Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Communism must be forever purged from this continent. If possible, this hemisphere.
English
Joseph McCarthy was right
481 posts
@mattvanswol There is a very widespread covert assassination methodology by the former soviet countries. Remember the polonium poisoning? And navalny too. It is a very high escalation by someone (Ukraine Russia Iran or Israel) to target a us senator. Someone is sending a signal
English
I’m sorry, but Lindsey Graham dying out of the blue like this doesn’t make any sense at all.
We have him on camera yesterday looking perfectly healthy.
None of this is making any sense…
English
@CynicalPublius Please @StephenM the mass deportation of every single socialist and communist professor is all I want for Christmas. The dissolution and grinding into dust of every single faculty leaving the university a husk, only useful for research is all I’ve ever wanted
English
"And because they credential the people who run media, law, government, and tech, the monoculture leaks into every elite institution downstream."
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus
Your median professor sits so far left that AOC, Sanders, and Warren would count as moderates in any faculty lounge. Faculty from 55 elite universities form one towering blue spike of ideology far out on the left, density exploding past 6, with virtually nothing on the conservative side. This was built through decades of selective hiring, social enforcement, and the systematic purge of dissent. And because they credential the people who run media, law, government, and tech, the monoculture leaks into every elite institution downstream.
English
@CynicalPublius We must forcibly deport every single one. The net multiplicative negative effect they’ve had in brainwashing every student that has gone on to work in every conceivable institution is incalculable.
English
@AnaKasparian Non Christians must be deported because they are part of a death cult which celebrates death. Just as we are living in a Christian morality without Christianity, ana lives in a Muslim morality without Islam.
English
@GordonGChang Every single communist and socialist must be expelled from our continent. If they are brainwashed students, they must be put through a cult de programming.
English
We are in the fight of our lives. If we lose, we lose everything.
The Conservative Alternative@OldeWorldOrder
MARCO RUBIO: "Marxism is not dead. If we don’t confront this now, and defeat it, it will destroy this country & everything that has made it special."
English
@CreativeDeduct Safe to say if they were all Somali we would not see such property rights emerge
English
How wild was the Wild West? Well, not nearly as wild as you've been led to believe.
In many frontier towns, property rights and voluntary cooperation maintained order long before the federal government arrived. Mining camps, cattle towns and farming settlements often established their own rules for land claims, water rights and livestock ownership, enforced through local associations, private protection agencies and community norms rather than distant federal authority.
Historians and economists who have studied this period, such as Terry Anderson and P.J. Hill, have shown that property rights emerged spontaneously and were generally well-respected. Disputes over claims were frequently settled through arbitration or local courts created by the settlers themselves. Violence certainly existed, but much of it was concentrated in specific places and often involved conflicts over resources that were poorly defined, rather than random lawlessness.
What made these communities function was not the presence of a powerful government, but the recognition that secure property rights were essential for trade, investment and long-term cooperation. Where clear ownership was established, people had strong incentives to respect the rules and resolve conflicts peacefully. Where it was absent or contested, disorder increased.
The Hollywood image of constant gunfights and chaos makes for great movies, but it obscures a more important historical lesson: order does not require a strong central state. It can arise when individuals have clear rights to their property and the freedom to create institutions suited to their circumstances. The American West, rather than being wild, provides a clear examples of this principle in action.
English
@Kristof_Poland Government workers should temporarily lose the ability to vote. This is because they would align with communists in always voting for a larger state to get more income and job security.
English
On communism – in summary:
1. Communism no longer comes for your property. It comes for your reality. The West still pictures bread lines and gulags, a failed economic theory safely buried in 1989 – that was only ever the surface symptom. Leftism-communism is the most insidious destructive force in our world today, and it survives every empirical refutation for one reason: it was never really an economic theory. It doesn’t care about the truth. It only seeks power.
2. At its core it is a civilizational cancer – a machine for distorting reality through constant lies, rewritten history, and the systematic corruption of truth. It practices negative selection: it promotes the ambitious sociopaths, the ideologues, and the conformists, while the honest and the competent are sidelined or destroyed. Talent, integrity, and productivity become liabilities. The body count runs to roughly a hundred million. But the deeper kill is spiritual – trust eroded, excellence punished, reality itself subordinated to raw power.
3. What has changed is the method, not the logic. Tanks and gulags were crude, visible, self-defeating. Today it does not confiscate – it destabilizes. Chaos is the new collectivization. Every manufactured crisis follows the same structural logic: disorder is produced, fear is maximized, and in the panic that follows, transfers of power occur that would have been politically impossible in calm times. You do not notice the expropriation, because you are too busy surviving the emergency they built for you.
4. The fuel running this engine is the Systemic Lie – not ordinary propaganda, but a managed reality in which the categories of thought themselves are corrupted. Productivity is renamed exploitation. Order is renamed fascism. Resistance is renamed hate. A population that cannot name extraction cannot resist it – that is the design, not a side effect. Polish has a word for what results: zakłamanie, a society so saturated with lies that truth becomes almost inaccessible. Obłuda is the mask of falsehood worn so long it begins to feel like a face.
5. This is why the ideology did not die in 1989. It mutated, migrated, and entrenched itself inside the institutions of the civilization it had set out to destroy. Under a system of institutionalized lying, the loyal are promoted and the honest are pushed out, until the institution fills, top to bottom, with people selected specifically for their unreliability. That is not inefficiency. That is institutional rot at the genetic level. People learn to say the words, attend the meetings, sign the statements – and inwardly check out entirely.
6. The damage was never only in the ideology. It was in the people – the habits of mind that decades inside a system of lies produce, habits that do not evaporate with a change of government. The decisive terrain now is institutional: the schools, the media, the corporations, and above all the artificial intelligence systems being trained at civilizational scale on values that half the civilization never chose and was never consulted on. Whoever writes the values into the machines will have more influence over the next century than any election result.
7. This is where civilizations are actually won and lost – not in grand gestures, but in millions of daily, invisible decisions about whether to say what you actually see. Every person who refuses to perform the lie one more time is doing something larger than they know. Name the chaos. Name the lie. The naming is the resistance.
Tell the truth, have courage, and build.
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland
What the West Still Doesn’t Get It: Communism’s True Core: The Systemic Lie Most people in the West think they understand communism. They picture bread lines, gulags, failed five-year plans, and the collapsed Soviet Union. They treat it as a discredited economic theory – an experiment that proved that abolishing private property doesn’t work. Case closed, history moved on. This misunderstanding may be the most dangerous intellectual failure of our time. Communism was never primarily an economic system. Economics was the surface. Beneath it lay something far more insidious: a total, systemic, institutionalized commitment to lying. Not occasional dishonesty. Not spin or propaganda in the ordinary sense. Something deeper – a civilizational war against truth itself, waged through every institution, every classroom, every newspaper, every conversation, until reality itself became negotiable and the lie became the air people breathed. The Words We’re Missing The Polish language, forged by decades of living under this system, produced words for this phenomenon that English simply cannot match: Zakłamanie [zah-kwah-MAH-nyeh] – a state of total, pervasive, socially embedded falsehood, a condition in which an entire society is saturated with lies so thoroughly that truth becomes almost inaccessible. Obłuda [ob-woo-dah] – a deep, performative hypocrisy, the gap between what is proclaimed and what is actually practiced, the mask worn so long it begins to feel like a face. These are not words for individual liars. They describe a system – a mode of social organization built on organized mendacity, where the lie is not the exception but the foundation. English has no single word for either concept, and that linguistic gap is not a coincidence. It reflects a gap in experience. Cultures that did not live under communism lack the vocabulary because they lack the wound. And because they lack the vocabulary, they struggle to recognize the thing when it reappears in new clothing. The Continuity: Communism, Leftism, Wokeism What we call wokeism today, or the broader radical left, is not a new phenomenon. It is the same operating system running on updated hardware. The specifics have changed – instead of the proletariat, we have marginalized identity groups; instead of bourgeois class enemies, we have racists and transphobes; instead of socialist realism, we have DEI statements. But the deep structure is the same. That deep structure is this: truth is not discovered, it is assigned. Reality is not something to be understood honestly but something to be narrated strategically. Language is not a tool for communication but a weapon of power. And anyone who resists the approved narrative is not simply wrong – they are dangerous, and must be silenced, shamed, or destroyed. This is zakłamanie in its modern form. This is obłuda wearing a human rights badge. The same movement that insists men can become women will insist, with equal fervor, that questioning this is an act of violence. The same institutions that claim to champion free inquiry systematically suppress dissent. The same people who invoke tolerance as their highest value are among the most intolerant forces in public life. The contradiction is not accidental – it is structural. It is the system working as designed. Why the West Still Doesn’t Get It People who grew up in freedom tend to assume, at some level, that bad actors know they are lying. That somewhere behind the ideological performance, there is a cynical operator who privately acknowledges reality. This assumption is wrong, and it is why Westerners consistently underestimate what they are dealing with. The totalitarian lie, at its mature stage, is not cynical. It is believed. Or rather, it creates a condition in which the distinction between belief and performance collapses entirely. People learn to say things they do not believe so fluently, and for so long, that they lose access to what they actually think. 1/2
English
@ReviewsPossum Dugin is joking it’s Russian humour
English
I have $30. So does my neighbor.
I spend my $30 on a live chicken. The chicken lays eggs. I eat some eggs and sell the rest. After a few days, I have made enough money to buy another chicken. That new chicken also produces eggs, so then I make money to buy more chickens. Soon, I have a substantial chicken farm, and I'm making a living selling eggs. I have achieved success.
My neighbor, on the other hand, spends his $30 on a pizza. He eats the pizza and now no longer has $30. He does not profit from his initial $30, so he has no success. He loses.
Did I contribute to my neighbor's loss?
Alexander Dugin@AGDugin
The very concept of the success is deeply immoral. If you are successful the other is loser. We shouldn’t accept it. We should prosper or suffer together. Otherwise it is satanic.
English
@AuronMacintyre It was all manufactured too. Rosa parks was a paid actor who only got the part because the other woman supposed to sit on the bus and cause a scene got pregnant out of wedlock and they figured it wouldn’t look good.
English
What if I told you this experiment was already run via the Civil Rights Act and it worked so completely that most people who think they believe in liberty will defend that experiment with their dying breath?
Wesley Yang@wesyang
Transgenderism is an uncontrolled society-scaled experiment in conformity and obedience: a test of how far you can make people parrot absurdities, inflict cruelties, collude with unrealities, and ostracize and punish people for things they do not themselves believe. It is a test of whether the moral self-abasements and routine betrayals that occurred in the Soviet Bloc with its secret police and political prisons and armies of informants could be replicated in liberal, democratic, and pluralistic societies that lacked this formal apparatus of repression: whether minor rewards and punishments could force people to punish people for stating the most self-evident of all truths and inspire them to cheer on the chemical castration and dismemberment of their own children. It is a test of whether civil liberties organization could be twisted into instruments of state repression and human rights groups instruments of defamation and violence against women. It is a test that most of the Western world is failing.
English
@ReviewsPossum Cause she thinks she can do better. That’s the root cause of all these issues
English
Why are women so repulsed by the idea of a man they know and trust falling in love with them? The dude knows you and decided none of your flaws are deal breakers, and now he wants to spend his life with you. Why is that a bad thing? How is that, in any sense, a betrayal?
English
If everyone is afraid to speak honestly about it, what does that tell you about the it?
English
@ChrisWillx In the old days you got a virgin wife which you were happy to marry. She pair bonded with you and would never divorce, and had tons of children. You would fight and die for your family and country. Now you get a ran through whore who divorces you the first chance she gets.
English
Men still pay for dates.
“A study of college students suggests that men almost always paid the entire bill on first dates and continued paying significantly more so in subsequent dates.
40% of women want men to accept their offer to help pay for dates.
39% of women do not want men to accept their offer to help pay for dates.
76% of men feel guilty if they don’t pay the bill on dates.
44% of men would stop dating a woman who never pays.”
^^ trying to thread the needle between all these percentages is basically impossible.
h/t @robkhenderson
English
@Babygravy9 It’s better we let them take over the UK, because we can have cassus belli. They have nuclear weapons so we must negotiate or take them by force before they become fully Islamised. It’s a huge danger for humanity their disregard for their own race.
English
Our entire civilisation is going to be murdered as it says these words if we don't abandon this absurd course we're on.
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK
🚨 NEW: Henry Nowak's final words to his killer were "I'm not a racist" according to new court documents
English
@reddit_lies This guy killed himself, here’s why this is actually about ME
English
@Cr7Godbrand We’ve known this for so long and yet here we are
English
Women are the enemy of civilizations because their loyalty is to survival, not principles. Women’s moral conscience is lower than men’s because their psychological development is based on shame, not guilt.
Men feel guilt as an inner punishment, while women feel shame as fear of outside judgment. Because of this, women’s behavior is driven by social survival rather than principles. This is why people say a woman has the prerogative to change her mind.
This leads to a lack of accountability and an inability to accept the truth. No matter how well arguments are presented, women hate the truth.
Women understand the world through their feelings, which causes shifting standards. Because of this lack of reason and logic, civilization cannot survive under female leadership.
Men build and women consume. Men build civilization, while women build families. When women rise in power, civilization collapses, as the proverb says, “the hen does not herald the morning.”
Women belong at the heart of the family because of reproduction. Men continue in their role as warriors, protectors, and providers at the family and national level.
Women are supposed to support society through reproduction and promoting family, but they are not doing so. This is a failure of duty to society.
The feminist desire to win without a clear goal and without understanding consequences weakens the state. The state becomes weak and is then conquered by stronger forces.
Women should not vote or hold positions of national importance.
jane@ijanedoll
Hit me with the harshest reality truth.
English
@DanielPriestley How does he win? The communists will kill him immediately after the revolution 🤣
English
Gary will win. He will successfully usher in wealth taxes and destroy what remains of the UK economy.
Investment will dry up, the number of people living in poverty will explode and the UK will be used globally as an example to the world about the dangers of socialist ideology.
How is he winning? He’s winning by losing.
He sits opposite billionaires, investors, entrepreneur and professionals.
Gary knows his audience. He doesn’t have to win arguments - he just has to show how mad he can make the rich.
He lets them explain to him why wealth taxes won’t work. You can see how incredulous they are at the stupidity of his suggestions. They can’t help but talk down to him.
He looks sad and hopeless. The wealthy, successful people are mad at him. The don’t like his ideas….
…. And that is the winning move. Checkmate. @garyseconomics wins.
Samuel Leeds@samuel_leeds
Billionaire legend @haidar_bassim completely dismantles the idea of a “wealth tax” on Gary Stevenson’s very own documentary. If all the rich people simply leave - where is the wealth to tax? It’s gone… @channelstv @garyseconomics #howtogetfilthyrich #garyseconomics
English
@RockChartrand No need to argue with communists who want to kill you and steal everything.
English
The moral argument against a wealth tax is simple:
Your wealth is not a public resource simply because other people are envious of it.
If it was earned voluntarily and without violating anyone's rights, others have no moral claim to it.
Jonathan Hinder MP@Jonathan_Hinder
The Right’s response to a wealth tax is always “but it won’t work!” What I find interesting is that there is rarely an attempt to argue against it on moral grounds, because they know most people find such wealth inequality utterly grotesque. There is overwhelming public support for doing something about this - I mean, LOOK at that polling👇👀 So, why don’t we crack on with the most effective and practicable ideas? We know that a proportional property tax, while a bit less flashy, actually works, so let’s start there! @FairerShare
English
@ThomBrady5 For example the most expensive painting of all time by a long shot is da Vinci
English
@ThomBrady5 Over long enough period taste will still win as the gothic or roman architecture will sell well and at extremely high cost to recreate, they would operate as Veblen goods where McMansions or modern design won’t sell well over time and will be shown to lose all value.
English
Is anyone going to listen to me or take my advice on this? No, of course not. I'm not trying to persuade anyone on this. This book gives a long-form, in-depth explanation. Free markets won't naturally deliver premium content. Aristocratic art requires taste, and patronage.
Fugitive Caesar@ThomBrady5
Moderation (or the lack of moderation) is not the big problem here. The problem is that short posts, quote tweets, and video content is incentivized, rather than the insightful long threads and Effort poasts which used to organically go viral. It's textbook enshittification.
English