Undermused

8.9K posts

Undermused banner
Undermused

Undermused

@wilderthanrogue

Trying to break the death march into oblivion and rejoining the circle of life. Liberate Yourself. Fear Nothing.

This Point in Time & Space Katılım Şubat 2016
492 Takip Edilen87 Takipçiler
HōloÇyphâ
HōloÇyphâ@fractal_verse·
And as it turns out the InterPlanetary Magnetic Field (IMF).. ☀️ 🧲 Contains the whole hologram of the fabric to reality… (Spoiler it’s musically-geometrically tuned..) And Somehow our ancestors deep in antiquity figured out how to track it all with planetary beat rhythms…! 🎶
English
1
0
1
48
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@sspriint @DevonRJames So show a MAGLEV in action, not some ducted fan unicycle balancing act any hack can do with AI these days. Grok cant find anything in the press about it and says your timeline is full of similar stories with no factual base. Think you need to touch grass and stop peddling crap.
English
0
0
2
124
sprint
sprint@sspriint·
@DevonRJames Kid's selling actual naval maglev ROVs and you're out here splitting hairs. Touch grass.
English
10
0
5
3.3K
sprint
sprint@sspriint·
PhD candidate found out the kid who built his lab's levitating ROV from scratch was selling the design to three navies. You built this on a cutting mat? Kitchen's for eating. Where'd you learn PID tuning? Claude Code. One weekend. It hovers. In water. Without touching anything. Magnetic suspension loop. Twelve hundred lines. Who's buying? Can't say. How much. Six figures. Per unit. The professor put his coffee down. The way you put it down when the kid you mentored just out-engineered your entire department. Bro. We have a whole controls lab. You did this between refinery shifts.
English
28
116
1.1K
116.4K
petr royce
petr royce@petrroyce·
@EmilKulaga @BenjaminDEKR there we go, the other two are early so not surprised. the point is more about design. chinese are not interested in the ugly looking thing.
English
2
0
0
14
Benjamin De Kraker
Benjamin De Kraker@BenjaminDEKR·
Ferrari designing this for China (and not traditional sports car buyers) is actually a really good point, which I and many others missed.
Benjamin De Kraker tweet media
Robert Scoble@Scobleizer

"You aren't getting it," a friend who lives in China told me after I said the new Ferrari is ugly. "This is gonna sell well with China's new rich." But why is a story of changing attitudes amongst car buyers, particularly in China. In a world where everyone around you is driving a new electric car, which is true in many Chinese cities now, showing up with a loud gas car just doesn't fit in anymore. Imagine you are a new rich factory owner in Shanghai. Do you want to drive around in a loud Ferrari, like I dreamed about doing when I was a kid? No. Chinese culture is about fitting in, about caring what everyone else thinks. Worse, in China they are going electric so fast that you can see the writing on the wall for gas. Soon gas stations will disappear altogether in major cities. And cars that pollute and put fumes into the air are already being seen as artifacts of an age that needs to die quickly, particularly in cities with 40 million people. Ferrari's sales are way down in China. New car brands there like @Xiaomi, @XPENG_Global, @NIOGlobal, @BYDCompany, and @HongqiGlobal are taking share with vehicles that have much more innovation than even this new Ferrari has. What are my credentials to talk about Ferrari? Well, I've studied automotive innovation my whole life. Audi taught me to race. I had the first ride in the Fiat 500, the BMW i3, the Tesla Roadster, the first Mercedes AI car, and a few others. Have hung out with many billionaires who have Ferraris, went on a famous car rally with such last year to study buyers of super cars, and car collectors, among other things. And I did consumer research about attitudes toward new innovations, like autonomy, around the world. But it goes deeper than just China, which buys more cars that USA and Europe combined. Ferrari is run by people who love to drive and love to drive gas cars with loud, big, engines. In USA that makes sense. My friend Scott Jordan, who owns a clothing company in Sun Valley, Idaho, has one, and within a few minutes from his home he can be on some of the best driving roads in the world. We argue about cars all the time, and he probably never will buy a Tesla. Loves the sound the Ferrari makes. And the design of the hand stitched leather dash. He hates this new Ferrari. Could never see himself in one. But his counterpart in China? Will never get onto a pretty road. When I was last in Shanghai I drove for hours and never stopped seeing high rise buildings with stop and go traffic. Americans can't grok that. They don't want a dirty, gas, car, that makes a lot of noise in China. All traditional luxury brands (another way for saying $500,000 or more for a car) are seeing sales declines for this reason. They also get on race tracks far less frequently than we can here in America. Which is where you can really enjoy a Ferrari. In fact, the luxury brands are more of a club than buying a car. I once hung out with the Bugatti owners from around the world (one of the benefits of living within walking distance of the Half Moon Bay Ritz Carlton). They told me that it is a club and that Bugatti flies their cars around the world for a variety of driving experiences. Makes sense, the last thing a billionaire wants to hear while on vacation is a pitch for a new startup, or someone begging for money (same thing, really). So they have a club experience that keeps them separated from those kinds. The Chinese buyer cares more about innovation than those of us in USA do. You see this in their vehicles, which have big huge screens covering the dash, and seats that rub their backs, and even suspensions that "hop" over potholes, not to mention autonomy that drives them everywhere in stop and go traffic. It's one reason why China's government has kept Tesla from really turning on its autonomy, which is slightly ahead of the Chinese brands. As a Tesla investor I am watching that closely. Speaking of Tesla, its new Roadster that we should see "within months" according to @elonmusk and his main designer @woodhaus2, should capture the world's attention, and especially the new rich in China. But will it be allowed into China in a world where USA doesn't allow Chinese cars to be imported here? The answer to that question is way above my pay grade. But if it were, it'd be a massive competitor to this new Ferrari. Why? Well, Ferrari's innovation just isn't there for this new consumer. It doesn't self drive. Its screens are smaller than any of those new Chinese brands, many of which started out making smartphones and other consumer electronics. And that leads to this design that is rightfully getting derided. Ferrari doesn't like being pushed into this new world of electric, screens, and autonomy. If it could it'd go back to an all-analog car, which is what most of the buyers of Ferrari like, taking them back to their childhood. I can just imagine what Jony Ive had to do to come up with even the design he was able to ship here. Consumers used to like buttons. Old people, particularly billionaires, still do. Takes them back to familiarity and tactile senses. They still talk about how much they love the buttons and knobs in their old cars. But the new Chinese consumers grew up with smartphones and iPads you can touch. Many of them carry around @Huawei triple fold phones, that, when unfolded look like an iPad. We don't have those in America yet and Apple is rumored to be bringing a single fold device to America later this year. Such a consumer is more impressed by big screens and automation than loud engines and fast speeds. But the new rich want to stand out. Often they are running factories or tech companies where most of the engineers have Teslas or one of the new Chinese brands. How do they stand out? Roll up in one of these. And now you understand why the design of this car is so ugly. Ferrari doesn't want its traditional consumer to buy it. And didn't want a mind-blowing aggressive design that would make its traditional customer pissed that it was "going electric." It's all about trying to regain share in China.

English
27
1
33
13.7K
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@SterlingCooley If youre claiming money from the 'creator' program and you have 4.3 millions followers, surely you would steer clear of doing that anyways. He doesnt make original content so shouldnt be treated as a creator.
English
0
0
0
4
Sterling Cooley
Sterling Cooley@SterlingCooley·
So, if you take video content from YouTube from someone else, slap your own "watermark" on it, and then someone else steals it - that's punished, but the original stealing isn't. It's like a game of hot-potato, don't be the last one caught stealing content
Sterling Cooley tweet media
Nikita Bier@nikitabier

@Rainmaker1973 After sourcing 2759 videos from @ViralRushX over the last 6 months, you're now circumventing attribution by simply cropping out his watermark? You cannot get more shameless than this. This is your last day in the creator program.

English
1
0
1
458
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
Healthcare extends life without asking what the life is for. Education that produces credentials without producing people who can think. Food systems that deliver calories while creating metabolic chaos. Social media that maximises connection metrics while producing isolation
English
0
0
0
3
thecollabagepatch
thecollabagepatch@thepatch_kev·
in the name of research we got an arduino uno q (4gb of ram) to run stable-audio-3-small-sfx using a swap file, after 3 minutes, it actually worked lol
English
2
2
22
3.2K
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@eigenrobot Perseus, you must use the mirror. Indirect gaze is the way. Keeps the epistemic sanitation possible without burnout. Respect for doing the work anyway.
English
0
0
2
48
eigenrobot
eigenrobot@eigenrobot·
where i err in this process i will always try to post corrections in the interest of epistemic sanitation but man the struggle will never end and some days it is a weariness of the flesh
English
2
0
87
4.1K
Cooper
Cooper@CooperZurad·
one of the most counterintuitive things about space is that springs don't work there so you have to come up with different solutions
English
88
14
455
54.3K
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@BlokeMan00 Cool story but wheres the living model? People have been throwing these models around for decades.
English
2
0
0
12
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@BlokeMan00 Maths is the ultimate reductionist tool. Extraordinary at describing the components of a system that's already been dissected. Useless at capturing what the living system was doing before you dissected it. Dead memory vs living memory
English
0
0
1
12
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
Considering the abundance is stupidity, are you surprised? No common sense out there.
English
1
0
2
0
Undermused
Undermused@wilderthanrogue·
@BoredNBased If chillen means leaning into the system haha I see you
English
1
0
1
11
BoredN'Based 🟦
BoredN'Based 🟦@BoredNBased·
Well that was easy Like flys to shit 🤣🤣
GIF
English
1
0
1
37
BoredN'Based 🟦
BoredN'Based 🟦@BoredNBased·
Silence will unfortunately make me act alone 😔 And that won't be good for them if I do.... or me so saying hello would be nice or my silence those attackers will fear most
English
1
0
0
23
Megalithic Marvels
Megalithic Marvels@derek__olson·
If we’re talking about “Out of Place Artifacts,” then let’s talk about the giant precision diorite scarab at the British Museum
English
30
99
1.3K
81.7K
Liam Nissan™
Liam Nissan™@theliamnissan·
Listen MAGAts (and silly, weak leftists) Graham Platner masturbated in an Afghanistan port-o-potty FOR YOUR FREEDOM. Next question.
English
27
33
298
13.3K