I promised that if $BTC hits $78,000,
I will give away $50,000 in BTC to 15 people.
So as promised I will be giving away
$50,000 to 15 person today.
Rules: Like, Retweet, and Comment "BTC" 🔔
Gonna lock comments in 24 hours!
English
user3333
190 posts
user3333 retweetledi
user3333 retweetledi
Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.
I have always been—and remain—an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto friendly. This lawsuit does not change how I feel about President Trump or the Trump Administration.
Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values. They wrongfully froze all of my tokens, stripped me of my right to vote on governance proposals, and have threatened to permanently destroy my tokens by “burning” them—all without any proper justification. I do not believe President Trump would condone these actions if he knew about them.
I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation. But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder. They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts.
All I want is to be treated the same as every other early investor who received tokens—no better, no worse.
I also want the community to know that I strongly oppose the new governance proposal World Liberty published on April 15.
If it passes, token holders who do not “affirmatively accept” its terms—including a requirement that 10% of all advisor tokens be permanently burned—will have their tokens locked indefinitely.
For early purchaser tokens, the proposal imposes a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule—and again, for those who do not affirmatively accept, their tokens are locked indefinitely.
This proposal is bad for the community, but because World Liberty has frozen my early investor tokens, I cannot vote them for or against the proposal.
I believe in fairness, transparency, and the principles that make crypto powerful. I will continue to fight for those principles. 🙏
English
🚨 NEW POLYMARKET: Another crypto hack over $100 million by…? polymarket.com/event/another-…
English
anyone wants free $asteroid?
no string attached lol
English
user3333 retweetledi
if i understand correctly, if the arbitrum security council gets compromised they can just do whatever they want to all of the funds on chain?
Arbitrum@arbitrum
The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.
English
I was losing 6.5% of my money per year due to inflation, so I decided to invest in crypto
Now I'm losing 45% per month
English
If you have 80-90% of your networth in crypto, you’re simply a retard
English
user3333 retweetledi
user3333 retweetledi
user3333 retweetledi
DeFi is a failed experiment if even Aave is getting fucked.
$5b stuck in Tether and USDC and the contagion hasn't even started.
English
user3333 retweetledi
For anyone stuck as a WETH supplier on @aave: the secondary market works.
1,000 aEthWETH → 980.38 WETH via @1inch. ~2% discount.
Not a great exit, but an exit. The discount is what the market thinks the haircut will be.
1inch.com/swap
Sergej Kunz@deacix
I'm a WETH provider on @aave watching my position go negative after the @KelpDAOxyz rsETH exploit. Can't withdraw — 100% utilization. Every failure here is a feature of shared-pool variable-rate lending: • One bad collateral listing impairs the whole WETH reserve • Slope2 punishes borrowers trapped when whales exit first • DAO votes move slower than collateral can lose its backing • First-come-first-served exits reward informed capital • Umbrella socializes losses onto suppliers who never approved the listing The architecture that fixes all of this already has its primitives deployed: Event-driven intent-based lending with fixed rates and P2P matching. Lenders sign intents specifying collateral, LTV, rate, duration, and event triggers. Borrowers sign symmetric intents. Solvers match. Custody stays with the user until atomic settlement. No shared pool. No slope2. No slow governance. No socialized loss. Each loan is a discrete contract. We solved this pattern for spot trading with 1inch Fusion. Lending is next.
English
