藤
2.9K posts
This is the secular equivalent of religious zealots telling you they “only need one Book.”
antifa honeypot@mformorphine
must be so blissful being a lib, no ideological framework for why things happen, no coherent understanding of history or economics, just individual issues that you interpret solely based on vibes
English
@capacitarded @klaptenning @liminal_warmth You are imposing your model of the world on the actually existing world, and finding that the real world isn't conforming to it. Instead of then recognising the limits of your model, you call the real world irrational and stupid.
English
@klaptenning @liminal_warmth It’s not a worldview it’s the only rational decision unless your worldview is “i should risk death to save people who can’t figure something simple out for themselves”
English
Ahhh the button discourse makes me so mad because everyone constructs these stupid thought experiments to “prove” red is correct and is too bad at theory of mind to realize that the presentation frame is intrinsically part of the test—different frame, different test
English
@liminal_warmth The math problem you've reduced it to isn't what it 'really is'. That's just the way you've chosen to model it by stripping it of context. You shouldn't impose your reductive model on to the rich, complex reality that actually exists.
English
@liminal_warmth To Reds: You should act based on how you think people will respond to a string of words in natural human language in a social context, because that's what's actually happening.
English
@ThePug1013 @TJStats Absolutely, though I think there'll be less regression in that he's producing results closer to what can be expected consistently from him than Schlittler is.
English
@meganigas @scullx @ChrisPacia The math problem you've reduced it to isn't what it 'really is'. That's just the way you've chosen to model it by stripping it of context. You shouldn't impose your reductive model on to the rich, complex reality that actually exists.
English
@meganigas @scullx @ChrisPacia You should act based on how you think people will respond to a string of words in natural human language in a social context, because that's what's actually happening.
English
If you vote differently in these scenarios congrats you are irrational.
Time to do some introspection and figure out why you respond emotionally to things rather than logically.
English
its always these bluecheck rw psyop spearheads pushing this red reasoning and there is a reason for that btw
vittorio@IterIntellectus
why would anyone even press blue?!?
English
@BarneyFlames @real_dreamr @ChrisPacia You can choose to reduce them to the same math problem. That doesn't mean they're 'the same'.
English
@real_dreamr @ChrisPacia They are in fact the same, if you can't see that you literally are incapable of abstract thought
English
藤 retweetledi
藤 retweetledi
藤 retweetledi
Choosing to read this as a miracle where God chose this moment to remove the Isiah verse he vaguely recalled from the Bible
Mukhtar@I_amMukhtar
Piers Morgan asked Russell Brand which passages were relevant to him when he brought a Bible into court.
English
藤 retweetledi
@beckytaylorgill Seriously. Any late night host would gave ruined this moment by trying to interject with a dumb joke.
Piers is so seasoned at these mind numbing shows that he knows it's funniest to stay silent.
English
藤 retweetledi
Hating piers Morgan aside this is such an incredible show of experience to just sit there silently and let him do this
Mukhtar@I_amMukhtar
Piers Morgan asked Russell Brand which passages were relevant to him when he brought a Bible into court.
English
