Jay

Damn Myron. You let these racist talk to you like that and you still defend them ? What a nerd.

Show her 1k n I bet you hit same day 😂😂

Thank you for the birthday card, President Trump! 🇺🇸

Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.

Respect is given where respect is due This black kid respectfully engages with ChudTheBuilder & Chud shows mutual respect back Until another black guy walks up & says “you should know better than to say that word” and then proceeds to call Chud a nigger Rules for thee

Evidence Exonerating "Chud the Builder" discovered: (by friend of family) Screenshots showing premeditation by Joshua Luvv to fight Dalton to launch his "twitch streaming." Joshua Fox / Joshua Luvv Facebook comments from Jan 10, 2026 (18 weeks before the Eatherly incident) Direct quotes from Fox's own account, in a thread with users "Kudo Menace" and "Bishop Reemo Yeezy": • Fox: "I been hopping to run into the chud mf but he don't be on this side of town. But outside of him ima call them a bitch and go about my day 😂😂😂" • Kudo Menace (responding): "chud just trolling us for a reaction. Don't let him bother you either. I don't think he's really racist anyway. Just click bait." • Fox: "trying to get some traction on my end so when I start my twitch I got a little fan base 😂😂😂" • Fox: "oh he don't bother me I just wanna fight 😂😂😂" • Bishop Reemo Yeezy: "on the internet correct. In person? Neutralizing the threat" (followed by a "NO PROBLEM…" meme image) What this establishes: • Fox publicly stated his intent to physically seek out "the chud" months before the incident • Even his own friend characterized the target as "just click bait" and "not really racist" • Fox's stated motivation was Twitch traction and a fan base, not a response to any actual harm • Fox explicitly said "I just wanna fight" • This is documented premeditation. The encounter at the Montgomery County Courthouse was not a chance escalation. It was the outcome Fox had been openly telling people he wanted.