Treschic

@5150daddy @IanRunkle @MafiaMasshole @watulookinkdat @defense_diaries @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow @TheEmilyDBaker Who said I believe him? You can dislike and not trust either person in the equation. She filed fake court documents. What excuse would there be for that?

@tres_chiccc @IanRunkle @MafiaMasshole @watulookinkdat @defense_diaries @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow @TheEmilyDBaker If you’re going to use one example as your basis then tell me how do you believe anything Aidan says when he’s been caught in 1000 lies this year alone 😂

I wonder if any "LawTubers" out there, such as @defense_diaries , @BrotherCounsel , @LawyerYouKnow , @TheEmilyDBaker , @IanRunkle et al will be covering any of this information objectively, or even acknowledging it at all? The contents have been authenticated by Kearney himself, repeatedly, as he continues to blame his ex-girlfriend for "stealing" his extraction and giving it to me (she didn't.) The judge in his restraining order hearing made it very clear that Kearney has waived privilege. All of this information has been alleged in the newly-filed defamation claim, and here it is - in black and white. Imagine if communications like this existed between the Alberts and McCabes? They don't, because the DOJ went back years in their phones and the most that was pulled out was the "asian house" and "tell them (the media) the guy never went in the house." These communications are a lot more pointed and revealing. Why the spin, why the slant, why the relative silence? Maybe people shouldn't trust these guys. jumpshare.com/share/augn068T…

@nowicanjoin @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow He literally covered a different case today.

@BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow Isn’t there something else, anything else, to talk about? You content creators are too invested in the circular firing squad of commenting on each other’s comments. There’s nothing to learn here. Just so boring.

Well, that was our point, Julie—to amuse you. @LawyerYouKnow and I are just making our best pitch to get on your show.

@5150daddy @IanRunkle @MafiaMasshole @watulookinkdat @defense_diaries @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow @TheEmilyDBaker The forged court filings maybe??? She’s a criminal.

@IanRunkle @MafiaMasshole @watulookinkdat @defense_diaries @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow @TheEmilyDBaker Known to be u reliable? You may not agree with her views but where do you get “unreliable” from? Sounds like you are drinking from the fountain of aidan. Do you think this is a fake extraction? If not then you have no basis to claim it’s unreliable.

@commcenterpod @KelseyCaterino I'm super curious what your former co-workers would have to say about you. Probably one of the good old boys that left female officers to fend for themselves.

@KelseyCaterino Is this what kind of cop you were? Lying about other cops who wear your old uniform, claiming they’re panicking because they see a surveillance camera? Were you the type of cop who let the public think something that’s not true about good cops? Were you the damsel in distress?

Just curious - what do you see?

@skyler157 @BrotherCounsel @NoteMyObjection @YouTube BC's 50k more subs says differently but ok (53k vs 3k).

@BrotherCounsel @NoteMyObjection @YouTube You are so full of shit. You are nowhere near Katherine Loftus' level of professionalism and intelligence.

Here is my take on @NoteMyObjection Interview of Kerry Roberts on the Karen Read case. youtu.be/Z0-pU3WnzbA?si… via @YouTube

@defense_diaries It's unfortunate that MSP didn't do 10% of the investigating that KR's lawyers and TB did. I have learned more than ever how important your job is and while I don't always agree (Khori Richens lol), you both are great at what you do. Kate likely hasn't watched any other coverage.

2/🧵 We do it ethically and with great respect to the victims and their families. There is no avoiding the cognitive dissonance that some may feel as to that aspect of our wrongful conviction coverage. All we can do is explain why it in fact remains in line with the principle of respecting the victims and their families. People can elect to listen or rage against us uninformed. It is their choice completely. Now, back to what I reviewed earlier. I believe that what was posted only cements the fact that Aidan Kearney wholeheartedly believed what he was reporting was the truth. He went so far as to challenge it at one point regarding the disputed 2:27 Google search. He believed what he was saying to be the truth. I saw nothing that would indicate that Karen Read’s attorneys did not believe wholeheartedly in the defense they were employing, which was developed from the evidence tendered to them by the Commonwealth. What I saw in those messages was attorneys performing their ethical duty to investigate the case on behalf of their client. I saw nothing in the messages indicating that they were actively putting forth information via pleadings, motions, etc. that they did not believe was the truth. If you take David Yannetti’s text at face value, which I do, he appears very much to believe that something happened in that house which caused John O’Keefe’s death. If I’m missing something, point it out. The case was not under gag and the filings were public record, including the most important filing of 4/12/23. THAT filing, not Aidan Kearney, made the defense’s theory of defense public. It was all laid out in that motion for the world to see and they were continuing to investigate it, as is their ethical duty, all the way up to trial. Again, before you start calling me names and attacking me, please review Rule 3.6. A defense attorney that finds a journalist that’s willing to report on the defense’s theory of the case is a gift, not evidence of a conspiracy. I realize that most of you are accustomed to the State trying the defendant in public, with leaks and pressers. Which as you can imagine, I find to be fundamentally unfair. What you saw in this case, was a leveling of the playing field…and now we all know how much had to go into accomplishing it. That speaks volumes as to the power of the Government. This is not a comprehensive answer as that would become too much, but I’m willing to listen to civil debate if any of you believe I’m seeing this the wrong way.

1/🧵 There seems to be a large number of people, in general, that seem to operate under the misconception that it is unethical for a defense attorney to speak with journalist. It is not. I’m attaching ABA Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.6, so that you may familiarize yourself with it. Once you’ve done that, if you’d like to debate the Safe Harbor rule…I’m here for it. There is also absolutely no prohibition that exists that does not allow for a Defendant, who is presumed innocent, to speak with the press or a journalist. I think most attorneys prefer to speak on behalf of their clients, but people are going to people. I have reviewed all 81 slides of what @MafiaMasshole posted today. There was some information that I had not seen. I am not speaking for any other attorney here or who has a YouTube channel or anywhere else and I’m going to preface my opinion with the following statements because context matters. @AlilawMotta and I pander to no one. We are career defense attorneys, we have made that abundantly clear since we started the podcast. We view issues and cases through that lens. That’s how our brains operate after decades of doing it. We don’t apologize for it, far from it, we own it, we embrace it, proudly. I firmly believe that being a defense attorney is an absolute privilege and is one of the most honorable professions that one can undertake. It is the quintessential David and Goliath scenario, as we are constantly at odds with our Government, with all of its might and resources, for the express purpose of defending the principles of the Constitution for ALL citizens of our Country, which includes those who have never stepped foot in a courtroom. As far as our public/social media profile….we cover cases that are of National concern, we cover cases that are of great public interest, we cover cases wherein we believe that a defendant has been denied their 6th Amendment right to fair trial, we cover cases where we believe that the wrong person has been convicted, which results in no justice for ANYONE involved, and which frankly, is where my passion lies. The concept that @AlilawMotta and I tailor our opinions on cases, and that’s all they are, our opinions, based on what we believe would help us build our business is absurd. One brief review of what we have covered on our channel will clearly reflect what I am saying to be true. I imagine we took a significant hit from our Richard Allen coverage, as we are of the firm belief that Richard Allen was absolutely denied a fair trial and moreover believe that he is factually innocent. That concept upsets some people. That concept angers some people. Those people are entitled to feel the way they do and believe what they believe. I hope to one day be able to PROVE them wrong. Riding the fence is the smart business decision. Going with the majority of public sentiment is the safe bet. We don’t do that unless we of course agree. Sometimes it’s to our social media business’s detriment. We don’t care. We have a different mission. We seek to educate the public on what it is that defense attorneys actually do, and what our role in the system really is beyond what many in the public misconceive it to be. We also seek to entertain while doing it. We hope and believe that we accomplish both of those things.

@goawayjd @defense_diaries @TheChauffeurX 227?

@defense_diaries @TheChauffeurX Hos many real attorneys need to refute Kate Peter's legal misinformation? 🙄

@MafiaMasshole @defense_diaries @BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow @TheEmilyDBaker @IanRunkle I'm confused. Every single person on your list has addressed it already. Ian is the only one that hasn't streamed but has made comments on X. All coverage seems to be fair to both sides with statements that some things may hold and others not.

@SaltySteno @DianaLasso1355 @RealNurseKim @NoteMyObjection Mishandled evidence where several things were stored together for weeks (months?). The "evidence" literally means nothing. And it wasnt microscopic taillight, it was microscopic plastic. Cannot be proven, because oh wait- the investigation was not conducted properly (at all).

@tres_chiccc @DianaLasso1355 @RealNurseKim @NoteMyObjection Microscopic taillight fragments in his fking clothes

@DianaLasso1355 @RealNurseKim @SaltySteno @NoteMyObjection Karen was proven innocent by a jury. He didn't die of natural causes. The reasonable explanation is that something else happened to him at the house. The lack of investigation (bias, conspiracy) is the excuse no one is arrested.

@RealNurseKim @SaltySteno @NoteMyObjection Thank God every one of the people he called murderers were arrested and convicted of murder to prove his statements. Oh. What other defense can he use at this point... umm... Maybe a retraction and apology? Opinion is out, what's left?

@daverelectric @MBeachlover 36

@MBeachlover How many steps did his phone record just before was hit by in the head in the garage ?

This Loser Lawyer is lying through his teeth reading the law suit filing. I could not even watch the whole thing. First off: Lie number 1: his phone temp never went up and down, it only went down: Data from John O'Keefe's phone in the Karen Read trial showed a significant, steady drop in battery temperature from approximately to between 12:32 a.m. and 6:14 a.m., supporting the prosecution's theory that he was left outside in the cold. The phone remained largely stationary near a flagpole, suggesting he never entered the home. Lie #2 Gaslighting and butcher evidence???? Who's gaslighting who and what evidence was there that anyone other than Karen was involved??? I'm waiting. Lie #3 She was not acquitted twice, once in the 2nd trial, 1st trial hung jury, no polling. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

@Pamelahaha123 @DropMicrodots @adamdeitch Lie to who? Most of what they do is not public information.

@tres_chiccc @DropMicrodots @adamdeitch Then why did he lie about it?

What do you get when your campaign is built on covering up rape and murder? You get what you deserve. 74 followers in 5 months. Way to go Greg!

@Pamelahaha123 @DropMicrodots @adamdeitch He’s probably had lots of secret meetings during his career. That’s literally the job.

@DropMicrodots @adamdeitch why did you have secret conversations with Karen Read and her legal team?

@Seth_A_Cooney @Clementine2009 @aburkhartlaw Do you think DNA is only found in semen?

@Clementine2009 @aburkhartlaw What kind of degenerate acts were they performing on that rifle?

Normal people wondering: Why isn't the FBI giving Tyler Robinson's defense what they're asking for? Tyler Robinson's defense, asking for proprietary source code for a program developed by a foreign government and all 19 million convicted offender DNA profiles in CODIS:

@DebraMc85536001 @DropMicrodots Hmm how did that work out for Hank?

@DropMicrodots Nice try. That lawyer examined this case and looked at evidence, trial testimony, depositions and rulings before he agreed to take it. The plaintiffs didn’t just walk in off the street, say they needed a lawyer, hand him a retainer check and hire him. That isn’t how this worked.

Nothing like Sandy Hook: The plaintiff's lawyer Christopher Mattei represented Sandy Hook families in their successful defamation trials against Alex Jones. What he doesn't know yet, is the house defendants have more in common with Adam Lanza than the victim's families. This case isn't what he thinks it is. Every creator, supporter of KR, JO, TB, and free speech should condemn it - as the next reprehensible act in the long line they've committed.

@TheFutureFlashx @findmeauser @hungus14 @adamdeitch Yes she did.

@findmeauser @hungus14 @adamdeitch They actually weren’t allowed 3rd party culprit. Lol. That’s your problem. In addition, she hasn’t been allowed in the wrongful death either

Someone smart has a theory about the defamation lawsuit. If the plaintiffs solidly lose on a truth defense by Aidan, that kinda equates to a probable cause threshold for a grand jury. Think about it- The plaintiffs are idiots. They’re asking for an indictment. @adamdeitch

@VoteGregConnor You need to address Sandra and your role in the investigation and coverup asap.

It’s official: Greg will be on the ballot on September 1st! With the support of well over 1,000 residents from every city and town in the county, Greg is ready to take that energy into the community to listen, lead, and ensure a justice system that works for everyone.

@Goatboy991994 And to think- we don’t even know what is on Proctors phone yet. Their lack of self awareness is shocking.

Was it a public attack or were people just angry that they used their connections to weaponize the justice system? I suppose we can call the 2nd screenshot a private attack from Kerry’s careless cousin. #freekarenread #johnokeefe #turtleboy

@spenski @HillarySimtv8g Fake account? lol

@tres_chiccc @HillarySimtv8g Geez, I love these fake accounts. Fun, fun, fun….ok, are you ready, a BRAIN! Kate has a full functioning brain unlike many others. Try to enjoy this beautiful April day.😊

The 3-year anniversary of the first blog that Karen Read and Aidan Kearney wrote together to control the narrative surrounding her murder case is as good a day as ever to go through the timeline of their conspiracy. Please enjoy 28 minutes of private messages and the context surrounding them. It bears repeating, that Aidan has never published one blog on the subject without getting all of the information from Read, and her full editorial control. Not one. And yes - Aidan Kearney wiretapped Read's attorneys, and sent it to his mistress. We have the messages! Show notes/timeline: jumpshare.com/share/augn068T… Support the witnesses: defendingthetruth.org Support my work: buymeacoffee.com/massholemedia

@fancypantsck I think that’s only if it was his criminal and his civil case (like in Karen’s circumstance). This is Karen’s civil case brought by the O’Keefes.

@DoctorTurtleboy Hold on a minute, you currently have an open criminal case. In similar situations (like Karen Read) individuals aren’t typically deposed while their criminal matter is still pending, because of their Fifth Amendment rights. So why is this being handled differently here?

I will be deposed by Attorney Dildo on July 30 in his failed attempt to sue Karen Read