Tvirtāks

@1Tock191389 @AndySaunders_1 @NASA @astro_reid Hopefully your family has great fun everytime you point to the hour hand of a clock and exclaim "no rotation"

@AndySaunders_1 @NASA @astro_reid no rotation

Left - Apollo 17, 1972 Right - Artemis II, 2026 Two photographs taken by one of us, of all of us, over half a century apart. What's changed?

@DerwentHarris @GardnerThe99 @AndySaunders_1 @NASA @astro_reid From spacecraft's point of view, yes.

@GardnerThe99 @AndySaunders_1 @NASA @astro_reid No.

@laacz Visi modeļi ir nepareizi, bet daudzi no tiem ir noderīgi 😃

Šodien sapratu, ka bezgalība kā matemātisks koncepts balstās vienā bezgalīgo kopu teorijas aksiomā. Eksistence nav pierādīta, tās pastāvēšana neizriet ne no kā. Kāds nolēma, ka tā vienkārši ir. Un tad parādās saskaitāmās bezgalības, nesaskaitāmās, dažāda lieluma, uc. ZFC ir fun.

@Speed_n_Angels @AJamesMcCarthy NASA photos are public domain along with EXIF data x.com/i/status/20400…

@AJamesMcCarthy Earth being illuminated by “moon shine”? I’d like to see the EXIF data. Remarkable image. “Upside down” Atlantic Ocean with Gibraltar beckoning…

At first glance this looks like a daytime photo- but it’s not. I don’t think we’ve ever seen Earth at night photographed quite like this. Historic.

@Nthimage @AJamesMcCarthy x.com/i/status/20400…

@AJamesMcCarthy Moonlit earth? Andrew, how long do you think the exposure is? Quite a bit of noise, so I suspect not faster than 1/3 s shutter. I am on my phone, and don't have the non web source with exit data...

@apel2026 @AJamesMcCarthy Earth's surface is quite reflective ISO (light sensitivity of camera sensor) hits a high number ⬇️ It's very basic photography. Sadly relatively unknown to last couple of generations right? Ppl who never toyed with manual settings or overexposed a shot x.com/i/status/20400…

@AJamesMcCarthy We can see the lights of so many cities. lisbon.. madrid.. Amazing pic. Indeed its surprising to see the earth that clearly on night side with the sun right behind earth. I wish some photographer can explain why its that clear. There is also the light of the moon helping I guess

@ChalussetG @henrydegods @AJamesMcCarthy When I try to hold camera still, I press it against something rigid or place it on a mount Here we have troll Jean whose brain capacity has only ever amounted to holding his hands steady and praying.

@henrydegods @AJamesMcCarthy this make no sense, try holding still your camera for 1/4s, in microgravity. Nothing make sense in this image, apart we're used to it from decades.

@instanceGWD @umair235 @AJamesMcCarthy Do you know what the knowledge cutoff date is for your AI? Piqued your interest? You would also do good to yourself if you read up what "out of distribution" means.

@umair235 @AJamesMcCarthy

@GameCanna @cryptovegan @AndySaunders_1 Different image releases for different purposes. Next question? Are you just trolling or you seriously have this much trouble figuring life out?

@cryptovegan @AndySaunders_1 why does nasa admit to using photoshop?

@cryptovegan @rybick @AndySaunders_1 Uh... frame of what? I see no window whatsoever

@rybick @AndySaunders_1 How is it high ISO and the frame of the window is barely visible?

@p1terskiy @Badmantips30 @AndySaunders_1 Southern. Orient yourself using Gibraltar and Africa

@Badmantips30 @AndySaunders_1 Northern Light

@BlueBeam0 The same way you can take a picture of your friend if you're both on a high speed train... your relative speed isn't crazy fast.

Some serious questions: How can someone make a perfect picture of fast spinning ball in a circulating solar system with a galaxy that is rushing with such a speed that no one can imagine and all this happens at same time? How?

@jeffmccloud81 @DJSnM Interesting, maybe it was deemed less necessary then. Looks to me like they were more protected behind Shuttle launch structure, the Shuttle at start did distance itself from the tower

@DJSnM Is the basket release at liftoff unique to Artemis? Don’t remember ever seeing or hearing of it with STS

I wish there was a camera on the escape baskets, partly to show that they were in fact empty to shut up the weirdos. But mostly so I could composite in a model of the Millennium Falcon flying away from a giant fireball.

@StellaerSir @DJSnM Do you know how far the closest observers stand to the launch pad at launch and why?

@DJSnM Well, NASA can always hire me to be in one of those baskets. I'll record it for everyone. Actually, I'll pay NASA for the opportunity

@MyBurnerAcctNow @alexboge @PixelAdvocate Can you concentrate for 1 min and reread the OP? "What he meant is straightforward: The factories were shut down. ... We didn’t forget how rockets work. We lost the industrial ecosystem" Those tapes in particular incurred nary any "loss". Yet you go berserk out about those.

@alexboge @PixelAdvocate @tvirter youtube.com/watch?v=BK-uat…

No one ever said we “lost the technology” to go back to the Moon. That’s not what Don Pettit said in a 2016 interview. What he actually said was: “I’d go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.” And the honest response to that is: So what? He said this decades after the Apollo program - after we had already gone to the Moon six times and landed twelve men on the surface. His comment has absolutely no bearing on whether those missions happened. What he meant is straightforward: The factories were shut down. The tooling and molds were scrapped. The materials became obsolete. The engineers and technicians moved on. The contractors moved on. We didn’t lose the physics. We didn’t forget how rockets work. We lost the industrial ecosystem that made something like the Saturn V possible at that moment in time. You can’t just snap your fingers and build another one. That’s all he meant. By 2016, we had: • gone to the Moon 6 times • landed 12 humans on its surface • built and operated over 10 space stations • maintained a permanently inhabited laboratory in orbit for over 15 years - the International Space Station (later joined by China’s crewed station, Tiangong space station) …and that’s when he said it’s a painful process to build it back again. So again: That quote clearly doesn’t mean what they pretend it means. Gotta Lie To Deny

@MyBurnerAcctNow @PixelAdvocate @alexboge The word "cannot" just speaks in economic sense. Going back the same way would work, just takes will, time, and budget. Doesn't take reinventing. In that sense, technology was *not* destroyed. Going back using new designs and supply chains also works, and that's easier to budget

@PixelAdvocate @tvirter @alexboge Uh huh. Sure Jan. He explicitly said that we "CANNOT" go back to the moon because we destroyed the technology and that he would LOVE to go BACK but cannot. You are the cherry picker. Let's call it a day. Have a blessed Good Friday.

@MyBurnerAcctNow @alexboge @PixelAdvocate You are triggered by his truthful words in a way logical people aren't.

@alexboge @PixelAdvocate @tvirter Is Don Petitt a liar?

@TheJohnnyDee7 @DJSnM You zoomed in on aurora australis, but yes

@DJSnM Look at top you can see the aurora borealis in green on the poles.

This looks like it's a daytime shot, but, it's actually taken from the dark side of Earth, with the planet illuminated by moonlight. This lets faint details like the aurora, stars and the sodium layer show up without over exposing the planet.

@User2474865 @KyleHollSays @CharlesKersey @DrChrisCombs I'm talking about new rifle, new rounds. Anyway we're home then? Laws of orbit have been proven incredibly well and it is known with great certainty how fast Starship would have to go to make full orbit, choice to make an incomplete one was just choice.

@tvirter @KyleHollSays @CharlesKersey @DrChrisCombs That same gel was proven to mimick tissue incredibly well and those same rounds have proven their lethality many thousands of times before you bought them

Posting this gem one more time

@armandsbrants @ilonchix Bezsakars? Pieteikums nav tas pats kas sarunāta tikšanās ar rezervētu resursu un laiku!

@ilonchix Varbūt viņi ir mācījušies no tiem vadītājiem un hr speciālistiem, kuri neatbild uz viņu pieteikumiem? 😁

Man kā jaunai vadītājai vēl joprojām ir grūti pieņemt un saprast, kāpēc tik daudziem potenciālajiem darbiniekiem ir tik grūti vienkārši pateikt, ka viņi neieradīsies uz interviju vai ir atraduši citu darbu. 🤷‍♀️