Tyler

@ayeejuju Has your son met schrödinger cat?

@JAbbott_1 @RippleXity You are clearly uneducated. It is supposed to be the neutral bridge asset that facilitates the exchange of any currency or asset for another currency or asset.

@RippleXity It was suppose to be the global reserve currency of the world! 🤣🤣🤣

🚨 JUST IN: $XRP Liquidity Index on Binance Just Crashed to Near Zero.

@TheStingisBack Hint: ghostbusters They saw toy sales and thought we need to make robocop for kids so we can sell toys.

RoboCop flying in RoboCop 3 (1993) is bad on almost every level, yet the movie plays it like a triumphant moment. Still can’t believe they took the ultra-violent ’87 classic and turned it into a PG-13 toy commercial. And why does the window shatter before he even hits it?

@Ichiebillionz Looks like Redemption

🎥 Game of Thrones Season 9 (2027) - Concept Trailer Daenerys Targaryen returns from dead, not as a mindless wight, but as the Night Queen herself. Fully aware, more powerful than ever, and ready to reclaim the throne, the kingdom, and the fear the world stole from her.

@MarioNawfal Every knock off of call of duty begs to Differ. Sold well enough to make money. Plus, all knowledge and creativity is based off of some prior observations. It’s not a leap to “invent” GTA.

The CEO of Take-Two, the company behind GTA, just said something the entire AI industry doesn't want to hear. And he said it without being anti-AI. Strauss Zelnick's argument is precise. AI is built on datasets. Datasets are backward-looking. Creativity is forward-looking. A model trained on everything that already exists cannot, by definition, produce something genuinely unexpected. And all hits, by their very nature, are unexpected. Asset creation and hit creation are not the same thing. AI is getting very good at the first one. The second one is what actually makes money, builds franchises, and changes culture. Nobody has shown AI can do that yet. The derivative property problem is real. You can clone GTA with existing technology. You could do it before AI. It would take 3 years and look identical. It still wouldn't sell. Because it isn't GTA. It's a clone of GTA. And consumers, despite what the industry occasionally pretends, can feel the difference between something genuinely new and something assembled from the residue of things that already worked. Thousands of mobile games ship every year. 0 to 5 hits get made. The same studios make them every time. The technology to make more games has been commoditized for years. It didn't democratize hit creation. It just flooded the market with more forgettable product. The Silicon Valley thesis that AI unlocks game creation for everyone is true in the same way that cheap cameras unlocked filmmaking for everyone. They did. And the same 5 studios still make the movies everyone watches. What Zelnick is saying, without quite saying it, is that the thing AI cannot replicate is taste. The instinct for what hasn't been done yet. The cultural antenna that detects the gap in the market before the data can see it. Data tells you what people wanted. Hits tell people what they want next. Those are different jobs.

@ChrisKFilms @Kgill39 I’d agree. Riley is not perfect, but I’d prefer Riley plus Murphy over Nurse and Murphy playing second pair.

Yes. Absolutely yes. While Rielly isn’t great defensively, neither was Nurse. At least Rielly brings an element that Nurse doesn’t have which is a strong transition game and some offense. This would make re-signing Murphy key as that would make for a good second pairing IMO. Rielly also saves $2M on the salary cap.

For Oiler fans, Darnell Nurse for Morgan Reilly. Yes or No?

@WallStreetMav @RBReich A single mom wrote a book in a coffee shop and became a billionaire. Unlike odds, but there another way.

@RBReich Building a successful company that provides a service or product that others want or need?

There are basically 5 ways to accumulate a billion dollars: 1) Profiting from a monopoly 2) Insider-trading 3) Political payoffs 4) Fraud 5) Inheritance Don’t believe the self-made myth.

@VigilantFox People have a hard time with two things being true: Hamas = evil actions & Israel = evil actions It’s possible for both to be true.

BILL MAHER: “If there’s one issue which makes me say to the far left, ‘Stop asking me why I make fun of the left more than I used to’ — [Israel] is it. This is why.” “You’re morally goofy. You’re ignorant. You don’t know history. You don’t know the present either.” “They put that whole thing out for the longest time about how Israel was starving the Palestinian people… People were starving because Hamas stole all the food!” FETTERMAN: “Exactly!” MAHER: “Because Hamas wants the people to die. First of all, they love being martyrs. Let’s just not gloss over that.” “That’s part of the whole religion-dominated culture — martyrdom is good… That’s why they strapped bombs to children. Okay?” “So again, you’re morally goofy if this is the team you want to be on.” “And Israel didn’t starve them… No other nation on earth at war would ever be even asked to feed their enemy.”

@grok @BioTurvaMies @TFTC21 So @grok can those void shareholders can sue forge or hiive or do they have a disclaimer that screws those who lost money?

It's legal for private companies like Anthropic. Their bylaws and stock agreements require board approval for any transfer—standard in startups to control who owns shares. Unapproved sales are void per those contracts and aren't recognized on the cap table. Secondary buyers (via Forge, Hiive, etc.) take on that counterparty risk knowingly. It's not fraud; the company didn't issue those shares to you directly. Public stock is different—this is restricted private equity.

Anthropic just published a support page that should terrify anyone holding its shares on the secondary market. "Any sale or transfer of Anthropic stock, or any interest in Anthropic stock, that has not been approved by our Board of Directors is void and will not be recognized on our books and records." Void. Not restricted. Not pending review. Void. That means if you bought Anthropic shares through Forge, Hiive, or any other secondary platform without board approval, you are not a stockholder. You have no stockholder rights. Your transaction is invalid. It gets worse. Anthropic says it does not permit SPVs to hold its stock. Any transfer to an SPV is void. Investment funds claiming to offer indirect exposure are "most likely relying on mechanisms that attempt to circumvent our transfer restrictions." Forward contracts, tokenized securities, synthetic exposure products, all of it potentially worthless. Their advice to investors: "Assume that it is invalid." There is a multi-billion dollar secondary market in Anthropic shares right now. Platforms are pricing the stock at $265-$1,400+ per share based on a $380 billion valuation. Real people have put real money into these positions. And Anthropic just told them none of it counts. This is the purest possible illustration of counterparty risk. You can buy a share of a company and have the company itself declare your ownership void because you bought it through the wrong channel.

@KILLTOPARTY Run the fuck away

🚨🚨RELUCTANT HANDJOBS🚨🚨

@spittinchiclets @BizNasty2point0 Agreed. Torching the organization and management would be perfectly acceptable though

If Connor McDavid ends up moving on from Edmonton, Oilers fans have no right to hate on him.

@TiffanyFong Honestly she is the best boss ever. Most bosses treat you like shit for 50 years and leave you with nothing. He got 12 months of abuse, offers of birthday BJs and probably a 50 million dollar lawsuit settlement. I wish I had a boss like that.

@RandPaul @DrAseemMalhotra He didn’t withhold it, they all did. It also wasn’t a secret. Zerohedge had much of this information posted in article in Jan-March of 2020. The fact they haven’t been arrested yet is a joke.

Ralph Baric has never answered this question satisfactorily: Why did he never inform pandemic leaders that his lab and Wuhan bat scientist Shi Zhengli had submitted a proposal to genetically engineer a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site two years before a pandemic caused by a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site erupted in Wuhan, China? Adding a furin cleavage site is a gain-of-function experiment and may be one of the reasons COVID-19 became able to infect humans! Baric’s withholding of this knowledge prevented scientists from realizing early on that COVID-19 was not a typical animal virus that often infects humans poorly, but was likely a coronavirus purposefully engineered to infect humans. Withholding knowledge of these proposed experiments allowed Fauci et al. to cover up his approval of NIH funding for gain-of-function experiments in Wuhan and to deceptively shift blame to the “wet market.” The cover-up would have been less successful had Ralph Baric revealed that scientists in Wuhan were seeking funding for these gain-of-function experiments. realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2026/…

@elonmusk @C_3C_3 Thank you for that. Any luck having the DOJ prosecute the war criminals who did what they did?

@C_3C_3 True

If Elon owned Twitter in 2020 they would not have been able to pull off COVID. Fact.

@Ambar_SIFF_MRA I have to know if he cried while getting a BJ or cried while eating her box? Details matter

>Lorna Hajdini, 37 >JPMorgan Executive >Used her power to abuse junior men >Forced married man into non-consensual sex acts >Allegedly drugged him with Rohypnol and erectile dysfunction pills >Forced non-consensual oral s*x while he cried and mocked him during the act >Engaged in facesitting, toe sucking and other acts >Used racial slurs calling him her "little brown boy" and made derogatory remarks about his wife >Threatened to destroy his career saying "I f**king own you" >Victim faced retaliation from JPMorgan after reporting the abuse >This is what feminist women do when they get power. >Imagine the outrage if the genders were reversed.

@MrBeast People are not smart. Potential death for pushing blue, guaranteed survival pushing red. Game theory all day.

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

@everestchris6 Hail

this OpenClaw agent SELLS roof inspections on autopilot. it watches hail radar 24/7, finds every $1M+ home in the storm path, and mails them a postcard with a satellite shot of their actual roof + a QR to a personalized video pitch by the next day reply "HAIL" + RT and I'll send you the full guide so you can build this too (must be following so I can DM)

@RipBullWinkle Hahaha. The gas fees/congestion on ETH would make settlement on ETH expensive and impossible. But ok

Raoul Pal just predicted the entire banking system moves to Ethereum for settlement within 18 months. $4.2 trillion in tokenized assets by 2027. He's looking at narrative while institutions build on different rails. 🧵

@_SmokeyGirl25 Any actual cowboy would take one look at this guys fake as yuppie “cowboy” costume and laugh in his posing posturing face.

Friends and I at the mall, This Hunk walks ,We Fall. Out 🔥🔥🔥🔥

@JoelKatz But of course it’s fine if the government lies, hence why the removed a law that prohibits the government from lying. Someone should also tell the CIA, whom we all know never engages in disinformation.

All disagreement with official truths will be considered by those in government to be deliberate misinformation. Some of the most important public political debates of the past decade (for example, around vaccine mandates) involved each side vehemently accusing the other of spreading deliberate, harmful misinformation for financial gain. We saw many governments punishing and limiting speech on precisely that basis even though the speech was on the very most important political decisions of the time, directly impacting elections. Nobody saying something like this could possibly believe in freedom of speech. What they believe is much more sinister. They believe it's important that people *think* others have free speech so they are convinced that they are hearing all sides of an argument while *they* retain control over what political viewpoints are and aren't permitted to be advanced. We see this playing out even today around the most important political issues of the day. For example, immigration policy.