Sparky

@itsme__azairah @heynavtoor @francesme They've trained the model.

@xxpksh59df @heynavtoor @francesme Uh,…

🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?

@StandUpForFact @StewardessJean Corruption. NED wanderers tax money back to their friends and family.

The House just voted to KEEP FUNDING NED, an NGO called "National Endowment for Democracy," defeating an amendment pushed by Elon Musk, Mike Benz, Rep. Eli Crane and others 81 REPUBLICANS joined Democrats. Final vote: 127-291. Trump tried to defund NED, but was stopped Eli Crane describes NED as a "contributor to global censorship campaigns and domestic propaganda" Unreal. Two good measures were defeated in the House today. Thoughts......??👀 Would be a shame if this went Viral on 𝕏 !!👌

@data_republican The only poll on this that matters is the one taken among the 9 Justices.

I seriously find this poll hard to believe. What are they thinking? Don't forget that every anchor baby becomes a voter and is entitled to bring their relatives here legally with chain migration. And anchor babies are entitled to welfare, health, and education benefits.

@EricTrump @gltgrif @Trump @realDonaldTrump Can you get rid of the homeless people while you're at it? I've never seen anything like it in the 25 years I've been here.

🚨 FIRST LOOK: The Donald J. Trump Presidential Library is officially here. Over the past six months, I have poured my heart and soul into this project with my incredible team at @Trump. This landmark on the water in Miami, Florida will stand as a lasting testament to an amazing man, an amazing developer, and the greatest President our Nation has ever known. 🇺🇸 These images have never been seen by the public — until today. Enjoy! trumplibrary.org

🚨 $2 Trillion Later, The Green Revolution Collapsed: How Chasing Weather Power Bankrupted the Grid and Cost the World $40 Trillion in Growth Between 2010 and 2026, governments and corporations poured roughly $2 trillion into solar, wind, and “net‑zero” programs under the promise of an imminent clean‑energy transition. What the public received instead was an illusion—a fragile grid, higher electricity prices, and negligible climate benefits. Energy remained just as carbon‑intensive, but far more expensive and unreliable. The fundamental error was confusing installed capacity with delivered power. Wind and solar often produce energy only 20 % of the time; fossil and nuclear plants generate 60‑90 % consistently. Billions went to weather‑dependent infrastructure that must still be backed up by coal and gas. Once backups, grid stabilization, and battery losses are factored in, true delivered costs for renewables reach $120–250 per MWh, double or triple those of gas, coal, or nuclear. When measured by physical reality rather than marketing slogans, that $2 trillion bought roughly the energy output of $400 billion in conventional power. It displaced almost no fossil fuel consumption and arguably reinforced it, since idling backup plants waste fuel. Worse, dependence on Chinese supply chains for solar panels and rare‑earth minerals eroded national energy independence and inflated emissions through hidden mining and shipping costs. If that same capital had been spent on modern nuclear or advanced natural‑gas infrastructure, the outcome would have been transformative. $2 trillion could have built about 285 GW of nuclear capacity (powering 250 million homes reliably for 70 years) or 1,650 GW of efficient gas plants (enough for 900 million homes for 30 years). Either path would have cut 70–80 gigatons of CO₂, reduced global electricity costs by half, and created genuine energy security. Instead, the current “green” trajectory delivered rising utility bills, rolling blackouts, and greater reliance on geopolitical adversaries. Global power costs rose roughly 60%, contributing to deindustrialization in Europe, worldwide inflation, and a cumulative $37–40 trillion loss in global GDP—about half of one year of global economic output. That’s the price of mistaking ideology for engineering. The lesson could not be clearer: physics determines prosperity. Dense, dispatchable energy such as nuclear or gas remains the backbone of civilization, and no amount of subsidies or messaging can legislate thermodynamics. The so‑called green transition did not decarbonize the planet—it impoverished it. The road to sustainability is not paved with solar subsidies but with unapologetic engineering and scientific honesty.

@data_republican They are members of the shadow government… they will not vote in anyone who’s not a member of their “organization” …

SHIELDED BY POWER - MEDIA SUPPRESSION TRAILER What happens when the FBI censors speech… before the public even sees the story? This new trailer exposes the Media Suppression chapter of our new documentary Shielded by Power — featuring never-before-seen clips from: @jsolomonReports, @JPMacIsaac, Bob Costello, @mirandadevine, @MikeBenzCyber and @mtaibbi. This documentary exists because whistleblowers refused to stay silent. Independent films like this only reach the public if people like you help make it happen. Support the documentary and help bring the full story to light: Back the Film👉 shieldedbypower.com Evidence shows government agencies monitoring social platforms and influencing what information spreads — and what gets buried. ⏳ Campaign ends April 12 — time is running out. If we don’t fund this film now, this story risks being lost. #ShieldedByPower #MediaSuppression #FreeSpeech #InvestigativeJournalism #Documentary #Whistleblowers

@nfl4sage @data_republican @USMCridgerunner So you think Trump is more corrupt than $200 million being laundered back to the Biden campaign from Ukraine? Or how about the pay from Burisma to Hunter Biden who kicked- back to his father? Get your head on straight. Your antisemitism is getting the best of your soul.

@xxpksh59df @data_republican @USMCridgerunner This was true in his first term. But Trump has sold out to Yisrael and its corporate sponsors. This administration has became more corrupt than any in modern history - and our thoroughly corrupt Congress is going along with all of it.

I have never been a Democrat. My views align more closely with Republicans, but after the last 24 hours my disgust is paralyzing. I have not supported a third party because I remember when it handed Bill Clinton the presidency. I signed the petition for the Convention of States but remain skeptical because there will be no agreement. What's left? I love our country. What can we do besides shout on X which doesn't seem very effective?

@wendyp4545 @ClarenceJorda13 @SpeakerJohnson @LeaderJohnThune Quit blaming the Democrats. It's like blaming the dog for barking. The Republicans could stop this anytime they want.

On Special Reports last night, traitor @SpeakerJohnson said on Fox News that he had talked to @LeaderJohnThune and that the Republicans in the House were going to pass a 2 month clean CR and.. Here is the important part. The con against America that Congress has secretly been pulling, that Johnson let slip out accidently: Once the House passes the clean CR, the Senate in a pro forma session, just one Senator, can pass the CR the House sends over. That's what they have been secretly doing but now that Johnson let it slip on national TV and people like my team caught it, they can't pull it off and the Senate is now forced to come back. Or If they try it, we'll expose them for it... For all of this time that Thune was claiming that he doesn't have the votes, bills need 60 votes, he doesn't have enough votes to break the filibuster, when they want something passed, all of a sudden, the numbers don't matter. 5 Senators "passed" a funding bill that defunded ICE and CBP. 1 Senator was going to accept the House's CR when they thought nobody was watching...

@RubinReport They never met any of it I wish people would really wake up to the fact that everything is performative in Washington.

This is one of the most perfect things the internet has ever created.

@ProudElephant No

Does Senate Majority Leader John Thune still have your support? YES or NO

Not to worry, the Democrats will fix everything when they get the majority. That's the goal of the Republican Senate, is it not? They are more comfortable as the opposition party because then they can pay everything lip service and they aren't responsible for doing anything except collecting campaign cash.

There is a serious constitutional crisis when the legislative branch of the federal government is unable to legislate because of self-imposed ‘extra-constitutional’ rules and procedures. The Byrd Rule… named for a long-dead Democrat leader who appears to control the Senate from the grave. The filibuster rule that can’t work because of some long ago interpretation of the filibuster process. The question is whether the Senate leaders will continue to allow their foolish adherence to arcane rules and procedures to create this constitutional crisis. They say they won’t “nuke” the filibuster. But they also won’t overturn the long ago ruling by a parliamentarian who “interpreted” the 2-speech rule to mean the filibuster can never ever end. As we have had to learn more about the Senate rules, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Senate is refusing to protect the filibuster by overturning the interpretation that makes the filibuster impossible to end without a supermajority. That’s a constitutional crisis and rather than seriously address the issue and the procedures and the rules, the Senators left town. So disgraceful. We will know soon enough where these Senators went if they traveled during the recess. How many went on junkets. Who had fundraising trips. What they did rather than face their responsibilities. Like funding DHS. Like securing our elections. Like addressing this constitutional crisis they have allowed to take over the Senate and that they refuse to remedy. This is not what the voters bargained for. This irresponsible bunch of Senators who refuse to protect the Senate and ensure its ability to function to serve the people. They’re mad at @BasedMikeLee for calling this all into public view. On full display so we now see it - understand it. And hate it. But he’s not the problem. They just didn’t want the public to ever find out. But now we know. And we are disgusted. @EIwatchdogs @BasedMikeLee @chiproytx

The Senate GOP has exactly two options if it wants to avoid drifting into irrelevance and a stunning loss in November: (1) Keep the filibuster and 60-vote cloture rule fully intact, but stand ready to overcome Senate Democrats’ unprecedented pattern of obstruction by aggressively enforcing the “talking filibuster”—a move that would require senators to work longer, harder hours and take fewer recesses, but lead to more thoughtful, careful deliberation in the legislative process, OR (2) Nuke the filibuster. I strongly prefer the first option. But we must choose either one or the other—because the status quo isn’t working and the resulting inertia isn’t just making it impossible to pursue a coherent agenda; it’s hurting the American people. What’s your preference?

@DataRepublican @francesme @SenTomCotton @LindseyGrahamSC @joniernst @DanSullivan_AK @iamlisalogan @SKDoubleDub33 @grok are always NGO's funded with tax money?

@SenTomCotton @LindseyGrahamSC @joniernst @DanSullivan_AK @iamlisalogan @SKDoubleDub33 Hard to appreciate the scale of this effort. Every blue dot is a NGO.

🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨 This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call. Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn't new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year. But what's not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as "a global anti-authoritarian movement," connecting U.S. officials with "colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly." They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, "international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces," and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism. At what point does this become treason? As always, patience as I pull together this thread. 👇

@SeanParnellASW @helen44767171

On March 20, 2026, a U.S. District Court judge vacated key security provisions of the Pentagon's October 2025 media access policy. The court removed every provision that allowed the Department to screen press credential holders for security risks and every provision that allowed the Department to deny, revoke, or suspend a press credential based on security considerations — while simultaneously ordering the Department to immediately reinstate press credentials for the New York Times. The Department always complies with court orders but disagrees with the decision and is pursuing an appeal. In the interim, and in compliance with the court's order, I have signed the revised "Pentagon Reservation In-Brief for Media Members," effective immediately. Here is what the revised policy does: Closure of Correspondents' Corridor. In assessing the Department's security posture following the court's removal of all security screening authority, the Department determined that unescorted access to the Pentagon cannot be responsibly maintained without the ability to screen credential holders for security risks. Effective immediately, the Correspondents' Corridor is closed. A new and improved press workspace will be established in an annex facility outside the Pentagon, but still on Pentagon grounds, and will be available when ready. Escorted Access Only. All journalist access to the Pentagon will require escort by authorized Department personnel. Credential holders will continue to have access to the Pentagon for scheduled press briefings, press conferences, and interviews arranged through public affairs offices. The Department remains committed to transparency and to working with credentialed journalists who cover the Department and the U.S. military. The Department is equally committed to the security of the Pentagon and the protection of the men and women who work there. The revised policy reflects both commitments.

What is different in this probe is that it is pursuing the real Russia conspiracy — the creation of a false narrative to kneecap the first Trump administration. The “truth will out,” and it appears to be coming out in Florida... jonathanturley.org/2026/03/23/tru…

...None of this will get anyone a Pulitzer, because the politics is wrong. However, it might just force the truth into the open. With Democrats promising to resume impeachments and investigations if they retake power in the midterms, it would be useful for the public to have a full understanding of what actually occurred last time.

Abigail Spanberger is insane and weird as shit.