cgt
27.6K posts

cgt
@tmppbr
Proud 🇧🇷🇪🇸🇻🇦 | 🇧🇷 BSc Computer Systems | 🇪🇸 MSc Financial Engineering | 🇧🇷 PhD candidate in Computational Economics | Crypto & FinTech enthusiast






i found a github repo that lets you spin up an AI agency with AI employees engineers, designers, growth marketers, product managers, QA, legal, sales each role runs as its own Claude Code agent and they coordinate to ship ideas 128,000+ stars in under 90 days here's the full breakdown: 1. engineering (7 agents) frontend, backend, mobile, ai, devops, prototyping, senior development 2. design (7) ui/ux, research, architecture, branding, visual storytelling, image generation 3. marketing (8) growth hacking, content, twitter, tiktok, instagram, reddit, app store 4. product (3) sprint prioritization, trend research, feedback synthesis 5. project management (5) production, coordination, operations, experimentation 6. testing (7) qa, performance analysis, api testing, quality verification 7. support (6) customer service, analytics, finance, legal, executive reporting 8. spatial computing (6) xr, visionos, webxr, metal, vision pro 9. specialized (6) multi-agent orchestration, data analytics, sales, distribution 50+ agents total. one repo. one solo founder running it. what i like about this approach is the framing instead of one big agent trying to do everything, you structure it like a company specialized roles. clear responsibilities. handoffs between agents instead of one prompt trying to hold everything the problem most people hit immediately: agents that don't loop don't scale one prompt → one answer → stops that's not an agency. that's a very expensive to-do list the missing piece is loops — agents that run, check their own output, self-correct, and hand back to the next agent without a human in the middle that's what turns this repo from a demo into something that actually ships the exact setup is in the article below. nothing complicated. copy-paste ready. bookmark this before you clone the repo ↓ github.com/msitarzewski/a…


ta saindo do papel

the problem with tech twitter is that it's truly a bubble. you could be working on your first project, see 100+ other founders talking about making >$10k MRR and feel like you're the only one in the world that isn't getting "rich" with AI. the reality is that if you're building with AI, you're instantly among <1% of the population and if you've even made a single dollar off of something you've built, that number drops significantly. keep in mind, most people are using AI as a search engine, doctor, therapist, etc - not to build a SAAS. don't get dissuaded, you're too early.




@levelsio Cool. Now we can guess the real rating super easily:



Only 2.2% of U.S. households have a paid AI subscription We are still so early












