Boris

Hezbollah is not equivalent to Lebanon. The platform condones whales manipulating UMA voting, engaging in illegal settlements, and robbing users of their funds. #FJraU3C" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/israel-x… @Polymarket @zachxbt @real_clazzy

@ObiTouchline @shayne_coplan @Polymarket @CarOnPolymarket @bosaurum Yup. If @Polymarket is going to misresolve markets just based on @bosaurum, who is completely COLLUDING with the whales, then it is unusable.

.@shayne_coplan @Polymarket has become unusable, and some traders like @CarOnPolymarket are scamming the market by working with @bosaurum, your head of markets. Below is a screenshot with proof. This is evident in how @bosaurum just misresolved a market with $3.5M in volume by conflating Hezbollah with Lebanon. They are not the same entity and the rules are clear. He also fat-fingered the resolution right before this one. Two errors back to back at this scale. This needs a re-review. This is not about money, this is about what is right and wrong. I am hoping you and the @Polymarket team can review this one. Many good people lost money by reading the market rules clearly. polymarket.com/event/israel-x…

Hey @shayne_coplan You’ve built - and continue to build - an excellent product. But right now, there’s real chaos happening on a number of markets in @Polymarket In the event polymarket.com/event/us-x-ira…, UMA token stakers are currently voting on the outcome. It’s ridiculous that the fate of a market with $120 million in trading volume is being decided by holders of a token with a market cap of only $42 million. If you subtract the exchanges and the team holdings, the actual stakers probably control no more than $20 million worth of tokens. And these holders who influence Polymarket resolutions are very likely participating in the bets themselves. That means the most interested parties are the ones deciding the outcome. How can they possibly make a fair and honest decision when their own profits are on the line? Is this really the kind of decentralization we were aiming for, Shayne? It would be much better if you appointed 7 anonymous experts who would vote on disputed markets in a balanced and objective way - instead of letting random UMA token holders decide the fate of a billion-dollar platform! By the way, I remember @Tyler_Did_It ran into a similar problem about a year ago. Below, I’ll explain why this market should resolve as NO: What actually happened on the evening of April 7, 2026: •Around 6:30–7:00 PM ET, President Trump posted on Truth Social. He offered to suspend U.S. bombing and attacks on Iran for two weeks, but only if Iran agreed to the complete, immediate, and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz.
He called it a “double-sided ceasefire” and described Iran’s 10-point plan as a “workable basis for negotiations.” Trump added that most issues were nearly resolved and the two weeks would be used to finalize a full agreement. •Iran’s Supreme National Security Council released its statement on April 8 (after midnight ET). They accepted the two-week ceasefire but framed it as a “great victory,” claiming the U.S. had fully accepted their 10-point plan. Why this is NOT a full official agreement: •It was a conditional, unilateral announcement by Trump — the pause in strikes depends on Iran immediately reopening the Strait. •No signed joint document or official bilateral statement exists. •The White House later clarified that Iran’s original 10-point plan was “fundamentally unserious,” “unacceptable,” and “thrown in the garbage.” What Trump called “workable” was a revised version negotiated via Pakistan. •Both sides interpret the deal very differently (especially on sanctions, uranium enrichment, Lebanon, and U.S. troop withdrawal).

@Polymarket @ThomBrady5 All these scams happening on polymarket should be stopped, you leave your decisions on UMA? Those fuckers just manipulate the result

@Polymarket @ThomBrady5 Bro you are fraud, because of you i lost, the Israel vs haezbollah ceasefire on 18 April. There was no ceasfire between Israel and haezbollah, you guys just manipulated the result. So that you dont have to pay anyone.

If you win a bet versus Polymarket, they will contact the Department of Justice and ask for you to be thrown in prison for 50+ years and have all your winnings confiscated. These guys are sore losers playing a rigged game.

Hey there, quick disclaimer: Car is actively buying NO on an alt to cover his YES shares, in case anyone actually thought he had principles.

@Sueaeh Great work on the UMA breakdown! I've tagged Hart Lambur (UMA) and Shayne Coplan (Polymarket) on LinkedIn to hold them accountable for this $94M mess. We need to turn up the heat together. Check it out: linkedin.com/posts/ronen-la…

For some reason the Polymarket team can give context and even clear the orderbooks for the POTUS dispute but for the Israel Lebanon ceasefire they're all quiet even though the same UMA mafia is going against the rules and forcing the wrong result. The market context shows a clea-

@Polymarket Your rules and facts don't determine the outcome; the whale's voting power does. Example: #W8bEukv" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/israel-x…

@Polymarket These scammers and whales from Polymarket will never let you win

🚨 NEW POLYMARKET: Clavicular pregnancy in 2026? polymarket.com/event/clavicul…

@bdndbd92031 @zachxbt @Polymarket @UMAprotocol #UMAprotocolScam

It’s honestly ridiculous. Ignoring real-world reality like this makes it feel like Polymarket and UMA together are running a massive scam operation. Disgusting. Israel never did ceasefire hezabollah, it was lebanon. @Polymarket @UMAprotocol #UMAWhaleScam #PolyScam

If the outcome is ultimately determined by UMA voting, then what’s the point of real-world events at all? Why post these prediction markets on Polymarket and take people’s money? Why not just run everything directly on UMA, let people vote there, and decide results that way?

We’re not making claims without evidence. We’re presenting: • on-chain data • governance structure • real dispute cases The question is simple: Is this system robust enough to guarantee fair resolution at scale? @Polymarket @UMAprotocol #PolyScam #UMAScam

When you combine: • subjective market wording • token-weighted governance • increasing delegation concentration You create conditions where outcomes can be influenced — even if unintentionally.

🚨 Evidence is emerging that Polymarket’s resolution system may be vulnerable to concentrated influence. This isn’t speculation anymore — we’re tracking data, voting patterns, and specific market outcomes. 👇