窥基

380 posts

窥基 banner
窥基

窥基

@wingedwork

Katılım Eylül 2012
140 Takip Edilen18 Takipçiler
winter
winter@winter35049208·
@Konekoutena 郎咸平的话你都敢信?那家伙就是大骗子。之前说手机不看好中国手机,汽车也是。自己给快鹿站台🚉多少人被坑了。他就一个坏逼
中文
2
0
7
3.4K
枫糖小猫
枫糖小猫@Konekoutena·
不管习近平是不是蒙的,但是这条路他赌对了。放十年前,中国汽车都是没人要的廉价货,记得还看过财经郎眼,郎咸平还说汽车是重技术积累的产业,新能源也只能是丰田大众这种老牌车企搞,中国搞汽车就是笑话。现在中国汽车通过智能化,真的实现了弯道超车。成为日本丰田和德国大众最大的竞争威胁
夏河@jlaw520

今日再看这张12年前的新闻简报,五味杂陈。我们这一代人都记得,当年看到『新能源汽车是迈向汽车强国的必由之路』国人第一反应是讥讽、嘲笑,觉得这不过又是一句大话+政治口号。因为那时候的中国汽车在世界舞台上几乎没有位置,中国品牌别说走向世界,连在自己人心里都嫌弃,说比亚迪=逼养的,丢人。 十几年过去,现实却把当年无知的冷笑一寸一寸打碎:今天中国电动车销量已经占全球62%,其中比亚迪在2025年成为全球电动车销量第一,旗下豪华车型U8 Arabian Edition在中东已成了各国土豪们的新宠,人手一台。超过了曾经不可一世的特斯拉。 再回首,不只是中国电动车赢了,而是我们很多人的判断输了。但没有人是先知,预言错了并不可耻,真正可耻的是,当事实已经摆在眼前,一个人仍然没有勇气承认自己曾经因目光短浅、判断错误,还要为了维护过去的立场继续硬熬。世界在往前走,某些人却永远停在了自己最固执的那一年。

中文
99
45
601
187.8K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@TfTHacker e's just looking for topics to drive traffic. In another post, he mentioned that Obsidian isn't that simple and is actually quite complex.In reality, whether Obsidian is simple or complex depends entirely on how you use it. I think he is well aware of this.
English
0
0
1
11
TfTHacker
TfTHacker@TfTHacker·
Tiago loves to stir the pot. I'm not really sure where his beef with Obsidian is coming from. If you believe in Obsidian, make sure to comment on this thread with your support! Let us make the Obsidian team feel good about the work they are doing. I have tried many apps over many years. I have researched, tested, written about, and extended them with plugins. I finally settled on Obsidian. There is no perfect app; there are always compromises. Obsidian finds the right balance of functionality and freedom. What I like about Obsidian is that markdown has always been central to its core. I use many other tools with my markdown files, but Obsidian functions as the container for them all. While Obsidian does many other things, at its core, it is about markdown. It always has been, and it will always be. Having arm-wrestled with the Obsidian team for years, the one thing I have seen is that they have a clear vision: to remain a high-quality environment for working with markdown, and they won't deviate from it. I really respect their determination to stick to their vision, even when that might bring about some limitations. They choose to live with the limitations rather than compromise their markdown capabilities. I also like that it is cross-platform, as I use it on my Mac, Linux, and iOS devices. It's stable, fast, and I have all my functionality on all my devices. I have uninstalled all other Tools for Thought apps. I don't follow them, and I don't spend time thinking about them. I am focused on a solid environment with Obsidian at the core for managing markdown, and lots of other tools wrapped around those files (ex, Claude Code and Codex, VS Code, Unix command line). I've never felt more productive in my life. Combining Obsidian with LLMs, I've never had better insights into my captured knowledge. I feel the Tools for Thought dream has become a reality.
Tiago Forte@fortelabs

I want to debunk the claim that I see a lot around here that Obsidian is "just plain text markdown files" which means "you can take them anywhere and open them with any app" That simply isn't true Yes, maybe the raw text of the notes is markdown, but many other parts cannot be moved elsewhere and opened by other apps: 1. The .obsidian/ directory contains your JSON config with plugins, settings, hotkeys, workspace state, link format, attachment paths – those can't be moved elsewhere 2. Plugin state files – Readwise's path-to-ID map, Templater's settings, Tasks plugin's database, Excalidraw's drawing data – even if plugins can be recreated, these settings cannot 3. .canvas files – JSON, not markdown. They reference notes by path and won't survive a move 4. .base files – JSON-based database/views over your notes. Same path-fragility 5. .excalidraw.md files – markdown wrapper around an Excalidraw JSON blob. Looks like markdown, isn't really 6. The link graph itself – backlinks, graph view, "linked mentions" – all computed from filenames and link references. They survive because the references are in the markdown, but they require Obsidian (or an Obsidian-aware tool) to materialize 7. Plugin-managed folders – Readwise output, Web Clipper output, Daily Notes location, Templates folder. Each is a folder whose contents are owned by an external system tracked in plugin state 8. Sync state – Obsidian Sync, iCloud, Dropbox, Google Drive each maintain their own state about what's where and what's been resolved. Move operations interfere with this state 9. Embedded query results – Dataview queries, Tasks queries, Bases queries. The query is in the markdown; the result is computed live and never persisted So technically you CAN move your files elsewhere, but you'd destroy most of what makes them valuable – the graph, the plugin state, the canvases, the embedded queries, the sync state, and any structural intent encoded in folder placement Which means you're just as locked in to Obsidian as any other "proprietary" app, it's just a hidden lock-in that's obscured by inaccurate marketing Saying "Obsidian is just markdown files" is like saying "your house is just bricks" The bricks are real and moveable – but the architecture, plumbing, and wiring aren't bricks, and those are most of what makes the house function

English
48
9
209
24.9K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@HiTw93 希望您能用汉字和汉语拼音命名项目
中文
1
0
1
750
Tw93
Tw93@HiTw93·
给大伙同步一下今天做的事情,我对几十个字一个一个调,包括笔画,横、竖、勾、撇、捺、点这种反复打磨了一下,然后有一个还不能到开源版本的雏形了。 以楷书为底:重心稳定、开合分明,保留书写感,避免油滑和装饰。 清先修结构、重心、开合,再处理端点和转折,让笔画清楚而不生硬。
Tw93 tweet media
Tw93@HiTw93

我很多开源产品使用的中文字体是仓耳今楷,我非常喜欢,后面有不少小伙伴也跟着用这个字体。它个人使用免费,商业使用需要授权,但在一些场景里确实会有授权和分发上的不便,突然有点儿想自己造一套开源的、精美舒服、方便阅读的中文字体。 读书时代就特别喜欢好看的中文字体,去年过年去绍兴玩,特地去了一趟当地西南的兰渚山下,《兰亭集序》诞生地。当时我记得还发了那块碑的照片推特,里面很多句子都写得非常好,后之视今,亦犹今之视昔。 逛到后面有间屋子,墙上有很多字画。王羲之偏行书,有精气神,我也喜欢,就是不方便现代阅读。看着看着偶然发现一些卫夫人相关的字,非常喜欢,非常舒服清爽。一查她是王羲之早期学书的重要老师之一,风格更接近魏晋小楷、古楷、钟繇一脉的楷法,但不古风,也不飘逸。 后面回来后,去找了不少卫夫人相关的字帖资料来看。有资料里形容这一路书风是「多骨微肉、清瘦有力、端正含蓄」,非常贴切,也非常有书卷气,我很喜欢。不过后面由于事情太多,就慢慢搁置了。 这几天刚好是五一假期,我在想要不要整一整,好好研究研究,做一套好看的,适合阅读、排版、印刷的中文字体出来,也很欢迎对中文字体有深入研究的小伙伴给我提建议。

中文
31
12
263
53K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@yuyimei2 现在央视的好多播音员也是整容的、小家子气的脸了
中文
0
0
0
1.3K
庾一梅
庾一梅@yuyimei2·
据说,这是某网站发布的视频,对比普通话、韩语以及日语播音风格,很多欧美网友的注意力都集中在长相方面,普遍认为中国主持人长相不同于日韩的网红感,更显大气温婉~~
中文
42
13
109
42.3K
Geek
Geek@geekbb·
看到一篇博文:依赖 AI 的人终将被时代抛弃……
Geek tweet media
中文
33
2
69
29.7K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@Stormi_luv They just don't have the blue checkmark.
English
0
0
0
6
Stormi
Stormi@Stormi_luv·
People who keep tweeting with 0 likes really Fear no one
English
837
990
6.3K
254.7K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@sanyi_eth_ Opus 的哲学对话能力依然是无敌的
中文
1
0
1
326
sanyi.eth
sanyi.eth@sanyi_eth_·
我总感觉Opus4.7没有GPT5.5聪明... 大家有这样的感觉吗?
中文
65
2
60
37.2K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@imwsl90 的确对于桌面环境配置有掌控感,但配置完了之后呢,你想安装一个商业软件,它大部分情况下没有
中文
1
0
4
426
卫斯理
卫斯理@imwsl90·
用Linux的爽感是什么呢? 掌控感 因为一切都是自己配置的
卫斯理 tweet media
中文
22
0
31
8.9K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@Alexu0317 @dotey 我用哲学对话的场景比较多,Opus 明显强于 Sonnet,供你参考
中文
0
0
0
89
Alex Xu
Alex Xu@Alexu0317·
@dotey 宝玉老师能分享一下Opus 4.7 和Sonnet 4.6的使用体验吗?我在迭代项目文档的时候,发现Opus并不比Sonnet强。该忘的都忘,该犯错的都犯错。在这个场景下,感觉不出来有什么区别。能展开谈谈其他的应用场景体验吗?
中文
2
0
0
20.6K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@TheGeorgePu Grok's $300 plan is as ridiculous as it gets. It can actually only chat and can't do anything else.
English
0
0
0
29
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
ChatGPT Pro: $200/mo. Claude Max: $200/mo. Google AI Ultra: $250/mo. Grok Heavy: $300/mo. Same script. Different landlord. You don't own your AI. You rent it. There's a ladder above you. $999 Mac Mini on your desk. Mac Studio in your office. Bare-metal GPU in any country. Your own H100 in a colo rack. Most will never know the ladder exists. Five months of rent buys the first rung.
English
53
8
148
12K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@dotey @turingou 把把那帖子删了吧,没必要跟他争,还“悲观美学”
中文
0
0
4
649
宝玉
宝玉@dotey·
@turingou 别误会,我说断章取义的意思就是说原文是断章取义。另外我只是说观点,也不针对人。
中文
10
0
53
22.2K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@typelessdotcom This is great! I've already started enjoying these benefits. I have to say that Typeless remains irreplaceable. Its key, irreplaceable feature is exactly what I imagined: it's like having a highly capable AI helping you organize and polish your voice output.
English
0
0
0
519
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@tmuxvim 我很难理解这种一句话的吐槽,他妈的七八万的阅读量是怎么来的?
中文
0
0
0
15
tmuxvim
tmuxvim@tmuxvim·
btw, OpenAI is probably losing TONS of money on most codex users lol
English
130
19
2.5K
187.5K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@techikansh Really? It still looks like $20 to me. Why are there always people spreading rumors that Anthropic has changed its pricing?
English
1
0
3
1.8K
Techikansh
Techikansh@techikansh·
token based billing is the future local llms will be NECESSITY in the near future...
Techikansh tweet media
English
12
5
373
40.2K
Xu
Xu@xchase173294·
大学生如何避免被流量收割? 1. 卸载抖音 2.卸载小红书
中文
34
2
150
15.2K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
GPT-5.5 是不是又做了什么更新啊?现在它基本上不说黑话了,甚至连它刚刚更新之后,继续保留的像“这个命题很强”、“这个说法很硬”这种只有小学生能找出来的拙劣词汇,它也好像也不用了。
中文
0
0
0
50
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@chickuu_ @nikitabier Whether you get 10,000 likes depends entirely on whether you are a blue-check verified user.
English
0
0
0
3
Chicku
Chicku@chickuu_·
@nikitabier Post one good thought → 10 likes Post one real thought → 10k impressions That asymmetry is addictive.
English
1
0
2
648
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
X is sufficiently capitalist where it is valuable to post & build a reputation here (unlike reddit or 4chan), but not so capitalist that it drains your soul like Linkedin. It’s perfect.
English
2.9K
816
14.6K
813.4K
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@nikitabier It's hilarious how Blue Check users can say just about anything and get tens of thousands of views. If you're not a Blue Check user, you can share the most interesting perspective imaginable, and it will still only get views in the single digits.
English
0
0
0
6
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
X 现在是真的把自己办成了有钱人俱乐部。 什么鸟人随便说一句话,都他妈好几万的阅读量;你就说一个再有趣的观点,不是蓝标,就只有十几个人看。
中文
0
0
0
55
窥基
窥基@wingedwork·
@umami_software There are too many issues with the current UI. It is especially unfriendly on the mobile version.
English
0
0
0
17
umami
umami@umami_software·
We are trying to build the best analytics platform possible, while always remaining open source. We'll get there as we add more requested features, all with the community's help. Want to see how we stack up to other products? Read more umami.is/compare
English
2
0
7
327