Yousaf 🇵🇸
1.1K posts

Yousaf 🇵🇸
@yousaf_sbr
Fullstack Typescript Engineer - Swimming 🏊♂️ | Weights 🏋️♂️ | Badminton 🏸 | Volleyball 🏐
Pakistan Katılım Şubat 2022
368 Takip Edilen43 Takipçiler

@MDUmairKh How do you see the commoners benefit in the future Btw?
English

@wkoszek @richiemcilroy Doesn't seem that beefy. Which one are you talking about specifically?

English

@richiemcilroy Use your Macbook as dumb terminal. Get yourself beefy server at OVH for $20/mo and just SSH there.
English

@productdevbook Great product dude 🙌 will buy the license at the end of the month
English
Yousaf 🇵🇸 retweetledi

How did christians go from "hijab is oppressive" to "We did it FIRST" lol
Ezzy@ezzyskii
Hijab’s are Catholic, Muslims took it from us.
English

🍞A brand-new UX that makes finding a job and connecting with companies simpler and faster is coming soon. ( %90 )

Wind@productdevbook
I’m going to publish a project using Cloudflare Workers and Cloudflare exclusively. This is a project I worked on while facing challenges during my job search. I hope it proves useful both for me and for everyone else looking for work. The job search process is truly exhausting.
English

DeepSeek v4 works fine, but it’s not the frontier-pressing moment we saw with Kimi 2.6. On Notion eval data, it’s similar performance to GPT 5.2, with understandable failings.
Most interesting — it doesn’t scale well. It’s ridiculously slow. On multiple major, trusted, and performant US inference providers we see it 15x slower than GPT 5.2 and 2x slower than Opus 4.7, a problem Kimi never had.
Curious if it’s a fundamental issue in architecture, or a matter of time til inference providers make it work. Doesn’t seem urgent either way, if Kimi can outperform. Cheaper maybe, but not groundbreaking.
English

@thewebtailor @diegohaz What's the best way to use them both? I personally plan & audit with GPT, & implement it via Opus, what's your setup?
English

@diegohaz Opus seems to be doing overly detailed planning, but it's missing incredibly simple things. ChatGPT is hasty, but much sharper in coding. Unfortunately, it's impossible to move forward without using both in parallel. we all’re basically sat down and made the two models paranoid.
English

I gave the same task to GPT-5.5 xhigh and Opus 4.7 max.
– GPT took ~30 minutes.
– Opus took ~2 hours.
Then I asked them to review each other's work and give an honest verdict on which was better.
– GPT said its own code was better.
– Opus said there was no obvious winner.
Then I asked them to learn from each other and apply the best parts they had learned to their own code. In the end, I asked them to review each other again and give an honest verdict after they had both improved.
– GPT kept saying its own code was better.
– Opus said GPT's code was better.
What a journey.
English

@v_language This means two things,
Either you're very good at the support or nobody uses V Lang.
English

How is Elysia 2 this fast
It's the "zero-copy" approach
It's very easy to allocate a new array/object, eg. { ...a, ...b } or [...a] or a.concat(b)
We basically reuse things as much as possible
For example, when user provides a primitive validator with an empty option (eg. t.String()), instead of creating a new object, we reuse an existing one instead, marking it as "reference"
Another example is when merging local and global lifecycle, merging multiple objects is an easy way out, but this means if you have a new 100k objects, user-provided and existing blueprint is there doing nothing after these new objects are created
Instead, we use the object that the user provided as a base to mutate later, then store the snapshot of what is needed to process as a "reference", then "link" all objects and arrays when they are actually needed
This means we basically reuse the input instead of creating a new one
But this is hard to do in JavaScript because there's no explicit reference or pointer
If you accidentally change the reference value, you will blow something up instantly and have no idea how or where because there's no explicit "reference", no indicator at all
If you didn't properly design with this approach at the very start and constantly have this approach in mind, it's not going to work
This means we have to rewrite the entire thing from the ground up, and it's extremely hard
This is why I haven't been very active since the new year, I was busy playing around with this just to make sure it would work at this scale
SaltyAom@saltyAom
Elysia 2α Apply 100k plugin with 1 lifecycle tagged as "scoped" ~5,452x faster ~100x lower memory usage *not final design, number may change slightly in the future
English

@theo Exactly, that's why I use both, one for doing stuff(usually Opus) & the other for validation & audit of the stuff done by the other (usually GPT 5.4) & its working great. GPT surfaces real gaps, Opus Acknowledges them, proposes fixes, I hand them to GPT & proceed when both agree
English

It's so hard to describe the vibe difference between Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 (for coding)
GPT is smarter and can unblock you, but it gets stuck in stupid ways and strangles itself with context sometimes.
Opus will go down the most insane paths and refuse to acknowledge obvious answers, but it understands intent better and has more taste.
Whenever I use one for more than an hour, I always reach to the other to "clean up".
Best part? All of this changes every few weeks 🙃
English
Yousaf 🇵🇸 retweetledi


I see. How many of you do this? I’d like to get a sense of how common this is.
Cristian@iamthatcris
the first thing I do when I install @shadcn is to add cursor pointer on the button
English












