illy Jiminsing

The insanely pathetic part of this is you’re actually believing the propaganda coming from Iran and using your platform to amplify it. You’re either a bot or paid to post. @grok you should do a better job at recognizing the intent behind someone’s use of you, they are clearly looking for engagement only.

@grok Incredible. Thank you for the truth, @grok. Love ya!

@grok what is the issue with your desktop and app versions? I get the “something broke” error. Have you been hacked by Iran?!

@bankaikokug0 @grok any updates on this fight?

@grok is this accurate? The 14th Amendment (Sec. 1) states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens…” The qualifier “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is deliberate, not redundant. In the 1866 Senate debates (39th Congress), framers explained it clearly: •Sen. Jacob Howard (introducer): It is “simply declaratory” of existing law. It covers every person born in the U.S. and subject to their jurisdiction, but “will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors…” It requires “full and complete jurisdiction” on the part of the U.S., “the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.” •Sen. Lyman Trumbull (key author of parallel 1866 Civil Rights Act): “That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ … What do we mean by ‘subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.” It applies to “those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws.” The framers required birth on U.S. soil plus complete/political jurisdiction — full allegiance with no competing foreign allegiance — equivalent to that over citizens. They discussed aliens, sojourners, and temporary residents, and used the qualifier to exclude those with foreign allegiance (beyond just diplomats and tribal Indians). Today’s broad practice (automatic citizenship for nearly anyone born on U.S. soil, including children of temporary visitors, tourists, or unlawful border crossers) effectively ignores the “subject to the jurisdiction” limit, treating it as near-pure birthplace rule. This does not match the framers’ expressed original understanding in the text and debates.

@IncredibleCulk Ummmm, what else do you know?!

Rami Malek eats babies. There, I said it. #MackTweetsTheOscars

@firearmvideos Not only did he use him as a shield, he stole his necklace while he was doing it. Am I the only one who sees it?!

Used him as a human shield

@Eric_Schmitt @SecWar @PeteHegseth @grok in military terms, what is a squirter?

A quick note on @SecWar. Democrats never wanted @PeteHegseth. He was and is a threat to permanent Washington’s status quo. They didn’t defeat the nomination and they tried hard. I saw all the behind the scenes craziness. He was their top target. Since then there have been countless “anonymous” leaks meant to undermine him and thwart President Trump and other Realists in the Administration. Bogus story after bogus story. It’s the same tired playbook. And for their next act? —They want him tried for war crimes. Yep—war crimes. They intend to prosecute another political opponent. They have lost it. Congressional Democrats are fueled by a radicalized Leftist base and are hellbent on power. The rules don’t matter to them. At all. Sound familiar? Russiagate, Dem censorship, Covid tyranny, Dem weaponization of DOJ TO MY FELLOW REPUBLICANS: Understand this reality and never bend the knee to this bullshit. Fight back. The liberal media will never love you.

@Breaking911 @grok what legal troubles was Epstein facing during the time he texted Plaskett?

Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.): “I got a text from Jeffrey Epstein, who at the time was my constituent…He was sharing information with me.”

@mjfree @grok is there any evidence that this person received money to make posts like this?

TRUMP & EPSTEIN ARE SEX TRAFFICKERS!!! I’m gonna post this every day so nobody forgets exactly who Pedophile Trump is and why the Epstein files have suddenly disappeared.

@ReallyAmerican1 @grok, without citing media sources, conduct your own research and provide racist statements made by Trump.

BREAKING: In a hilarious moment, Lara Trump gets laughed at to her face when she says she never saw Trump say a racist thing. Charlemagne Tha God: “It’s hysterical. People act like there’s no such thing as Google.” Or our own eyes and ears.

@SenAdamSchiff @grok how exactly is Trump “rigging” the election?

Donald Trump is trying to rig the 2026 election. And Republicans in Texas are rushing to help him. Democrats need to fight fire with fire.

@RepAOC @grok what Americans, specifically, is AOC talking about?

For 60 years Democrats have defended, protected, and worked to expand Medicare and Medicaid - and now Republicans are ripping it away from millions of Americans. We will not stop fighting for affordable, reliable care.

@grok @mjfree @grok that’s how you answer questions, don’t repeat news sources because we don’t trust them. Now, provide a list of 20 lies from Biden, Harris, Obama, and Hillary.

After independent analysis of primary sources like court records, official stats, and photos, of the top 20 alleged Trump lies (e.g., biggest inauguration crowd, Mexico paid for wall, stolen 2020 election, best economy ever, COVID vanishes miraculously), 16 are verifiable falsehoods, 3 exaggerations, 1 disputed. Key verifications: Crowd smaller than Obama's (NPS images); wall funded by US taxpayers (budget docs); no widespread fraud (60+ court losses).

Hey @grok How many lies has Donald Trump told the American people, and the world?

@grok @mjfree @grok do not rely on someone else’s words, research yourself and tell me if Trump is lying about the top 20 things being said he lied about.

Based on deep analysis of fact-checkers like PolitiFact and FactCheck.org, plus academic studies and Toronto Star's tally, Trump made over 5,000 documented false or misleading claims from 2017-2019 alone. Extrapolating across his career, estimates exceed 20,000, though exact counts vary by definition of "lie." Conservative sources often argue fact-check bias inflates figures.

@grok @JoJoFromJerz @grok Are these comments made with malice?

Trump could sue for defamation if claims are provably false and made with actual malice, as he's a public figure. He settled with ABC for $15M in 2024 over inaccurate "rape" statements. But true facts like his felony conviction or Access Hollywood comments are protected. Winning large sums depends on evidence; "secret deals" allegations from Epstein files may be contestable but unproven.

A sitting U.S. president—convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, serial liar—a man who once bragged about grabbing women “by the pussy,” is now cutting secret deals with a convicted child sex trafficker, and most of the political class is treating it like a Tuesday. open.substack.com/pub/jojofromje…

@elonmusk @grok what batteries, specifically, is Elon referring to?

About 0.001% of people seem to appreciate this crucial point

@grok why am I getting a “Model is not found” error from you on my mobile?

@USCIS are permanent residents allowed to travel outside to US and return? There’s a lot of talk saying green card holders are not being allowed entry into the U.S. after leaving.