Will Quist

8K posts

Will Quist

Will Quist

@wquist

Partner @slow

The Bay Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.1K Takip Edilen7.8K Takipçiler
Slow Ventures
Slow Ventures@slow·
The threat isnt that AI makes bad decisions. Its that the workflows AI is being dropped into were already wrong. Enterprises are automating the wrong thing at scale. @wquist
English
6
1
11
1.6K
VAULT wallet
VAULT wallet@stable_VAULT·
@slow @wquist AI won’t fix broken workflows it’ll just make bad habits faster. We’re not automating efficiency; we’re scaling inherited dysfunction, and that’s where trust gets eroded in financial systems.
English
1
0
2
23
Will Quist retweetledi
Wasteland Capital
Wasteland Capital@ecommerceshares·
We now have 30+ companies competing in the data centre CPU & TPU markets. All at astronomical multiples & valuations. Barriers to entry seem non-existent. We have a 3-player oligopoly in HBM, with no new entrants even on the horizon. Barriers to entry are astronomical. Hmm…
English
24
16
417
63.2K
Finding Moats Investment Research
Not exactly my point though. What I was trying to say is that every time a stock drops, people suddenly remember valuation mattered — as if it was obvious all along. You understand the business first, then you worry about the numbers. Using a ratio on accounting earnings as the main filter for cheap vs expensive is, at least the way I see it, where things get a bit too simple. Same goes for DCFs on businesses with high barriers to entry and assets that are nearly impossible to replicate — the spreadsheet will never fully capture what makes those businesses special.
English
2
0
0
45
Finding Moats Investment Research
The problem — at least the way I see it — is reducing investing, with all its complexity, to a mathematical formula, however sophisticated it may be. How do you put in a DCF that $AMZN selling books would end up building AWS? That $DHR would go from an industrial asset play to a pure diagnostics and life science business? That $NFLX would disrupt Blockbuster and build a dominant global streaming service? That $TSLA would go from selling cars to selling autonomous humanoid robots? That $GOOG would acquire YouTube and turn it into one of the most profitable assets on the planet? The hard part is everything the formula can't see, IMO.
Gerhard Visagie 🇿🇦🇷🇼@Gerhard_Paladin

Best way to avoid overvaluation is to do a DCF valuation and IRR calculation. Even with simple assumptions .

English
2
0
2
2.2K
Will Quist retweetledi
TBU
TBU@TBU12345678·
more detail on why I think the AI labs are probably overglazed: - I believe we are over 100% penetrated of the first slug of AI users. More will come with fine but hearing some dumb tokenmaxxing stuff. People are spending 2x their salaries (often by mistake) and not generating topline. Things like continuous web scraping, etc. are wildly expensive. This sets up for “AI optimizations” in the same way we saw “cloud optimizations” with $SNOW and $DDOG in 2022. AI is real but will take time to get the second mover cohort on board and the first movers are clearly “overusing” - these labs are a boom for VCs who had mega funds they needed to deploy but no co’s who could take huge checks and an inexplicable allergy to hardware. along come mega capital intensive co’s that you can plow huge checks into bc you know the idiot next door will do it next round. these will be good IPOs but the price charts will look like $SNOW. the private markets extracted too much value too fast
English
27
13
369
131.4K
Will Quist retweetledi
alexander green
alexander green@alexframegreen·
Ai is expensive bc it’s made by fancy people in fancy places and subsidized by fancy VC’s. This is not priced in
Xiaoyin Qu@quxiaoyin

Why is @deepseek_ai 100x cheaper than @AnthropicAI? China is vertically integrated to be cheap. → Cheap model: token-optimized, aggressive caching, less GPU per query → Cheap chips: Huawei silicon, no Nvidia tax → Cheap energy: subsidized power, state-scale grid → Cheap talent: top researchers at a fraction of US salaries → Cheap economics: DeepSeek funded by trading profits, inference doesn’t need to make money The only thing they lag is performance. But as they get “good enough”, being cheap matters a lot, and being frontier keeps getting harder.

English
2
2
16
1.9K
Will Quist retweetledi
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
The cyber security oligopoly is dead. AI changes everything: • Attack volume explodes (automation) • Attack sophistication leaps (reasoning) • The surface moves (models, data, agents) The current players are defending a world that no longer exists.
English
5
2
25
3.1K
Will Quist retweetledi
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
Most cybersecurity AI takes miss the point entirely. They assume agents just make current workflows faster / smarter / stronger. I can't help but believe in an autonomous world, the workflows themselves don't make sense anymore.
English
2
2
13
1.8K
Will Quist retweetledi
TJ Parker⚡️
TJ Parker⚡️@tjparker·
Optimistic take: US healthcare is actually set up very well for the AI era. GP shortage. Best therapies and proceduralists in the world for actual interventions. And a ton of admin bloat / bad incentives that create surface area to arbitrage.
English
15
10
144
12.3K
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
@tjparker @semil yah, i am more reacting to people thinking they have 3-5 fund returners...
English
1
0
5
581
Semil
Semil@semil·
fascinating data from long-time tier 1 LP in many early-stage VC funds over many vintages: for this LP, in their VC fund vintages which produced a 3x net, those VC funds on average had 1.7 fund returning companies. (read that slowly)
English
16
6
149
32K
Semil
Semil@semil·
@tjparker my 2 cents - most would assume their own fund could have 3-5 fund returners, but the average being below 2 across this many vintages is sobering
English
3
0
18
2.9K
Will Quist retweetledi
Books Behind Borders
Books Behind Borders@MHTruthUltra·
The entire US economy right now is 7 companies sending a trillion fake dollars back and forth to each other
English
432
4.9K
34.6K
570.3K