P3rtch

@chicfryrice The main reasons I could see why we don't would be, language barrier, activities prior to applying, not being able bodied, incapable of understanding what you are signing up for. Stuff like that.

I don’t understand why we don’t require people to enlist in the military to become a citizen. It’s the best way to show your loyalty to the country.

@txrealitycheck @JetSetGent @TRHLofficial Isn't it trying to Include people who aren't citizens yet? And or applying protection under the law to said people?

@JetSetGent @TRHLofficial Then why not just say "citizens?" Why add extra words if you mean something that can be said with a single word?

SCOTUS may rule that birthright citizenship is constitutional, using precedent and a loose interpretation of an earlier ruling, so we may need to approach the issue of one million Chinese communists voting in our elections in the future differently. As it holds, they can’t even be denaturalized. There would definitively and permanently be no solution and creating citizens of those who dilute our values is republic ending. What we can do now, is aggressively and publicly enforce FARA, the Espionage Act, and related statutes against anyone (citizen or not) acting under CCP direction. Prosecute espionage, influence ops, and undisclosed CCP ties. That’s really it though. If it’s ruled constitutional for anyone infiltrate and dismantle our republic, all we can do is try to disincentivize it. How utterly demoralizing.

@helring @bonchieredstate @GoatMcLean_ The intent they are talking about here are with regards to the newly freed slaves who birthed children. Not exactly for tourists and undocumented people to essentially sneak in a new American?

@bonchieredstate @GoatMcLean_ It literally says born or naturalized in the United States , and subject to the jurisdiction. Thats not vague. You just don’t like the obvious answer. Its not everyone that sets foot because they were neither born in the US nor naturalized. But babies born here were.

To me, the birthright citizenship case is one that's so painfully obvious when you apply both a historical lens and common sense. Anchor babies were not the intent. But also, the language is just vague enough that without a new amendment, we'll never get it overturned.

@Headqarters_69 @bonchieredstate @bazzdgrogan @jewshido I believe your terminology should be, "can" own nukes but also meh.

@bonchieredstate @bazzdgrogan @jewshido So private citizens should own nukes?

@KurtSchlichter Man there are so many smart people talking about this, it can be very hard to follow a lot of it, and hard to participate in the conversation if you don't know really how everything works. My questions would be, can this be reviewed again or is it likely we won't?

You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.

@KatelynTweeter Of course!

If you are pro-life would you ever be willing to adopt an unwanted baby? Trying to prove a point.

@NateHasAHandle @KeithGross @JustinWStapley I'm seeing so many different comments about what jurisdiction means or implies.

@KeithGross @JustinWStapley Thats just not true, jurisdiction has nothing to do with allegiance and everything to do with if the US laws apply to you or not. Thats why the Amendment excludes the children of foreign diplomats who have diplomatic immunity, aka they aren't under our jurisdiction

If illegal immigrants are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" under what authority can the federal government deport them? This is the problem with living constitutionalism and consequentialism, it seeks to craft constitutional law that is a tangle of knots, twists, and turns to wrest the foundational document of our republic toward whatever fancy the zeitgeist arrives at. The originalist path not only makes more sense but actually accomplishes the whole point of having a written constitution...the consistent application of the rule of law according to text, history, and tradition.

@GrumpyDude1968 @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola So his parents were not citizens but owned a house in the US?

@unkeptjupiter @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola Wong Kim Ark was declaired a Citizen by birthright Citizenship because his parents were legal permanent residents and were "domiciled" in the United States. Domiciled is legally defined as "having your permanent legal home" in a particular place. You can only have 1 domicile.

Republicans: “The Constitution says ‘Shall not be infringed’ so all gun laws are illegal! The Founders didn’t make mistakes!” Also Republicans: “Well, actually, when the Founders wrote ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens’ they didn’t mean it.”

@GrumpyDude1968 @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola That's really interesting! What happened in the wing kim ark case?

@unkeptjupiter @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola The debates leading up to the vote on the 14th Amendment defined Jurisdiction as "complete political jurisdiction," not nearly obedience to laws. In the Wong Kim Ark case, it was further defined as "owing direct and immediate allegiance to the United States."

@GrumpyDude1968 @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola If there is no diplomatic immunity, and they fall under our jurisdiction, and they are in our country when they are born, as per the constitution of the US, yes they would be a us citizen I suppose.

@unkeptjupiter @ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola If a secretary in the French Embassy steals your car, can she be arrested? Service, Technical, and Administrative staff do not have diplomatic immunity. Would her child be a US citizen under your interpretation of the 14th Amendment?

@ConservativaPol @Thomas_Banacek @ChiefJosheola So if an illegal steals your car do they go to jail?

No, they're not. They are citizens of another country. Their primary allegiance is to another country. That's why the US Oath of Allegiance for foreigners being naturalized says: "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen;"

@limitlessleila Hmmm, well I'd say men should be preparing for some aspect of therapy since there is possibly a reason why that's happening? Though I don't think the two of these things equate to much relativity. Unless your initial thinking has a lot underlying info I don't have.

For those who think women should keep separate finances and income “just in case” her husband stops providing for her… What do you think men should do to prepare for “just in case” his wife stops sleeping with him?

Llevo 15 años compitiendo y analizando MOBAs, y hoy por fin puedo contaros el siguiente paso. Me uno oficialmente a @PredecessorGame como parte de su Elite Partner Program y como accionista de Omeda Studios. 📈 No es una colaboración más; voy a trabajar directamente con el equipo en el diseño y la estrategia del juego junto a leyendas como @Weak3n. Gracias por confiar en mi visión para construir el futuro de este género. ⚔️ #PredecessorPartner

@Honey1412527 @balc_top @JM1888_ The thing you are failing to realize is....being in the country illegally opens doors for companies to do this. Being against deportation as a whole is what has gotten these poor illegal immigrants so many jobs where their employer can abuse them as workers.

@balc_top @JM1888_ No it’s fucked up to let them do three days worth of work just to get them deported without even paying them. I’m against deportation as a whole but waiting until they finished the job to call ICE is disgusting. They basically just wanted free labour

no matter what you think, this is actually fucking horrible

Epic games????

#predecessor The Most Cinematic Predecessor Trailer Yet! [PCC Extended Cut] (4K UE5) OUT NOW: youtube.com/watch?v=HQduFx…

say what u want about Pred but they def know how to get some great people in the right places. Kirt big welcome man! Been watching and listening for years! Welcome to the Pred gang ! #Predecessor

@Teedium_ Sounds like you came immediately XD

I am in the middle of observing a Predecessor game about to close it out, and my bra-less girlfriend brings me a sandwich (not asked for) with potatoes as I see Neft get a double kill by Prime. So how is your day going?

Extremely honoured to partner with one of the best in the MOBA community. @Weak3n has a wealth of knowledge and expertise, along with just being a fantastic content creator. Exciting times ahead as we shape the future of @PredecessorGame

A few weeks ago, I was offered an opportunity that honestly doesn't come around often. After speaking with the founder and working through the details, OFFICIALLY, I now have equity options in the studio behind @PredecessorGame. I'm excited to be more involved with the team and help support the growth of the game and its community. You'll be seeing a lot more of me in-game, on stream, and on YouTube.