Realelonmusk

133 posts

Realelonmusk banner
Realelonmusk

Realelonmusk

@warisbitch

nothing impressive

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Şubat 2020
201 Takip Edilen105 Takipçiler
Balázs Pozsgay
Balázs Pozsgay@pozsgaybalazs·
Crazy times! On July 22 we found a solution to one of the five major problems in quantum information theory usig AI. The problem is distillability or un-distillability of Werner states. We checked the computations and they are correct. The really crazy thing is this: just around this time there were 2 other groups who cracked this. First there was a group who just recently posted a paper about this on arxiv, it appeared on July 23. Second, there was an announcement from a different group yesterday (July 24) with no arxiv but a public overleaf. We can prove that we had the result before the arxiv paper appeared, and we can post our new paper on monday, it can appear on tuesday. So everybody was pretty much around the same time. Interestingly, our proof is different from the one on arxiv. AI model: ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Human authors: Thomas C. Fraser, Felix Huber, BP and István Vona
English
20
67
572
85.5K
Jason Abaluck
Jason Abaluck@Jabaluck·
Lots of idiots will make mathematical breakthroughs, but they won't get any meaningful credit. Everyone can tell who was a good mathematician in the before times and who is using AI. The problem case is math PhD students. Two things will happen: 1) Math PhD students will pivot to areas where AI is currently weak (a rapidly shrinking pond) 2) Math will become more reliant on human referrals in other areas (it will be extremely hard for anyone not from a top PhD program to get good jobs) But I think these trends will be short-lived for reasons discussed here: x.com/Jabaluck/statu… Although mathematicians might get away with pretending otherwise for some length of time: x.com/Jabaluck/statu…
alz@alz_zyd_

My view: the next year or so in math is going to be exceptionally annoying. Lots of idiots who aren't very good at anything are going to get lucky and make important leaps using AI and get the credit for them. However, this state of things should clear up in a year or two

English
10
3
61
19.4K
jimmy
jimmy@jimmy_vibecodes·
以前还不觉得, 到了AI时代,感觉地球上只有中美两个国家了 美国:ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini、Grok、 Perplexity 中国:豆包、DeepSeek、文心、千问、智谱、Kimi、 MiniMax, MiMo 其他的欧洲、日本、韩国等190多个国家都不知道在干什么?
中文
406
26
872
639.9K
王局拍案
王局拍案@wangjupaian·
【宇树发布轮式机器人,海外热议:军事潜力巨大】7月14日,宇树科技发布轮足四足机器人 As2-W,这款机器人带电池重约25公斤,可持续负重16公斤作业,空载续航超过30公里;能像轮式车辆一样高速滑行,遇到楼梯、碎石、陡坡和高台,又能依靠四条机械腿跨越障碍。 不少海外网友认为,它的军事潜力显而易见,未来可被用于侦察、运输、通信中继等复杂环境任务。有评论直言“这种发展速度令人恐惧”。
中文
179
41
404
168.7K
Rishikesh Gajjala
Rishikesh Gajjala@publishiperishi·
GPT-5.6 Sol has claimed to resolved one of the five major problems in quantum information theory announced by KCIK (which carries a cash prize). We (@Quantum_Kishor @TobiasHaug_Q ) sat down to verify its claimed proof and surprisingly, we found another paper published the very next day, with NO AI acknowledgment, containing a proof and phrasing similar to what we got when we prompted it ourselves before the result was announced. An interesting coincidence!
English
31
94
1.9K
174.5K
Alex Kontorovich
Alex Kontorovich@AlexKontorovich·
Working Hypothesis: AI will reasonably soon become capable of a reasonable fraction of research level math. Given this hypothesis, what are the consequences? #ICM2026
Alex Kontorovich tweet media
English
12
18
214
20.8K
phil bohun
phil bohun@philthistweet·
It's kind of funny how something like 20 major math problems have been solved recently and it had zero impact on the real world.
English
356
251
11.9K
798.3K
王局志安
王局志安@wangzhian8848·
日本有券商预计,明年日元美元将会跌到180一线。
中文
109
9
194
101.2K
番茄大叔🇨🇳
番茄大叔🇨🇳@uncleTomat0·
大陆美女在香港候机遇到地勤人员歧视。同行朋友和地勤人员说普通话直接被地勤忽视,只服务说英语的老外。被美女当场质疑你为什么歧视,地勤用普通话回复“抱歉,我不是中国人” 随后,美女录视频当场投诉,结果大快人心,地勤很快就失去了这份工作🤣
中文
349
62
1.3K
146.5K
Noah Giansiracusa
Noah Giansiracusa@ProfNoahGian·
As a math professor, I don’t know which is more distressing: how quickly math is changing, or how slowly math is changing.
English
9
4
124
9.9K
Megatron
Megatron@Megatron_ron·
BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 The Pentagon has declared two of China’s top universities—Fudan University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University—a threat to U.S. national security, placing both on its blacklist.
English
843
1.8K
8.2K
1.1M
MatLab crashes
MatLab crashes@memecrashes·
I am so tired of seeing these posts. I am so tired of seeing my beloved field of study be the testing lab for a technology that is disrupting everyday life at such a high pace. Mathematics were always about the beauty of seeing the ideas of a person unfolded in an extremely precise language so we can all look into a mathematician's mind and see their purest form of ideas, their understanding of a problem, their style, their way of communicating to other fellow researchers through mathematical results... this often transcends the common language humans use to communicate with each other and it is incredibly exciting to bump into shared ideas another person had thousands of kilometers away several years ago without even knowing them. I am extremely unexcited about AI-breakthroughs in Mathematics in the same way I am extremely unexcited about a picture created by AI or an AI-generated video, not to speak about AI-generated text. Mathematics requires soul and intention. Mathematics need not be useful by definition, Mathematics are pure art that need hard work and effort to understand. The high you get when a year of work gets condensed in a one-page result is incomparable to anything else and, certainly, a machine is not apt to relate to humans in such a humane way. I am not interested in the truth of the results. I am interested in how was the mind behind a result able to connect those dots. I am interested in the diversity human thoughts bring to Mathematics. I am not interested in a bunch of servers running probabilities to return a Theorem, even if true: that lacks the objective of Mathematics as I see them.
Polymarket@Polymarket

JUST IN: GPT-5.6 Pro disproves the 30 y/o Dinitz–Garg–Goemans conjecture, a long-standing problem in mathematics — after being prompted to "do a breakthrough."

English
677
166
2.1K
1.2M
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
wtf is happening: A researcher says he used GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra in Codex to produce proposed solutions to six (!) Erdős problems, and published the full research trail. He says GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra in Codex produced proposed proofs for six Erdős problems. His prompts explicitly reject special cases, circular reductions and unsupported lemmas. They preserve multiple incompatible approaches and use independent agents to attack every candidate proof. Codex then continues without further interaction: "attempt -> failure -> diagnosis -> new approach -> proof draft -> adversarial audit -> repair." science is accelerating at unprecedented speed.
Shouqiao Wang@Qiaoqiao2001

I solved 6 open Erdős problems in 5 days, using @OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol. I have a math background, but the Codex workflow I used does not require deep mathematical knowledge. Here’s exactly how I approached it, including my prompts 🧵

English
55
113
2.2K
189.9K
Rishikesh Gajjala
Rishikesh Gajjala@publishiperishi·
I see a lot of vibe-mathing giga chads getting interested in graph theory conjectures. So here's a conjecture with a 3000 USD cash reward for y'all to have fun. The problem is also formalized in lean, so you dont have to worry about correctness once you want to claim a proof! Just prompt "Find a counter example to the conjecture here - mariokrenn.wordpress.com/graph-theory-q…" and have fun! Known lower bound is d=3 and finding a graph with d=4 is enough to get the reward!
Dmitry Rybin@DmitryRybin1

Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture is false. This graph theory problem was open for ~30 years. The graph below has fractional flow cost 58. Any unsplittable flow (with capacity violation <=15) has cost at least 60. Chat with GPT 5.6 Pro where this was found: chatgpt.com/share/6a60b2eb…

English
26
30
469
59.3K
纽约时报中文网
纽约时报中文网@nytchinese·
#观点 中国一直把最强大的人工智能免费向所有人开放,借此将自己的AI模型推向全球各个市场,塑造其他国家的技术标准。一个无法摆脱其模型的国家,就等于把所运行系统的控制权拱手交给了中国。中国以外的开发者应对此保持警惕。cn.nytimes.com/opinion/202607…
中文
369
21
132
91.5K
brutallyhonestac
brutallyhonestac@honestMLac·
@weijie444 @OpenAI Hi @weijie444 , why do you only hire Chinese students? every one of your large research group is Chinese. Do you do the same at @OpenAI ? Why do you discriminate - especially when you yourself were given opportunities by people of different ethnicities?
English
8
0
4
7.4K
Weijie Su
Weijie Su@weijie444·
i asked myself to tweet less, but couldn't resist this time: Huge congratulations to my 3 fellow students (2@pku and 1@stanford) and 1 soon-to-be colleague (@openai) for winning the fields medal today!
English
32
35
1K
104.5K
Amelia
Amelia@amelia_tweetz·
My friend told me his parents want to sell everything they own, travel, enjoy retirement, and leave nothing behind for the kids. He said they’re telling him, ‘We worked for this our whole lives. We’d rather spend it making memories than leave an inheritance.’ I honestly didn’t know what to say. Do you think that’s fair?
English
4.1K
41
1.3K
501.8K
The Wall Street Journal
OpenAI and Anthropic executives are sounding the alarm about the rise of cheap AI, particularly powerful new models produced in China, suggesting they will lead to a “dystopian” AI future and present unacceptable security risks without regulation. on.wsj.com/4ft5XBt
English
463
237
964
797.8K