Will Quist

8.3K posts

Will Quist

Will Quist

@wquist

Partner @slow

The Bay Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.1K Takip Edilen7.9K Takipçiler
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
@iamjakestream @t_blom @NotTomBrown @ScottWu46 I think that’s a smaller part of it. I think smart founders jump to the largest newly available opportunity, and at the time irl social discovery seemed like a good place to spend time.
English
2
0
7
790
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
There is a fun pipeline of people from 2010s social discovery startups to AI companies @t_blom prev worked with Anthropic cofounder @NotTomBrown at his company Grouper, a startup that arranged drinks between groups of friends @ScottWu46 (Cognition) cofounded Lunch Club, which matched professionals for in person meetings @alexandr_wang was working on a Classpass for nightclubs before pivoting to Scale AI And of course @sama cofounded Loopt, a location based social network Kind of funny that a large chunk of the most ambitious technical talent of the 2010s was temporarily allocated to arranging drinks, dates, and lunches
Tom Blomfield@t_blom

Personal update: I'm taking a leave of absence from YC to join Anthropic. I'll be working with @NotTomBrown on the compute team. Powerful AI has the potential to improve the life of every human on earth and, as we enter the early stages of recursive self-improvement, availability of compute becomes one of the most important issues to solve. I'm excited to get started 🚀

English
39
12
474
73.7K
Will Quist retweetledi
Erik Bruckner
Erik Bruckner@E_Bruxxx·
Not sure who needs to hear this, but you can have world-class technology and still build a dogshit business. The market rewards value delivered, not technical difficulty. One of the nastiest traps is confusing technical admiration with commercial demand. Your first product should probably be uglier, narrower, and more manual than you want. Ship it.
English
4
5
58
2.8K
Will Quist retweetledi
Howard Lindzon
Howard Lindzon@howardlindzon·
Elon screaming at Goldman Sachs all day tor the $spcx print below $138 is something i’d pay to listen to
Howard Lindzon tweet media
English
7
1
33
18.9K
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
Just a reminder, but a company can be on the right arc of history with a great product and still be a shitty stock to own.
English
2
0
20
2.6K
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
@devahaz I really enjoy watching 6'3" people opine And I'll remember that next time someone needs something from a higher shelf
English
0
0
1
49
Deva Hazarika
Deva Hazarika@devahaz·
@wquist What can I say, I’m a capitalist! Man, nobody can defeat me in this argument now that I can play the Will card, so incredibly powerful.
Deva Hazarika@devahaz

@PapaBearett @Philip_DT As a believer in capitalism, free markets, and private enterprise, I believe the social norm should be people pay for what they need. So fat people may need to pay for an extra seat and tall people may need to pay for extra legroom.

English
1
0
1
340
Deva Hazarika
Deva Hazarika@devahaz·
I don’t recline if in economy as a courtesy, it already sucks for everyone. But I do believe all have the right. If you can’t fit if someone reclines, it’s on you to purchase a premium seat or one w/ no reclining seat in front. Just like buying 2 seats if you’re too wide to fit.
Philip@Philip_DT

Im 6’4“ with long legs, if you’re in front of me you wont be able to recline your seat, sorry. I understand if you don’t get that at first and slam you seat into my knees once. All good if you do it a second time I’m going to slam your seat forward in return.

English
26
4
207
25.7K
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
100% But everyone think tech = automation. That is a 20 year solution to a 5 year problem... Zane hits on but, we have a workflow problem not workforce to deal with... "American factory in 2026 should be AI-native the way a startup is cloud-native. Quoting in hours, not days. Real-time scheduling instead of whiteboards. Predictive maintenance instead of $2M/hour unplanned downtime."
Zane Hengsperger@zanehengsperger

x.com/i/article/2076…

English
1
0
11
2K
Will Quist retweetledi
Jared Sleeper
Jared Sleeper@JaredSleeper·
It is a myth that companies need to be a certain scale to IPO. Public markets work just fine at <$5bn. See: $DAVE Fintech - $5b (up 7600% from lows!) $HNGE Healthtech - $7b now (2x day one price) $HTFL AI Healthcare - $2.4b
English
4
4
38
9.5K
Will Quist retweetledi
signüll
signüll@signulll·
today zuck went to the temple & performed the all important “your margin is my opportunity” ritual. a very sacred act of capitalism.
English
31
123
3.6K
200K
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
@pitdesi @KenjiCapital Sheel you know as well as anyone that 50 degrees is confined to a tiny little box with great burritos. It's a pool day in mill valley!
English
0
0
3
254
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
@KenjiCapital Yes but is a high of 50° really comfortable? You have it better in Oakland than we do in SF
English
20
0
97
19.7K
Tyler | Kenji Capital
Tyler | Kenji Capital@KenjiCapital·
This is exactly why it’s hard to leave the Bay Area when you grew up in the Bay Area.
Tyler | Kenji Capital tweet media
English
304
217
3.8K
1.3M
Will Quist
Will Quist@wquist·
I was today years old when I realized being misunderstood or not believed rounds to being wrong.
English
0
0
0
195
Dhruv Vasishtha
Dhruv Vasishtha@dvasishtha·
My contrarian take: this is a big opportunity for early stage funds to invest in great companies and founders that don't fit this mold. What Ben is describing are overwhelmingly consensus and concentrated bets, the opposite of what venture as an asset class is known for.
Ben Braverman@braveben

The venture markets are wide open for founders, but 99% of the capital is only available if you fit one of these three archetypes right now. Here's the summary of a convo @maxaltman and I had last week - 1. App Layer, AI infrastructure and a few vertically integrated AI native businesses that all have one thing in common: obscene, historically unprecedented growth rates. Examples include: Harvey/Legora in Legal, Profound in Marketing, Replit and Lovable in software engineering and Baseten, Fireworks, Crusoe etc at the infrastructure layer. Not only are these businesses delivering historically unprecedented growth, their valuations remain reasonable by comparison to the AI ‘pure play’ labs.Loosely defined as $1 to$10m+in y1 after launch and then $10m to$100m+ in y2. These reasonable valuations reflect anxiety among investors that these new markets are not yet settled; that the revenue could contract as easily as it grew. Because this anxiety is depressing valuations evenly across the market, the most obvious opportunity for venture investors right now is to determine which of these high-growers have actually built durable moats. Those that have done so are effectively ‘on sale’ right now. 2. The Hand of God Companies - The megafunds and the titans who lead them are now structurally influential enough to occasionally preordain a business in a valuable category. The hit rates of such businesses are not 100% but they are systematically higher and, as such, appear ‘overpriced’ at every round despite being sound investments. These businesses often require significantly more upfront capital than the market would normally accept at each early stage of risk but exist in categories so large that any new winner is obviously extremely valuable. This is real alpha creation by the top firms and to deny this reality is to deny the simplest way to make money in venture today. 3. Speculative AI labs - effectively cargo cults hoping to summon new labs into existence. There are currently ~200 neolabs, all raising up rounds on ideas alone, many without yet-released models. VCs are buying numerous versions of the OpenAI/Anthropic lottery ticket. This segment of the market has the tactile sensation of 2021: high entry prices, valuations dictated by narrative (though not a guarantee of the same outcome). There will be new frontier labs and the overall returns will justify the endeavor, but the loss ratios will be legendary.

English
6
0
23
10.3K
Jeff Richards
Jeff Richards@jrichlive·
@wquist ah. sometimes the author is 100X smarter than the reader.
English
1
0
1
53