Rachel on the Battlefield ☦️

Too many American Christians have no knowledge of the Old Testiment. Which means they can easily be deceived.

Calvin and his determinism strikes again… how many souls will be lost because of this doctrine of demons?

@__lilith666 What this vid is talking about it called Calvinism and as a follower of Christ, I completely agree with you. It makes God a Monster and there is no good reason to believe in it.

The human species would be a million times more advanced if these child-like, moronic beliefs could be left behind.

In light of today’s possible “disclosure” - whatever that means - it’s important that Christians understand it’s not a flat demon vs angels reality in scripture like we’ve been taught (especially in the west). Brush up on your biblical cosmology (there are plenty of great resources) and realize God didn’t hide these realities from us - our teachers did. Because the “supernatural” reality of scripture doesn't fit neatly in many doctrinal frameworks and we in the west want neat and tidy Ted Talks every Sunday from our pulpits - so after decades of dim systematic theology proliferating our seminaries and programing our Shepards - in many churches anyway - don’t even understand what they’re reading in the wider biblical narrative. Time to crack open your bible and start doing some word studies. I suggest you begin the word “elohim” - as this is where the lie these entries will tell us will likely emerge from. 📖

@Atomsmade Man did that. Not God. God sent Christ, we killed him. According to scripture, we always kill the prophets that God sends to us. “So you are witnesses consenting to the deeds of your fathers: They killed the prophets, and you build their tombs.“

Why would an almighty, all-loving God need to brutally torture and murder His own son just to forgive people’s sins? Would you, as a responsible parent, ever put your child through that level of suffering to forgive someone else?

@JoshuaBarzon Eastern Orthodox nails it

Which view do you hold?

The morning of disclosure and every pastor in America is speed-reading Enoch.

@FaceLikeTheSun Amazing to watch

They're going for the hat trick

Every culture until the modern world believed in a reality we cannot see, but which was very real. Modernity has dumbed us and numbed us and is going to draw us into a trans-humanist horror in the near future. So, actually I think it‘s the opposite. Babies are born knowing angels and modernity teaches them to stop looking at the light.

I do not know why some people have such difficulty understanding that atheism is the default position… Babies are not born believing in gods, they only begin to adopt religious beliefs after being taught them by parents, family, or society…

@Joel231Prophecy Yes, this has been my concern

We may get right up to the Antichrist being revealed before pretrib adherents are suddenly confronted with the reality that Scripture has taught all along. We will still be here for the tribulation. How do they pivot on a dime from “we won’t be here”, to “endure to the end”?

“If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not bridle his tongue, he deceives his heart and his religion is worthless. Pure and undefined religion before our God and Father is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” James 1:27

@DavidLCorbo The hybrids emerge

Not unlikely

@RisingDisciples The fatalistic cynicism. Just sad.

MacArthur's statement is ridiculous and the statement by 5 Solas is beyond absurd. Only other Calvinists are able to swallow such nonsense.

People have been taken onto craft, there is well documented witness testimony, has been for decades, of a breeding program. It’s sad to me, how people who haven’t even glanced at the 75 years of literature, are suddenly experts. As a fellow Christian it’s important that we don’t simply dismiss people’s experience. Many christians have encountered these entities—me included. It’s not a “hallucination” it’s very real. And I agree, these things are not demons, by they are most definitely 100% evil.

I strongly disagree that “aliens” are demons. If you’re outside, and you see what you think is an alien or UFO, odds are you’re either misunderstanding what you’re seeing, or you’re hallucinating. The reason spiritual warfare sometimes manifests as an alien obsession or the occult is actually because Satan / demons leverage your obsessions, paranoias, anxieties, and fears to break down your faith. Whether you’re obsessed with porn, aliens, conspiracy theories, or even generally good things like sports, money, or food, the “prince of the power of the air” (which is actually a joke; it means he’s the prince of nothing) will use it to damage your faith, your relationships, your family, your job … your whole life. But it’s that heart issue of obsession and compulsion inside you — that refusal to prioritize the things of God — that he’s using to break you open spiritually, not whatever it is you’re obsessing over. That’s just some random thing you picked.

He created hell (or more appropriately called in scripture, ”the lake of fire”) for the Dragon and his angels who rebelled And drug us all into this mess. Anyone who sides with the dragon will go with him. That’s the jist of it. It’s a “pick a side” scenario in the end. “And they marched across the broad expanse of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. But fire came down from heaven and consumed them. And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur, into which the beast and the false prophet had already been thrown. There they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. Then I saw a great white throne and the One seated on it. Earth and heaven fled from His presence, and no place was found for them…” Rev 19 “The sea gave up its dead, and Death and Hades gave up their dead, and each one was judged according to his deeds. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death— the lake of fire. And if anyone was found whose name was not written in the Book of Life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.” Rev 20

For God so loved the world that he created Hell just in case you don't love him back. 🔥🔥😉

That scripture doesn’t say we are given Christ’s righteousness. It says we become God’s righteousness - in Christ. In other words, if we are in Him, covenanting with Him, we are in right covenant standing by the Grace of the Father (which is what righteousness is - it is not a moral purity, it is a covenantal purity, it is a covenantal word - Righteousness is “right covenant standing” - loyal to the covenant, walking in believing loyalty - aka Faith)

There's an important distinction you appear to be missing. The Bible teaches that we are justified by grace alone through faith alone. We are justified on the basis of Christ's merits, and faith is the vehicle by which that comes to us. Christ's righteousness is credited to us through faith. For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. — 2 Corinthians 5:21

A perfect smack down by Dr. Hieser on Original Sin. Scripture never states we inherit Adam’s guilt. Never. At all. There is an argument to be made in scripture for the innocence of infants. We only carry guilt for our own actions (Ez 18). I’d love to hear arguments on this. It baffles me that we’ve fallen into this Original Sin trap… youtube.com/watch?v=T3IkEy…

@HewittRincrast Faith

@writeontheedg3 And to be justified before God means to be declared righteous in His sight. ...on the basis of what?

@5Solas2 Should I believe Peter, who was actually with Christ after the Resurrection, or this William fellow? 🤔

William Perkins, in his Exposition of the Symbol or Creed of the Apostles, rejects the view that Christ’s soul locally descended into the place of the damned and instead favors the interpretation that Christ was held under the power of death in the grave until the resurrection. "Therefore that we may come to speak of the meaning of it; we must know that it hath some usual expositions, which we will rehearse in order and then make choice of that which shall be thought the fittest. 1. The first is that Christ's soul after the passion upon the cross, did really and locally descend into the place of the damned. But this seems not to be true. The reasons are these: (1) All the evangelists, and among the rest St Luke, intending to make an exact narration (Luke 1:3) of the life and death of Christ, hath set down at large His passion, death, burial, resurrection and ascension, and withal they make rehearsal of small circumstances, therefore no doubt they would not have omitted Christ's local descent into the place of the damned, if there had been any such thing. And the end why they penned this history was that we might believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God; and believing, we might have life everlasting (John 20:31). Now there could not have been a greater matter for the confirmation of our faith than this: that Jesus the son of Mary who went down to the place of the damned, returned thence to live in happiness for ever. (2) If Christ did go into the place of the damned, then either in soul or in body or in Godhead. But His Godhead could not descend, because it is everywhere, and His body was in the grave. And as for His soul it went not to hell, but presently after His death it went to Paradise, that is, the third heaven, a place of joy and happiness (Luke 23:43), This day thou shalt be with me in Paradise; which words of Christ must be understood of His manhood or soul, and not of His Godhead. For they are an answer to a demand; and therefore unto it they must be suitable. Now the thief seeing that Christ was first of all crucified, and therefore in all likelihood should first of all die, makes his request to this effect: Lord, thou shalt shortly enter into thy kingdom, remember me then; to which Christ's answer (as the very words import) is thus much: I shall enter into Paradise this day, and there shalt thou be with me. Now there is no entrance but in regard of His soul or manhood. For the Godhead which is at all times in all places, cannot be said properly to enter into a place. Again, when Christ saith, Thou shalt be with me in Paradise, He doth intimate a resemblance which is between the first and second Adam. The first Adam sinned against God, and was presently cast forth out of Paradise; Christ the second Adam, having made a satisfaction for sin, must immediately enter into Paradise. Now to say that Christ in soul descended locally into hell, is to abolish this analogy between the first and second Adam. (3) Ancient councils in their confessions and creeds omitting this clause, shew that they did not acknowledge any real descent, and that the true meaning of those words, He descended, was sufficiently included in some of the former articles, And that may appear because when they set down it, they omit some of the former; as Athanasius in his creed setting down those words, He descended etc., omits the burial, putting them both for one as he expounds himself elsewhere. Now let us see the reasons which may be alleged to the contrary: Objection 1. (Matt. 12:40) The Son of man shall be three days and three nights in the earth, that is, hell. Answer 1. This exposition is directly against the scope of the place; for the Pharisees desired to see a sign, that is, some sensible and manifest miracle; and hereunto Christ answers that He will give them the sign of Jonah, which cannot be the descent of His soul into the place of the damned, because it was insensible; but rather His burial, and after it His manifest and glorious resurrection. Answer 2. The heart of the earth may as well signify the grave, as the centre of the earth. For thus Tyre bordering upon the sea is said to be in the heart of the sea (Ezek. 27:4). Answer 3. This exposition takes it for granted that hell is seated in the midst of the earth; whereas the Scriptures reveal unto us no more but this: that hell is in the lower parts; but where these lower parts should be, no man is able to define. Objection 2. (Acts 2:27) Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption. Answer. These words cannot prove any local descent of Christ's soul. For Peter's drift in alleging of them is to prove the resurrection, and he saith expressly that the words must be understood of the resurrection of Christ (v.31), He seeing this before, spake of the resurrection of Christ. What? Namely these words: His soul was not left in hell etc. Now there is no resurrection of the soul, but of the body only, as the soul cannot be said to fall, but the body. It will be replied that the word quchn cannot signify the body and the word adou the grave. Answer: The first word signifies not only the spiritual part of man, the soul; but also the whole person, or the man himself (Rom. 13:1; 1 Cor. 15:40). And the second is as well taken for the grave as for hell (Rev. 20:14) Death and adou are cast into the lake of fire, Now we cannot say that hell is cast into hell, but the grave into hell. And the very same word in this text must needs have this sense. For Peter makes an opposition between the grave into which David is shut up and the hell out of which Christ was delivered (vv. 29,31). Again, it will be said that in this text there be two distinct parts: the first of the souls coming forth of hell, in these words: Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; the second, of the bodies rising out of the grave in the next words: Neither wilt thou suffer my flesh to see corruption. Answer: It is not so, for flesh in this place signifies not the body alone but the human nature of Christ, as appears in v.30, unless we shall say that one and the same word in the same sentence is taken two ways. And the words rather carry this sense: Thou wilt not suffer me to continue long in the grave; nay, which is more, in my time of continuance there, thou wilt not suffer me so much as to feel any corruption, because I am thy holy one. Objection 3. (1 Pet. 3:18,19) Christ was quickened in spirit, by the which spirit He went and preached to the spirits which are in prison. Answer. The place is not for this purpose. For by spirit is not meant the soul of Christ, but His Godhead, which in the ministry of Noah preached repentance to the old world. And I think that Peter in this place alludes to another place in Genesis 6:3, where the Lord saith, My Spirit shall not always strive with man, because he is but flesh. And if the spirit doth signify the soul, then Christ was quickened either by His soul, or in His soul. But neither is true. For the first, it cannot be said that Christ was quickened by His soul, because it did not join itself to the body; but the Godhead joined them both. Neither was He quickened in soul; for His soul died not. It could not die the first death, which belongs to the body; and it did not die the second death, which is a total separation from God; only it suffered the sorrows of the second death, which is the apprehension of the wrath of God; as a man may feel the pangs of the first death, and yet not die the first death, but live. Again, it is to no end that Christ's soul should go to hell to preach, considering that it was never heard of that one soul should preach to another, especially in hell, where all are condemned and in conscience convicted of their just damnation, and where there is no hope of repentance or redemption. It will be answered that this preaching is only real or experimental, because Christ shews Himself there to convince the unbelief of His enemies; but this is flat against reason. For when a man is justly condemned by God, and therefore sufficiently convicted, what needs the judge himself come to the place of execution to convict him? And it is flat against the text; for the preaching that is spoken of here is that which is performed by men in the ministry of the Word, as Peter expounds himself (1 Pet. 4:6), To this purpose was the gospel also preached unto the dead, that they might be condemned according to men in the flesh, that they might live according to God in the Spirit. Lastly, there is no reason why Christ should rather preach and shew Himself in hell, to them that were disobedient in the days of Noah, than to the rest of the damned. 2. And this is the first exposition, the second follows: He descended into hell, that is, Christ descended into the grave, or was buried. This exposition is agreeable to the truth, yet it is not meet or convenient. For the clause next before, He was buried, contained this point; and therefore if the next words following yield the same sense, there must be a vain and needless repetition of one and the same thing twice, which is not in any wise to be allowed in so short a creed as this. If it be said that these words are an exposition of the former, the answer is that then they should be more plain than the former. For when one sentence expoundeth another, the latter must always be the plainer; but of these two sentences, He was buried, He descended into hell, the first is very plain and easy, but the latter very obscure and hard, and therefore it can be no exposition thereof; and for this cause this exposition neither is to be received. 3. Thirdly, others there be which expound it thus: He descended into hell, that is, Christ Jesus, when he was dying upon the cross, felt and suffered the pangs of hell and the full wrath of God seizing upon His soul. This exposition hath his warrant in God's Word, where hell often signifies the sorrows and pains of hell, as Hannah in her song unto the Lord (1 Sam. 2:6) saith, The Lord killeth and maketh alive, He bringeth down to hell and raiseth up, that is, He makes men feel woe and misery in their souls, even the pangs of hell, and after restoreth them. And David saith (Psa. 18:5), The sorrows of death compassed me, and the sorrows of hell laid hold on me. This is an usual exposition received of the church, and they which expound this article thus, give this reason thereof. The former words, was crucified, dead and buried, do contain (say they) the outward sufferings of Christ. Now, because He suffered not only outwardly in body, but also inwardly in soul, therefore these words He descended into hell, do set forth unto us His inward sufferings in soul, when He felt upon the cross the full wrath of God upon Him. This exposition is good and true, and whosoever will may receive it. Yet nevertheless it seems not so fitly to agree with the order of the former articles. For these words, was crucified, dead and buried, must not be understood of any ordinary death, but of a cursed death, in which Christ suffered the full wrath of God, even the pangs of hell both in soul and body. Seeing then this exposition is contained in the former words, it cannot fitly stand with the order of this short creed, unless there should be a distinct article of things repeated before. 4. But let us come to the fourth exposition, He descended into hell, that is, when He was dead and buried, He was held captive in the grave, and lay in bondage under death for the space of three days. This exposition also may be gathered forth of the Scriptures. St Peter saith (Acts 2:24), God hath raised Him up (speaking of Christ) and loosed the sorrows of death, because it was impossible that He should be holden of it. Where we may see that between the death and resurrection of Christ, there is placed a third matter, which is not mentioned in any clause of the Apostles' Creed, save in this; and that is His bondage under death, which cometh inbetween His death and rising again. And the words themselves do most fitly bear this sense, as the speech of Jacob sheweth (Gen. 37:35), I will go down into hell (or the grave) unto my son mourning. And this exposition doth also best agree with the order of the Creed: first, He was crucified and died; secondly, he was buried; thirdly, laid in the grave, and was therein held in captivity and bondage under death. And these three degrees of Christ's humiliation, are most fitly correspondent to the three degrees of His exaltation: He rose again the third day, answering to the first degree of His humiliation, He died; the second degree of His exaltation, He ascended into heaven, answering to going down into the grave, was buried; and thirdly, His sitting at the right hand of God (which is the highest degree of His exaltation) answering to the lowest degree of humiliation, He descended into hell. These two last expositions are commonly received, and we may indifferently make choice of either, but the last (as I take it) is most agreeable to the order and words of the Creed. Thus much for the meaning of the words; now follow the uses: 1. And first of all, Christ's descending into hell teacheth that every one of us that professeth the name of Christ, that if it shall please God to afflict us, either in body or in mind or in both, though it be most grievous and tedious manner, yet must we not think it strange. For if Christ upon the cross not only suffered the pangs of hell, but after He was dead, death takes Him and as it were carries Him into his den or cabin, and there triumpheth over Him, holding Him in captivity and bondage, and yet for all this was He the son of God; and therefore when God's hand is heavy upon us any way, we are not to despair, but rather think it is the good pleasure of God to frame and fashion us that we may become like unto Christ Jesus as good children of God. David, a man after God's own heart, was by Samuel anointed king over Israel, but withal God raised up Saul to persecute him, as the fowler hunteth the partridge in the mountains, in so much as David said there was but one step between him and death. So likewise Job (Job 2:8,9), a just man and one that feared God with all his heart, yet how heavily did God lay His hand upon him? His goods and cattle were all taken away, and his children slain, and his body stricken by Satan with loathsome boils from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head, so as he was fain to take a potsherd and scrape himself sitting among the ashes. And Jonah, the servant and prophet of the most high God, when he was called to preach to Nineveh, because he refused for fear of that great city, God met with him, and he must be cast into the sea and there be swallowed up of a whale, that so He might chastise him. And thus doth He deal with His own servants, to make them conformable to Christ. And further, when it pleaseth God to lay His hands upon our souls, and make us have a troubled and distressed conscience, so as we do as it were struggle with God's wrath as for life and death, and can find nothing but His indignation seizing upon our souls, which is the most grievous and perplexed estate that any man can be in; in this case howsoever we cannot discern or see any hope or comfort in ourselves, we must not think it strange, nor quite despair of His mercy. For the son of God Himself descended into hell, and death carried Him captive, and triumphed over Him in the grave; and therefore though God seem to be our utter enemy, yet we must not despair of His help. In divers psalms we read how David was not only persecuted outwardly of his enemies, but even his soul and conscience were perplexed for his sins, so as (Psa. 32:3,4) his very bones were consumed within him, and his moisture was turned into the drought in summer. This caused Job to cry out (Job 6:3,4) that the arrows of God were within him, and the venom thereof did drink up his spirit, the terrors of God did fight against him, and the grief of his soul was as weighty as the sand of the sea, by reason whereof he saith that the Lord did make him a mark and a butt to shoot at; and therefore when God shall thus afflict us, either in body or in soul or in both, we must not always think that it is the wrathful hand of the Lord that begins to bring us to utter condemnation for our sins, but rather His fatherly work to kill sin in us and to make us grow in humility, that so we may become like unto Christ Jesus. 2. Secondly, whereas Christ for our sakes was thus abased, even unto the lowest degree of humiliation that can be, it is as an example for us to imitate, as Christ Himself prescribeth (Matt. 11:29), Learn of me, that I am meek and lowly. And that we may the better do this, we must learn to become nothing in ourselves, that we may be all in all forth of ourselves in Christ; we must loath and think as basely of ourselves as possibly may be in regard of our sins, Christ Jesus upon the cross was content for our sake to become a worm and no man, as David saith (Psa. 22:6); which did chiefly appear in this lowest degree of His humiliation, when as death did as it were tread on Him in his den; and the same mind must likewise be in us which was in Him. The liking that we have of ourselves must be mere nothing, but all our love and liking must be forth of ourselves in the death and blood of Christ. And thus much of this clause, as also of the state of Christ's humiliation."

@5SolasMissy Except He does share His Glory with Christ and all those who belong to the Son…

God shares His glory with no one

@JoshJoh08126102 @fringedotcom You can listen to his show - @TConfessionals - it’s very good and he is very versed in scripture, which is what’s really important. Plenty of ”denominational” Shepards don‘t actually know scripture

@fringedotcom What denomination? What colleges did they attend? I mean false prophets are every where

Are these real pastors? Real christians? Do not be deceived