Gowrish

2.2K posts

Gowrish

Gowrish

@yashnagi07

Know Thyself 🪽

Dubai Katılım Aralık 2021
2.3K Takip Edilen169 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Gowrish
Gowrish@yashnagi07·
We're just at the dawn of the Intelligence Era
English
1
0
5
1.1K
Gowrish retweetledi
Dr Singularity
Dr Singularity@Dr_Singularity·
AI is the new engine of civilization. The smartest capital on Earth is moving toward AI. The future is going to be richer, faster, stranger, and more abundant than almost anyone believes.
English
27
29
272
7.9K
Gowrish
Gowrish@yashnagi07·
@natiakourdadze curious, which vibe coding tool are you using to build this in 20 mins?
English
0
0
0
22
Gowrish retweetledi
Ben Lang
Ben Lang@benln·
YC on how to build a company with AI from the ground up:
Ben Lang tweet mediaBen Lang tweet media
English
95
552
5.4K
455.8K
Gowrish retweetledi
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
wake up because this is the GREATEST time in history to start a company with TRILLIONS of dollars up for grabs over the next 10 years 1. consumer mobile is INTERESTING again for the first time since like 2017. apps can actually do things now. do things. real things. book the flight, draft the contract, follow up with the lead, negotiate the rate, do things. we went from "tap to view" to "tap to deploy." the entire interaction model of software just flipped & most people haven't even registered it yet. OH, and the cost to create these apps is 1/100th of 2017. 2. HARDWARE is back on the table because you can shove Gemma 4 or DeepSeek onto a device that costs less than dinner & it runs locally with zero cloud costs. a year ago that sentence would have sounded insane. you can ship a physical product with a real brain in it now. the last time hardware was this accessible was the early smartphone era & that created a trillion dollar app economy from scratch. 3. literally EVERY category is open to be rebuilt AI-first. the incumbents know it & they're paralyzed. they can't move fast because moving fast because incumbents move slower than you (usually). that paralysis is your opportunity. build the app. build the SaaS. build the AI agent 4. distribution is FREE. you can go from zero audience to 10,000 people who trust you in 90 days on X or YT or IG your first 100 customers are sitting in your replies right now. the old playbook of "raise money, hire sales team, buy ads" is being lapped by a solo founder with a twitter account & a working demo. Oh, and you can use AI to automate a lot of it (ideas, research, AI avatars etc) 5. Idk about you but it feels like companies are doing LAYOFFS like it's the great depression and it's only getting started. No job is secure. So, building a side project that could turn into the main project is more important than ever. 6. the ENTIRE economy is being repriced in real time. the surface area for new companies has never been wider. the tools to build are free. the models are open source. the incumbents are running committees about their "AI strategy" while you could have already shipped. and somehow the predominant response from most people is to watch youtube videos about it & go back to their 9-5. not saying this is easy not saying everyone will win but im saying right now is a time worth trying YOU ARE LIVING through a mass reshuffling of who owns what & who builds what. the last time this happened was the internet itself. before that, electricity. this almost never happens. & you're sitting there doing nothing about it? wake up.
English
138
190
2K
122.5K
Gowrish retweetledi
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
startup idea for you use postiz (20k+ github stars project) to sell AI social media content/management to 1 niche of SMBs. what's postiz? it's an open source social media scheduler with AI built in. basically buffer + AI and free to download. 1. self-host postiz. use codex/claude code to help you figure this out in an afternoon. 2. pick one niche. dentists, realtors, lawyers. can even go a subniche like orthodentists vs dentists. family law over of lawyers. 2. wrap it in their language. "AI social media for dental practices" 3. add "we write your captions with AI" as the hook. that's what they're actually paying for. 4. plug it into n8n, make, or zapier so posting, scheduling, and approvals run on autopilot. the client approves with one tap. everything else is handled. 5. charge $50/mo-$100 per seat. that's nothing to a business paying $2,000/mo for a social media freelancer. you're 25x cheaper and 10x more reliable because the system runs whether you're awake or not. win-win for everyone. 6. build one landing page. run one onboarding call. that's the whole sales motion. 7. build media to attract customers. post tips for that niche on X, tiktok, youtube. become the "social media for dentists" person. 8. reinvest profits to build other tools that serve that same niche. scheduling, reviews, patient intake. build those tools or plug in more open source projects. now you own the vertical. these businesses KNOW they need to post. they hate doing it. they will never find postiz on github. they will google "someone please handle my social media." that's you open source is the new wholesale. the code is free. the customer relationship is where the margin lives. you can do this as one person. you can do this as a two person team. you don't need funding. you don't need an office. you need a laptop, a niche, and the willingness to start. someone is going to do this. might as well be you.
GREG ISENBERG tweet media
English
138
126
2K
156.1K
Gowrish retweetledi
Gowrish retweetledi
Jared Friedman
Jared Friedman@snowmaker·
What I told 2,000 future founders in Bengaluru today: 1/ We believe we are at the start of a second wave of Indian companies that will build world-class AI native products for the global market. Emergent and Giga are the model of the future. 2/ Just because a space seems crowded doesn't mean it's too late. Zepto, Emergent, Giga - none were first movers. Second mover advantage is real. 3/ In fact, a good formula for finding startup ideas is to look at ideas that are showing some promise and just execute them better. Execution is everything: if you're an exceptional engineer, and you can build and move faster than your competitors, you'll win. 4/ There is every reason to believe Indian teams can beat US teams building global products. The level of engineering talent here is on a whole different level, and that's the key input. 5/ In the AI era, the best founders are the ones building at the edge of what's technically possible. You need to be experimenting wth the latest models, the latest open source projects. 6/ Stay in the flow of information. Watch the right podcasts, follow the right people on X. With AI changing this fast, you need to know what the smartest builders are thinking. 7/ Most of the best startups don't come from someone explicitly trying to start a company. They start from someone building a project just for fun, or tinkering with a new technology because they are curious. India needs more of this "tinkering" culture - this is how you have novel ideas when technology is shifting quickly. 8/ Founders are getting younger. Aadit was 18 when he started Zepto. The Giga founders were 20 when they came to SF. Young people who can learn very fast have the advantage right now. 9/ The best founders are pushing AI coding to the max. You can now write 20K lines of code / day. One person can do the work that just a year ago would take a 100 person team. The best builders are taking advantage and building at Garry Tan speeds.
English
109
374
2.8K
393.3K
Gowrish retweetledi
Simone Canc
Simone Canc@simonecanciello·
whoever vibe codes an iphone app for peptides will own this niche in the next months. 0 real apps making money right now. and they’re not even globally known yet.
Simone Canc tweet media
English
38
25
725
130.7K
Gowrish retweetledi
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
THE CLEAREST PATH TO A $10M+ SOFTWARE EXIT in 2 YEARS (with AI and agents) building an agency right now is one of the most interesting business moves the productized agency had its moment in 2022. it collapsed because scaling humans is a nightmare. inconsistent output, people quitting, margins getting crushed. most of the founders (and creators) who tried it got burned and moved on but the thesis was right. the labor problem is just solved now with AI, claude code, openclaw etc. here's the actual playbook i'd run today: pick one painful deliverable for one specific buyer. like SEO content for e-commerce brands doing $1M+ but not "marketing." or like ad creatives for DTC brands spending $50k/month on meta. one thing. one customer. that's it then you build the AI workflow behind it. you're selling an outcome on a monthly retainer. $3-5k/month. 80%+ margins because your cost is compute and a few hours of QA "BuT tHaT'S nOt a BiG bUsInnesS" okay but you're still swinging for the fences because the agency IS the research and development for your agent SaaS every client is paying you to figure out what to automate. you're learning what breaks, what scales, what customers actually want. by month 4 you know exactly what to productize. you build the software on top of the workflow you've already proven works and already have customers paying for agency funds the agent SaaS. SaaS scales without the agency overhead. the clients become your first software customers now let's talk about what this actually looks like financially year 1: 10 clients at $4k/month. $480k revenue. 2 people. maybe $80k in costs including compute, tools, one part time VA. you're taking home $400k between two people while building the software in the background year 2: you launch the software. your 10 agency clients are the first to convert. they already trust you. they've seen the output. you charge $800/month for the software version. now you have recurring software revenue AND the agency still running year 3: agency is winding down or running on autopilot. software has 200 customers at $800/month. that's $1.9M ARR. 2-3 person team. 85% margins. you are now a very attractive acquisition target the exit math is interesting. SaaS at $1.9M ARR with strong retention trades at 5-8x revenue. that's a $10-15M exit for something two people built in 3 years starting with zero VC CAVEAT: Startups are hard. A lot needs to go right. But from a framework perspective, I think this probably the lowest risk, highest reward option for lots of of folks and most of the businesses cost $0 to start basically this is the most capital efficient path to a software exit that exists right now happy building
English
271
213
3.1K
453.5K
Gowrish retweetledi
Murat
Murat@muratworks·
App ideas launched on the App Store in the last 90 days & made $10k+ in revenue: - Romance novels - AI Agent assistant - Mobile IDE for Claude Code - Quran Study App - AI Hairstyle Try On - AI Photo & Video Creator - Anime Chat Roleplay - AI Video Generator - Live Air Traffic Radio - Quran Widgets - AI Chatbot - Alarm Clock to Wake Up - Workouts Tracker - Coloring book - AI Interior Design - Speed tracker
English
20
14
232
14.7K
Gowrish retweetledi
Gumroad
Gumroad@gumroad·
Build something small, sell it to someone real, and watch everything change.
English
69
29
415
11.9K
Gowrish retweetledi
Kunal Shah
Kunal Shah@kunalb11·
When expertise becomes an API, connecting dots becomes a superpower.
English
59
95
955
27.8K
Gowrish retweetledi
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Every AI tool you need to escape the permanent underclass: • OpenClaw • Hermes Agent • Gemma 4 running on a Mac Mini • Paperclip • ChatGPT 5.4 Pro • Claude Code • Codex app • 2nd monitor that has these agents up 24/7 Do work on 1st monitor. Constantly prompt 2nd monitor
English
228
144
1.7K
105.4K
Gowrish retweetledi
himanshu
himanshu@himanshustwts·
and here is the full architecture of the LLM Knowledge Base system covering every stage from ingest to future explorations.
himanshu tweet media
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
101
580
5.8K
661.8K