jeremy

74.8K posts

jeremy

jeremy

@thought_less_

Katılım Ağustos 2011
2.8K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
jeremy
jeremy@thought_less_·
@SpecialPuppy1 Don’t blame me. I voted for Kamala
English
13
2
56
33.4K
kh
kh@r168538·
@mattyglesias Establishment Democrats on average lost to Donald Trump.
English
1
0
0
39
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
This is too meta for me. People should vote for El-Sayed if they want to. I don’t really agree with him on the issues and leftists are on average significantly worse electorally performers so my advice would be to vote for Stevens.
Shadi Hamid@shadihamid

With all due respect to @mattyglesias, the last few weeks have suggested to me that the center-left cares more about beating down the left than they do about beating Trump. We've seen the re-introduction of "woke" tropes by the Democratic establishment, weaponized against Abdul El-Sayed to suggest he's some kind of mysogonist, without any actual evidence. To accuse a Muslim man of misogyny is a classic trope, of course. If I was someone who cared about the future of the Democratic Party and it's ability to compete with the GOP, I'd be more enthusiastic about people like Abdul and Zohran, who model a positive "clean-living" masculinity. I'd be be enthusiastic about their ability to turn out young voters who are otherwise disaffected by a party that doesn't seem to want to listen to them. They're also practicing Muslims who respect the role of religion in public life, something we need more of in an overly secularized Democratic Party. This doesn't mean that everyone has to like Abdul or want him to win. Even if you want him to lose, you should see that he has something genuinely positive to offer to the Democratic Party. When the left wants to beat establishment candidates, it's called "factionalism." When the establishment wants to beat the left, it's not called that. It's just normal and unaccounted for. Take @neeratanden for example. Her feed is mostly about her disdain for the left. I don't see how this is constructive. And those of us who are not part of the Democratic establishment shouldn't concede too much ground on these points. I worry, though, that we have.

English
25
15
362
45.4K
Shadi Hamid
Shadi Hamid@shadihamid·
But that doesn't address my main point, that the center-left shouldn't be focusing so much of its energy, attention, and resources on factional battles with its left flank. You can want Haley Stevens to win, while also seeing the benefit of candidacies like Abdul's for the future of the Democratic Party. Instead, over the last couple weeks, we've seen a concerted effort to demonize the DSA and Israel-critics instead of seeing them as an important part of any future winning coalition.
English
15
0
22
1.9K
jeremy retweetledi
Democrats
Democrats@TheDemocrats·
Duly elected.
Democrats tweet media
English
1.8K
1.3K
13.3K
171.5K
jeremy retweetledi
Neera Tanden🌻
Neera Tanden🌻@neeratanden·
According to @ryangrim, after multiple scandals Platner was the safe, obvious pick for the general. Maybe people should be a little suspect of your push for candidates who have never won any primary or ever faced a Republican in their lives.
Ryan Grim@ryangrim

According to @neeratanden this is the safe, obvious pick for the general

English
117
85
768
90.1K
jeremy
jeremy@thought_less_·
@AsteadWH Nothing about “nobody has actually replaced her” here. Who are the contenders? Who else has more than one base? No one has even started trying
English
0
0
1
74
Astead
Astead@AsteadWH·
3) Harris retains goodwill from key portions of the party's base.
Astead tweet media
English
7
4
61
86.2K
Astead
Astead@AsteadWH·
🧵 I talked to Democratic Party officials, black voters in South Carolina, and prominent Democratic donors about whether the party wants former VP Kamala Harris to for president (again) in 2028. Some takeaways:
English
21
18
207
159.7K
Rude Dunner
Rude Dunner@opeitsnick20·
@bajablaster7102 @ImNotOwned Did you read that I said we should push against her running again? But regardless, democratic voters do like her! And we should figure out why and how to use that to support someone else who is better. Please just consider that I also want change
English
1
0
0
54
drew
drew@ImNotOwned·
Kamala is like the definition of mediocrity. Would be so dumb to run it back.
English
8
8
363
348K
Baja Blast
Baja Blast@bajablaster7102·
@opeitsnick20 @ImNotOwned they liked her so much that they just simply didn't vote for her. grow up, man. No one likes Kamala, and that ship has sailed, it's time for a new form of Democratic politics that isn't the nonsense that she has to offer.
English
2
0
3
89
jeremy
jeremy@thought_less_·
@chucklemea61294 @hecubian_devil /form a reasonable coalition where they know their place (wealthy blue enclaves). Worst place to have them is sniping from the outside because they believe they’re popular but are too lazy and scared to find out
English
0
0
1
4
Pumpkin Boy
Pumpkin Boy@NPRtotebags·
@melliflora @ContraPoints What's depressing about this scenario is it depicts something that could literally never happen. And if it did in some freak occurrence of nature, it would amount to a bunch of fish brushing against a great white shark.
English
1
0
3
62
jeremy retweetledi
Keegs 🧮🏗️
Keegs 🧮🏗️@LittleKeegs0·
Have any folks really worried about alignment grappled with the fact that current AI models are much better aligned with human life and flourishing than the leaders of the US government?
English
3
2
22
624
jeremy retweetledi
Reverend Raphael Warnock
Reverend Raphael Warnock@ReverendWarnock·
Donald Trump is at war with our democracy and Georgia is ground zero. But this is John Lewis’ Georgia. We are not intimidated. We are not moved. Mr. President, instead of attacking our democracy, why don’t you do something about the high cost of gas, housing, and health care?
English
3.1K
2.9K
16.4K
389.4K
jeremy retweetledi
Jon Ossoff
Jon Ossoff@ossoff·
Jon Ossoff tweet media
ZXX
974
2.7K
29.5K
703.9K
Charlotte
Charlotte@UtilityCalc·
@hecubian_devil another signal of us escaping marginality. a sign that we matter.
English
1
0
17
917