Thomas

Use your mind to control a robotic arm to feed yourself, hands-free! We built an EEG-controlled robotic arm at Stanford’s @hackwithtrees to help assist those who have mobility issues—those with disabilities, stroke survivors, and Parkinson’s who face a hard time eating without assistance. (About 1/3 of stroke survivors struggle with this issue in the US alone!) Once you concentrate, we decode the electrical signals from your brain and trigger the robotic arm to start the automatic feeding process. We detect objects, send commands to the 5 DOF robotic arm to grab & try feeding the user! 1/

Antigravity still not fixed

@richzou That was a good read

@chatgpt21 @rand_longevity Bar for agi became so low lol

@rand_longevity Well he’s wrong lol, when we think of general intelligence we don’t think of a hyper jagged model that can’t beat children on arc AGI 3 in my opinion

jensen confirms we have AGI, I agree with him

@shiri_shh @steipete Whats his setup? Just openClaw ?

The working style of OpenClaw founder @steipete is insane. bro runs 4–10 AI coding agents in parallel to generate, review, and commit code at superhuman speed. hitting 500+ commits pretty much every day and did 6,600+ in jan month alone. NVIDIA CEO must be happy seeing him spend $250k worth of tokens every month lmao

@kimmonismus cool

So cool: Supermemory 99% on Sota Memory! •Achieved ~99% on LongMemEval_s using experimental ASMR (Agentic Search and Memory Retrieval) technique. •Replaced vector search and embeddings with parallel observer agents extracting structured knowledge across six vectors from raw multi-session histories. •Deployed specialized search agents for direct facts, related context, and temporal reconstruction; no vector database required. Will be open source in 11 days!

@WindowsLatest Took this long to realize lol

BREAKING: Microsoft confirms it’ll make Windows 11 a calmer OS with fewer upsells or ads. The company also says it will raise the bar on Windows 11 quality in 2026 and focus on performance over unwanted Copilot integrations. Microsoft says it'll improve driver quality, make apps stable, improve connections with Bluetooth accessories, reduce USB-related crashes and connection loss, and enable improved printer discoverability and connections. "The work is underway," says Microsoft. "You can expect to see tangible progress that you’ll be able to feel as you preview builds from us throughout the rest of the year."

@AndrewHart This blog post is such a gem

Sam Altman, from 2019: "I am willing to take as much time as needed between projects to find my next thing. But I always want it to be a project that, if successful, will make the rest of my career look like a footnote." blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-succ…

@garrytan hbd

It's my birthday and on my birthday I want to recognize all my haters. Haters do the best marketing. Love your haters.

@demishassabis how universes exist is a mystery to me

It’s 2am again, my favourite time, and as always reality is still staring me in the face 🧐

@smhanov my friend's hosting it lol hf!

Who's in Waterloo today for socratica symposium?

i didn't know uoft gave students access to PitchBook

Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.

@r0ck3t23 I like his clarity Well thoughtful leader

there are some weird ppl out there on LinkedIn

I'm not very happy with the code quality and I think agents bloat abstractions, have poor code aesthetics, are very prone to copy pasting code blocks and it's a mess, but at this point I stopped fighting it too hard and just moved on. The agents do not listen to my instructions in the AGENTS.md files. E.g. just as one example, no matter how many times I say something like: "Every line of code should do exactly one thing and use intermediate variables as a form of documentation" They will still "multitask" and create complex constructs where one line of code calls 2 functions and then indexes an array with the result. I think in principle I could use hooks or slash commands to clean this up but at some point just a shrug is easier. Yes I think LLM as a judge for soft rewards is in principle and long term slightly problematic (due to goodharting concerns), but in practice and for now I don't think we've picked the low hanging fruit yet here.

LLM inference speed with vs. without KV caching: (learn how and why it works below)

@windsurf it's true!

Seeing a lot of renewed interest in Kimi K2.5, so we're making it free for Trial, Pro, Teams, and Max users for the next 7 days!

Customizing the timeline keeps resetting