it doesn't eliminate it. unless you capture the knowledge first. at 8090 we built Software Factory around the Knowledge Graph for exactly this reason. Requirements captures business intent in plain english. Blueprints captures architecture decisions. Work Orders and Tests link every artifact forward and backward. nothing lives in a head. everything lives in the graph. EY deployed this across hundreds of consultants. new engineers reach productivity in weeks, not quarters. the context is in the system. tribal knowledge dies. documentation lives. that's not a slogan. it's the architecture. try it: factory.8090.ai/?utm_source=x&…
















