Virginia Postrel

3.4K posts

Virginia Postrel banner
Virginia Postrel

Virginia Postrel

@vpostrel

L.A. writer @WorksinProgMag THE FABRIC OF CIVILIZATION @BasicBooks. POWER OF GLAMOUR, SUBSTANCE OF STYLE, FUTURE & ITS ENEMIES https://t.co/lO0ECC3o1W

West L.A. Katılım Ocak 2009
2.6K Takip Edilen16K Takipçiler
Ryan Moulton
Ryan Moulton@moultano·
It's so depressing that I was able to take 7th grade algebra in an urban public high school in the Midwest as a routine thing, but have to struggle to offer that to my kids as a special exception in the richest place on Earth that is the center of the world's tech industry.
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc

This is an incredibly unstrategic fight to pick but every time I wade into a battle over whether to allow eighth graders to take algebra I just want to say "actually, a good school offers algebra in sixth grade and a great school offers it in third."

English
18
52
2K
128K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Andrew Weiss
Andrew Weiss@BayWestInvest·
In Los Angeles, if you want to replace a duplex in a middle class neighborhood with, say, a new 8-unit apartment building... 1) You will need to pay each of the existing households between $84,750-$111,900 in relocation assistance. 2) 2 of your 8 new units will be deed-restricted affordable housing. 3) All 8 new units will be rent-controlled. 4) If your completed project is worth more than $5.3M, it will be subject to the Mansion Tax. The current housing shortage: not a mystery!
English
82
250
2.4K
86K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Gary Winslett 🌐🇺🇸
Gary Winslett 🌐🇺🇸@GaryWinslett·
There is a broader lesson here. If you want growth and affordability, you’re going to need to embrace deregulation and entrepreneurship, and resist the urge to micromanage.
M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray

The trouble is, if Houston banned front-loading townhouses and slot houses, there wouldn't have been a townhouse boom. This reluctance to micromanage, even when it results slightly suboptimal outcomes, is why Houston builds and other American cities don't.

English
1
13
109
4.6K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Alex Armlovich
Alex Armlovich@aarmlovi·
New AGF blog: Tokyo is the world's most affordable megacity--and they're still permitting homes at many times the pace of NYC, London, Paris Yet land prices are still very high! A 1-acre suburban home in Chiyoda would cost over $100M before you nail the first board Tokyo shows structures can be affordable if you stack enough of them on pricey land. It also shows that YIMBYism will not crash land markets or impoverish land-rich homeowners in attractive areas Tokyo also heightens the contradictions of the profit-focused version of the Homevoter Hypothesis: In the highest-demand neighborhoods of the US, the homevoters prioritizing "Boomer suburb vibes" are not just hurting renters, they're costing *themselves* billions of dollars of land value
Alex Armlovich tweet media
English
19
89
722
105.6K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
M. Nolan Gray 🥑
M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray·
I'm not aware of a single instance where IZ mandates ushered in broad improvements in housing affordability, but I'm aware of loads of instances in which they crushed housing production. Blue cities/states need to take the evidence seriously and scrap these failed programs.
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 tweet media
English
23
109
658
53.6K
Virginia Postrel
Virginia Postrel@vpostrel·
I also live in this district and I hold Katy’s father’s antigrowth advocacy against her. Lev did a lot to get us into our current mess and she’s his nepo baby.
Toby Muresianu 🇺🇦@tobyhardtospell

This image has a key lesson for housing advocates. Story time...🍿 I live in Katy's district, and help run a grassroots pro-housing neighborhood group (@WestsideForEv). In 2023, a 24-story building was proposed near transit in this district (1050 La Cienega). Mixed-use, on a vacant lot, with a public pocket park, would singlehandedly double the amount of dedicated Affordable Housing in the area. Still got heavy NIMBY pushback and wasn't clear if it would get through planning commission even though it would probably be illegal to block it. We supported it. We were on good terms with Katy as we had endorsed her, were aggressively supporting her key priority (a 30-ish bed homeless housing facility in my neighborhood) and got ~70 petition signatures from people in the area in favor of the 24-story building to counter the argument that the "community was against it". At the hearing, staff report was that all the NIMBY claims were baseless and approval recommended. Katy said the building was "too tall" but her hands were tied by state law, etc. so she didn't officially oppose. The building was approved. Okay, we'll take it. We kept working with her (successfully) on the homeless housing project. Unfortunately, she rapidly became worse on housing, perhaps because she feared a NIMBY challenger. She led the movement to roll back LA’s ED1 initiative (streamlining for 100% Affordable Housing projects) in areas with "Historic Preservation Overlay Zones" (which IRL cover lots of non-historic parts of LA), delayed meeting with local housing orgs who'd supported her until after the rollback was codified, and then offered nothing new on increasing housing despite LA home production continuing to crater and having promised to build a lot of it in her campaign. She voted to oppose SB79 allowing ~7 stories of housing near train stations. When it passed anyway, she led the effort to hobble and delay implementation. Etc. We were getting nowhere. Then I decided to help campaign against her. @HenryForLA, a Tenants Rights Attorney, wanted to run on a pro-housing platform. I started helping run the digital operation. We're very much underdogs (she is an incumbent who has literally 10x our funding) but we have some viral successes, got endorsements from pro-housing organizations, are being recommended in an increasing number of voter guides, and are criticizing her housing record publicly. Now, suddenly it's night and day. She is literally posting pictures of 2 *67-story* towers and saying "more of this please." Someone who delayed legalization of seven story buildings by transit *six weeks ago.” Who largely ignored housing advocates even when we'd actively fought for her key priorities. She hadn't even posted on twitter in years! All this is to tell housing advocates: Run candidates. Organizing around projects, speaking up for them, etc is good. But if your elected officials aren't giving you the time of day, running candidates against them is like having power tools. You have no idea how responsive government can be until you are publicly running to take their job and telling people how you'll do a better one. Oh, and please support @HenryForLA. You can trust we like tall buildings; we also did six weeks ago.

English
0
1
2
563
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
YIMBYLAND
YIMBYLAND@YIMBYLAND·
They're literally running back the anti-nuclear playbook. That set us back a half-century in nuclear power. Imagine what would happen if we set back AI research by a half-century... 中国获胜/胜利属于中国
Garry Tan@garrytan

Sanders and AOC introduced a bill to pause ALL AI data center construction. 300+ local bills filed. Half of planned 2026 data centers facing delays or cancellation. Each one brings billions to local economies. The people who say they want American jobs are trying to block the biggest job creation engine since the interstate highway system.

English
121
226
2.1K
104.3K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Internet Archive
Internet Archive@internetarchive·
"There’s something weirdly magical about the early internet with its clunky fan sites, pixelated GIFs, and blogs with neon text. And while most of it vanished years ago, the Wayback Machine lets you return and experience it all over again." - Sam Singleton, @pcmag pcworld.com/article/313546…
English
10
107
427
14.9K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬@RuxandraTeslo·
Thrilled to announce I'm joining @WorksInProgMag and @stripe to continue my research and writing on clinical trials & biotech innovation, with many more articles to come. (If you haven't already, subscribe to the magazine. It's great in terms of content and very beautiful.) My work is driven by a core conviction: in the years and decades ahead, we will be far more constrained by the quality of our culture and institutions than by technology itself. In biology, a remarkable convergence is underway. AI, alongside a wave of other emerging tools, is fundamentally expanding what science can do. But beneath this sizzling potential, something is going wrong in Western biotechnology. China is pulling ahead and companies are increasingly moving clinical trials there, drawn by faster clinical trial timelines and a more dynamic ecosystem. Promising therapies sit in limbo for years. Despite the science being here, personalized cancer therapies are not viable to anyone but a few who can afford to navigate the labyrinthine regulatory apparatus. And pharmaceutical R&D productivity has remained stubbornly flat in the last 10 years, after decades of decline. And I can't imagine a better home for my research and writing on what can be done to accelerate biomedical progress than Works in Progress. This is a magazine that has published some of the most important writing on why the physical world has stopped working, including "The Housing Theory of Everything," which became one of those rare pieces that actually changed how people think about a problem. But this is not just about my desire to study biotech innovation. Biotech is not an anomaly. The same pattern: technology outrunning the institutions meant to govern it, is playing out across society. And now AI is compressing the timeline, accelerating pressures that were already straining the system. When people ask what I worry about when it comes to AI, I tell them it’s not the usual things. I'm not losing sleep as much over AI taking my job. I am more worried that we will lose our appetite for depth and that long-form thought, serious reading, sustained attention, the very things that make culture worth having, will erode faster than we notice. That our collective intelligence will hollow out, gradually. And the very problems we have now will only accelerate. @WorksInProgMag is a resistance movement against that, condensed in the form of magazine. It stands for long-form, in-depth writing. It stands for beauty. It is fundamentally anti-slop. In that sense, it's a natural fit with @stripe. A payments company publishing a magazine might seem like an odd pairing. That is, until you understand what kind of payments company @stripe actually is. It has always been driven by a genuine passion for craft and for getting small things exactly right. I am really proud to be part of something that embodies my own values in such a deep way, especially at a turning point in history.
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 tweet media
English
48
46
730
85K
Chris Elmendorf
Chris Elmendorf@CSElmendorf·
@mattyglesias @ezraklein They represent small territories & very few have brands known to voters or non-"group" donors. So they're more vulnerable to HOA eruptions and more dependent on labor unions to finance campaigns. Parties should operate as a check, but not in 1-party/top-2-election la la land.
English
4
3
110
2.7K
Chris Elmendorf
Chris Elmendorf@CSElmendorf·
Watching @ezraklein grill the candidates for CA governor on housing policy was a vertiginous experience. tl, dr: "Abundance" has won the war of ideas, but not the war of legislative attrition in Sacramento. And no one's talking about the second war. 🧵/21
Chris Elmendorf tweet media
English
16
67
735
123.8K
Virginia Postrel
Virginia Postrel@vpostrel·
Very interesting thread
Chris Elmendorf@CSElmendorf

Watching @ezraklein grill the candidates for CA governor on housing policy was a vertiginous experience. tl, dr: "Abundance" has won the war of ideas, but not the war of legislative attrition in Sacramento. And no one's talking about the second war. 🧵/21

English
0
0
3
590
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Peter B
Peter B@realpeteyb123·
Ok… most of you know I was in the organic baby formula business, but what you don’t know is I dabbled in diapers as well. I also know this baby2baby “non profit” and have had past interactions with them.. I’ll leave that out for now.. Let’s dive into this absolute grifting nonsense. Prepare to be shocked. California is about to spend $20 million of taxpayer money to give 100,000 newborns 400 diapers each through Baby2Baby. Do the math with me: 100,000 babies × 400 diapers = 40 million diapers $20,000,000 ÷ 40,000,000 = $0.50 per diaper!!!!! Now walk into any Costco in California and you can buy the same quality diapers for .12 to .15 cents each! That’s $48 to $60 for 400 diapers. So the state is paying 8–10x more per diaper than a regular family buying in bulk. They could’ve just handed every low-income new mom $100 cash and told her to go to Costco. She’d get more diapers, better ones if she wanted, and still have money left for formula, wipes, or whatever the hell she actually needs. But nah… that wouldn’t let Gavin and his connected “nonprofit” girls running the show there cut ribbons, take photos, do galas and be friends with celebrities and brag about the “first-in-the-nation” program while skimming their cut for “administration” and “partnerships.” This is peak government stupidity!!! Spend way more money to feel good and look good, instead of just trusting parents with their own damn money. We’re not helping babies. We’re funding another bloated nonprofit-government grift. Math doesn’t lie. The diaper math is brutal. What a scam and a joke!!!!!
Governor Gavin Newsom@CAgovernor

FREE DIAPERS COMING THIS SUMMER!

English
1.1K
7.7K
23.2K
1.2M
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
Saloni
Saloni@salonium·
Write for us! We're commissioning many more pieces at Works in Progress, and broadening formats too. worksinprogress.news/p/more-article… I'll be commissioning & editing much more on science and global health. Here's a thread of some pieces I'm excited about –
English
5
32
142
16.2K
Virginia Postrel retweetledi
M. Nolan Gray 🥑
M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray·
The Santa Barbara Planning Commission proposed doubling "affordable housing" fee on new production, such that it would cost $159,968 in fees to build a single median-sized rental unit. This is the housing policy equivalent of applying leeches to a sick patient.
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 tweet media
English
11
26
208
13.1K