Tim Benbow

2.3K posts

Tim Benbow

Tim Benbow

@timbenbow1

Professor of Strategic Studies, Defence Studies Department, King's College London at the Joint Services Command and Staff College

Katılım Mayıs 2015
181 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Robert Jenrick
Robert Jenrick@RobertJenrick·
Britain has paid Norway over £100 billion for gas since 2021. For gas they’re drilling in the North Sea, the same sea Ed Miliband has banned new drilling in on the British side. Madness.
English
1.4K
4.8K
25.4K
902.8K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Air Power
Air Power@RealAirPower1·
While high-end assets like THAAD and the F-35 grab all the headlines, a "blue-collar" hero, as I like to call it, is quietly winning the drone war every night. The RAF Regiment’s Rapid Sentry system, deployed around Erbil, Iraq, has notched an incredible tally of ~50 Iranian drone intercepts since February 28. To put that in perspective, Rapid Sentry has downed roughly 10 times as many drones as the RAF’s fighter jets in the same theater! It’s the ultimate goalkeeper: a VSHORAD designed exclusively to tackle low and slow threats like the Shahed-136. 1/2
Air Power tweet mediaAir Power tweet media
English
60
532
4K
298.6K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Max K
Max K@MaxE2review·
Imagine being a brutalised Cuban peasant, living under crushing communist dictatorship your entire life, then having to put up with western socialists flying out to your country in order to prop up that dictatorship while ranting about how oppressive their own, infinitely freer societies, supposedly are
CODEPINK@codepink

NOW 🇨🇺 We're on our way to Cuba! Our CODEPINK delegation to the Nuestra América convoy is carrying thousands of pounds of urgently needed humanitarian aid. We stand with Cuba!

English
241
666
2.8K
90.8K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Jerome Starkey
Jerome Starkey@jeromestarkey·
“the long-awaited defence investment plan (DIP)…may not arrive until June — a year after the strategic defence review. “It has gone from having a strategic basis to looking like a “spreadsheet exercise”, adding: “They’ve lost the plot.”
Larisa Brown@larisamlbrown

Exclusive: Ministers could push back major shipbuilding programmes and other projects to make £10 billion worth of savings in the Ministry of Defence thetimes.com/article/98990d…

English
4
9
44
6.1K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Shashank Joshi
Shashank Joshi@shashj·
A sign of sickness at the top of the intelligence community when the DNI simply refuses to read out portions of her written statement that contradict the president's false public claims. Antithesis of the truth telling that intelligence should stand for. aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/18…
English
22
401
1.2K
31.6K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Isaac Stone Fish
Isaac Stone Fish@isaacstonefish·
Why is Gabbard using China's preferred term of "peaceful reunification?" --Taiwan was never really part of China, so it's not "re"-unification. --There's no scenario where it wouldn't involve at least a little -- and far more likely a massive amount -- of force and coercion; so it's not "peaceful."
Nick Schifrin@nickschifrin

.@DNIGabbard: "The IC assesses that China likely prefers to set the conditions for an eventual peaceful reunification with Taiwan short of conflict."

English
61
41
147
15.9K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Robert Johnson 🇬🇧
Robert Johnson 🇬🇧@RJohnsonCCW1·
@shashj @Ziya_Meral It seems strangely inconsistent for this UK government to show concern over FOIs, when it dismissed the spying of Cash & Berry, ignored the fate of Jimmy Lai, & has refused to call PRC a "threat" to the point of refusing to accept analysts reports on this. Ask @lukedepulford
English
0
1
1
207
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Greg Bagwell
Greg Bagwell@gregbagwell·
Trump fails to attract any support, why? Firstly, most allies are pretty upset with the way he has attacked Iran, without any consultation or preparation of his case for doing so. Second, the war appears to have not been planned with the current deterioration in mind. 🧵1/4
Greg Bagwell tweet media
English
94
345
1.8K
244.9K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Jorit Wintjes
Jorit Wintjes@JoritWintjes·
Out of curiosity - did you speak up publicly when your president floated the idea of taking Greenland by force? Did you speak up publicly when your president spat on the graves of European soldiers killed while heeding your call in Iraq and Afghanistan? Did you speak up ...
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Just spoke to @POTUS about our European allies’ unwillingness to provide assets to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning, which benefits Europe far more than America. I have never heard him so angry in my life. I share that anger given what’s at stake. The arrogance of our allies to suggest that Iran with a nuclear weapon is of little concern and that military action to stop the ayatollah from acquiring a nuclear bomb is our problem not theirs is beyond offensive. The European approach to containing the ayatollah’s nuclear ambitions have proven to be a miserable failure. The repercussions of providing little assistance to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning are going to be wide and deep for Europe and America. I consider myself very forward-leaning on supporting alliances, however at a time of real testing like this, it makes me second guess the value of these alliances. I am certain I am not the only senator who feels this way.

English
50
94
1K
26.4K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський
British military bases in Cyprus. This is what Ukraine’s security proposal could look like – our experts would place interception teams, and set up radars and acoustic coverage, and this would all work. If Iran launched a large-scale attack – similar to Russian attacks – we would guarantee protection. This is the kind of reinforcement we offer, and it may soon be needed across Europe. And drones can be launched not only from land, but also from ships at sea. Such long-range strikes are no longer rare. Different countries already use them. And since European seas still have many tankers from Russia’s shadow fleet, launching drones from such vessels is no longer something unexpected. From my address to the Parliament of the United Kingdom (5/7)
English
209
963
6K
291.7K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Andy Mayer
Andy Mayer@mayerandrew·
Having now found and read this very odd 'quickie' report from the Smith School. Some comments. 1) The central argument is that a mainly renewable energy system could save more money on household bills than draining the North Sea of oil and gas. 2) From the off we should note the point of drilling is provide oil and gas for use or sale, not to subsidise bills. Use replaces imports. While the revenues from sales of domestic production could be used for anything, most of which would be wiser than funding a subsidy on bills that would increase energy demand. 3) The central argument is fatally undemined when the report says "We do not explicitly include the costs of intermittency", going on to treat the wholesale cost of electricity as the assumed marginal price of future renewables. 4) If you're only comparing the costs of renewables when the wind is blowing and sun is shining, it will of course be low. What sets household bills however is that plus the very high system and policy costs. Which relate in part to all the other times. 5) The paper assumes these remain broadly constant, but that's mad. To get to sufficient renewables capacity to provide all our power needs requires massive overinvestment in idle capacity, grid infrastructure, balancing and backup services. All on bills or tax. That's why bills were rising despite gas prices falling 2023-24. This gets harder the more 'firm power' you take off the grid, not easier. 6) Most of that back-up capacity into the 2040s would be gas power peaking plant, which speaks to the unwisdom of trying to polarise the debate between renewables or the North Sea. They're currently in codependency relationship that pleases neither. 7) On top of which the report is assuming the full electrification of home heating, which means even more the same. All of which would also be creating bottlenecks in supply chains that would make it unfeasibly expensive if forced at pace. 8) As a final finesse all the system costs are then removed from bills and dumped on general taxation. Which is a traditional game of 'hide the vegan sausage' not a saving. More likely additive as you remove the price signals that drive efficient investment, and create a bureaucracy to redistribute funds. 10) What's mostly fascinating about this report is how many media outlets have reported it as factual, without reading it, or probing the very obviously flawed assumptions behind the scenarios presented.
Colin Walker@colinwalker79

Latest in 'drill baby drill' news: University of Oxford says a UK powered entirely by clean energy…could save households up to £441 a year In contrast, maximising oil and gas extraction from North Sea would offer savings of just £16 to £82 independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…

English
20
80
254
19.8K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
David Blagden
David Blagden@blagden_david·
“We ran a tiny navy into the ground with overstretched commitments, unattractive recruitment/retention offers, penny-pinching dockyard support/maintenance contracts, inadequate weapons fits and munitions holdings, and too few replacement hulls - now we demand to know why!”
John Redwood@johnredwood

A commercial shipping company does not have to have three to five fairly new ships undergoing maintenance to keep one at sea. So why does the navy?

English
9
62
393
30.1K
Tim Benbow retweetledi
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
He wants to deploy UK forces we don’t have to keep oil and gas flowing 3,000 miles away but forbids any new investment in our sector of the North Sea. Bonkers.
BBC Politics@BBCPolitics

“It is very important that we get the Strait of Hormuz reopened” Energy Secretary Ed Miliband says “it is something we’re looking at” when #BBCLauraK asks whether the UK might send ships and drones to the Persian Gulf bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…

English
715
3.8K
17.5K
418.5K