Walter H. Demelo
3.5K posts

Walter H. Demelo
@walterhdemelo
Co-founder & COO of MindShift Studios | Educational Technologist
Jacksonville Beach, FL Katılım Eylül 2016
867 Takip Edilen858 Takipçiler

I just built a $10K/month creative strategist inside Claude Code 🤯
Drop in your competitor Facebook page URLs → it scrapes every active ad, watches every video, finds the patterns, and writes 10 ad concepts in your brand voice.
All inside Claude Code.
Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still manually scrolling the Meta Ad Library, screenshotting ads into Google Docs, and guessing at what's working.
If you're losing a full day every week pulling competitor ads one by one, watching each video to reverse-engineer the hook, typing notes into a brief doc, and then writing new concepts from scratch every single time...
This system eliminates the entire loop:
→ Apify scrapes every active ad from your competitors' Meta Ad Library pages (video + image)
→ Downloads every creative asset into a local folder
→ Gemini watches each video and breaks it down across 7 dimensions — hook, angle, visual format, copy framework, CTA, emotional trigger, pacing
→ Runs the full batch and surfaces the patterns that show up across 3+ ads
→ Claude generates 10 ad concepts built on the proven mechanics, matched to your brand voice
No scrolling the Ad Library until your eyes glaze over.
No screenshots floating around in random Google Docs.
No guessing which hooks are actually working right now.
What you get:
- Individual creative breakdowns for every competitor ad (7 dimensions each)
- A pattern report showing which hooks, formats, and triggers keep repeating
- 10 ready-to-brief ad concepts traced back to real competitor data
- A reusable system — new competitors, new brief, same pipeline
The research that takes your team a full day now runs in 15 minutes for ~$3 in API costs.
Built 100% in Claude Code with Apify + Gemini.
I put together a full playbook showing how to build the entire thing step-by-step from scratch.
Want the playbook for free?
> Like this post
> Comment "ADS"
And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
English
Walter H. Demelo retweetledi

I just gave Claude control of my cold email campaigns. Here's what happened:
Most cold email managers are stuck in the same loop:
☒ Log into Instantly manually every day
☒ Check metrics one sequence at a time
☒ Pause underperformers by hand
☒ Write new copy with no data to guide it
Until we built the opposite.
And I just recorded a full walkthrough breaking down the complete system:
→ How Claude logs into Instantly, reads your dashboard, and flags what's broken
→ How to set rules so Claude pauses sequences under 1% reply rate automatically
→ How Claude scales winning sequences by 20% volume without touching a thing
→ How Claude rewrites losing email steps using only your best-performing copy as reference
→ How Claude pulls weekly reports and saves them to a local folder - zero dashboard diving
This isn't theory or fluff.
I'm showing the exact prompts, the folder structure, the permission setup, and the confirmation flow Claude uses before making any changes.
The wildest part?
We do it all from one Mac with the Claude desktop app.
(No extra tools. No dev work. No agency.)
No bloated tech stack. No extra headcount. No manual ops work eating your week.
This system is built on Computer Use - Claude sees your screen, navigates your tools, and asks for confirmation before anything risky.
You stay in control. Claude does the work.
Want the full breakdown?
Follow me
Reply "COWORK"
I'll send it straight to your DMs.
English

I'm going to delete this post in 48 hrs...
Because I just dropped the most BRAIN-DEAD creative strategy for scaling Facebook ads in 2026.
This is the exact TOP-TIER system we use to find winning ads at scale just by copying proven concepts from other industries and let AI do the job for us.
We charge $10,000/mo to do this for clients…
But today, I'm giving it away 100% FREE.
Like + Comment "BRAIN" and I'll send it to you.
English

$168k in skincare sales came from an ad that doesn’t look like skincare marketing
no models
no glossy routines
no before & afters
Just an animated products screaming while bacteria party underneath
it explains the problem in 2 seconds
no voiceover needed
ChatGPT → Object POV
MakeUGC → generate
Scenes → make it talk
UGC cost: $1
Scale: 10× overnight
comment “SKIN” for the breakdown
(Must be following)
English
Walter H. Demelo retweetledi
Walter H. Demelo retweetledi

Joe Rogan: Pierre has "full-blown AIDS - Alberta Independence Denial Syndrome"
Innisfail door knockers: 2/3 of doors support independence
Zero federal income tax = 33-38% take-home pay increase
Why wouldn't you vote for that?
#Ableg #AlbertaIndependence
English
Walter H. Demelo retweetledi

I can no longer recommend brands use Openclaw
its amazing but
Claude Cowork Computer basically does all the same things but 1000% easier
like this is what most people will use it for and its so much easier to get going than openclaw
Were now scaling brands with arcads + claude cowork instead
The stack is less relevant than the strategy though, we focus on going viral and driving sales profitably.
If you want to see how we scale 8 figure Amazon + tiktok shop brands with Claude, comment SCALE and I’ll send it over
PS — Repost for early access.

English

Clay’s new pricing is probably my fault. We were paying $314 a month, but using (based on their new model) $214,087.50 worth of Clay a WEEK. Here’s the story:
A year ago Clay's head of product hopped on a call with me.
I told him we were hitting their platform 17.3 million times per week.
Almost all custom events (i.e. HTTPs)
I remember his response being something close to "Holy shit, I think you are the largest user of Clay"
I said yeah that doesn't surprise me.
But then it also came up that we were only paying $3,769 a year.
We talked about HTTPs, custom integrations, how we were basically using Clay as a giant API orchestration layer.
I knew his wheels were turning.
If you saw my last post, you know we eventually replaced Clay entirely with a $200/mo Claude Code subscription. 272,000 leads per second vs Clay's 27 hours for the same volume.
But before we left, we were the perfect case study for why Clay's old pricing was broken.
$314/mo for 17.3 million weekly, for what they now call ‘actions’.
Run the math. We were paying $0.00001815 per action.
Clay announced their new pricing structure. They split everything into Data Credits and ‘Actions.’
Actions are HTTPs, custom integrations, API calls. The exact things we were doing 17.3 million times a week.
The new price per action credit works out to about 1.24 cents each. A 681% price increase for us
I know you might say, "But Clay is letting people stay on the old pricing if they want," and I hear you
but
I also don't know how it makes me feel that someone brand new would have to pay $856,350 per month to get the same advantages I had when I was starting out only 3 years ago.
I'm not saying that one call caused the entire restructuring.
But I am saying their head of product learned that day that someone was running 17 million HTTPs a week for the price of a nice dinner.
And now every HTTP costs 1.24 cents.
anyways
For the last year, we've been trying to figure out how to get off of our dependency on Clay.
That was until Cursor / Claude Code / Codex came out
My VP of Growth, @James, who doesnt know how to write a single line of code, touched Claude Code for the first time
And three weeks later he replaced Clay for us
We could process 272k rows per second now for the cost of a Claude Code sub
My last post was about that system
Then after that post, Clay announces new pricing that specifically monetizes the exact thing we were doing at a massive scale.
Coincidence? Maybe.
But
I may owe everyone using Clay an apology
If your Clay bill just went up, you can probably blame me for that one. Sorry!
I put together a system blueprint of what I did to replace Clay for myself -- every tool, the tech stack, a Clay vs custom comparison, and a 6-step playbook for building your own. Plus a video walkthrough where I show you the live system and how each tool actually works.
Reply CODE below and I'll DM it to you.
English

I’m launching Stanley (AI Head of Content) on June 1, 2026.
Over the next 6-12 months, I'll grow it from $0 → $10M ARR.
In public.
(While running my $30M ARR business full time)
I will also be using only AI employees to do it, so you can copy the playbook.
I'll update this thread as I go. Bookmark it and follow along to hold me accountable 🤝
Comment "alpha" to get early access.
My social media stats as of today:

English

SHOCKING: 99% of people using LinkedIn for outbound are barely scratching the surface.
Right now, the entire internet is screaming "LinkedIn, LinkedIn, LinkedIn"... But here's the truth: sending random DMs without a system won't book 10 calls a day.
To unlock its real power, you need to master:
- Profile optimisation that gets inbound interest before you DM anyone
- DM frameworks with 15%+ reply rates built in
- A sell-by-chat structure that converts without pressure or pitching
I spent 100+ hours building the most complete LinkedIn outbound playbook and compiled all 5 core modules plus 2 bonuses into one resource.
I'll give it to only 1,000 people.
To get it:
1. Follow me MUST (so I can DM)
2. Comment "PLAYBOOK"
3. I'll DM you the playbook
If you don't follow or comment, you won't receive it.

English

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯
Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design.
One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes.
All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code.
Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth.
If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads.
It's the pages.
Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page.
Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck:
→ Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta
→ Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1)
→ Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2
→ Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code
→ Export the code and paste it into Claude Code
→ Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds
No designer.
No $3K per landing page.
No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019.
What you get:
→ Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks
→ Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it
→ Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots
→ A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline
Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code.
I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code.
Want it for free?
> Like this post
> Comment "STITCH"
And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
English





